Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
VF Episodes (vf + episode)
Selected AbstractsPacing During Ventricular Fibrillation: Factors Influencing the Ability to CaptureJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 1 2001JONATHAN C. NEWTON M.S. Pacing During Ventricular Fibrillation.Introduction: Recent studies showed that pacing atrial and ventricular fibrillation (VF) is possible. The studies presented here determined which parameters influence the efficacy of a pacing train to capture fibrillating ventricular myocardium. Electrode type, current strength, order of pacing trains, polarity, and VF morphology preceding the pacing trains were investigated. Methods and Results: A 504-electrode recording plaque sutured to the right ventricle of pig hearts was used to record the activations of VF and those resulting from the pacing stimulation. Capture of VF by pacing was determined by observing an animated display of the first temporal derivative of the electrograms. A series of electrodes in a line captured the heart more frequently during VF than did a point electrode. Increasing the current strength to 10× diastolic pacing threshold increased the incidence of capture, but increasing this strength further did not. The second or third train of 40 stimuli had greater capture rates than did the first train during the same VF episode. Anodal and cathodal unipolar, and bipolar stimulation were equally efficacious in capturing VF. VF activation during the 1-second interval preceding pacing was more organized for pacing trains that captured than those that did not. The highest incidence of capture, 46% to 61% of pacing trains, occurred with a line of electrodes at 10× diastolic pacing threshold delivered by the second or third train. Conclusion: The probability of a pacing train capturing fibrillating myocardium can be influenced by the pacing protocol parameters. [source] Repolarization Abnormality in Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation:JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 1 2004Assessment Using 24-Hour QT-RR, QaT-RR Relationships Introduction: We evaluated the characteristics of QT-RR and QaT (apex of T wave)-RR relationships in patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) compared with control subjects. We hypothesized that IVF patients have unique repolarization dynamics related to a reduced fast Na current and a prominent transient outward current. Methods and Results: The study group consisted of 9 men (age 47 ± 10 years) with IVF (6 with Brugada type and 3 with non-Brugada type) who had experienced nocturnal episodes of VF. The control group consisted of 28 healthy age-matched men (age 44 ± 12 years). The relationships between QT and RR intervals and between QaT and RR intervals were analyzed from 24-hour Holter ECG data using an automatic measurement system. Both QT and QaT at RR intervals of 0.6, 1.0, and 1.2 seconds were determined from QT-RR and QaT-RR linear regression lines. Both QT-RR and QaT-RR slopes were lower in the IVF group than in the control group (QT-RR: 0.092 ± 0.023 vs 0.137 ± 0.031, P < 0.001; QaT-RR: 0.109 ± 0.025 vs 0.153 ± 0.028, P < 0.001). QT at an RR interval of 0.6 second did not differ between two groups, but QT at RR intervals of either 1.0 or 1.2 seconds was significantly shorter in the IVF group than in the control group (RR 1.0 s: 0.384 ± 0.018 vs 0.399 ± 0.017, P < 0.05; RR 1.2 s: 0.402 ± 0.019 vs 0.426 ± 0.020, P < 0.01). QaT at RR intervals of either 1.0 or 1.2 seconds also was shorter in the IVF group (RR 1.0 s: 0.289 ± 0.022 vs 0.312 ± 0.021, P < 0.01; RR 1.2 s: 0.311 ± 0.024 vs 0.343 ± 0.024, P < 0.01). In four patients, oral administration of disopyramide (300 mg/day) was effective in suppressing VF episodes and increased slopes of QT-RR and QaT-RR relationships. Conclusion: IVF patients had lower slopes of QT-RR and QaT-RR regression lines and impaired prolongation of QT and QaT at longer RR intervals compared with control subjects. These unique repolarization dynamics may be related to the frequent occurrence of VF episodes at night. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 15, pp. 59-63, January 2004) [source] Spatiotemporal Correlation Between Phase Singularities and Wavebreaks During Ventricular FibrillationJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 10 2003YEN-BIN LIU M.D. Introduction: Phase maps and the detection of phase singularities (PSs) have become a well-developed method for characterizing the organization of ventricular fibrillation (VF). How precisely PS colocalizes with wavebreak (WB) during VF, however, is unknown. Methods and Results: We performed optical mapping of 27 episodes of VF in nine Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts. A WB is a point where the activation wavefront and the repolarization waveback meet. A PS is a site where its phase is ambiguous and its neighboring pixels exhibit a continuous phase progression from ,, to +,. The correlation coefficient between the number of WBs and PSs was 0.78 ± 0.09 for