Home About us Contact | |||
Valve Area (valve + area)
Kinds of Valve Area Selected AbstractsA Nomogram for Measurement of Mitral Valve Area by Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area MethodECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Issue 8 2007Mehmet Uzun M.D. Introduction: Although its accuracy has been documented in many studies, the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method is not used widely for mitral valve area (MVA) measurement. In this study, we prepared a new nomogram and tested its use in MVA assessment. Material and Methods: The study included 23 patients (age: 27 ± 5 years) with mitral stenosis, of whom 7 were in atrial fibrillation. The MVA was measured by four methods: planimetry (PL) (reference method), pressure-half time (PHT), conventional PISA (CP), and nomogram (Nomo) methods. The nomogram included two unknowns: (1) r; the radius of the first PISA section; (2) a; the length of the border opposite to the PISA angle in the triangle with both adjacent borders of 1 cm. The nomogram was also tested for its popularity potential by eight echocardiographers, none of whom were included in the author list. Results: Mean MVAPL was 1.85 ± 0.53 cm2 (range: 0.72,2.99), mean MVAPHT was 1.72 ± 0.56 cm2 (range: 0.91,3.30), mean MVACP was 1.69 ± 0.45 cm2 (range: 0.97,2.54), and MVANomo was 1.70 ± 0.44 cm2 (0.96,2.49). The nomogram correlated with planimetry (r = 0.87; P < 0.001), pressure half-time (r = 0.71; P < 0.001) and conventional PISA (r = 0.99; P = 0.000) methods. The nomogram method also correlated with planimetry in patients with atrial fibrillation (r = 0.81; P = 0.026). The echocardiographers found that the nomogram is superior to the planimetry and conventional PISA methods but inferior to the pressure half-time method in terms of simplicity. Conclusion: The new nomogram is potentially helpful in measurement of MVA. It may be used as an additional method in assessing severity of mitral stenosis. [source] Demonstration of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Eccentricity by Real Time 3D Echocardiography: Implications for the Determination of Aortic Valve AreaECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Issue 8 2007Sanjay Doddamani M.D. Background: Determination of the left ventricular outflow tract cross-sectional area (ALVOT) is necessary for calculating aortic valve area (AVA) by echocardiography using the continuity equation (CE). In the commonly applied form of CE, ,r2 is used to estimate ALVOT utilizing the assumptions that LVOT is round and the parasternal long axis (PLAX) plane bisects LVOT. Imaging LVOT using real time 3D echocardiography (RT3DE) eliminates the need for these assumptions. We tested the hypothesis that LVOT is round based on a formula for eccentricity. Methods and Results: In 53 patients, 2D echocardiography (2DE) and RT3DE were acquired. ALVOT was calculated by 2DE using ,r2 (ALVOT-2D). Using RT3DE, ALVOT planimetry was performed immediately beneath the aortic valve (ALVOT-3Dplan). Eccentricity Index (EI) was calculated using the shortest and longest LVOT diameters. The long axis was measured to be larger by 0.53 cm ± 0.36 (P < 0.005). The median EI was 0.20 (0.00,0.54), indicating that half the subjects had at least a 20% difference between the major and minor diameters. ALVOT-3Dplan was larger than ALVOT-2D (3.73 ± 0.95 cm2 vs. 3.18 ± 0.73 cm2; P < 0.001) by paired analysis. Using the equation of an ellipse (,ab), ALVOT-3Dellip was 3.57 ± 0.95 resulting in improved agreement with ALVOT-3Dplan. Conclusions: In our small patient sample with normal aortic valves, we showed the LVOT shape is usually not round and frequently, elliptical. Incorrectly assuming a round LVOT underestimated the ALVOT-3Dplan and consequently the AVA by 15%. Investigating the LVOT in aortic stenosis is warranted to evaluate whether RT3DE may improve measurement of AVA. [source] Comparison of Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area Method and Pressure Half Time Method for Evaluation of Mitral Valve Area in Patients Undergoing Balloon Mitral ValvotomyECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Issue 9 2005Thottuvelil Narayanan Sunil Roy M.D. Background: The pressure half time (PHT) method is unreliable for