Venous Cannulation (venous + cannulation)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Kinds of Venous Cannulation

  • central venous cannulation
  • peripheral venous cannulation


  • Selected Abstracts


    A Descriptive Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Cannulation of the Internal Jugular Vein to Landmark-based Subclavian Vein Cannulation

    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 4 2010
    Daniel Theodoro MD
    Abstract Objectives:, The safest site for central venous cannulation (CVC) remains debated. Many emergency physicians (EPs) advocate the ultrasound-guided internal jugular (USIJ) approach because of data supporting its efficiency. However, a number of physicians prefer, and are most comfortable with, the subclavian (SC) vein approach. The purpose of this study was to describe adverse event rates among operators using the USIJ approach, and the landmark SC vein approach without US. Methods:, This was a prospective observational trial of patients undergoing CVC of the SC or internal jugular veins in the emergency department (ED). Physicians performing the procedures did not undergo standardized training in either technique. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse events defined as hematoma, arterial cannulation, pneumothorax, and failure to cannulate. Physicians recorded the anatomical site of cannulation, US assistance, indications, and acute complications. Variables of interest were collected from the pharmacy and ED record. Physician experience was based on a self-reported survey. The authors followed outcomes of central line insertion until device removal or patient discharge. Results:, Physicians attempted 236 USIJ and 132 SC cannulations on 333 patients. The overall adverse event rate was 22% with failure to cannulate being the most common. Adverse events occurred in 19% of USIJ attempts, compared to 29% of non,US-guided SC attempts. Among highly experienced operators, CVCs placed at the SC site resulted in more adverse events than those performed using USIJ (relative risk [RR] = 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05 to 3.39). Conclusions:, While limited by observational design, our results suggest that the USIJ technique may result in fewer adverse events compared to the landmark SC approach. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:416,422 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine [source]


    The Use of a Femoral Arterial Cannula for Effective Dilation for Percutaneous Femoral Venous Cannulation

    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, Issue 1 2005
    Hrvoje Gasparovic M.D.
    The technique presented may be particularly helpful when redo sternotomy is deemed hazardous and cardiopulmonary bypass is judged mandatory prior to redo sternotomy. The patient presented in this paper had two previous cardiac operations with prior surgical exposure of femoral vessels in whom institution of cardiopulmonary bypass prior to sternotomy was of paramount importance due to a 7-cm ascending aortic aneurysm. [source]


    Evaluation of a diclofenac transdermal patch for the attenuation of venous cannulation pain: a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

    ANAESTHESIA, Issue 4 2006
    A. Agarwal
    Summary Venous cannulation, although a minor procedure, is often painful. The present study was planned to evaluate the efficacy of a diclofenac transdermal patch placed over the venepuncture site in decreasing the pain of cannulation. Seventy-two adults undergoing elective surgery were included in this randomised, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were divided into three equal groups. The Control group had a placebo adhesive patch placed on the both the dorsum of hand and the buttock; the Diclofenac-Buttock group had a placebo patch placed on the dorsum of the hand and a diclofenac transdermal patch on the buttock; the Diclofenac-Hand group had a diclofenac transdermal patch placed on the dorsum of hand and a placebo patch on the buttock. The patches were applied 1 h before cannulation. An 18G cannula was used for all venous cannulations. Pain during cannulation was assessed on a non-graduated 10-cm visual analogue scale. Median [interquartile range] pain scores were 3.0 [2.0,4.0] in the Diclofenac-Hand group, 5.0 [4.3,7.8] in the Diclofenac-Buttock group and 6.5 [4.5,7.0] in the Control group, p < 0.05. The numbers needed to treat were six and two in the Diclofenac-Buttock and Diclofenac-Hand groups, respectively. The application of a diclofenac transdermal patch at the cannulation site appears to be effective in decreasing cannulation pain. [source]


    A Descriptive Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Cannulation of the Internal Jugular Vein to Landmark-based Subclavian Vein Cannulation

