Home About us Contact | |||
UNOS Database (uno + database)
Selected AbstractsLow donor-to-recipient weight ratio does not negatively impact survival of pediatric heart transplant patientsPEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2010Liwen Tang Tang L, Du W, Delius RE, L'Ecuyer TJ, Zilberman MV. Low donor-to-recipient weight ratio does not negatively impact survival of pediatric heart transplant patients. Pediatr Transplantation 2010: 14:741,745. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract:, A major limitation to success in pediatric heart transplantation is donor organ shortage. While the use of allografts from donors larger than the recipient is accepted, the use of undersized donor grafts is generally discouraged. Using the UNOS database, we wanted to evaluate whether using smaller donor hearts affects the short- and long-term survival of pediatric heart transplant patients. A retrospective analysis of data entered into the UNOS database from April 1994 to May 2008 was performed. Pediatric heart transplant recipients (ages 0,18 yr) with DRWR <2.0 were identified and divided into two groups: Low-DRWR (<0.8) and Ideal-DRWR (0.8,2.0). Patients' demographics, pretransplant diagnoses, age at transplantation, severity of pretransplant condition, and rate of complications prior to hospital discharge after transplantation were noted. Fisher's exact, chi-square, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare patients' baseline characteristics. Kaplan,Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard regression were used to compare patients' survival and to identify independent risk factors for outcomes. There were 3048 patients (204 with Low- and 2844 with Ideal-DRWR). The Low-ratio group patients were older (8.3 vs. 6.9 yr; p = 0.001), there was a slight male predominance in the Low-DRWR group (p = 0.055). The Low-DRWR group had longer transplant wait time than the Ideal-DRWR group (97 vs. 85 days; p = 0.04). The groups did not differ in race, primary diagnoses, severity of pretransplant condition (medical urgency status, need for ventilation, inotropic support, ECMO, nitric oxide, or dialysis, the PVR for those with bi-ventricular anatomy), or post-transplant complications (length of stay, need for inotropic support, dialysis, and rate of infections). The Low-DRWR patients had less episodes of acute rejection during the first-post-transplant month. Infants with DRWR 0.5,0.59 had lower 30-day survival rate (p = 0.045). There was no difference in short- and long-term survival between the patients with DRWR 0.6,0.79 and DRWR 0.8,2.0. Use of smaller allografts (DRWR 0.6,0.8) has no negative impact on the short- and long-term survival of pediatric heart transplant patients. [source] Orthotopic liver transplantation for children with Alagille syndromePEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 5 2010Ronen Arnon Arnon R, Annunziato R, Miloh T, Suchy F, Sakworawich A, Hiroshi S, Kishore I, Kerkar N. Orthotopic liver transplantation for children with Alagille syndrome. Pediatr Transplantation 2010: 14:622,628. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract:, AGS is an inherited disorder involving the liver, heart, eyes, face, and skeleton. Aim: To determine the outcome of LT in children with AGS compared to those with BA. Methods: Children with AGS and BA who had a LT between 10/1987 and 5/2008 were identified from the UNOS database. Results: Of 11 467 children who received a liver transplant, 461 (4.0%) had AGS and 3056 (26.7%) had BA. One- and five-yr patient survival was significantly lower in patients with AGS in comparison with patients with BA (AGS; 82.9%, 78.4%, BA; 89.9%, 84%, respectively). Early death (<30 days from transplant) was significantly higher in AGS than in BA. One- and five-yr graft survival was significantly lower in AGS than in BA (AGS; 74.7%, 61.5%, BA; 81.6%, 70.0%, respectively). Death from graft failure, neurological, and cardiac complications was significantly higher in patients with AGS than in patients with BA. Serum creatinine at transplant, prior LT, and cold ischemic time >12 h were identified as risk factors for death. Conclusion: Children with AGS were older at the time of LT and their one- and five-yr patient and graft survival were significantly lower compared to BA. Risk factors for poor outcome in AGS after LT were identified. [source] Histidine,Tryptophan,Ketoglutarate (HTK) Is Associated with Reduced Graft Survival in Deceased Donor Livers, Especially Those Donated After Cardiac DeathAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2009Z. A. Stewart Single-center studies have reported that liver allograft survival is not affected by preservation in histidine,tryptophan,ketoglutarate (HTK) versus University of Wisconsin (UW) solution. We analyzed the UNOS database of liver transplants performed from July, 2004, through February, 2008, to determine if preservation with HTK (n = 4755) versus UW (n = 12 673) impacted graft survival. HTK preservation of allografts increased from 16.8% in 2004 to 26.9% in 2008; this was particularly striking among donor after cardiac death (DCD) allografts, rising from 20.7% in 2004 to 40.9% in 2008. After adjusting for donor, recipient and graft factors that affect graft survival, HTK preservation was associated with an increased risk of