measurement of mitral valve area (MVA) immediately after valvotomy. The proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method has been used to derive mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis. The aim of our study was to compare PISA method and PHT method in patients undergoing percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy (BMV). Methods: The PISA was recorded from the apex and MVA was calculated using continuity equation by the formula 2,r2 Vr/Vm, where 2,r2 is the hemispheric isovelocity area, Vr is the velocity at the radial distance "r" from the orifice, and Vm is the peak velocity. A plain angle correction factor (,)/180 was used to correct the inlet angle subtended by leaflet tunnel as a result of leaflet doming. Results: MVA calculated using PISA method (r = 0.5217, P < 0.0001, SE = 0.016) and PHT (r = 0.6652, P < 0.0001, SE = 0.017) correlated well with 2D method in patients with mitral stenosis before BMV. After BMV, MVA by PISA method correlated well with 2D planimetry (r = 0.5803, P < 0.0001, SE = 0.053) but PHT showed poor correlation (r = 0.1334, P = 0.199, SE = 0.036). The variability of measurement of MVA was most marked with PHT method in the post-BMV period. Conclusion: The PISA method correlates well with 2D planimetry in patients with mitral stenosis before and after BMV and is superior to the PHT method in the post-BMV period where the latter may be unreliable. [source] Diagnostic Accuracy of Handheld Echocardiography for Evaluation of Aortic StenosisECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Issue 5 2010Arnd Schaefer M.D. Background: Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Early identification of these patients by echocardiography is crucial. We conducted this study to evaluate a handheld ultrasound device (HCU) in patients with suspected severe aortic stenosis (AS) in comparison to a standard echocardiography device (SE). Methods: A HCU (Vivid I; GE Healthcare) and a SE device (Philips iE 33) were used to evaluate 50 consecutive patients with suspected severe AS. Two consecutive echocardiographic studies were performed by two experienced and blinded examiners using HCU and SE device. AS was graded by mean transaortic pressure, aortic valve area (AVA), and indexed AVA (AVA adjusted for body surface area). Results: Mean difference for mean transaortic gradient, AVA and indexed AVA for the SE and HCU device were 1.28 mmHg (,0.70 to 3.26 mmHg), ,0.02 cm2 (,0.06 to 0.01 cm2), and ,0.01 cm2/m2 (,0.03 to 0.01 cm2/m2), respectively. Discrepancies between both devices were not associated with misinterpretation of the degree of AS. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that HCU can be used to evaluate patients with suspected AS. (ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY 2010;27:481-486) [source] Does Left Atrial Size Predict Mortality in Asymptomatic Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis?ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Issue 2 2010Grace Casaclang-Verzosa M.D. Background: We assessed the hypothesis that diastolic function represented by left atrial size determines the rate of development of symptoms and the risk of all-cause mortality in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Methods: From a database of 622 asymptomatic patients with isolated severe AS (velocity by Doppler , 4 m/sec) followed for 5.4 ± 4 years, we reviewed the echocardiograms and evaluated Doppler echocardiographic indices of diastolic function. Prediction of symptom development and mortality by left atrial diameter with and without adjusting for clinical and echocardiographic parameters was performed using Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis. Results: The age was 71 ± 11 years and 317 (62%) patients were males. The aortic valve mean gradient was 46 ± 11 mmHg, and the Doppler-derived aortic valve area was 0.9 ± 0.2 cm2. During follow-up, symptoms developed in 233 (45%), valve surgery was performed in 290 (57%) and 138 (27%) died. Left atrial enlargement was significantly correlated with symptom development (P < 0.05) but the association diminished after adjusting for aortic valve area and peak velocity (P = 0.2). However, atrial diameter predicted death independent of age and