    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 4 2010
    Daniel Theodoro MD
    Abstract Objectives:, The safest site for central venous cannulation (CVC) remains debated. Many emergency physicians (EPs) advocate the ultrasound-guided internal jugular (USIJ) approach because of data supporting its efficiency. However, a number of physicians prefer, and are most comfortable with, the subclavian (SC) vein approach. The purpose of this study was to describe adverse event rates among operators using the USIJ approach, and the landmark SC vein approach without US. Methods:, This was a prospective observational trial of patients undergoing CVC of the SC or internal jugular veins in the emergency department (ED). Physicians performing the procedures did not undergo standardized training in either technique. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse events defined as hematoma, arterial cannulation, pneumothorax, and failure to cannulate. Physicians recorded the anatomical site of cannulation, US assistance, indications, and acute complications. Variables of interest were collected from the pharmacy and ED record. Physician experience was based on a self-reported survey. The authors followed outcomes of central line insertion until device removal or patient discharge. Results:, Physicians attempted 236 USIJ and 132 SC cannulations on 333 patients. The overall adverse event rate was 22% with failure to cannulate being the most common. Adverse events occurred in 19% of USIJ attempts, compared to 29% of non,US-guided SC attempts. Among highly experienced operators, CVCs placed at the SC site resulted in more adverse events than those performed using USIJ (relative risk [RR] = 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05 to 3.39). Conclusions:, While limited by observational design, our results suggest that the USIJ technique may result in fewer adverse events compared to the landmark SC approach. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:416,422 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine [source]


    Transillumination by light-emitting diode facilitates peripheral venous cannulations in infants and small children

    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 8 2010
    K. HOSOKAWA
    Background: Transillumination facilitates the visualization of peripheral veins in infants and children. The clinical usefulness of light-emitting diode (LED)-powered devices has not been thoroughly studied. Methods: We randomly assigned 136 infants and children weighing <15 kg, undergoing general anesthesia, to red LED-powered transillumination (TM group, n=67) vs. the usual method (UM group, n=69) of peripheral venous cannulations. Venous puncture was performed following anesthesia induction with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide. The primary and secondary study endpoints were the rate of successful cannulations at initial attempt, and the duration of insertion attempts, respectively. Results: The median score of the estimated cannulation difficulty before attempted puncture was similar in both groups. The success rates at first attempt were 75% and 61% (NS) and mean±SD times to successful venous access were 47±34 and 68±66 s (NS) in the TM and UM groups, respectively. The cannulation procedures were completed significantly earlier in the TM group than in the UM group (hazard ratio, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.03,2.47; P=0.03). In the subgroup of infants and children <2 years old, venous cannulation was successful at first attempt in 73% and 49% in the TM group (n=44) and in the UM group (n=47), respectively (P=0.03). Conclusions: LED-powered transillumination devices facilitated peripheral venous cannulations in small infants and children. [source]


    Routine chest X-ray is not required after a low-risk central venous cannulation

    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 9 2009
    A. PIKWER
    Background: Knowledge of the radiographic catheter tip position after central venous cannulation is normally not required for short-term catheter use. Detection of a possible iatrogenic pneumothorax may nevertheless justify routine post-procedure chest X-ray. Our aim was to design a clinical decision rule to select patients for radiographic evaluation after central venous cannulation. Methods: A total of 2230 catheterizations performed using external jugular, internal jugular or subclavian venous approaches during a 4-year period were included consecutively. Information on patient data and corresponding procedures was recorded prospectively. A post-procedure chest X-ray was obtained after each cannulation. Results: Thirteen cases (0.58%) of cannulation-associated pneumothorax were identified. The risk of pneumothorax after a technically difficult (1.8%) or subclavian (1.6%) cannulation was significantly higher than after cannulation not considered as difficult (0.37%) or performed using other routes (0.33%). Clinical signs of pneumothorax within 8 h of cannulation were found in all seven patients with pneumothorax requiring specific treatment. A new clinical decision rule for radiographic evaluation after central venous cannulation based on the results of the present study shows that 48% of the post-procedure chest X-rays performed in our patients were clinically redundant. Conclusion: Clinical symptoms were reported in all patients with pneumothorax requiring specific treatment. Approximately half of the post-procedure chest X-ray controls could be avoided using the proposed clinical decision rule to select patients for radiographic evaluation after central venous cannulation. A large prospective multi-centre study should be carried out to further evaluate this decision rule. [source]


