			Home About us Contact

Virus Receptor (virus + receptor)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Life Sciences	50%

Selected Abstracts

Variation in enterovirus receptor genes

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, Issue 1 2003
Åse Karttunen
Abstract The increased incidence of a enterovirus infections observed in patients with type 1 diabetes preceding the development of the clinical disease could be partially explained by variation in the genes coding for enterovirus receptors. We carried out sequence analysis of the most common enterovirus receptor molecules in 21 diabetic children and 20 healthy adults. DNA was isolated from the leukocytes, and gene regions known to code for virus-recognizing domains in major enterovirus receptors were amplified and sequenced. Heterozygous single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), Ala 67 (GCG),,,Thr (ACG), was detected in the poliovirus receptor gene in four individuals in the diabetes group, but not in the control group. However, serological studies could not confirm that this substitution would convey different susceptibility to poliovirus infection. A heterozygous SNP, Lys 29 (AAG),,,Met (ATG), was found in the intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) (receptor for rhinoviruses and some coxsackie A viruses) in one individual in both groups. A silent SNP in the ,2 integrin subunit gene (echovirus 1 receptor) was frequently found in both groups, a silent heterozygotic SNP in coxsackievirus-adenovirus receptor (coxsackie B virus receptor) gene was seen in one individual in the diabetes group, whereas no variation was found in the DAF (echovirus receptor) and ,3 integrin subunit sequences (receptor for coxsackievirus A9) studied. In conclusion, both synonymous and nonsynonymous sequence variability of genes coding for enterovirus and rhinovirus receptors was shown to occur, but no pattern directly specific for type 1 diabetes was found. J. Med. Virol. 70:99,108, 2003. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Biodistribution of the RD114/mammalian type D retrovirus receptor, RDR

THE JOURNAL OF GENE MEDICINE, Issue 3 2004
Bronwyn J. Green
Abstract Background The limited expression of viral receptors on target cells is a recognized barrier to therapeutic gene transfer. Previous analysis of receptor expression has been performed using indirect methods due to a lack of receptor-specific antibodies. Methods In this report we have used anti-RDR antiserum to provide direct histochemical and flow cytometric analysis of the expression of RDR, which is the cognate receptor for RD114-pseudotyped vectors as well as being a neutral amino acid transporter. Results RDR was present on a range of normal tissues with relevance to gene therapy including: colon, testis, ovary, bone marrow and skeletal muscle. It was also highly expressed on immature cells present in the squamous epithelia of skin, cervix, nasal mucosa, bronchus and tonsil. Of relevance to possible germline gene transfer, we demonstrated a lack of RDR expression on male or female germ cells. RDR expression on mature hemopoietic cell subsets showed up to 5-fold variability between individuals within each lineage,with some individuals expressing low levels of RDR across all blood lineages. Both myeloid and monocytic lineages contained the highest fraction of cells expressing RDR, whereas lymphoid lineages showed the lowest. Coexpression of CD34 and RDR ranged from 2.04 to 0.44% in G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood samples. Conclusions As a means to optimize gene transfer protocols, biodistribution studies such as these are fundamental to enable targeting of the virus receptor most abundantly expressed on relevant populations. The inter-individual variation of receptor expression seen here also raises the possible requirement for tailor-made gene therapy protocols. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Crystallization and X-ray diffraction analysis of human CLEC5A (MDL-1), a dengue virus receptor

ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION F (ELECTRONIC), Issue 1 2010
Aleksandra A. Watson
The human C-type lectin-like protein CLEC5A (also known as MDL-1) is expressed on the surface of myeloid cells and plays a critical role in dengue-virus-induced disease by signalling through the transmembrane adaptor protein DAP12. The C-type lectin-like domain of CLEC5A was expressed in Escherichia coli, refolded and purified. Recombinant CLEC5A crystals were grown by sitting-drop vapour diffusion using polyethylene glycol 6000 as a precipitant. After optimization, crystals were grown which diffracted to 1.56,Å using synchrotron radiation. The results presented in this paper suggest that crystals producing diffraction of this quality will be suitable for structural determination of human CLEC5A. [source]

Activation of Epstein-Barr virus/C3d receptor (gp140, CR2, CD21) on human cell surface triggers pp60src and Akt-GSK3 activities upstream and downstream to PI 3-kinase, respectively

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, Issue 9 2003
Monique Barel
Abstract We previously demonstrated that CR2 activation on human B lymphocyte surface specifically triggered tyrosine phosphorylation of the 95-kDa nucleolin, this leading to its binding on SH2 domainsof p85 sub-unit of PI 3-kinase and to activation of this enzyme. The specificity of CR2 pathway was clearly demonstrated as neither CD19 nor BCR could induce tyrosine phosphorylation of nucleolin in normal B lymphocytes. These data led us to investigate herein additional molecular events, which were triggered by CR2 activation, upstream and downstream to PI 3-kinase activation. Upstream, we demonstrated that pp60src, a tyrosine kinase of the src family, was involved in tyrosine phosphorylation of nucleolin, while syk tyrosine kinase was not. We also demonstrated a direct protein-proteininteraction of pp60src with nucleolin in a CR2-dependent and CD19-independent pathway. Downstream, we demonstrated that CR2 activation also triggered Akt and GSK3 enzyme activation, this pathway being under the control of pp60src tyrosine kinase activation. These regulatory functions of activated CR2 were specific as independent of syk tyrosine kinase and of CD19 and BCR activation. Thus, CR2 activation recruits a specific mechanism to activate PI 3-kinase and its subsequent pathways, this mechanism being different to those recruited by CD19 and BCR. [source]