gender (P = 0.007), comorbid conditions (P = 0.03), and AS severity and Doppler parameters of diastolic function (P = 0.002). Conclusion: Diastolic function, represented as left atrial diameter, is related to mortality in asymptomatic patients with severe AS. (ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY 2010;27:105-109) [source] Echo-Tracking Assessment of Carotid Artery Stiffness in Patients with Aortic Valve StenosisECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Issue 7 2009Francesco Antonini-Canterin M.D. Background: There is little information about mechanical properties of large arteries in patients (pts) with aortic stenosis (AS). Methods: Nineteen patients with AS (aortic valve area: 0.88 ± 0.29 cm2) and 24 control subjects without AS but with a similar distribution of risk factors were recruited. , index, pressure-strain elastic modulus (Ep), arterial compliance (AC), augmentation index (AIx), and local pulse-wave velocity (PWV) were obtained at the level of right common carotid artery (CCA) by a real time echo-tracking system. Time to dominant peak of carotid diameter change waveform, corrected for heart rate (tDPc), and maximum rate of rise of carotid diameter (dD/dt) were measured. Systemic arterial compliance (SAC) was also calculated. Parameters of AS severity (mean gradient, valve area, stroke work loss [SWL]) were determined. Results: tDPc was higher in patients with AS than in controls (7.9 ± 0.6 vs. 6.6 ± 0.7, P < 0.0001) while dD/dt was lower (5.3 ± 3.6 mm/s vs. 7.8 ± 2.8 mm/s, P = 0.01). AIx was significantly higher in AS group (32.5 ± 13.6% vs. 20.6 ± 12.2%, P = 0.005) and had a linear correlation both with tDPc (r = 0.63, P < 0.0001) and with dD/dt (r =,0.38, P = 0.01). There was a significant correlation between carotid AC and SAC (r = 0.49, P = 0.03), but only carotid AC was related to SWL (r = 0.51, P = 0.02), while SAC was not (P = 0.26).Conclusions: AIx was the only parameter of arterial rigidity found to be higher in patients with AS than in controls. Carotid AC showed a significant correlation with SAC and it seemed to be more closely related to AS severity than to SAC. [source] A Nomogram for Measurement of Mitral Valve Area by Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area MethodECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Issue 8 2007Mehmet Uzun M.D. Introduction: Although its accuracy has been documented in many studies, the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method is not used widely for mitral valve area (MVA) measurement. In this study, we prepared a new nomogram and tested its use in MVA assessment. Material and Methods: The study included 23 patients (age: 27 ± 5 years) with mitral stenosis, of whom 7 were in atrial fibrillation. The MVA was measured by four methods: planimetry (PL) (reference method), pressure-half time (PHT), conventional PISA (CP), and nomogram (Nomo) methods. The nomogram included two unknowns: (1) r; the radius of the first PISA section; (2) a; the length of the border opposite to the PISA angle in the triangle with both adjacent borders of 1 cm. The nomogram was also tested for its popularity potential by eight echocardiographers, none of whom were included in the author list. Results: Mean MVAPL was 1.85 ± 0.53 cm2 (range: 0.72,2.99), mean MVAPHT was 1.72 ± 0.56 cm2 (range: 0.91,3.30), mean MVACP was 1.69 ± 0.45 cm2 (range: 0.97,2.54), and MVANomo was 1.70 ± 0.44 cm2 (0.96,2.49). The nomogram correlated with planimetry (r = 0.87; P < 0.001), pressure half-time (r = 0.71; P < 0.001) and conventional PISA (r = 0.99; P = 0.000) methods. The nomogram method also correlated with planimetry in patients with atrial fibrillation (r = 0.81; P = 0.026). The echocardiographers found that the nomogram is superior to the planimetry and conventional PISA methods but inferior to the pressure half-time method in terms of simplicity. Conclusion: The new nomogram is potentially helpful in measurement of MVA. It may be used as an additional method in assessing severity of mitral stenosis. [source] Demonstration of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Eccentricity by Real Time 3D Echocardiography: Implications for the Determination of Aortic Valve AreaECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Issue 