    Vascular catheterization is difficult in infants with Down syndrome

    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 1 2009
    D. S. SULEMANJI
    Background: Our aim was to compare difficulties in vascular access interventions in infants with and without Down Syndrome (DS) undergoing congenital heart surgery. Methods: The anesthesia records of infants with DS undergoing congenital heart surgery (Group DS, n=61) were reviewed and matched with records of infants without DS (Group ND, n=61). Vascular cannulation sites, the experience of the anesthesiologists performing each procedure, the number of clinicians who attempted each procedure until it was successfully performed, and the number of attempts for each catheterization were recorded. Results: The rate of unsuccessful peripheral venous cannulation in any of the four extremities was higher in Group DS (P=0.026). The success rate of radial artery cannulation was lower in Group DS (P=0.048). Although the total number of attempts for arterial cannulation was higher in Group DS, the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.058). However, in Group DS, the clinician who was able to cannulate the artery successfully required a significantly higher number of attempts at cannulation (P=0.011). For central venous catheterization, cannulation site and the number of attempts required before success was achieved were similar in both groups. The specialist-to-resident ratio was higher in Group DS (P=0.037). Conclusion: Our results indicate a trend toward clinicians having more difficulty performing arterial and peripheral venous catheterizations in infants with DS compared with performing the same procedure in infants without DS. Anesthesiologists should be prepared for catheterization difficulties in this patient population. In infants with DS, we recommend that catheterizations be performed by more experienced physicians. [source]


    Venous thromboembolic disease: A single-centre case series study

    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, Issue 12 2006
    Fiona Newall
    Aim: The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in children has likely changed since first being described a decade ago because of evolving management strategies and a greater awareness of predisposing factors for thrombosis in children. The Royal Children's Hospital commenced a 4-year prospective registry of venous thrombosis in 1999 to determine the current Australian epidemiology of venous thrombosis in infants and children. Methods: A prospective, single-centre registry was established to determine the prevalence, aetiology, diagnostic criteria, management and outcome of venous thromboembolism in an Australian tertiary paediatric centre. Results: The incidence of venous thrombosis was 8.0/10 000 hospital admissions. Fifty-eight per cent of infants and 49% of children were male. Seventy-seven per cent of venous thromboses in infants were associated with central venous cannulation compared with 47% in children. Doppler ultrasonography was the most frequently used diagnostic tool. Treatment strategies varied between age groups. The all-cause mortality rate for infants and children in this study was 8.4% (direct thrombus-related mortality 0%). Fifteen per cent of all patients demonstrated complete resolution of their venous thrombosis at discharge, with 48% demonstrating complete resolution at follow-up assessment. Fifteen per cent of patients experienced significant thrombosis-related morbidity at follow-up assessment. Conclusion: In this single-centre registry, venous thrombosis in infants and children occurred with greater frequency than has previously been reported and its epidemiology varied. Central venous catheterisation continues to be a common precipitant to venous thrombosis. Optimal diagnostic and treatment interventions for venous thromboembolism have not yet been determined for infants and children, despite the significant incidence of long-term sequelae. [source]


    Use of saline infusion instead of gel for ultrasound-guided (USG) central venous cannulation

    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 5 2008
    R. Sinha
    No abstract is available for this article. [source]


    One should avoid central venous cannulation on the same side as a functioning forearm arteriovenous haemodialysis fistula

    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 3 2008
    R. Pandey
    No abstract is available for this article. [source]


