			Home About us Contact

Unprovoked Seizures (unprovoked + seizures)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Incidence Studies of Epilepsy and Unprovoked Seizures

EPILEPSIA, Issue 11 2002
Irene A. W. Kotsopoulos
Summary: ,Purpose: To evaluate the methodology of incidence studies of epilepsy and unprovoked seizures and to assess the value of their findings by summarizing their results. Methods: A Medline literature search from January 1966 to December 1999 was conducted. In each selected study, key methodologic items such as case definition and study design were evaluated. Furthermore, a quantitative meta-analysis of the incidence data was performed. Results: Forty incidence studies met the inclusion criteria. There was considerable heterogeneity in study methodology, and the methodologic quality score was generally low. The median incidence rate of epilepsy and unprovoked seizures was 47.4 and 56 per 100,000, respectively. The age-specific incidence of epilepsy was high in those aged 60 years or older, but was highest in childhood. Males had a slightly higher incidence of epilepsy (median, 50.7/100,000) than did females (median, 46.2/100,000), and partial seizures seemed to occur more often than generalized seizures. Developing countries had a higher incidence rate of epilepsy (median, 68.7/100,000) than did industrialized countries (median, 43.4/100,000). Similar results were found for unprovoked seizures. The incidence of epilepsy over time appears to decrease in children, whereas it increases in the elderly. Conclusions: The age-specific incidence of epilepsy showed a bimodal distribution with the highest peak in childhood. No definitive conclusions could be reached for the incidence of unprovoked seizures and other specific incidence rates of epilepsy. More incidence studies with an adequate study methodology are needed to explore geographic variations and time trends of the incidence of epilepsy and unprovoked seizures. [source]

Interobserver reliability of visual interpretation of electroencephalograms in children with newly diagnosed seizures

DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE & CHILD NEUROLOGY, Issue 5 2006
Hans Stroink MD
The reliability of visual interpretation of electroencephalograms (EEG) is of great importance in assessing the value of this diagnostic tool. We prospectively obtained 50 standard EEGs and 61 EEGs after partial sleep deprivation from 93 children (56 males, 37 females) with a mean age of 6 years 10 months (SE 5mo; range 4mo,15y 7mo) with one or more newly diagnosed, unprovoked seizures. Two clinical neurophysiologists independently classified the background pattern and the presence of epileptiform discharges or focal non-epileptiform abnormalities of each EEG. The agreement was substantial for the interpretation of the EEG as normal or abnormal (kappa 0.66), almost perfect for the presence of epileptiform discharges (kappa 0.83), substantial for the occurrence of an abnormal background pattern (kappa 0.73), and moderate for the presence of focal non-epileptiform discharges (kappa 0.54). In conclusion, the reliability of the visual interpretation of EEGs in children is almost perfect as regards the presence of epileptiform abnormalities, and moderate to substantial for the presence of other abnormalities. [source]

Recommendation for a definition of acute symptomatic seizure

EPILEPSIA, Issue 4 2010
Ettore Beghi
Summary Purpose:, To consider the definition of acute symptomatic seizures for epidemiological studies, and to refine the criteria used to distinguish these seizures from unprovoked seizures for specific etiologies. Methods:, Systematic review of the literature and of epidemiologic studies. Results:, An acute symptomatic seizure is defined as a clinical seizure occurring at the time of a systemic insult or in close temporal association with a documented brain insult. Suggestions are made to define acute symptomatic seizures as those events occurring within 1 week of stroke, traumatic brain injury, anoxic encephalopathy, or intracranial surgery; at first identification of subdural hematoma; at the presence of an active central nervous system (CNS) infection; or during an active phase of multiple sclerosis or other autoimmune diseases. In addition, a diagnosis of acute symptomatic seizure should be made in the presence of severe metabolic derangements (documented within 24 h by specific biochemical or hematologic abnormalities), drug or alcohol intoxication and withdrawal, or exposure to well-defined epileptogenic drugs. Discussion:, Acute symptomatic seizures must be distinguished from unprovoked seizures and separately categorized for epidemiologic purposes. These recommendations are based upon the best available data at the time of this report. Systematic studies should be undertaken to better define the associations in question, with special reference to metabolic and toxic insults, for which the time window for the occurrence of an acute symptomatic seizure and the absolute values for toxic and metabolic dysfunction still require a clear identification. [source]