8 2007Sanjay Doddamani M.D. Background: Determination of the left ventricular outflow tract cross-sectional area (ALVOT) is necessary for calculating aortic valve area (AVA) by echocardiography using the continuity equation (CE). In the commonly applied form of CE, ,r2 is used to estimate ALVOT utilizing the assumptions that LVOT is round and the parasternal long axis (PLAX) plane bisects LVOT. Imaging LVOT using real time 3D echocardiography (RT3DE) eliminates the need for these assumptions. We tested the hypothesis that LVOT is round based on a formula for eccentricity. Methods and Results: In 53 patients, 2D echocardiography (2DE) and RT3DE were acquired. ALVOT was calculated by 2DE using ,r2 (ALVOT-2D). Using RT3DE, ALVOT planimetry was performed immediately beneath the aortic valve (ALVOT-3Dplan). Eccentricity Index (EI) was calculated using the shortest and longest LVOT diameters. The long axis was measured to be larger by 0.53 cm ± 0.36 (P < 0.005). The median EI was 0.20 (0.00,0.54), indicating that half the subjects had at least a 20% difference between the major and minor diameters. ALVOT-3Dplan was larger than ALVOT-2D (3.73 ± 0.95 cm2 vs. 3.18 ± 0.73 cm2; P < 0.001) by paired analysis. Using the equation of an ellipse (,ab), ALVOT-3Dellip was 3.57 ± 0.95 resulting in improved agreement with ALVOT-3Dplan. Conclusions: In our small patient sample with normal aortic valves, we showed the LVOT shape is usually not round and frequently, elliptical. Incorrectly assuming a round LVOT underestimated the ALVOT-3Dplan and consequently the AVA by 15%. Investigating the LVOT in aortic stenosis is warranted to evaluate whether RT3DE may improve measurement of AVA. [source] Validation of the Peak to Mean Pressure Decrease Ratio as a New Method of Assessing Aortic Stenosis Using the Gorlin Formula and the Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance-Based Hybrid MethodECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Issue 4 2007Dariusch Haghi M.D. Background: We sought to validate the recently introduced peak to mean pressure decrease ratio (PMPDR), using the Gorlin formula and a hybrid method which combines cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived stroke volume with transaortic Doppler measurements to calculate aortic valve area (AVA). Methods: Data analysis in 32 patients with severe (AVA <= 0.75 cm2) or moderate aortic stenosis who had prospectively been entered into our aortic stenosis database. Results: Gorlin-derived AVA was 0.61 ± 0.10 cm2 in severe and 0.92 ± 0.14 cm2 in moderate aortic stenosis (P < 0.01). Corresponding values for PMPRD were 1.61 ± 0.10 and 1.73 ± 0.18, respectively (P < 0.05). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for PMPDR <1.5 to predict severe aortic stenosis were 0.12, 0.92, 0.67, and 0.44 as assessed by the Gorlin formula. Conclusions: Using the Gorlin formula as the reference standard, our study confirms results of a previously reported study on the performance of PMPDR for assessment of aortic stenosis. [source] Comparison of Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area Method and Pressure Half Time Method for Evaluation of Mitral Valve Area in Patients Undergoing Balloon Mitral ValvotomyECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Issue 9 2005Thottuvelil Narayanan Sunil Roy M.D. Background: The pressure half time (PHT) method is unreliable for measurement of mitral valve area (MVA) immediately after valvotomy. The proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method has been used to derive mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis. The aim of our study was to compare PISA method and PHT method in patients undergoing percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy (BMV). Methods: The PISA was recorded from the apex and MVA was calculated using continuity equation by the formula 2,r2 Vr/Vm, where 2,r2 is the hemispheric isovelocity area, Vr is the velocity at the radial distance "r" from the orifice, and Vm is the peak velocity. A plain angle correction factor (,)/180 was used to correct the inlet angle subtended by leaflet tunnel as a result of leaflet doming. Results: MVA calculated using PISA method (r = 0.5217, P < 0.0001, SE = 0.016) and PHT (r = 0.6652, P < 