graft loss (HR 1.14, p = 0.002), especially with DCD allografts (HR 1.44, P = 0.025) and those with cold ischemia time over 8 h (HR 1.16, P = 0.009). Furthermore, HTK preservation was associated with a 1.2-fold higher odds of early (< 30 days) graft loss as compared to UW preservation (OR 1.20, p = 0.012), with a more pronounced effect on allografts with cold ischemia time over 8 h (OR 1.31, p = 0.007), DCD allografts (OR 1.63, p = 0.09) and donors over 70 years (OR 1.67, p = 0.081). These results suggest that the increasing use of HTK for abdominal organ preservation should be reexamined. [source] Obesity and Outcome Following Renal TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2006J. L. Gore Single institution series have demonstrated that obese patients have higher rates of wound infection and delayed graft function (DGF), but similar rates of graft survival. We used UNOS data to determine whether obesity affects outcome following renal transplantation. From the UNOS database, we identified patients who underwent primary kidney-only transplantation between 1997 and 1999. Recipient and donor body mass index (BMI) was categorized as underweight (BMI < 18.5), normal (BMI 18.5,24.9), overweight (BMI 25,29.9), obese (BMI 30,34.9) or morbidly obese (BMI , 35). We correlated BMI with intermediate measures of graft outcome and overall graft survival, and created multivariate models to evaluate the independent effect of BMI on graft outcome, adjusting for factors known to affect graft success. The study sample comprised 27 377 recipients. Older age, female sex, African American race and increased comorbidity were associated with obesity (p < 0.001). Compared with normal weight patients, morbid obesity was independently associated with an increased risk of DGF (p < 0.001), prolonged hospitalization (p < 0.001), acute rejection (p = 0.006) and decreased overall graft survival (p = 0.001). Donor BMI did not affect overall graft survival (p , 0.07). Recipient obesity is associated with an increased risk of DGF and decreased graft survival following renal transplantation. [source] Liver transplantation for sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (veno-occlusive disease): case report with review of the literature and the UNOS databaseCLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 4 2008Fernando E. Membreno Abstract:,Background:, Severe sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) is a life-threatening complication of stem cell transplantation. We report the case of a young man transplanted for SOS. Method:, A single chart review with query of the United Network of Organ Sharing database and review of the medical literature. Case:, A 23-yr-old male diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia underwent a matched unrelated stem cell transplant. The conditioning regimen included high-dose cyclophosphamide and busulfan. Within one month, he developed painful hepatomegaly, jaundice, ascites, and weight gain, and was diagnosed with biopsy-proven SOS. Despite therapy with defibrotide, he continued to deteriorate with the development of progressive renal failure and encephalopathy. The patient underwent orthotopic liver transplantation. After surgery, he developed cytomegalovirus infection and six wk later presented with a bile leak, hepatic artery thrombosis, and a liver abscess. A repeat bone marrow biopsy showed no evidence of recurrent disease. Although the patient was listed for re-transplantation, he succumbed prior to an organ becoming available. Conclusion:, Severe SOS in the setting of bone marrow transplantation portends a poor prognosis. Careful patient selection, timing, and perhaps less immunosuppression should be considered when performing a liver transplantation in the setting of severe SOS. [source] United Network for Organ Sharing's expanded criteria donors: is stratification useful?,CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2005Edwina S. Baskin-Bey Abstract:, The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Expanded Criteria Donor (ECD) system utilizes pre-transplant variables to identify deceased donor kidneys with an increased risk of graft loss. The aim of this study was to compare the ECD system with a quantitative approach, the deceased donor score (DDS), in predicting outcome after kidney transplantation. We retrospectively reviewed 49 111 deceased donor renal transplants from the UNOS database between 1984 and 2002. DDS: 0,39 points; ,20 points defined as marginal. Recipient outcome variables were analyzed by ANOVA or Kaplan,Meier method. There was a 90% agreement between the DDS and ECD systems as predictors of renal function and graft survival. However, DDS identified ECD, kidneys (10.7%) with a significantly poorer outcome than expected (DDS 20,29 points, n = 5,252). Stratification of ECD+ kidneys identified a group with the poorest outcome (DDS ,30 points). Predictability of early post-transplant events (i.e. need for hemodialysis, decline of serum creatinine and length of hospital stay) was also improved by DDS. DDS predicted outcome of deceased donor renal transplantation better than the ECD system. Knowledge obtained by stratification of deceased donor kidneys can allow for improved utilization of marginal kidneys which is not achieved by the UNOS ECD definition alone. [source] |