Benign Partial Epilepsies (benign + partial_epilepsy)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Benign Partial Epilepsies of Adolescence: A Report of 37 New Cases

EPILEPSIA, Issue 12 2001
G. Capovilla
Summary: ,Purpose: To delineate the electroclinical features of patients with partial seizures in adolescence with a benign outcome. Methods: Patients were recruited in five different Italian epilepsy centers. Patients were selected among those with partial seizures between ages 11 and 17 years. We excluded benign childhood epilepsies, those with neurologic or mental deficits, and those with neuroradiologically documented lesions. We also excluded patients with less than 3 years' follow-up or who were still receiving antiepileptic therapy. Results: There were 37 (22 male, 15 female) patients. Seizures started at the mean age of 14.5 years (range, 11,16.11). Two main electroclinical patterns emerged: 16 of 37 patients had somatomotor seizures frequently associated with focal theta discharges involving the centroparietal regions. Ten of 37 patients showed versive seizures and interictal spiking involving the posterior regions. A third group had clinical characteristics resembling the cases described by Loiseau. All had a favorable outcome. Conclusions: This relevant multicenter study further confirms the existence of benign partial epilepsies with onset during adolescence. [source]


Early Recognition of Benign Partial Epilepsy in Infancy

EPILEPSIA, Issue 6 2000
Akihisa Okumura
Summary: Purpose: The aim of this study is to determine how precisely we can recognize the outcome in infants with epilepsy beginning in the first year of life. Methods: We performed a prospective 5-year follow-up study on 63 patients who developed epilepsy in the first year of life. We first judged that patients met the criteria of "possible benign partial epilepsy in infancy (BPEI)" on enrollment in this study. At 2 years of age, we reevaluated the seizure and developmental outcome in the patients who were diagnosed as having "possible BPEI." We finally judged that patients met the criteria of "definite BPEI" at age 5 years. "Possible BPEI" was defined as epilepsy meeting all the following conditions: (a) complex partial seizures and/or secondarily generalized seizures; (b) normal psychomotor development and neurologic findings before onset; (c) normal interictal electroencephalograms; (d) normal cranial computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings; and (e) no seizures during the first 4 weeks of life. "Definite BPEI" was defined as epilepsy meeting all the following criteria in addition to those of "possible BPEI": (a) normal psychomotor development beyond age 5 years, and (b) no seizures beyond age 2 years. Results: Thirty-two of the 63 patients met the inclusion criteria completely and were included in the "possible BPEI" group. Twenty-five of the 32 patients completed the 5-year follow-up. At age 2 years, four patients were excluded from the "possible BPEI" group because of seizure recurrence and/or delayed development. By age 5 years, one had a recurrence of seizures, and another exhibited mildly delayed psychomotor development. We finally diagnosed 19 patients as having "definite BPEI.""Definite BPEI" accounted for 76% of the patients diagnosed as having "possible BPEI" at the first presentation and 90% of those who met the conditions on reevaluation at age 2 years. Conclusions: Recognition of BPEI is possible, to some extent, at the first presentation, and reevaluation at age 2 years is useful for a more precise diagnosis. [source]


Benign Partial Epilepsies of Adolescence: A Report of 37 New Cases

EPILEPSIA, Issue 12 2001
G. Capovilla
Summary: ,Purpose: To delineate the electroclinical features of patients with partial seizures in adolescence with a benign outcome. Methods: Patients were recruited in five different Italian epilepsy centers. Patients were selected among those with partial seizures between ages 11 and 17 years. We excluded benign childhood epilepsies, those with neurologic or mental deficits, and those with neuroradiologically documented lesions. We also excluded patients with less than 3 years' follow-up or who were still receiving antiepileptic therapy. Results: There were 37 (22 male, 15 female) patients. Seizures started at the mean age of 14.5 years (range, 11,16.11). Two main electroclinical patterns emerged: 16 of 37 patients had somatomotor seizures frequently associated with focal theta discharges involving the centroparietal regions. Ten of 37 patients showed versive seizures and interictal spiking involving the posterior regions. A third group had clinical characteristics resembling the cases described by Loiseau. All had a favorable outcome. Conclusions: This relevant multicenter study further confirms the existence of benign partial epilepsies with onset during adolescence. [source]


