Home About us Contact | |||
Uncontrolled Hemorrhage (uncontrolled + hemorrhage)
Selected AbstractsUncontrolled Hemorrhage in Insulin-dependent Diabetic RatsACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 8 2009Eric J. Morley MD Abstract Objectives:, Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a known risk factor for higher morbidity and mortality after trauma. The authors tested the hypothesis that there is a difference in the response to uncontrolled hemorrhage between normal euglycemic rats and insulin-dependent diabetic rats. Methods:, Thirty-one adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were used in this study. Fifteen streptozocin (STZ)-injected rats became diabetic (DM+) 2 weeks after treatment. Sixteen rats served as nondiabetic controls (DM,). All rats were anesthetized with Althesin and their femoral arteries were catheterized via cutdown, allowing continuous monitoring of vital signs. Sixteen (eight DM,, eight DM+) rats underwent uncontrolled hemorrhage by 75% tail amputation. Fifteen (eight DM,, seven DM+) rats served as nonhemorrhage controls. The mean arterial pressure (MAP), lactate, and cumulative hemorrhage volume per 100 g were measured prehemorrhage and then every 15 minutes posthemorrhage for 2 hours. Data were reported as mean ± standard deviation. Interval data were analyzed by analysis of variance (two tails, , = 0.05). Results:, Prehemorrhage glucose was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the DM+ (357.9 ± 22.2 mg/dL) versus DM, (125.7 ± 9.7 mg/dL) rats. At baseline, there was no significant difference in weight, MAP, or lactate between DM+ and DM, rats. Body-weight-adjusted mean cumulative hemorrhage volume was significantly greater (p < 0.04) in diabetic rats (2.52 ± 0.15 cm3/100 g body weight) than the nondiabetic rats (1.86 ± 0.25 cm3/100 g body weight). Conclusions:, Compared to nondiabetic rats, diabetic rats suffered a greater blood loss after the same uncontrolled vascular injury. [source] An Alternative Hemostatic Dressing: Comparison of CELOX, HemCon, and QuikClotACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 1 2008Buddy G. Kozen MD Abstract Objectives:, Uncontrolled hemorrhage remains a leading cause of traumatic death. Several topical adjunct agents have been shown to be effective in controlling hemorrhage, and two, chitosan wafer dressing (HemCon [HC]) and zeolite powder dressing (QuikClot [QC]), are being utilized regularly on the battlefield. However, recent literature reviews have concluded that no ideal topical agent exists. The authors compared a new chitosan granule dressing (CELOX [CX]) to HC, QC and standard dressing in a lethal hemorrhagic groin injury. Methods:, A complex groin injury with transection of the femoral vessels and 3 minutes of uncontrolled hemorrhage was created in 48 swine. The animals were then randomized to four treatment groups (12 animals each). Group 1 included standard gauze dressing (SD); Group 2, CX; Group 3, HC; and Group 4, QC. Each agent was applied with 5 minutes of manual pressure followed by a standard field compression dressing. Hetastarch (500 mL) was infused over 30 minutes. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded over 180 minutes. Primary endpoints included rebleed and death. Results:, CX reduced rebleeding to 0% (p < 0.001), HC to 33% (95% CI = 19.7% to 46.3%, p = 0.038), and QC to 8% (95% CI = 3.3% to 15.7%, p = 0.001), compared to 83% (95% CI = 72.4% to 93.6%) for SD. CX improved survival to 100% compared to SD at 50% (95% CI = 35.9% to 64.2%, p = 0.018). Survival for HC (67%) (95% CI = 53.7% to 80.3%) and QC (92%; 95% CI = 84.3% to 99.7%) did not differ from SD. Conclusions:, In this porcine model of uncontrolled hemorrhage, CX improved hemorrhage control and survival. CELOX is a viable alternative for the treatment of severe hemorrhage. [source] Uncontrolled Hemorrhage in Insulin-dependent Diabetic RatsACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 8 2009Eric J. Morley MD Abstract Objectives:, Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a known risk factor for higher morbidity and mortality after trauma. The authors tested the hypothesis that there is a difference in the response to uncontrolled hemorrhage between normal euglycemic rats and insulin-dependent diabetic rats. Methods:, Thirty-one adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were used in this study. Fifteen streptozocin (STZ)-injected rats became diabetic (DM+) 2 weeks after treatment. Sixteen rats served as nondiabetic controls (DM,). All rats were anesthetized with Althesin and their femoral arteries were catheterized via cutdown, allowing continuous monitoring of vital signs. Sixteen (eight DM,, eight DM+) rats underwent uncontrolled hemorrhage by 75% tail amputation. Fifteen (eight DM,, seven