    An outcome study on complications using routine ultrasound assistance for internal jugular vein cannulation

    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 10 2007
    M. Lamperti
    Background:, Ultrasound guidance for central venous cannulation is advised by recent guidelines, but is not being applied in everyday practice. The purpose of this study was to determine the reduction in complications when applying an ultrasound locating device for internal jugular vein catheterization. Methods:, An observational study was conducted from November 2004 to October 2005 in a tertiary neurosurgical hospital on 300 patients undergoing internal jugular vein cannulation using an ultrasound technique. Patients were not randomized and operators were trained using theoretical and practical courses. Prior to the study, the investigators, who were consultant anaesthesiologists, had to perform at least 20 successful supervised cannulations. Results:, Cannulation was successful in all cases. The incidence of arterial puncture was 2.7%, and multiple venous punctures represented the main minor complication (14%). Bivariate analysis of the overall complications revealed no significant correlation with age group, American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) classification, body mass index, or position and diameter of the vein. Conclusions:, Ultrasound cannulation of the internal jugular vein minimized complications. These could be avoided when new ultrasound probes and specific needles are introduced. [source]


    Importance of downward bevel direction during central venous cannulation through subclavian vein

    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 10 2006
    M. Gurjar
    No abstract is available for this article. [source]


    Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation in infants and children

    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 4 2002
    P. Åsheim
    Background: Percutaneous central venous cannulation in infants and children is a challenging procedure. Traditionally, an external landmark technique has been used to identify puncture site. An ultrasound-guided technique is now available and we wanted to evaluate this method in children and infants, looking specifically at the ease of use, success rate and complications. Methods: Forty-two consecutive infants and children (median 16.5 [0,177] months and 10 [3,45] kg) scheduled for central venous catheter placement were registered. An ultrasound scanner made for guiding puncture of vessels was used. After locating the puncture site, a sterile procedure was performed using an accompanying kit to aid puncture of the vessel. Results: Cannulation was successful in all patients and we had no complications during insertion of the catheters. The right internal jugular vein was preferred in most patients, and in 95% of the patients the vein was punctured at the first attempt. The median time from start of puncture to aspiration of blood was 12 (3,180) seconds. Conclusion: The ultrasound-guided technique for placement of central venous catheters was easy to apply in infants and children. It is our impression that it increased the precision and safety of the procedure in this group of patients. [source]


    The FLACC behavioral scale for procedural pain assessment in children aged 5,16 years

    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 8 2008
    STEFAN NILSSON MSN RN
    Summary Objectives:, To evaluate the concurrent and construct validity and the interrater reliability of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) scale during procedural pain in children aged 5,16 years. Background:, Self-reporting of pain is considered to be the primary source of information on pain intensity for older children but a validated observational tool will provide augment information to self-reports during painful procedures. Methods:, Eighty children scheduled for peripheral venous cannulation or percutaneous puncture of a venous port were included. In 40 cases two nurses simultaneously and independently assessed pain by using the FLACC scale and in 40 cases one of these nurses assessed the child. All children scored the intensity of pain by using the Coloured Analogue Scale (CAS) and distress by the Facial Affective Scale (FAS). Results:, Concurrent validity was supported by the correlation between FLACC scores and the children's self-reported CAS scores during the procedure (r = 0.59, P < 0.05). A weaker correlation was found between the FLACC scores and children's self-reported FAS (r = 0.35, P < 0.05). Construct validity was demonstrated by the increase in median FLACC score to 1 during the procedure compared with 0 before and after the procedure (P < 0.001). Interrater reliability during the procedure was supported by adequate kappa statistics for all items and for the total FLACC scores (, = 0.85, P < 0.001). Conclusions:, The findings of this study support the use of FLACC as a valid and reliable tool for assessing procedural pain in children aged 5,16 years. [source]


    Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation in a very small preterm neonate

