			Home About us Contact

Ventricular Electrode (ventricular + electrode)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Intraoperative Study of Polarization and Evoked Response Signals in Different Endocardial Electrode Designs

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 7 2001
CHING LAU
LAU, C., et al.: Intraoperative Study of Polarization and Evoked Response Signals in Different Endocardial Electrode Designs. Some new generation pacemakers use an algorithm based on evoked response (ER) detection to verify beat-to-beat capture and to enable automatic adjustment of output. This is a prospective acute study of polarization signal (PS) and ER in nine currently available electrodes. Intraoperative testing of ventricular bipolar electrodes used the Autocapture (AC) algorithm. The intrinsic R wave, PS, ER, acceptance of AC function, and stimulation thresholds (STs) were obtained. Ventricular electrodes were categorized as follows: titanium nitride (TiN)-coated passive and active fixation, high impedance (HI), passive fixation (VP), iridium oxide-coated titanium (IROX) (VI), and platinum helix (PH) active fixation. Acute testing was performed in 217 patients with an average age of 74.26 years, 59.6% were men with primary pacing indication-SSS (46.3%). There were no significant differences found with respect to R wave and threshold between the various electrodes. PH active-fixation electrodes had significantly higher ER and PS than other groups including the TiN-coated active-fixation electrodes. TiNcoated electrodes (active and passive fixation) had significantly lower PS than other electrodes. As a result, TiN electrodes had a significantly higher functional rate of AC (91.7%), whereas PH had the lowest rate (0%). In conclusion, (1) polarization characteristics are significantly different for commercially available ventricular electrodes, (2) certain physical features at the tissue to electrode interface like TiN coating appears to be more important in determining PS than electrode tip size and fixation method, and (3) the current algorithm for AC requires electrodes that provide low polarization for satisfactory performance. [source]

Orthodromic Pacemaker-Mediated Tachycardia in a Biventricular System Without an Atrial Electrode

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2004
ANTONIO BERRUEZO M.D.
Pacemaker-mediated tachycardia is a well-known complication of dual-chamber devices. In this report, we describe for the first time a case of orthodromic pacemaker-mediated tachycardia in a patient in whom a biventricular system without an atrial electrode had been implanted. Retrograde atrial activation was directly produced by the dislodged coronary vein electrode in the AV groove, resulting in simultaneous capture of the left atrium and left ventricle. During tachycardia, AV nodal conduction was via the anterograde pathway of the circuit and limited the ventricular response. Subsequently, right ventricular activation was sensed by the right ventricular electrode that triggered biventricular pacing and left atrial capture, perpetuating the tachycardia. Because the left atrial threshold was higher than the left ventricular threshold, the problem could be resolved easily by lowering the output of the coronary vein electrode. [source]

Efficacy of Single Lead VDD Pacing in Patients with Impaired and Normal Left Ventricular Function

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 8 2000
ANDREAS SCHUCHERT
Atrial synchronous ventricular pacing seems to be the best pacing mode for patients with advanced AV block and impaired LV function. The long-term follow-up of single lead VDD pacing was studied in 33 patients with impaired LV function and compared to 42 patients with normal LV function. All patients received the same VDD lead and VDDR pacemaker. The lead model with 13-cm AV spacing between the atrial and ventricular electrode was implanted in 89% of the patients. Follow-ups were 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after implantation. The percentage of atrial sensing and the P wave amplitude were determined at each follow-up. Minimal P wave amplitude at implantation was 2.0 ± 1.4 mV in patients with impaired and 1.7 ± 0.9 mV with normal LV function (not significant). At the 12-month follow-up, 33 patients with normal and 23 patients with depressed LV function remained paced in the VDD mode. The remaining patients died in five (impaired LV function) and seven cases (normal LV function) or their pacemakers were programmed to the VVI/VVIR pacing mode in four (impaired LV function) and three cases (normal LV function). P wave amplitude did not differ in the two groups (e.g., at month 12: impaired: 1.17 ± 0.42 mV; normal: 1.09 ± 0.49 mV). The atrial sensitivity was programmed in most patients to sensitive settings with no differences between the two groups (e.g., at month 12: impaired: 0.13 ± 0.06 mV; normal: 0.13 ± 0.05 m V). The diagnostic counters indicated nearly permanent atrial sensing (e.g., at month 12: impaired: 99.3 ± 2.2%; normal: 99.0 ± 1.0 mV). In conclusions, single lead VDD pacing restored AV synchronous ventricular pacing in patients with normal and with impaired LV function indicating that it could be an alternative to DDD pacemakers, but not to dual-chamber pacing. [source]