Home About us Contact | |||
VT Episodes (vt + episode)
Selected AbstractsAmiodarone or Procainamide for the Termination of Sustained Stable Ventricular Tachycardia: An Historical Multicenter ComparisonACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 3 2010Keith A. Marill MD Abstract Objectives:, The objective was to compare the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) procainamide and amiodarone for the termination of spontaneous stable sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Methods:, A historical cohort study of consecutive adult patients with stable sustained VT treated with IV amiodarone or procainamide was performed at four urban hospitals. Patients were identified for enrollment by admissions for VT and treatment with the study agents in the emergency department (ED) from 1993 to 2008. The primary measured outcome was VT termination within 20 minutes of onset of study medicine infusion. A secondary effectiveness outcome was the ultimate need for electrical therapy to terminate the VT episode. Major adverse effects were tabulated, and blood pressure responses to medication infusions were compared. Results:, There were 97 infusions of amiodarone or procainamide in 90 patients with VT, but the primary outcome was unknown after 14 infusions due to administration of another antidysrhythmic during the 20-minute observation period. The rates of VT termination were 25% (13/53) and 30% (9/30) for amiodarone and procainamide, respectively. The adjusted odds of termination with procainamide compared to amiodarone was 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.4 to 3.9). Ultimately, 35/66 amiodarone patients (53%, 95% CI = 40 to 65%) and 13/31 procainamide patients (42%, 95% CI = 25 to 61%) required electrical therapy for VT termination. Hypotension led to cessation of medicine infusion or immediate direct current cardioversion (DCCV) in 4/66 (6%, 95% CI = 2 to 15%) and 6/31 (19%, 95% CI = 7 to 37%) patients who received amiodarone and procainamide, respectively. Conclusions:, Procainamide was not more effective than amiodarone for the termination of sustained VT, but the ability to detect a significant difference was limited by the study design and potential confounding. As used in practice, both agents were relatively ineffective and associated with clinically important proportions of patients with decreased blood pressure. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:297,306 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine [source] Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shock: Appropriate or Inappropriate?ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, Issue 2 2010F.R.C.P.C., Michael A. Nault M.D. A 76-year-old female with a single chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implanted for secondary prevention was referred due to multiple discharges. The device was programmed for ventricular tachycardia (VT) detection at 400 ms, fast VT detection at 280 ms, and ventricular fibrillation detection at 320 ms. Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) during charge was enabled. Interrogation revealed a VT episode with a mean cycle length of 270 ms, which was successfully terminated with ATP during charge. Seconds later, the device delivered a shock. This case illustrates the importance of understanding programming algorithms as part of troubleshooting when facing a scenario of device discharge. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2010;15(2):181,183 [source] Transvenous Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation in a Patient with Tricuspid Mechanical ProsthesisJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2007MAURO BIFFI M.D. Background. A 64-year-old woman was referred to our center because of poorly tolerated ventricular tachycardia (VT) at 210 bpm due to an old myocardial infarction. The patient had been operated on at age of 20 for mitral valve commissurolysis, at age of 49 for ductal carcinoma, at age of 56 for mitral valve replacement, and at age of 61 for tricuspid valve replacement. Left ventricular EF was 31%. The patient was in permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) since the age of 53. She had undergone three cardiac surgery procedures, ending with two prosthetic mechanical valves. The cardiac surgery team advised against an epicardial ICD implantation. Results. We achieved a fully transvenous implant, with a screw-in defibrillation coil in the low right atrium and a bipolar pacing/sensing lead in a posterolateral branch of the coronary sinus. Pacing/sensing parameters were reliable, and effective defibrillation occurred at 20 J by a stepdown protocol. During 16-month follow-up, three VT episodes at 210 bpm were terminated by antitachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy. Left ventricular pacing/sensing was stable at long term. Conclusion. Thanks to technologic improvements, transvenous ICD implantation is feasible and safe in patients with a tricuspid mechanical prosthesis. [source] Simultaneous Atrial and Ventricular Anti-Tachycardia Pacing as a Novel Method of Rhythm DiscriminationJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 7 2006SAMIR SABA M.D. Background: Inappropriate shocks remain a problem in patients with defibrillators (ICD). Objective: To evaluate a new discrimination algorithm for supraventricular (SVT) and ventricular (VT) tachycardias, based on the response to simultaneous (A+V) atrial (A) and ventricular (V) anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP). Methods: Patients undergoing electrophysiological testing or dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation were enrolled (N = 32) and underwent A+V ATP through a Marquis ICD with investigational software. If persisting after ATP, the rhythm was classified as VT if the first electrical event was sensed on the V channel and as an SVT otherwise. Results: Arrhythmia sequences (N = 275; 53 VT; 222 SVT) were analyzed in 26 patients (age = 51 ± 17 years, 13 men, LVEF = 0.49 ± 0.14). In response to A+V ATP, 55% of SVT versus 41% of VT episodes were terminated (P = NS). Termination of VT but not of SVT was more likely with faster (50% at ATP/arrhythmia cycle length (CL) = 0.81 vs 8% at ATP/arrhythmia CL = 0.88, P = 0.02) but not with longer ATP bursts (P = NS). Of the 115 arrhythmias that persisted after A+V ATP, the algorithm correctly classified 24 of 24 VT (GEE-adjusted sensitivity = 100%) and 85 of 91 SVT (GEE-adjusted specificity = 93%). Proarrhythmia was noted after two A+V ATP, in the form of atrial fibrillation induction and VT acceleration. Conclusions: We describe a new algorithm that can discriminate between SVT and VT with a high sensitivity and specificity. This form of ATP can terminate 55% of SVT sequences. The performance of this new algorithm merits further testing in a large population of dual-chamber ICD patients. [source] Antitachycardia Pacing for Spontaneous Rapid Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients with Prophylactic Cardioverter-Defibrillator TherapyPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 7 2006WOLFRAM GRIMM Aims: Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) has not routinely been used in patients who received implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for primary prevention of sudden death. This study investigated the efficacy of empirical ATP to terminate rapid ventricular tachycardia (VT) in heart failure patients with prophylactic ICD therapy. Methods and Results: Ninety-three patients with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 22 ± 7% (range: 9,35%) due to nonischemic or ischemic cardiomyopathy received prophylactic ICDs with empiric ATP. At least 2 ATP sequences with 6-pulse burst pacing trains at 81% of VT cycle length (CL) were programmed in one or two VT zones for CL below 335 ± 23 ms and above 253 ± 18 ms. Ventricular flutter and fibrillation (VF) with CL below 253 ± 18 ms were treated in a separate VF zone with ICD shocks without preceding ATP attempts. During 38 ± 27 months follow-up, 339 spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurred in 36 of 93 study patients (39%). A total of 232 VT episodes, mean CL 293 ± 22 ms, triggered ATP in 25 of 36 patients with ICD interventions (69%). ATP terminated 199 of 232 VT episodes (86%) with a mean CL of 294 ± 23 ms in 23 of 25 patients (88%) who received ATP therapy. ATP failed to terminate or accelerated 33 of 232 VT episodes (14%) with a mean CL of 287 ± 19 ms in 12 of 25 patients (48%) who received ATP therapy. Conclusions: Painfree termination of rapid VT with empirical ATP is common in heart failure patients with prophylactic ICD therapy. The occasional inability of empiric ATP to terminate rapid VT in almost 50% of patients who receive ATP for rapid VT warrants restrictive ICD programming with regard to the number of ATP attempts in order to avoid syncope before VT termination occurs. [source] Adenosine-Induced Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with Supraventricular TachycardiasANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, Issue 4 2008Cagatay Ertan M.D. Background: Adenosine is widely used for the diagnosis and the termination of supraventricular arrhythmias. There are many case reports and few series about the proarrhythmic potential of adenosine. We sought to evaluate the proarrhythmic potential of adenosine used to terminate the supraventricular arrhythmias. Methods: The records of all patients that received adenosine for the termination of supraventricular tachycardia were reviewed retrospectively and those with a continuous electrocardiographic (ECG) recording during adenosine administration were included to the study. Results: Our search identified 52 supraventricular episodes of 46 patients with a continuous ECG recording during adenosine administration. Following adenosine administration, premature ventricular contraction (PVC) or ventricular tachycardia (VT) developed in 22 (47.8%) patients and in 26 (50%) tachycardia episodes. No patient had a sustained VT. Nonsustained VT developed in eight (17.4%) patients. All VT episodes were polymorphic, short, and self-terminating. When the basal and demographic properties of patients with PVC or VT and those without PVT or VT were compared, there was no significant difference. Conclusions: Adenosine is a quite safe and effective drug for the termination of narrow QRS complex tachycardia but it often induces nonsustained VT or PVC that are clinically insignificant in the absence of other accompanying heart disease. [source] |