0.0001, SE = 0.017) correlated well with 2D method in patients with mitral stenosis before BMV. After BMV, MVA by PISA method correlated well with 2D planimetry (r = 0.5803, P < 0.0001, SE = 0.053) but PHT showed poor correlation (r = 0.1334, P = 0.199, SE = 0.036). The variability of measurement of MVA was most marked with PHT method in the post-BMV period. Conclusion: The PISA method correlates well with 2D planimetry in patients with mitral stenosis before and after BMV and is superior to the PHT method in the post-BMV period where the latter may be unreliable. [source] Catheterization,Doppler Discrepancies in Nonsimultaneous Evaluations of Aortic StenosisECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Issue 5 2005Payam Aghassi M.D. Prior validation studies have established that simultaneously measured catheter (cath) and Doppler mean pressure gradients (MPG) correlate closely in evaluation of aortic stenosis (AS). In clinical practice, however, cath and Doppler are rarely performed simultaneously; which may lead to discrepant results. Accordingly, our aim was to ascertain agreement between these methods and investigate factors associated with discrepant results. We reviewed findings in 100 consecutive evaluations for AS performed in 97 patients (mean age 72 ± 10 yr) in which cath and Doppler were performed within 6 weeks. We recorded MPG, aortic valve area (AVA), cardiac output, and ejection fraction (EF) by both methods. Aortic root diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVIDd) and posterior wall thickness (PWT) were measured by echocardiography and gender, heart rate, and heart rhythm were also recorded. An MPG discrepancy was defined as an intrapatient difference > 10 mmHg. Mean pressure gradients by cath and Doppler were 36 ± 22 mmHg and 37 ± 20 mmHg, respectively (P = 0.73). Linear regression showed good correlation (r = 0.82) between the techniques. An MPG discrepancy was found in 36 (36%) of 100 evaluations; in 19 (53%) of 36 evaluations MPG by Doppler was higher than cath, and in 17 (47%) of 36, it was lower. In 33 evaluations, EF differed by >10% between techniques. Linear regression analyses revealed that EF difference between studies was a significant predictor of MPG discrepancy (P = 0.004). Women had significantly higher MPG than men by both cath and Doppler (43 ± 25 mmHg versus 29 ± 15 mmHg [P = 0.001]; 42 ± 23 mmHg versus 32 ± 15 mmHg [P = 0.014], respectively). Women exhibited discrepant results in 23 (47%) of 49 evaluations versus 13 (25%) of 51 evaluations in men (P = 0.037). After adjustment for women's higher MPG, there was no statistically significant difference in MPG discrepancy between genders (P = 0.22). No significant interactions between MPG and aortic root diameter, relative wall thickness (RWT), heart rate, heart rhythm, cardiac output, and time interval between studies were found. In clinical practice, significant discrepancies in MPG were common when cath and Doppler are performed nonsimultaneously. No systematic bias was observed and Doppler results were as likely yield lower as higher MPGs than cath. EF difference was a significant predictor of discrepant MPG. Aortic root diameter, relative wall thickness, heart rate, heart rhythm, cardiac output, presence or severity of coronary artery disease, and time interval between studies were not predictors of discrepant results. [source] The Myocardial Performance Index in Patients with Aortic StenosisECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Issue 4 2002Jude A. Mugerwa M.D. Objectives: This study was designed to determine the effect of chronic afterload on a Doppler-derived myocardial performance index (MPI) combining both systolic and diastolic left ventricular dysfunction. Methods: The study included 36 patients with a diagnosis of aortic stenosis and 36 normal subjects. Doppler-derived myocardial performance index (MPI), defined as the sum of the isovolumic contraction time and isovolumic relaxation time divided by ejection time, was measured from the mitral valve inflow and left ventricular outflow velocity patterns and was then related to the aortic valve area, valve gradient, and other echocardiographic variables. Results: The values of the Doppler-derived MPI in the patients with aortic stenosis