DM+) rats served as nonhemorrhage controls. The mean arterial pressure (MAP), lactate, and cumulative hemorrhage volume per 100 g were measured prehemorrhage and then every 15 minutes posthemorrhage for 2 hours. Data were reported as mean ± standard deviation. Interval data were analyzed by analysis of variance (two tails, , = 0.05). Results:, Prehemorrhage glucose was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the DM+ (357.9 ± 22.2 mg/dL) versus DM, (125.7 ± 9.7 mg/dL) rats. At baseline, there was no significant difference in weight, MAP, or lactate between DM+ and DM, rats. Body-weight-adjusted mean cumulative hemorrhage volume was significantly greater (p < 0.04) in diabetic rats (2.52 ± 0.15 cm3/100 g body weight) than the nondiabetic rats (1.86 ± 0.25 cm3/100 g body weight). Conclusions:, Compared to nondiabetic rats, diabetic rats suffered a greater blood loss after the same uncontrolled vascular injury. [source] Preclinical Studies with Adrenomedullin and Its Binding Protein as Cardiovascular Protective Agents for Hemorrhagic ShockCARDIOVASCULAR THERAPEUTICS, Issue 3-4 2006Rongqian Wu ABSTRACT Traumatic injury is a major, largely unrecognized public health problem in the US that cuts across race, gender, age, and economic boundaries. The resulting loss of productive life years exceeds that of any other disease, with societal costs of $469 billion annually. Most trauma deaths result either from insufficient tissue perfusion due to excessive blood loss, or the development of inflammation, infection, and vital organ damage following resuscitation. Clinical management of hemorrhagic shock relies on massive and rapid infusion of fluids to maintain blood pressure. However, the majority of victims with severe blood loss do not respond well to fluid restoration. The development of effective strategies for resuscitation of traumatic blood loss is therefore critically needed. We have recently discovered that the vascular responsiveness to a recently-discovered potent vasodilatory peptide, adrenomedullin (AM) is depressed after severe blood loss, which may be due to downregulation of a novel specific binding protein, AM binding protein-1 (AMBP-1). Using three different animal models of hemorrhage (controlled hemorrhage with large volume resuscitation, controlled hemorrhage with low volume resuscitation, and uncontrolled hemorrhage with minimum resuscitation), we have shown that cell and organ injury occurs after hemorrhage despite fluid resuscitation. Administration of AM/AMBP-1 significantly improves cardiac output, heart performance and tissue perfusion, attenuates hepatic and renal injury, decreases pro-inflammatory cytokines, prevents metabolic acidosis, and reduces hemorrhage-induced mortality. Thus, administration of AM/AMBP-1 appears to be a novel and useful approach for restoring cardiovascular responses, preventing organ injury, and reducing mortality after hemorrhagic shock. [source] An Alternative Hemostatic Dressing: Comparison of CELOX, HemCon, and QuikClotACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 1 2008Buddy G. Kozen MD Abstract Objectives:, Uncontrolled hemorrhage remains a leading cause of traumatic death. Several topical adjunct agents have been shown to be effective in controlling hemorrhage, and two, chitosan wafer dressing (HemCon [HC]) and zeolite powder dressing (QuikClot [QC]), are being utilized regularly on the battlefield. However, recent literature reviews have concluded that no ideal topical agent exists. The authors compared a new chitosan granule dressing (CELOX [CX]) to HC, QC and standard dressing in a lethal hemorrhagic groin injury. Methods:, A complex groin injury with transection of the femoral vessels and 3 minutes of uncontrolled hemorrhage was created in 48 swine. The animals were then randomized to four treatment groups (12 animals each). Group 1 included standard gauze dressing (SD); Group 2, CX; Group 3, HC; and Group 4, QC. Each agent was applied with 5 minutes of manual pressure followed by a standard field compression dressing. Hetastarch (500 mL) was infused over 30 minutes. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded over 180 minutes. Primary endpoints included rebleed and death. Results:, CX reduced rebleeding to 0% (p < 0.001), HC to 33% (95% CI = 19.7% to 46.3%, p = 0.038), and QC to 8% (95% CI = 3.3% to 15.7%, p = 0.001), compared to 83% (95% CI = 72.4% to 93.6%) for SD. CX improved survival to 100% compared to SD at 50% (95% CI = 35.9% to 64.2%, p = 0.018). Survival for HC (67%) (95% CI = 53.7% to 80.3%) and QC (92%; 95% CI = 84.3% to 99.7%) did not differ from SD. Conclusions:, In this porcine model of uncontrolled hemorrhage, CX improved hemorrhage control and survival. CELOX is a viable alternative for the treatment of severe hemorrhage. [source] |