			Home About us Contact

Ventricular Rhythm (ventricular + rhythm)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Clustering of RR Intervals Predicts Effective Electrical Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2004
MAARTEN P. VAN DEN BERG M.D.
Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is characterized by an irregularly irregular ("random") heart beat. However, controversy exists whether the ventricular rhythm in AF is truly random. We investigated randomness by constructing three-dimensional RR interval plots (3D plots), allowing identification of "clustering" of RR intervals. It was hypothesized that electrical cardioversion (ECV) would be more effective in AF patients with clustering, because clustering might reflect a higher degree of organization of atrial fibrillatory activity. Methods and Results: The study group consisted of 66 patients (44 men and 22 women; mean age 68 ± 11 years,) who were referred for ECV because of persistent AF. Twenty-four-hour Holter recordings were used to construct 3D plots by plotting each RR interval (x axis) against the previous RR interval (y axis) and the number of occurrences of each of these x,y combinations (z axis). A clustering index was calculated as the percentage of beats within the peaks in the 3D plot. Based on the 3D plots, clustering of RR intervals was present in 31 (47%) of the 66 patients. ECV was effective in restoring sinus rhythm in 29 (94%) of these 31 patients, whereas sinus rhythm was restored in only 25 (71%) of the remaining 35 patients without clustering (P = 0.020). The clustering index ranged from <2% in the 12 patients with failed ECV to >8% in the 32 patients with sinus rhythm at the end of the study (4 weeks after the ECV); the clustering index in the 22 patients with a relapse of AF after effective ECV was intermediate (P = 0.034 and P = 0.042, respectively). Conclusion: This study indicates that ECV is more effective in restoring sinus rhythm in AF patients with clustering compared to patients in whom no clustering is apparent on 3D plots. In addition, the degree of clustering appears to be predictive of the overall outcome of ECV; the higher the degree of clustering, the higher the likelihood of sinus rhythm at follow-up. [source]

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-Left Bundle Branch Block Morphologies

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5 2010
JOHN RICKARD M.D.
Introduction: In select patients with systolic heart failure, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to improve quality of life, exercise capacity, ejection fraction (EF), and survival. Little is known about the response to CRT in patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB) or non-specific intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) compared with traditionally studied patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Methods: We assessed 542 consecutive patients presenting for the new implantation of a CRT device. Patients were placed into one of three groups based on the preimplantation electrocardiogram morphology: LBBB, RBBB, or IVCD. Patients with a narrow QRS or paced ventricular rhythm were excluded. The primary endpoint was long-term survival. Secondary endpoints were changes in EF, left ventricular end-diastolic and systolic diameter, mitral regurgitation, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class. Results: Three hundred and thirty-five patients met inclusion criteria of which 204 had LBBB, 38 RBBB, and 93 IVCD. There were 32 deaths in the LBBB group, 10 in the RBBB, and 27 in the IVCD group over a mean follow up of 3.4 ± 1.2 years. In multivariate analysis, no mortality difference amongst the three groups was noted. Patients with LBBB had greater improvements in most echocardiographic endpoints and NYHA functional class than those with IVCD and RBBB. Conclusion: There is no difference in 3-year survival in patients undergoing CRT based on baseline native QRS morphology. Patients with RBBB and IVCD derive less reverse cardiac remodeling and symptomatic benefit from CRT compared with those with a native LBBB. (PACE 2010; 590,595) [source]

Accelerated ventricular rhythm in the neonatal period: a review and two new cases in asymptomatic infants with an apparently normal heart

ACTA PAEDIATRICA, Issue 10 2004
M Anatoliotaki
Accelerated ventricular rhythm (AVR) was observed in two newborn infants. In the first case, arrhythmia was noted during the foetal period. Both neonates were asymptomatic and had no evidence of cardiac disease. The arrhythmia eventually disappeared when the infants were 4 mo and 24 d old, respectively. AVR in the neonatal period is reviewed in this report and recent information regarding appropriate diagnostic evaluation, differentiation from ventricular tachycardia and treatment is outlined. Conclusion: Accelerated ventricular rhythm is a benign and self-limited arrhythmia in the neonatal period. However, it is important to differentiate it from other serious rhythm disorders, mainly ventricular tachycardia, in order to avoid unnecessary and potentially harmful treatment and to relieve parental anxiety. [source]