Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
VAD Implantation (vad + implantation)
Selected AbstractsExperience with over 1000 Implanted Ventricular Assist DevicesJOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, Issue 3 2008Evgenij V. Potapov M.D. We present our experience since 1987. Subjects and Methods: Between July 1987 and December 2006, 1026 VADs were implanted in 970 patients. Most of them were men (81.9%). The indications were: cardiomyopathy (n = 708), postcardiotomy heart failure (n = 173), acute myocardial infarction (n = 36), acute graft failure (n = 45), a VAD problem (n = 6), and others (n = 2). Mean age was 46.1 (range 3 days to 78) years. In 50.5% of the patients the VAD implanted was left ventricular, in 47.9% biventricular, and in 1.5% right ventricular. There were 14 different types of VAD. A total artificial heart was implanted in 14 patients. Results: Survival analysis showed higher early mortality (p < 0.05) in the postcardiotomy group (50.9%) than in patients with preoperative profound cardiogenic shock (31.1%) and patients with preoperative end-stage heart failure without severe shock (28.9%). A total of 270 patients were successfully bridged to heart transplantation (HTx). There were no significant differences in long-term survival after HTx among patients with and without previous VAD. In 76 patients the device could be explanted after myocardial recovery. In 72 patients the aim of implantation was permanent support. During the study period 114 patients were discharged home. Currently, 54 patients are on a device. Conclusions: VAD implantation may lead to recovery from secondary organ failure. Patients should be considered for VAD implantation before profound, possibly irreversible, cardiogenic shock occurs. In patients with postcardiotomy heart failure, a more efficient algorithm should be developed to improve survival. With increased experience, more VAD patients can participate in out-patient programs. [source] Developing a Comprehensive Mechanical Support ProgramJOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, Issue 3 2001David N. Helman M.D. As cardiac surgery centers appreciate that ventricular assist devices (VAD) can dramatically impact patient survival as a bridge to transplant or recovery, and possibly permanent therapy, increasing numbers will desire to establish mechanical support programs. A number of vital elements must be put in place in order to operate a successful mechanical support program. Of utmost importance is the assembly of a dedicated team focused on comprehensive care of critically ill patients in need of circulatory support. An ongoing commitment from anesthesiologists, cardiologists, nephrologists, and other support staff is essential. Selection of complementary assist devices should be made to cover the spectrum of required support scenarios, both short- and long-term. Outpatient therapy has become increasingly important in mechanical cardiac assistance and establishment of an office where "LVAD coordinators" see outpatients facilitates this aspect of the program. Critically ill patients in need of cardiac assistance may benefit from specialized medical therapies such as: (1) intravenous arginine vasopressin for vasodilatory hypotonsion; (2) inhaled nitric oxide for right heart failure; (3) aprotinin to reduce hemorrhage; and (4) early enteral feeding in an effort to reduce infectious complications and improve rehabilitation following VAD implantation. A regional network with spoke hospitals centered around a hub hospital with long-term VAD and heart transplant programs can improve survival of patients with postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock via early transfer to the hub hospital. In this article, we describe the components of our mechanical support program that have allowed us to successfully support patients with heart failure in need of circulatory support. [source] Pediatric Heart Transplant Candidates With Failed Donor Heart Allocation After Eurotransplant Urgency Listing Profit From Pretransplant Mechanical Circulatory Support BridgingARTIFICIAL ORGANS, Issue 4 2009Takeshi Komoda Abstract:, Due to the Eurotransplant organ allocation policy, urgency listing for heart transplantation (HTx) remains in force until ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation in Germany. We studied the prognosis of HTx candidates after failed donor heart allocation in urgent status. We studied all adult and pediatric (<18 years) HTx candidates who underwent primary HTx after Eurotransplant urgency listing between January 2001 and December 2006 (Group A-uHTx [A-"u"rgent status "HTx"], n = 99; Group P-uHTx [P-"u"rgent status "HTx"], n = 24) and those to whom donor heart was not urgently allocated before VAD implantation or death in the same period (Group A-fHA [A-"f"ailed "H"eart "A"llocation], n = 21, Group P-fHA [P-"f"ailed "H"eart "A"llocation], n = 10). Mortality rate after urgency listing or primary VAD implantation was studied in each group. In adult patients, 1-year mortality rate after urgency listing in Group A-fHA was 56.8% and significantly higher than in Group A-uHTx (30.6%, P < 0.001, log-rank test). After failed urgent heart allocation, 15 out of 21 patients in Group A-fHA had VAD implantation and two patients (9.5%) underwent HTx after VAD implantation. In pediatric patients, 1-year mortality rate in Group P-fHA was 40.0% and significantly higher than in Group P-uHTx (8.5%, P < 0.05). In Group P-fHA, all 10 patients underwent VAD implantation after failed urgent heart allocation and six patients (60.0%, P < 0.01 vs. Group A-fHA, Fisher's exact test) underwent HTx after VAD implantation. After failed urgent donor heart allocation, pediatric HTx candidates seem to profit more from mechanical circulatory support than adults. [source] Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation bridge to adult heart transplantationCLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2010Jennifer Chia-Ying Chung Chung JC, Tsai PR, Chou NK, Chi NH, Wang SS, Ko WJ. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation bridge to adult heart transplantation. Clin Transplant 2010: 24: 375,380. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract:, Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can rescue some critical patients with circulatory collapse when intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and ventricular assist devices (VAD) are not suitable. A subset of these patients can use ECMO for direct bridging, or indirect double bridging via VAD to heart transplantation (HTx). For these patients, we identified risk factors for unsuccessful ECMO bridging, with survival to receiving either HTx or VAD as the measure of success. The characteristics evaluated were age, sex, body mass index, pre-ECMO cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), IABP use, dialysis use, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, and the etiology of cardiomyopathy. From January 1995 to August 2007, there were 70 adult ECMO patients with the intent to bridge to HTx (male: 55, age: 46 ± 14 yr). Thirty-one patients (44%) were successful in bridging. A stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis found that age > 50 yr (p = 0.003), pre-ECMO CPR (p = 0.001) and SOFA score > 10 at ECMO initiation (p = 0.018) were significant independent predictors of unsuccessful bridging. Direct VAD implantation, if possible, is preferable to double bridging in patients over 50 yr. Also, elective ECMO support before hemodynamic deterioration to cardiac arrest or multiple organ dysfunction would improve rates of successful ECMO bridging. [source] | ||||||||||