Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Varicose Vein Surgery (varicose + vein_surgery)
Selected AbstractsIncidence of deep vein thrombosis after varicose vein surgeryBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 12 2004A. M. van Rij Background: Varicose vein surgery is generally considered to have little risk of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT). This prospective study examined the incidence of DVT in patients undergoing varicose vein surgery. Methods: Lower leg veins were assessed before operation by duplex ultrasonography in 377 patients, and reassessed 2,4 weeks after surgery, and again at 6 and 12 months. Patients were instructed to contact a physician if symptoms consistent with DVT occurred before the scheduled follow-up appointment. Preoperative prophylaxis (a single dose of subcutaneous heparin) was left to the discretion of the vascular surgeon. Results: DVT was detected in 20 (5·3 per cent) of the 377 patients. Of these, only eight were symptomatic and no patient developed symptoms consistent with pulmonary embolus. Eighteen of the 20 DVTs were confined to the calf veins. Subcutaneous heparin did not alter the outcome. No propagation of thrombus was observed and half of the DVTs had resolved without deep venous reflux at 1 year. Conclusion: The incidence of DVT following varicose vein surgery was higher than previously thought, but these DVTs had minimal short- or long-term clinical significance. Copyright © 2004 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] 980-nm laser therapy versus varicose vein surgery in racially diverse Penang, MalaysiaANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 5 2009Murli N. Lakhwani Abstract Background:, Chronic venous disorders are conditions of increasing prevalence in the developing world, and venous ulceration is the terminal sequel. Currently there are only limited data on all aspects of this from Southeast Asia. The aim of the present study was to assess differences in the demography and outcome between varicose vein surgery (VVS) and the relatively new endovenous laser therapy (EVT) in patients from Penang, Malaysia. Methods:, A retrospective study was performed. Patients who presented to the outpatient clinic of the surgical department with saphenofemoral junction and/or saphenopopliteal junction incompetence associated with reflux of the great saphenous vein or small saphenous vein, respectively, underwent either surgery (1999,2004) or laser therapy (2004,2006). A single surgeon at a single institution performed all procedures. Results:, A total of 350 limbs were treated from 292 patients. Demographics, symptoms, outcomes and complications that arose in both groups were compared. There were significant improvements in pains, swelling, cramps and heaviness postoperatively (P < 0.001) in both groups. Deep venous thrombosis was present as a complication in the VVS group at 3.0%, but was absent altogether in the EVT group. Conclusions:, Although both are highly effective procedures, laser therapy has become popular as an elective procedure with its minimally invasive nature, cosmesis, rapid recovery and other advantages. Surgery remains an important and very cost-effective procedure, especially in a developing society such as Penang. [source] Randomized clinical trial comparing bipolar coagulating and standard great saphenous stripping for symptomatic varicose veinsBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 4 2007D. Lorenz Background: Typical side-effects of saphenous stripping for symptomatic varicose veins include painful thigh haematomas, which a new bipolar coagulating electric vein stripper (EVS) may reduce. Methods: In a randomized, single-blind trial at three vascular centres, 99 patients were assigned to EVS and 101 to conventional stripping. The primary outcome was postoperative pain at rest and following physical exercise (climbing stairs). Haematomas were quantified by ultrasonography. Further endpoints were duration of postoperative compression, sick leave and quality of life (measured by the Chronic Lower Limb Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ) and Short Form 36 (SF-36®)). Results: Mean resting visual analogue scale for pain 24 h after surgery was 1·6 in the EVS group and 3·3 in the conventional stripping group (mean difference 1·7, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1·4 to 1·9, P < 0·001). Mean ratings following exercise were 3·3 and 5·5 (mean difference 2·3, 95 per cent c.i. 2·0 to 2·6, P < 0·001) respectively. No patient in the EVS group had a measurable thigh haematoma, compared with 74 patients after conventional stripping (P < 0·001). The EVS significantly decreased the length of compression therapy and sick leave, and produced superior CIVIQ and SF-36 ratings. Conclusion: The EVS was safe and effective in avoiding painful haematomas following varicose vein surgery. Copyright © 2007 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Anatomical variation at the saphenofemoral junction,BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 3 2005M. Donnelly Background: This study was designed to document the surgical anatomy of the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ). Methods: The anatomy of the SFJ was recorded diagrammatically in 2089 consecutive groin dissections performed to treat primary varicose veins. The number of primary tributaries, bifid systems, junctional tributaries and the relationship of the external pudendal artery (EPA) to the long saphenous vein (LSV) were recorded. Results: The LSV was bifid in 18·1 per cent of legs. The number of tributaries at the SFJ varied from one to ten. In 33·4 per cent one or more (junctional) tributaries joined the LSV or common femoral vein deep to the deep fascia. The EPA crossed anterior to 16·8 per cent of LSVs. In 4·6 per cent it passed posterior to one large tributary or trunk of a bifid LSV and anterior to the second trunk, making identification of the second trunk particularly difficult. Conclusion: A thorough understanding of the anatomical variations of the SFJ is important in ensuring that the junction is managed safely and adequately in patients with varicose veins. Failure to appreciate these variations may account for a significant proportion of inadequate primary varicose vein surgery. Copyright © 2004 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Incidence of deep vein thrombosis after varicose vein surgery (Br J Surg 2004; 91: 1582-1585)BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 3 2005S. EnochArticle first published online: 28 FEB 200 No abstract is available for this article. [source] Incidence of deep vein thrombosis after varicose vein surgeryBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 12 2004A. M. van Rij Background: Varicose vein surgery is generally considered to have little risk of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT). This prospective study examined the incidence of DVT in patients undergoing varicose vein surgery. Methods: Lower leg veins were assessed before operation by duplex ultrasonography in 377 patients, and reassessed 2,4 weeks after surgery, and again at 6 and 12 months. Patients were instructed to contact a physician if symptoms consistent with DVT occurred before the scheduled follow-up appointment. Preoperative prophylaxis (a single dose of subcutaneous heparin) was left to the discretion of the vascular surgeon. Results: DVT was detected in 20 (5·3 per cent) of the 377 patients. Of these, only eight were symptomatic and no patient developed symptoms consistent with pulmonary embolus. Eighteen of the 20 DVTs were confined to the calf veins. Subcutaneous heparin did not alter the outcome. No propagation of thrombus was observed and half of the DVTs had resolved without deep venous reflux at 1 year. Conclusion: The incidence of DVT following varicose vein surgery was higher than previously thought, but these DVTs had minimal short- or long-term clinical significance. Copyright © 2004 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] | ||||||||||