    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 4 2005
    ANDREAS MACHOTTA MD
    Summary Percutaneous central venous cannulation of small infants is a challenging procedure. The use of ultrasound guidance has been shown to increase the success rate generally in children and to decrease the incidence of associated complications. To demonstrate that this technique is also suitable in very small infants we describe the case of a preterm neonate of 850 g body weight (BW), in which percutaneous central venous cannulation was performed successfully using ultrasound imaging for guidance. [source]


    Litigation related to anaesthesia: an analysis of claims against the NHS in England 1995,2007

    ANAESTHESIA, Issue 7 2009
    T. M. Cook
    Summary The distribution of medico-legal claims in English anaesthetic practice is unreported. We studied National Health Service Litigation Authority claims related to anaesthesia since 1995. All claims were reviewed by three clinicians and variously categorised, including by type of incident, claimed outcome and cost. Anaesthesia-related claims account for 2.5% of all claims and 2.4% of the value of all claims. Of 841 relevant claims 366 (44%) were related to regional anaesthesia, 245 (29%) obstetric anaesthesia, 164 (20%) inadequate anaesthesia, 95 (11%) dental damage, 71 (8%) airway (excluding dental damage), 63 (7%) drug related (excluding allergy), 31 (4%) drug allergy related, 31 (4%) positioning, 29 (3%) respiratory, 26 (3%) consent, 21 (2%) central venous cannulation and 18 (2%) peripheral venous cannulation. Defining which cases are, from a medico-legal viewpoint, ,high risk' is uncertain, but the clinical categories with the largest number of claims were regional anaesthesia, obstetric anaesthesia, inadequate anaesthesia, dental damage and airway, those with the highest overall cost were regional anaesthesia, obstetric anaesthesia, and airway and those with the highest mean cost per closed claim were respiratory, central venous cannulation and drug error excluding allergy. The data currently available have limitations but offer useful information. A closed claims analysis similar to that in the USA would improve the clinical usefulness of analysis. [source]


    Ultrasound for central venous cannulation: surveys before and after NICE guidance

    ANAESTHESIA, Issue 4 2009
    P. Jefferson
    No abstract is available for this article. [source]


    Ultrasound for central venous cannulation , are you trained to use it?

    ANAESTHESIA, Issue 4 2009
    N. Harris
    No abstract is available for this article. [source]


    A new use of rubber gloves for venous cannulation

    ANAESTHESIA, Issue 8 2004
    F. Bryden
    No abstract is available for this article. [source]


    Evaluation of a needle-free injection system for local anaesthesia prior to venous cannulation

    ANAESTHESIA, Issue 3 2000
    J. A. Cooper
    We evaluated a single-use, disposable, carbon-dioxide-powered, needleless injector (J-Tip, National Medical Products Inc., CA, USA), which is claimed to deliver a virtually painless, subcutaneous injection. Seventy-two patients undergoing various types of surgery had a large-bore intravenous cannula inserted prior to induction of general anaesthesia. Three minutes beforehand, a subcutaneous injection of 0.3 ml of 1% plain lidocaine was administered. Subjects were randomly allocated to receive the lidocaine either by the needleless injector or from a conventional syringe and a 25G needle. Pain scores were recorded on injection of the lidocaine and on insertion of the cannula. There was significantly less pain on injection with the needleless injector than with the 25G needle (p < 0.001) but, surprisingly, there was more pain on cannulation (p < 0.001). We conclude that the device certainly delivers a less painful subcutaneous injection than a 25G needle, but perhaps provides less effective skin anaesthesia for venous cannulation at sites where the subcutaneous space is small; its use might be better suited to areas where the subcutaneous space is deeper. [source]


    Use of an Embalming Machine to Create a Central Venous Access Model in Human Cadavers