Validation of a brief screening instrument for the ascertainment of epilepsy

EPILEPSIA, Issue 2 2010
Ruth Ottman
Summary Purpose:, To validate a brief screening instrument for identifying people with epilepsy in epidemiologic or genetic studies. Methods:, We designed a nine-question screening instrument for epilepsy and administered it by telephone to individuals with medical record,documented epilepsy (lifetime history of ,2 unprovoked seizures, n = 168) or isolated unprovoked seizure (n = 54), and individuals who were seizure-free on medical record review (n = 120), from a population-based study using Rochester Epidemiology Project resources. Interviewers were blinded to record-review findings. Results:, Sensitivity (the proportion of individuals who screened positive among affected individuals) was 96% for epilepsy and 87% for isolated unprovoked seizure. The false positive rate (FPR, the proportion who screened positive among seizure-free individuals) was 7%. The estimated positive predictive value (PPV) for epilepsy was 23%, assuming a lifetime prevalence of 2% in the population. Use of only a single question asking whether the subject had ever had epilepsy or a seizure disorder resulted in sensitivity 76%, FPR 0.8%, and estimated PPV 66%. Subjects with epilepsy were more likely to screen positive with this question if they were diagnosed after 1964 or continued to have seizures for at least 5 years after diagnosis. Discussion:, Given its high sensitivity, our instrument may be useful for the first stage of screening for epilepsy; however, the PPV of 23% suggests that only about one in four screen-positive individuals will be truly affected. Screening with a single question asking about epilepsy yields a higher PPV but lower sensitivity, and screen-positive subjects may be biased toward more severe epilepsy. [source]

A Follow-up Survey on Seizures Induced by Animated Cartoon TV Program "Pocket Monster"

EPILEPSIA, Issue 4 2004
Yoshiko Ishiguro
Summary: Purpose: To identify the short-term outcome of patients who had seizures while watching an animated cartoon TV program, "Pocket Monster," on December 16, 1997. Methods: One and three years after the incident, questionnaires were sent to physicians of each patient about seizure recurrence, EEGs, and medication. Results: Among 103 patients in whom epileptic seizures occurred during the TV program and information on the outcomes was available, 25 (24%) patients had a history of unprovoked seizures before the incident (Epilepsy Group), and 78 (76%) did not (Non-Epilepsy Group). Twenty-three (22%) patients were reported to have seizures after the incident, and 15 of them had visually induced seizures. Patients of the Epilepsy Group had more seizure recurrence than did those of the Non-Epilepsy Group (56% vs. 9%; p < 0.0001), either for unprovoked (44% vs. 4%; p < 0.0001) or visually induced seizures (28% vs. 9%; p < 0.05). Of nine patients of the Non-Epilepsy Group who had seizures after the incident, only three developed recurrent unprovoked seizures. In the Non-Epilepsy Group, no difference was found in seizure recurrence between patients in whom valproate (VPA) was prescribed immediately after the incident and in those without medication (one of five (20%) vs. seven of 73 (10%); p > 0.05). EEG was performed at least once in 98 patients after the incident. Photoparoxysmal response (PPR) was present in 45 (46%) patients, and spontaneous epileptiform discharges, in 49 (50%). PPR did not have any correlation with recurrence of seizures, neither spontaneous nor visually induced seizures, whereas spontaneous epileptiform discharges showed a good correlation with seizure recurrence (34% vs. 8%; p < 0.01), including visually induced seizures (24% vs. 2%; p < 0.01). Conclusions: Short-term outcomes showed that 70 (68%) of 103 patients who had a seizure during the incident had no seizures before and during ,3 years of follow-up. [source]

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Incidence Studies of Epilepsy and Unprovoked Seizures

Antiepileptogenesis and Seizure Prevention Trials with Antiepileptic Drugs: Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials

EPILEPSIA, Issue 4 2001
Nancy R. Temkin
Summary: ,Purpose: To synthesize evidence concerning the effect of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for seizure prevention and to contrast their effectiveness for provoked versus unprovoked seizures. Methods: Medline, Embase, and The Cochrane Clinical Trials Register were the primary sources of trials, but all trials found were included. Minimal requirements: seizure-prevention outcome given as fraction of cases; AED or control assigned by random or quasi-random mechanism. Single abstracter. Aggregate relative risk and heterogeneity evaluated using Mantel,Haenszel analyses; random effects model used if heterogeneity was significant. Results: Forty-seven trials evaluated seven drugs or combinations for preventing seizures associated with fever, alcohol, malaria, perinatal asphyxia, contrast media, tumors, craniotomy, and traumatic brain injury. Effective: Phenobarbital for recurrence of febrile seizures [relative risk (RR), 0.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.32,0.82) and cerebral malaria (RR, 0.36; CI, 0.23,0.56). Diazepam for contrast media,associated seizures (RR, 0.10; CI, 0.01,0.79). Phenytoin for provoked seizures after craniotomy or traumatic brain injury (craniotomy: RR, 0.42; CI, 0.25,0.71; TBI: RR, 0.33; CI, 0.19,0.59). Carbamazepine for provoked seizures after traumatic brain injury (RR, 0.39; CI, 0.17,0.92). Lorazepam for alcohol-related seizures (RR, 0.12; CI, 0.04,0.40). More than 25% reduction ruled out valproate for unprovoked seizures after traumatic brain injury (RR, 1.28; CI, 0.76,2.16), and carbamazepine for unprovoked seizures after craniotomy (RR, 1.30; CI, 0.75,2.25). Conclusions: Effective or promising results predominate for provoked (acute, symptomatic) seizures. For unprovoked (epileptic) seizures, no drug has been shown to be effective, and some have had a clinically important effect ruled out. [source]