Sulthiame in childhood epilepsy

PEDIATRICS INTERNATIONAL, Issue 5 2004
Bruria Ben-Zeev
AbstractBackground:,Sulthiame is a central carbonic anhydrase inhibitor found to be effective for both partial and generalized seizures. It has been in use in some European countries and in Israel for over 30 years. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of sulthiame in childhood epilepsy by conducting a multicenter, retrospective study of patients who received this drug. Methods:,The charts of 125 consecutive epilepsy patients treated with sulthiame as monotherapy or add-on therapy were reviewed. Results:,Twenty-nine out of 39 patients with benign focal epilepsy of childhood became seizure-free. Total seizure control was also achieved in 17 of 42 patients with symptomatic, non-refractory localization-related epilepsy, and in all 10 cases with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Complete normalization of the EEG occurred in 13 of 20 patients with benign partial epilepy of childhood. Side-effects were minimal and caused discontinuation of treatment in only seven children. Conclusion:,The high tolerability, efficacy, convenience of use and low cost suggest that sulthiame should become a first line drug in the benign partial epilepsies of childhood and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. It also has a role as add-on treatment in other partial and myoclonic epilepsies. [source]


Childhood Epilepsy Due to Neurocysticercosis: A Comparative Study

EPILEPSIA, Issue 11 2001
Lisiane S. Ferreira
Summary: ,Purpose: To assess the clinical profile of pediatric patients with epilepsy and neurocysticercosis (NC), and compare them with a group of pediatric patients with benign partial epilepsy to determine clinical differences, response to treatment, and prognosis. Methods: We studied 28 patients (16 girls) with probable or definitive diagnosis of NC and epilepsy and 32 patients (16 girls) with partial benign epilepsy (BE). All patients had normal neurologic examination. We compared NC and BE patients looking for differences in demographics (age at first seizure, gender, family history); clinical presentation (type, frequency, duration, and total number of seizures, duration of epilepsy, status epilepticus, cluster, and postictal deficit); treatment [duration, number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), maximal dose, drug association, number of seizure-free patients, time to obtain control and recurrence after medication discontinuation]; complementary examinations (the first and the last EEG). Results: The mean follow-up was 5.4 years for the 28 NC patients and 4.6 years for the 32 BE patients (p = 0.98). We did not find statistical differences between NC and BE in gender, family history, types of seizures, frequency and length of seizures, previous status epilepticus, seizure clustering, and presence of postictal deficits. However, we found that NC compared with BE patients had significant longer AED treatment, more seizures after AED introduction, tried more AEDs and at maximal dose, and in 20%, required polytherapy. The recurrence rate in NC was 54.4% and this was not significantly associated with number of lesions and disease activity seen on CT scans or the presence of EEG abnormalities. Conclusions: NC presents with a mild form of epilepsy in terms of seizure severity; however, it is more challenging in regard to drug management and has a less favorable long-term prognosis in terms of seizure remission. The number of lesions or disease activity seen on computed tomography (CT) as well as EEG abnormalities have no prognostic value in childhood epilepsy due to NC. [source]


Early Recognition of Benign Partial Epilepsy in Infancy

EPILEPSIA, Issue 6 2000
Akihisa Okumura
Summary: Purpose: The aim of this study is to determine how precisely we can recognize the outcome in infants with epilepsy beginning in the first year of life. Methods: We performed a prospective 5-year follow-up study on 63 patients who developed epilepsy in the first year of life. We first judged that patients met the criteria of "possible benign partial epilepsy in infancy (BPEI)" on enrollment in this study. At 2 years of age, we reevaluated the seizure and developmental outcome in the patients who were diagnosed as having "possible BPEI." We finally judged that patients met the criteria of "definite BPEI" at age 5 years. "Possible BPEI" was defined as epilepsy meeting all the following conditions: (a) complex partial seizures and/or secondarily generalized seizures; (b) normal psychomotor development and neurologic findings before onset; (c) normal interictal electroencephalograms; (d) normal cranial computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings; and (e) no seizures during the first 4 weeks of life. "Definite BPEI" was defined as epilepsy meeting all the following criteria in addition to those of "possible BPEI": (a) normal psychomotor development beyond age 5 years, and (b) no seizures beyond age 2 years. Results: Thirty-two of the 63 patients met the inclusion criteria completely and were included in the "possible BPEI" group. Twenty-five of the 32 patients completed the 5-year follow-up. At age 2 years, four patients were excluded from the "possible BPEI" group because of seizure recurrence and/or delayed development. By age 5 years, one had a recurrence of seizures, and another exhibited mildly delayed psychomotor development. We finally diagnosed 19 patients as having "definite BPEI.""Definite BPEI" accounted for 76% of the patients diagnosed as having "possible BPEI" at the first presentation and 90% of those who met the conditions on reevaluation at age 2 years. Conclusions: Recognition of BPEI is possible, to some extent, at the first presentation, and reevaluation at age 2 years is useful for a more precise diagnosis. [source]