were significantly higher than those in the controls (0.54 ± 0.20 vs 0.38 ± 0.04, respectively; P < 0.001). Transmitral deceleration time and the E/A ratio (r = 0.47 and r = 0.35, respectively; P < 0.05) were significant univariate correlates, and mitral deceleration time was the only significant correlate of MPI. However the index did not correlate with aortic valve area, peak and mean valve gradients, left ventricular mass, or age. Conclusions: Doppler-derived MPI reflects severity of global left ventricular dysfunction in patients with aortic stenosis and may be of clinical value in this patient population. [source] Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function after Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve PlastyJOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, Issue 1 2010Yong-Qiang Lai M.D. This procedure anchors the correspondence leaflets to create a double-orifice mitral valve. The original mitral valve anatomy is changed, and the opening of mitral valve is restricted. Little is known whether this procedure affects the left ventricular diastolic function. Methods: Thirty patients with mitral regurgitation were included in this study. Fifteen with posterior leaflet prolapse received quadrangular resection (group 1), 15 with anterior or bileaflet prolapse underwent edge-to-edge procedure (group 2). Acute hemodynamics was monitored with a Swan-Ganz catheter (Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, CA, USA). Left ventricular diastolic function was also evaluated with echocardiography in 28 patients with sinus rhythm. The ratio of peak E velocity and A velocity (E/A), the ratio of early diastolic peak flow velocity to early diastolic mitral annular movement velocity (E/Em), and the ratio of early diastolic mitral annular velocity to late diastolic mitral annular velocity (Em/Am) were measured before operation and one week after operation. Results: Mitral valve area and mitral regurgitate grade decreased significantly after operation. There was no significant change in pulmonary artery wedge pressure between two groups and in each group before and after operation. Echocardiography evaluation showed there was no significant difference in E/A, E/Em, and Em/Am before and after operation between two groups and in each group. Conclusion: Edge-to-edge mitral valve plasty procedure has no significant impairment on left ventricular diastolic function. A double-orifice mitral valve has similar hemodynamic behavior with a physiological valve.(J Card Surg 2010;25:5-8) [source] Does Aortic Root Enlargement Impair the Outcome of Patients With Small Aortic Root?JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, Issue 5 2006Hasan Ardal The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term results of the posterior root enlargement. Methods: Between 1985 and 2002, 124 patients underwent aortic valve replacement with a posterior root enlargement. The main indication was a small aortic valve orifice area to patient body surface area (indexed valve area < 0.85 cm2/m2). Fifty-four (44%) patients were male, and 70 (56%) were female with a mean age 39.1 ± 14.3 years. Indications for operation were severe calcified aortic valve stenosis (37.1%), severe aortic insufficiency (25.8%), or combination (37.1%). Seventy-five (60%) patients received double-valve replacement. A pericardial patch was used in 100 patients (80.6%) and a Dacron patch was used in 24 patients. Results: Operative mortality was 6.4% (8 patients). The causes of hospital mortality were low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) (in 6 patients), cerebrovascular events (in 1 patient) and multiple organ failure (in 1 patient). Multivariate analysis demonstrated concomitant coronary revascularization to be a significant (p = 0.03) predictor for early mortality. There were six (5.4%) late deaths. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated LCOS (p = 0.013) and infective endocarditis (p = 0.003) to be significant predictors for late mortality. Atrioventricular block required a permanent pacemaker was observed in 4 patients (3.2%). Conclusions: Posterior aortic root enlargement techniques can be easily applied without additional risks. Long-term survival and freedoms from valve-related complications are satisfactory. [source] Immediate and Long-Term Outcome of Redo Percutaneous Mitral Valvuloplasty: Comparison with Initial Procedure in Patients with Rheumatic Mitral RestenosisJOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 1 2010OSAMA RIFAIE M.D. Aims: We explored the immediate and long-term outcome of redo percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty (PMV) in a series of patients with mitral restenosis in comparison with initial PMV in the same series. Methods: We enrolled 40 consecutive patients presenting with mitral restenosis after successful initial PMV. Redo PMV was performed by the antegrade transseptal approach using either the Inoue technique or the multitrack technique. Reassessment by transthoracic echocardiography was repeated 48 hours later, and annually thereafter. Procedural success was defined as 50% or more increase of mitral valve area (MVA) with a final MVA ,1.5 cm2, without major complications. Restenosis was defined as loss of >50% of the initial gain of MVA by the preceding PMV with a final MVA <1.5 cm2. Results: Procedural success was achieved in 37 (92.5%) patients. Both the initial and redo procedures were similar concerning the final MVA and mean transmitral pressure gradient (P > 0.05 for all). The gain of MVA was higher in the initial as compared to the redo procedure (P < 0.001). The initial mitral valve score correlated negatively with the final MVA in both the initial and redo procedures, and was the only independent predictor of the time to redo procedure, by multivariate regression analysis. At long-term follow-up (61 ± 2.8 months), the mean MVA was 1.6 ± 0.3 cm2. Three patients,out of 12 available for follow-up,developed restenosis. Conclusion: Redo PMV for mitral restenosis is feasible, safe, and achieves immediate and long-term outcome comparable to initial PMV. (J Interven Cardiol 2010;23:1,6) [source] Prospective Evaluation of the Balloon-to-Annulus Ratio for Valvuloplasty in the Treatment of Pulmonic Stenosis in the DogJOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, Issue 4 2006Amara Estrada Background: In dogs, treatment of pulmonic valve stenosis (PS) with pulmonary balloon valvuloplasty (PBV) is a viable method to decrease the pressure gradient across the valve. However, to the authors' knowledge, the variables that influence the selection of the correct balloon size for the procedure have not been explored. Moreover, the lesions caused by the procedure have not been detailed. Hypothesis: Variables that influence the measurement of the annulus could affect selection of the balloon size. We sought to determine the effects of treatment when the balloon-to-annulus ratio (BAR) was or > 1.3, but within the recommended range of 1.2,1.5, regardless of whether dilation was performed with single or double balloon technique. Animals: Twenty-five Beagles with PS were studied. Methods: Inter-and intra-observer variability, echocardiography versus angiocardiography, and systolic versus diastolic timing were evaluated for the BAR. Assessment of right ventricular (RV) pressure, Doppler gradient, stenotic valve area, and RV wall thickness were compared before and 1, 90, and 180 days after treatment. Postmortem examination of the heart was done. Results: Significant correlations existed in measurement of the annulus; however, variation existed that would change balloon size. Improvement in the degree of PS was significant regardless of the BAR or single or double ballooning. In the most severely affected dogs, continued improvement was noted on day 90. Postmortem examination revealed tears in the commissures and the valve leaflets. Conclusions: Multiple factors influenced determination of the BAR and a range of 1.2,1.5 was effective without detrimental consequences. Dogs with severe PS had continued decrease in RV pressure 3 months after treatment. [source] Comparison of early results of percutaneous metallic mitral commissurotome with Inoue balloon technique in patients with high mitral echocardiographic scoresCATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 3 2002Adel M. Zaki MD Abstract We compared the safety, efficacy, and cost of the newly introduced percutaneous metallic commissurotome (PMC) with the results of Inoue balloon