Home About us Contact | |||
Ultrasonic Scaling (ultrasonic + scaling)
Selected AbstractsIn vitro evaluation of Er:YAG laser scaling of subgingival calculus in comparison with ultrasonic scalingJOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, Issue 5 2000A. Aoki The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Er:YAG laser scaling and the morphological and histological changes of the laser-scaled root surface in comparison with the effectiveness and root surface changes produced by conventional ultrasonic scaling. Fifty-three periodontally involved human extracted teeth with a band of subgingival calculus were used. The teeth were divided randomly into 2 groups for laser scaling and ultrasonic scaling. Laser irradiation was performed at an energy output of 40 mJ/pulse and 10 pulses/s under water spray, with the probe tip contacted obliquely to the root surface. Ultrasonic scaling was performed at a clinically standard power setting. The time required for scaling, the scaled area and the temperature changes were determined using both methods of treatment. The features of the scaled surfaces were examined by histological and scanning electron microscope (s.e.m.) observations. The Er:YAG laser provided subgingival calculus removal on a level equivalent to that provided by the ultrasonic scaler, without major thermal elevation. Macroscopically, the laser-treated root surface was somewhat rougher than or similar to the ultrasonically scaled root. However, the efficiency of the laser scaling was lower than that of the ultrasonic scaling. In addition, histological examination revealed a thin deeply stained zone on the lased root surface, and s.e.m. analysis revealed a characteristic microroughness on the lased surface. The laser scaling provided a level of calculus removal that was similar to that provided by the ultrasonic scaling. However, the Er:YAG laser produced superficial, structural and thermal microchanges on the root cementum. [source] Significant influence of scaler tip design on root substance loss resulting from ultrasonic scaling: a laserprofilometric in vitro studyJOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, Issue 11 2004Søren Jepsen Abstract Objectives: Ultrasonic scalers have become increasingly popular for subgingival debridement. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of different working tip designs (narrow versus wide) on root substance loss caused by either magnetostrictive or piezoelectric ultrasonic devices. Methods: In this in vitro study, a magnetostrictive ultrasonic system with either Slimline or TFI-10 inserts and a piezoelectric ultrasonic system with either Perioprobe or Type-A inserts were compared at different application forces. Loss of root dentin was determined by defect width, defect depth and defect volume resulting from standardized instrumentation using laser profilometry. Results: There were consistent and statistically significant differences between all groups. The mean observed dentin alterations for the magnetostrictive ultrasonic device operating a Slimline insert at a lateral force of 0.3 N were 254.4 ,m, 6.3 ,m and 22.5 ,m3 and for the TFI-10 tip 759.0 ,m, 23.5 ,m and 160.2 ,m3 for the parameters defect width, depth and volume, respectively. For the piezoelectric ultrasonic system operating a Perioprobe insert, the corresponding mean values were 352.0 ,m/12.1 ,m/56.4 ,m3 and for the universal Type-A insert they were 402.4 ,m/14.0 ,m/133.4 ,m3. With application forces of 0.7 N, root substance removal increased up to twofold. Conclusion: The present investigation could demonstrate that the aggressiveness of magnetostrictive and piezoelectric ultrasonic devices to root substance was significantly influenced by the scaler tip designs, increasing for wider scaler tips as compared with narrow, probe-shaped inserts. [source] In vitro evaluation of Er:YAG laser scaling of subgingival calculus in comparison with ultrasonic scalingJOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, Issue 5 2000A. Aoki The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Er:YAG laser scaling and the morphological and histological changes of the laser-scaled root surface in comparison with the effectiveness and root surface changes produced by conventional ultrasonic scaling. Fifty-three periodontally involved human extracted teeth with a band of subgingival calculus were used. The teeth were divided randomly into 2 groups for laser scaling and ultrasonic scaling. Laser irradiation was performed at an energy output of 40 mJ/pulse and 10 pulses/s under water spray, with the probe tip contacted obliquely to the root surface. Ultrasonic scaling was performed at a clinically standard power setting. The time required for scaling, the scaled area and the temperature changes were determined using both methods of treatment. The features of the scaled surfaces were examined by histological and scanning electron microscope (s.e.m.) observations. The Er:YAG laser provided subgingival calculus removal on a level equivalent to that provided by the ultrasonic scaler, without major thermal elevation. Macroscopically, the laser-treated root surface was somewhat rougher than or similar to the ultrasonically scaled root. However, the efficiency of the laser scaling was lower than that of the ultrasonic scaling. In addition, histological examination revealed a thin deeply stained zone on the lased root surface, and s.e.m. analysis revealed a characteristic microroughness on the lased surface. The laser scaling provided a level of calculus removal that was similar to that provided by the ultrasonic scaling. However, the Er:YAG laser produced superficial, structural and thermal microchanges on the root cementum. [source] |