Home  About us  Contact
 

Beating Donor (beating + donor)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Kinds of Beating Donor

  • non-heart beating donor
    		•

    Selected Abstracts

    Transmission of an undiagnosed sarcoma to recipients of kidney and liver grafts procured in a non-heart beating donor

    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2005
    Olivier Detry
    Transmission of an undiagnosed cancer with solid organ transplantation is a rare but dreadful event. In this paper the authors report the transmission of an undiagnosed sarcoma to recipients of kidney and liver grafts procured in a Maastricht category 3 non-heart beating donor. To the authors' knowledge this case is the first report of such a transmission with a liver graft procured in a non-heart beating donor. The cancer transferal was diagnosed 1 year after transplantation in the recipients of the liver and of one kidney. The liver recipient died from multiple organ failure after a failed attempt of tumor resection. The kidney recipient underwent immunosuppression withdrawal and transplantectomy. Non-heart beating donors should not be particularly at risk for undiagnosed cancer transmission if the procurement is performed according to the same rules of careful inspection of the abdominal and thoracic organs. After diagnosis of donor cancer transmission, kidney recipients should have the graft removed, and immunosuppression should be interrupted. The management of liver graft recipients is very difficult in this setting, and long-term survival was very rarely reported. (Liver Transpl 2005;11:696,699.) [source]

    Progressive interstitial fibrosis of kidney allograft early after transplantation from a non-heart beating donor: possible role of persistent ischemic injury

    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2010
    Kohsuke Masutani
    Masutani K, Kitada H, Yamada S, Tsuchimoto A, Noguchi H, Tsuruya K, Katafuchi R, Tanaka M, Iida M. Progressive interstitial fibrosis of kidney allograft early after transplantation from a non-heart beating donor: Possible role of persistent ischemic injury. Clin Transplant 2010: 24 (Suppl. 22): 70,74. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract:, The donor was 63-yr-old woman with subarachnoid hemorrhage. As she developed severe hypotension for more than four h before cardiac arrest, we biopsied the grafts and decided to transplant those kidneys. Recipient 1 was a 23-yr-old man on 13-yr dialysis program. After 19 d of delayed graft function (DGF), we discontinued hemodialysis (HD). However, the decrease in serum creatinine (sCr) was poor. The minimum sCr was 4.3 mg/dL on post-operative day (POD) 40, and increased to 6.5 mg/dL. The contralateral graft was transplanted to a 61-yr-old man (recipient 2) with 18-yr HD. After 15 d of DGF period, sCr decreased gradually and has been stable at 1.9 mg/dL. In recipient 1, graft biopsies performed on POD 15, 69, and 110, revealed progressive interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA) without evidences of acute rejection, tacrolimus associated injury, reflux nephropathy, or viral nephropathy. The second biopsy on POD 69 showed typical findings of acute tubular necrosis. We compared the clinical courses of the two recipients because certain features of recipient 1, such as age, duration of HD, total ischemic time, and body size were advantageous, whereas graft function was poorer than that in recipient 2. Recipient 1 developed severe anemia following the dissociation of graft function from recipient 2. In this case, posttransplant anemia and lower blood pressure might promote IF/TA through persistent ischemic tubular damage, and positive CMV antigenemia and its treatment could promote anemia. Especially in the kidney allograft from a marginal donor, we should consider various factors to obtain a better graft outcome. [source]

    Transmission of an undiagnosed sarcoma to recipients of kidney and liver grafts procured in a non-heart beating donor

    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2005
    Olivier Detry
    Transmission of an undiagnosed cancer with solid organ transplantation is a rare but dreadful event. In this paper the authors report the transmission of an undiagnosed sarcoma to recipients of kidney and liver grafts procured in a Maastricht category 3 non-heart beating donor. To the authors' knowledge this case is the first report of such a transmission with a liver graft procured in a non-heart beating donor. The cancer transferal was diagnosed 1 year after transplantation in the recipients of the liver and of one kidney. The liver recipient died from multiple organ failure after a failed attempt of tumor resection. The kidney recipient underwent immunosuppression withdrawal and transplantectomy. Non-heart beating donors should not be particularly at risk for undiagnosed cancer transmission if the procurement is performed according to the same rules of careful inspection of the abdominal and thoracic organs. After diagnosis of donor cancer transmission, kidney recipients should have the graft removed, and immunosuppression should be interrupted. The management of liver graft recipients is very difficult in this setting, and long-term survival was very rarely reported. (Liver Transpl 2005;11:696,699.) [source]

    Optimizing the use of donated cadaver livers: Analysis and policy development to increase the application of split-liver transplantation

    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 10 2002
    Jean C. Emond MD
    The American Society of Transplant Surgeons and the American Society of Transplantation jointly sponsored a conference in Crystal City, Virginia, on March 28th and 29th, 2001, to explore mechanisms for maximizing the cadaver-organ donor pool. Participants from transplantation medicine, surgery, organ procurement organizations, the general public, and government convened to address expanding utilization of each organ type. The committee assigned to review liver organ utilization identified multiple practices that could expand the potential donor pool including non,heart beating donors, marginal grafts, efficient allocation of cadaver organs, and wider application of split-liver transplantation. This article details the data reviewed by the liver committee and their recommendations on policy development for the expanded application of split-liver transplantation. [source]

    The long-term outcome of tacrolimus in cadaveric kidney transplantation from non-heart beating donors

    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2005
    Nobuyuki Fukuhara
    Abstract:, Tacrolimus (Tac), developed in 1990, has been applied as an immunosuppressive agent for liver, heart, and kidney transplantation and is known to have more powerful immunosuppressive effects than cyclosporine (CyA). To evaluate the efficacy of Tac in cadaveric kidney transplants from non-heart beating donors, we present the long-term outcome of patients receiving kidneys with ischemic damage, and compared it with that of CyA. Between July 1990 and December 2000, 55 patients with end-stage renal disease received kidneys from non-heart beating donors (Maastrichy category 3) and were treated with Tac and steroid immunosuppressive therapy. During the same period, we also performed 137 non-heart beating cadaveric renal transplants treated with CyA-based immunosuppressive therapy. The patient survival rate was 98% at 1 yr and 96% at 3,10 yr in the Tac group, and 97% at 1,3 yr, 93% at 5 yr and 85% at 10 yr in the CyA group. The graft survival rate was 91% at 1 yr, 80% at 3 yr, 63% at 5 yr and 34% at 10 yr in the Tac group, and 88% at 1 yr, 75% at 3 yr, 63% at 5 yr and 49% at 10 yr in the CyA group. There was no significant difference in either patient or graft survival rates between the two groups. Acute early rejection in the Tac group was less than that in the CyA group but acute tubular necrosis was the same in both groups. This indicates that Tac is available for cadaveric kidney transplants from non-heart beating donors. In conclusion, Tac is available as an immunosuppressive agent even for kidney transplants from non-heart beating donors. [source]