each heart and 0.81 for all VF episodes (P < 0.001), indicating a significant temporal correlation. We then superimposed the WBs and PSs for every 100 frames of each episode. These maps showed a high degree of spatial colocalization. To quantify spatial colocalization, the spatial shifts between the cumulative maps of WBs and PSs in corresponding frames were calculated by automatic alignment to obtain maximum overlap between these two maps. The spatial shifts were 0.04 ± 0.31 mm on the x-axis and 0.06 ± 0.27 mm on the y-axis over a 20 × 20 mm2 mapped field, indicating highly significant spatial correlation. Conclusion: Phase mapping provides a convenient and robust approach to quantitatively describe wave propagation and organization during VF. The close spatiotemporal correlation between PSs and WBs establishes that PSs are a valid alternate representation of WB during VF and further validated the use of phase mapping in the study of VF dynamics. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 14, pp. 1103-1109, October 2003) [source] Mechanisms of Ventricular Fibrillation Initiation in MADIT II Patients with Implantable Cardioverter DefibrillatorsPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 2 2008RYAN ANTHONY M.D. Background:The availability of stored intracardiac electrograms from implantable defibrillators (ICDs) has facilitated the study of the mechanisms of ventricular tachyarrhythmia onset. This study aimed to determine the patterns of initiation of ventricular fibrillation (VF) in Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II patients along with associated electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters and clinical characteristics. Methods:Examination of stored electrograms enabled us to evaluate the rhythm preceding each episode of VF and to calculate (intracardiac) ECG parameters including QT, QT peak (QTp), coupling interval, and prematurity index. Results:Sixty episodes of VF among 29 patients (mean age 64.4 ± 2.5 years) were identified. A single ventricular premature complex (VPC) initiated 46 (77%) episodes whereas a short-long-short (SLS) sequence accounted for 14 (23%) episodes. Of the 29 patients studied, 23 patients had VF episodes preceded by a VPC only, two patients with SLS only, and four patients with both VPC and SLS-initiated episodes. There were no significant differences between initiation patterns in regards to the measured ECG parameters; a faster heart rate with SLS initiation (mean RR prior to VF of 655 ± 104 ms for SLS and 744 ± 222 ms for VPC) approached significance (P = 0.06). The two patients with SLS only were not on ,-blockers compared to 83% of the VPC patients. Conclusion:Ventricular fibrillation is more commonly initiated by a VPC than by a SLS sequence among the MADIT II population. Current pacing modes designed to prevent bradycardia and pause-dependent arrhythmias are unlikely to decrease the incidence of VPC-initiated episodes of VF. [source] A Prospective Randomized-Controlled Trial of Ventricular Fibrillation Detection Time in a DDDR Ventricular DefibrillatorPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 8 2000KENNETH A. ELLENBOGEN Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) with dual chamber and dual chamber rate responsive pacing may offer hemodynamic advantages for some ICD patients. Separate ICDs and DDDR pacemakers can result in device to device interactions, inappropriate shocks, and underdetection of ventricular fibrillation (VF). The objectives of this study were to compare the VF detection times between the Ventak AV II DR and the Ventak AV during high rate DDDR and DDD pacing and to test the safety of dynamic ventricular refractory period shortening. Patients receiving an ICD were randomized in a paired comparison to pacing at 150 beats/min (DDD pacing) or 175 beats/min (DDDR pacing) during ICD threshold testing to create a "worst case scenario" for VF detection. The VF detection rate was set to 180 beats/min, and VF was induced during high rate pacing with alternating current. The device was then allowed to detect and treat VF. The induction was repeated for each patient at each programmed setting so that all patients were tested at both programmed settings. Paired analysis was performed. Patient characteristics were a mean age of 69 ± 11 years, 78% were men, coronary artery disease was present in 85%, and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.34 ± 0.11. Fifty-two episodes of VF were induced in 26 patients. Despite the high pacing rate, all VF episodes were appropriately detected. The mean VF detection time was 2.4 ± 1.0 seconds during DDD pacing and 2.9 ± 1.9 seconds during DDDR pacing (P = NS). DDD and DDDR programming resulted in appropriate detection of all episodes of VF with similar detection times despite the "worst case scenario" tested. Delays in detection may be seen with long programmed ventricular refractory periods which shorten the VF sensing window and may be avoided with dynamic ventricular refractory period shortening. [source] | ||||||||||