    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 2009
    Lee Wilbur
    Background:, Human cadavers provide an effective model for procedural training; however, inconsistent blood return during central venous cannulation compromises the overall reliability of this procedure. Objective:, To create and quantitatively assess a human cadaver central venous access model using a continuously-run embalming machine. Curriculum:, Emergency medicine (EM) faculty at Indiana University created this model for a procedure lab designed for EM residents. The right femoral artery was identified by superficial dissection and cannulated distally towards the lower leg. This cannula was connected to a Duotronic embalming machine with a solution composed of 16 oz of 24-index fluid and 3 gallons of tap water at a fixed output of 13 pounds per square inch (psi). Next, the left subclavian vein and artery were identified by dissection and each was cannulated with an 18 gauge angiocath connected to a continuous pressure monitor. Pressures (mmHg) in the subclavian vein and artery were measured continuously while study personnel cannulated the left femoral, right subclavian, right supraclavicular, and right internal jugular veins. This model was assessed for dual sessions lasting two hours each with a two hour break in-between. Results:, During the first session, subclavian pressures were measured at 3 mmHg venous and 22 mmHg arterial, increasing to 11 mmHg venous and 27 mmHg arterial during the second session. Residents were able to withdraw at least 5 milliliters at each central venous site in the embalmed cadaver. Conclusions:, We created a reliable and measurable central venous access model in a fresh-frozen human cadaver using a standard embalming machine. [source]


    Transillumination by light-emitting diode facilitates peripheral venous cannulations in infants and small children

    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 8 2010
    K. HOSOKAWA
    Background: Transillumination facilitates the visualization of peripheral veins in infants and children. The clinical usefulness of light-emitting diode (LED)-powered devices has not been thoroughly studied. Methods: We randomly assigned 136 infants and children weighing <15 kg, undergoing general anesthesia, to red LED-powered transillumination (TM group, n=67) vs. the usual method (UM group, n=69) of peripheral venous cannulations. Venous puncture was performed following anesthesia induction with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide. The primary and secondary study endpoints were the rate of successful cannulations at initial attempt, and the duration of insertion attempts, respectively. Results: The median score of the estimated cannulation difficulty before attempted puncture was similar in both groups. The success rates at first attempt were 75% and 61% (NS) and mean±SD times to successful venous access were 47±34 and 68±66 s (NS) in the TM and UM groups, respectively. The cannulation procedures were completed significantly earlier in the TM group than in the UM group (hazard ratio, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.03,2.47; P=0.03). In the subgroup of infants and children <2 years old, venous cannulation was successful at first attempt in 73% and 49% in the TM group (n=44) and in the UM group (n=47), respectively (P=0.03). Conclusions: LED-powered transillumination devices facilitated peripheral venous cannulations in small infants and children. [source]


    Evaluation of a diclofenac transdermal patch for the attenuation of venous cannulation pain: a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

    ANAESTHESIA, Issue 4 2006
    A. Agarwal
    Summary Venous cannulation, although a minor procedure, is often painful. The present study was planned to evaluate the efficacy of a diclofenac transdermal patch placed over the venepuncture site in decreasing the pain of cannulation. Seventy-two adults undergoing elective surgery were included in this randomised, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were divided into three equal groups. The Control group had a placebo adhesive patch placed on the both the dorsum of hand and the buttock; the Diclofenac-Buttock group had a placebo patch placed on the dorsum of the hand and a diclofenac transdermal patch on the buttock; the Diclofenac-Hand group had a diclofenac transdermal patch placed on the dorsum of hand and a placebo patch on the buttock. The patches were applied 1 h before cannulation. An 18G cannula was used for all venous cannulations. Pain during cannulation was assessed on a non-graduated 10-cm visual analogue scale. Median [interquartile range] pain scores were 3.0 [2.0,4.0] in the Diclofenac-Hand group, 5.0 [4.3,7.8] in the Diclofenac-Buttock group and 6.5 [4.5,7.0] in the Control group, p < 0.05. The numbers needed to treat were six and two in the Diclofenac-Buttock and Diclofenac-Hand groups, respectively. The application of a diclofenac transdermal patch at the cannulation site appears to be effective in decreasing cannulation pain. [source]