mitral valvuloplasty (BMV) in 80 patients with mitral stenosis (MS). The mean increase in mitral valve area (MVA) was 0.95 ± 0.19 to 1.7 ± 0.35 cm2 for PMC and 0.97 ± 0.15 to 1.81 ± 0.36 cm2 for BMV (P = NS). The Wilkins echocardiographic scores before dilatation did not correlate with any difference in MVA after dilatation. Bilateral commissural splitting was significantly more common with PMC than with BMV (30/39 patients, 76.9%, vs. 21/40 patients, 52.5%; P = 0.02). Postprocedural severe mitral regurgitation occurred in 1/39 (2.6%) in the PMC group and in 4/41 (9.8%) in the BMV group. Because the PMC device is resterilizable, we estimated the cost to be one-fourth the cost of BMV with the Inoue balloon. The estimated device cost ratio of PMC to BMV for each patient was 1 to 4.25. The early results of PMC on the MVA are comparable to BMV. However, PMC had better results not only in patients with high echocardiographic scores, but the PMC device splits commissural calcification better than BMV. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2002;57:312,317. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy: Immediate and long-term follow-up resultsCATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 4 2002Ramesh Arora MD Abstract Percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy has emerged as an effective nonsurgical technique for the treatment of patients with symptomatic mitral stenosis. This report highlights the immediate and long-term follow-up results of this procedure in an unselected cohort of patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis from a single center. It was performed in a total of 4,850 patients using double balloon in 320 (6.6%), flow-guided Inoue balloon technique in 4,374 (90.2%), and metallic valvulotome in 156 (3.2%) patients. Their age range was 6.5,72 years (mean, 27.2 ± 11.2 years) and 1,552 (32%) patients were under 20 years of age. Atrial fibrillation was present in 702 (14.5%) patients. No patient was rejected on the basis of echocardiographic score using the Wilkins criteria. Echocardiographic score of , 8 was present in 1,632 (33.6%) patients, of which 103 (2.1%) had densely calcified (Wilkins score 4+) valve. A detailed clinical and echocardiographic (two-dimensional, continuous-wave Doppler and color-flow imaging) assessment was done at every 3 months for the first year and at 6-month interval thereafter. The procedure was technically successful in 4,838 (99.8%) patients but optimal result was achieved in 4,408 (90.9%) patients with an increase in mitral valve area (MVA) from 0.7 ± 0.2 to 1.9 ± 0.3 cm2 (P < 0.001) and a reduction in mean transmitral gradient from 29.5 ± 7.0 to 5.9 ± 2.1 mm Hg (P < 0.001). The mean left atrial pressure decreased from 32.1 ± 9.8 to 13.1 ± 6.2 mm Hg (P < 0.001). Although there was no statistically significant difference in the MVA achieved between de novo and restenosed valves (1.9 ± 0.3 and 1.8 ± 0.2 cm2, respectively; P > 0.05), or between noncalcific and calcific valves (2.0 ± 0.3 and 1.8 ± 0.2 cm2, respectively; P > 0.05), on the whole MVA obtained after percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy was less in restenosed and calcific valves. Ten (0.20%) patients had cardiac tamponade during the procedure. Mitral regurgitation appeared or worsened in 2,038 (42%) patients, of which 68 (1.4%) developed severe mitral regurgitation. Urgent mitral valve replacement was carried out in 52 (1.1%) of these patients. Data of 3,500 patients followed over a period of 94 ± 41 months (range, 12,166 months) revealed MVA of 1.7 ± 0.3 cm2. Elective mitral valve replacement was done in 34 (0.97%) patients. Mitral restenosis was seen in 168 (4.8%) patients, of which 133 (3.8%) were having recurrence of class III or more symptoms. Thus, percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy is an effective and safe procedure with gratifying results in high percentage of patients. The benefits are sustained in a majority of these patients on long-term follow-up. It should be considered as the treatment of choice in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis of all age groups. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2002;55:450,456. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] |