			Home About us Contact

Urinary Sphincter (urinary + sphincter)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Kinds of Urinary Sphincter

artificial urinary sphincter

Selected Abstracts

New Enhancements of the Scrotal One-Incision Technique for Placement of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Allow Proximal Cuff Placement

THE JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, Issue 10 2010
Steven K. Wilson MD
ABSTRACT Introduction., Urinary incontinence impairs sexual functioning and sexual satisfaction. Traditional artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation requires perineal incision for cuff placement and a second inguinal incision for reservoir and pump placement. We believed AUS could be placed easier and quicker through one scrotal incision. Aim., In an effort to effect more proximal placement of the cuff while keeping the advantages of the one scrotal incision technique, we report enhancements to the original surgical technique. Methods., Thirty patients have been operated upon using the enhanced technique. A modification of the SKW retractor system (AMS) facilitates deep bulbar exposure. Twenty patients were first time implantations and 10 were revisions with five of the revisions having had the original AUS placed by traditional two-incision technique. Two of the first time AUS patients received an inflatable penile prosthesis through the same incision. Main Outcome Measures., We evaluated site of cuff placement, sizes of cuffs used, postoperative continence status. Results., All of the virgin AUS required dissection of the bulbocavernosus muscle prior to cuff placement. In scrotally placed revisions, replacement cuffs were situated considerably proximal (4.5,7.5 cm) to the original cuff site. The perineal placed revisions were accomplished through a scrotal incision with replacement of two cuffs in the same site and the three other patients immediately distal. No intraoperative complications were seen. One patient developed scrotal hematoma requiring drainage. Only 15 patients are available for follow-up and all are socially continent (one pad or less). Conclusions., Transscrotal approach is used safely and efficiently for penile implants and AUS implantation. The new enhancements to the one-scrotal incision technique allow more proximal cuff placement as evidenced by the bulbocavernosus muscle dissection and use of larger cuffs. Continence rate is similar to rates achieved with perineal placement of cuff found in the literature. Wilson SK, Aliotta PJ, Salem EA, and Mulcahy JJ. New enhancements of the scrotal one incision technique for placement of artificial urinary sphincter allow proximal cuff placement. J Sex Med 2010;7:3510,3515. [source]

Current use of the artificial urinary sphincter and its long-term durability: A nationwide survey in Japan

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 1 2009
Yoichi Arai
Objectives: Although the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is one of the most effective surgical treatments for severe urinary incontinence, little is known about its use in Japan. A nationwide survey was done to determine contemporary trends in AUS use and its long-term durability. Methods: Data on AUS units sold in Japan were provided directly by Takai Hospital Supply Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, and a survey form was sent to all 44 institutes where AUS implantation had been carried out. The survey included various demographic and preoperative variables, surgical variables, and postoperative outcomes. Results: Between 1994 and 2007, a total of 100 AUS devices had been provided in Japan. Of the 44 institutes, 24 responded to the survey, and a total of 64 patients were enrolled in the study. Post-urological surgery incontinence accounted for 81.3% of the indications. During the mean follow-up of 50 months, mechanical failure occurred in four (6.2%), and the device was removed in 13 (20.3%) due to infection (14.0%), erosion (4.7%), or urination difficulty (1.5%). Of the 58 patients evaluated, 91.4% reported social continence. Five- and 10-year failure-free rates were 74.8% and 70.1%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, operative time was an independent predictor of treatment failure (P = 0.0334). Conclusions: Considering recent trends in prostate surgery, the AUS may be significantly underused in Japan. Although excellent long-term durability has been achieved, a learning effect appears to be evident. The Japanese urological community needs to provide appropriate patients with this treatment option. [source]

Static single channel and multichannel water perfusion pressure profilometry in a bench model of a urethra,,

NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, Issue 7 2010
G.R. Hirst
Abstract Aims To determine the catheter perfusion and withdrawal rate which generate the most repeatable single (SCPP) and multichannel pressure profilometry (MCPP) profiles in a bench model. Methods A bench model using a urethral substitute was developed in which SCPP and MCPP were performed using the Brown,Wickham method. One single channel and four multichannel catheters were tested using seven withdrawal rates and three perfusion rates. Repeatability was determined using spread of mean profile pressure, cross-correlation, Bland,Altman statistic, and a one-tailed Student's t -statistic. An artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) model was constructed to create a predictable intraluminal profile. MCPP data were used to generate three-dimensional (3D) images of the pressures exerted by the AUS model. Results A withdrawal rate of 0.5,mm/sec and perfusion rate 1,ml/min produced the most repeatable SCPP profiles with a spread of mean profile pressure ,7,cmH2O. For MCPP, a 10,F 6-channel catheter using a withdrawal rate of 1,mm/sec and perfusion rate of 1,ml/min produced the most similar profiles (cross-correlation,=,0.99). However, the spread of MCPP was large (spread ,44,cmH2O per channel). Nevertheless MCPP was able to consistently demonstrate areas of high pressure as predicted by the AUS model. Conclusions MCPP was not repeatable and is an unreliable measure of urethral pressure. MCPP and 3D images do demonstrate directional differences predicted from the AUS model. These may be of use for qualitative understanding and appreciation of relative relationships if not actual forces within the urethra and have application in understanding urethral function in vivo. Neurourol. Urodynam. 29:1312,1319, 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