Epilepsy Can Be Diagnosed When the First Two Seizures Occur on the Same Day

EPILEPSIA, Issue 9 2000
Peter Camfield
Summary: Purpose: Experts have suggested that when the first two (or more) unprovoked seizures occur on the same day, they should be considered as a single event and the diagnosis of epilepsy await a further seizure. We have studied the subsequent clinical course of children with their first two seizures on the same day ("same day" group) compared with children with their first two seizures separated by more than one day ("different day" group). Method: The Nova Scotia childhood epilepsy database documented all newly diagnosed children with epilepsy from 1977 to 1985 with follow-up in 1990 and 1991. Epilepsy was defined as two or more unprovoked seizures regardless of the interval between seizures provided that consciousness fully returned between seizures. All patients had their first seizure between the ages of 1 month and 16 years. Seizure types were restricted to partial, generalized tonic-clonic, and partial with secondary generalization. Results: Of the 490 children with partial or generalized tonic-clonic seizures and follow-up of more than 2 years, 70 had their first two or more seizures on the same day and 420 had their first two seizures on different days. Eighty percent (56 of 70) of the "same day" group subsequently had one or more further seizures with (n = 14) or without (n = 42) medication; 80.9% (340 of 420) of the "different day" group had one or more further seizures with (n = 115) or without (n = 225) medication. Seizure types were nearly identical. Cause was the same (except for fewer idiopathic "genetic" cases in the "same day" group: 1 of 70 vs. 42 of 420; p = 0.02). Rates of mental handicap and previous febrile seizures were the same. Children in the "same day" group were younger on average (60 vs. 84 months; p = 0.001) and were somewhat more likely to have neurological impairment. Outcome after 7 years average follow-up was the same: 58% of the "same day" group and 56% of the "different day" group were in remission. Conclusion: If two or more unprovoked seizures (with normal consciousness between) occur on the same day, the child appears to have epilepsy and will have a clinical course identical to that of the child with a longer time interval between the first two seizures. [source]

Evaluation of first unprovoked seizures in children by general paediatricians in New Zealand

JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, Issue 11 2006
Rachel E Johnson
Aim: To determine current practice of general paediatricians in New Zealand in the investigation and management of a first unprovoked seizure in childhood. Methods: A self-administered questionnaire was emailed to 109 general paediatricians in New Zealand. The questionnaire presented the participant with three hypothetical case scenarios representing a generalised tonic clonic seizure, a complex partial seizure and an episode of non-specific collapse. The participant was asked to indicate what investigations and course of management was required. Results: Forty-seven questionnaires were returned. Primary investigations included an electroencephalogram (EEG) in 47% of cases after a first generalised tonic clonic seizure increasing to 89% after a second. Ninety-one per cent of paediatricians were likely to request an EEG after a complex partial seizure. No paediatrician would request neuroimaging following a first generalised tonic clonic seizure. Neuroimaging was requested by 10% of paediatricians following a second generalised tonic clonic seizure and by 47% following a complex partial seizure. No paediatrician elected to initiate antiepileptic drugs after a first generalised tonic clonic seizure, but 49% would initiate treatment after a second generalised tonic clonic seizure. Eleven per cent of paediatricians would start treatment after a single complex partial seizure. Conclusion: Less than 50% of general paediatricians would request an EEG after a first unprovoked seizure. This is an unexpectedly low rate that may reflect accessibility. New Zealand paediatricians had an appropriately low rate of requesting neuroimaging. As currently recommended no general paediatricians began antiepileptic drugs in the scenario of a single uncomplicated seizure in the absence of other risk factors. [source]