New Enhancements of the Scrotal One-Incision Technique for Placement of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Allow Proximal Cuff Placement

Management of recurrent anastomotic stenosis following radical prostatectomy using holmium laser and steroid injection

BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 7 2008
Ehab Eltahawy
OBJECTIVE To present our experience with the management of recurrent and resistant anastomotic stenosis following radical prostatectomy (RP) using transurethral laser incision of the stenotic area and injection of steroids. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 1999 and April 2006, we evaluated 24 patients with anastomotic stenosis that would not allow the passage of the flexible cystoscope (17 F). Using the paediatric 7.5 F Olympus scope and a 550-µm fibre holmium laser, deep incisions were cut at the 3 and 9 o'clock positions at the bladder neck, and then triamcinolone was injected at the incision sites. Another session was then scheduled for office cystoscopy 6 weeks later, and if that showed evidence of annularity, another incision was made, as described above. RESULTS All 24 patients had RP for localized disease, 21 were retropubic and two were perineal, and one laparoscopic. Five patients had adjuvant radiotherapy. The mean patient age was 64 years. Nineteen (79%) patients had previous attempts to open the bladder neck: eight patients had dilatation, eight patients had internal urethrotomy, five patients underwent transurethral resection of the bladder neck, and six patients had open surgical intervention. The procedure was done once in 17 patients, and twice in seven patients. After a mean (range) follow up of 24 (6,72) months, 19 patients (83%) had a well-healed and widely patent bladder neck. Of the 24 patients, 17 had urinary incontinence (UI) associated with the bladder neck contracture. An artificial urinary sphincter was implanted in 11 patients, three of which had to be explanted for malfunction in two, and erosion in one. CONCLUSION Holmium laser bladder neck incision and steroid injection for anastomotic stenosis after RP had a success rate of 83% in this small series. It can be used safely as a primary treatment, or in some cases, for resistant and recurrent stenosis. It appears that insertion of an artificial sphincter can be done in patients with UI when the bladder neck remains patent for at least 8 weeks. [source]

84 One year results of a French, multicentre, prospective clinical study of act® (adjustable continence therapy) for the treatment of female of stress urinary incontinence due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency

BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 2006
E. CHARTIER KASTLER
Introduction:, This Prospective, multicentre clinical investigation sought to assess the feasibility and efficacy of the adjustable balloons ACT® for treatment of female Stress Urinary Incontinence SUI with ISD. Materials and Methods:, The ACT® implant consists of a two-lumen conduit of variable length with an expandable silicone balloon (0.5,8 cc) on the proximal end and a distal subcutaneous titanium port. Two balloons were placed periurethrally at the bladder neck. Continence rate (no leakage during direct visual stress test with 250 ml placed in the bladder), improvement, failures, quality of life (I-QoL) and morbidity were assessed. Results:, Sixty-seven patients (62 ± 9.8-years-old) were implanted in France during 75 procedures (8 revisions). Average follow-up was 12 months. At baseline, urethral closure pressure was 22.5 ± 10.8 cm H2Oand 39 patients (58%) had previously undergone at least one surgery for SUI. Continence increased from 0% at baseline to 57% at1 year and I-QoL improved from 39.4 ± 19 at baseline to 63.7 ± 23.3 at one year. Balloon adjustment was required in 64% of patients. Complications included erosion (11%), spontaneously resolved retention (2%) and infection (4%). Conclusion:, ACT® offers a viable alternative for the treatment of SUI in female with ISD. The implantation is a minimally invasive and efficient procedure and stable over time therapy for patients with severe SUI with ISD. Implantation can be done under local anaesthesia. The positioning of ACT® treatment versus artificial urinary sphincter still needs to be determined. [source]

87 French multicentric prospective study for treatment of postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence (SUI) using adjustable continence therapy (PROACTÔ)

BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 2006
E. CHARTIER KASTLER
Introduction:, This study assessed the feasibility and efficacy of ProACTÔ for treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence. Material and methods:, Using fluoroscopic control two percutaneous balloons are placed at the vesico-urethral anastomosis (Prostatectomy; Ablatherm) or the apex (TURP) and filled with isotonic solution. Postoperatively, 1 ml can be titrated monthly until optimum continence is achieved. Results:, Fifty-eight patients were implanted, 52 postcancer treatment (51 Radical Prostatectomy with 11/51 postradiotherapy and 1/52 Ablatherm) and six following benign surgery (four TURP and two other prostatectomies). Mean age was 70.8 years old (56.6,87.2) with time since initial surgery 5.3 years (6 months,20.6 years). Prior surgical incontinence treatments included artificial urinary sphincters (eight), bulking agent injections (three) and male sling (one). Mean urethral closure pressure (n = 36) was 49 cm of H2O at baseline. Average pads/day was 2.9 (1 to 10). Mean quality of life (I-QoL) was 45 (2,85). At median follow-up (14 months), 11 patients (19%) were dry, 21 (36%) improved, 17 (29 %) unchanged; 2 (3.4%) worse and seven (12%) had undergone explanation. Quality of Life increased to 61 (17,100). Of the 24 postradical prostatectomy patients without radiotherapy, 92 % are improved, 38 % being completely dry. However six (55%) of postradiotherapy patients failed. Sixteen patients required explanation due to infection (two); urinary retention (one); urethral erosion (one); pain (one), defective balloons (two); other (one) non-response (eight). Four patients were successfully re-implanted. Conclusion:, ProACT is an effective treatment option as an alternative to the artificial urinary sphincter. [source]

Combined external urethral bulking and artificial urinary sphincter for urethral atrophy and stress urinary incontinence

BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 6 2005
Nadeem U. Rahman
OBJECTIVE To describe a technique of externally bulking the urethra with a soft-tissue graft before placing another artificial urinary sphincter (AUS), as when placing another AUS for recurrent male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) other manoeuvres, e.g. placing a tandem cuff or transcorporal cuff, must be used to obtain urinary continence in an atrophic urethra, and each is associated with morbidity. PATIENTS AND METHODS From January 2003 to July 2004, five patients (mean age 74 years, range 62,84) treated by radical prostatectomy were referred for recurrent SUI after placing an AUS (four, including one with urethral erosion) or a male sling (one, with a resulting atrophic urethra). Each patient was treated with an external urethral bulking agent (Surgisis® ES, Cook Urological, Spencer, Indiana) and had an AUS placed. RESULTS In each patient the greatest urethral circumference was <4 cm. To place a functional 4 cm cuff, the diameter of the urethra was enhanced by wrapping it with Surgisis ES. Continence was significantly improved in all patients except one 84-year-old man who had the replanted artificial sphincter removed because of erosion 14 months after surgery. CONCLUSION In cases of severe recurrent SUI from urethral atrophy after placing an AUS, externally bulking the urethra with Surgisis ES before placing another AUS is well tolerated, and gives satisfactory results. [source]

Experience with non-cycled artificial urinary sphincters

BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 7 2004
C.D.A. Herndon
Papers in this section review experience with artificial urinary sphincters, hypospadias, and the exstrophy/epispadias complex. Also, in keeping with a significant theme of urological trauma in this issue of the journal, authors from Mansoura evaluate the late renal functional and morphological evaluation of high-grade renal injuries in children after conservative treatment. OBJECTIVE To report our experience in children and adolescents with a non-cycled artificial urinary sphincter. While some children with the AUS can void, others require clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) through the sphincter or an alternative site for catheterization; in some of the latter we have either not cycled (pumped) an activated AUS or the AUS has failed, and there is concern about ischaemia in some adults with a non-cycled AUS. PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 143 patients who had an AUS placed between 1980 and 2002 were reviewed retrospectively; 15 (10 boys and five girls) no longer cycled (pumped) their AUS. The mean age at AUS insertion was 11 years and the mean (range) follow-up after insertion was 10.4 (1.64,22.2) years. The diagnoses included myelomeningocele in 11, sacral agenesis in three and cloaca in one. Nine patients have an activated functioning AUS and in six the AUS does not function; in the first nine the sphincter has not routinely been cycled (pumped) for a mean (range) of 1.6 (0.6,2.9) years. In the other six with a nonfunctioning AUS the mean (range) observation period is 6.4 (1.5,10) years since the system has not functioned. RESULTS All patients were completely continent, including the six with a nonfunctioning AUS. After inserting the AUS, two patients voided in combination with CIC (one each urethral and abdominal stoma) and 13 emptied by CIC (nine abdominal stoma, four urethral). There was a mechanical complication in eight patients; three had the AUS repaired and are dry, and five are dry with no repair. In one patient the AUS was never activated. To date there has been no erosion of the cuff in any of the 15 patients with a non-cycled AUS. CONCLUSION The AUS remains an extremely reliable procedure to achieve continence in children and young adults. It is versatile and can be combined with other procedures that provide an alternative means for catheterization. While some have noted the need to routinely cycle the AUS to prevent erosion, this has not been our experience in these 15 patients. [source]

87 French multicentric prospective study for treatment of postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence (SUI) using adjustable continence therapy (PROACTÔ)