			Home About us Contact

Transplantation Centers (transplantation + center)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Utilization of Defibrillators and Resynchronization Therapy at the Time of Evaluation at a Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Center

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 8 2010
DANIEL B. SIMS M.D.
Background: Internal cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduce mortality, but are underutilized in routine clinical practice. The use of these devices in patients at the time of an initial evaluation at an advanced heart failure and cardiac transplantation center is unknown. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who were enrolled in a database examining parameters of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients at the time of an initial outpatient evaluation at a tertiary care center. Rates of ICD and CRT use in eligible patients were determined. Results: Two hundred two patients had an average age of 54 ± 13 years and an average peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) of 12.5 ± 4.5 mL/kg/min. Of 97 patients eligible for an ICD only, 57% had an ICD at the time of evaluation. Sixty-four percent of ICD-eligible male patients had an ICD compared to 36% of ICD-eligible female patients (P = 0.015). Of 105 patients meeting criteria for CRT, 54% had a CRT device. There was no difference between CRT use in eligible male and female patients. Conclusions: ICDs and CRT are underutilized in patients with severe CHF at the time of evaluation at a tertiary care center despite young age, objective functional limitation, and active consideration for advanced CHF therapies. Female patients have lower rates of ICD use than male patients. (PACE 2010; 988,993) [source]

Pediatric renal transplantation: Single center experience

PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 1 2005
Sevgi Mir
Abstract:, Although renal transplantation (RTx) is actually the first choice of treatment for children with end-stage renal disease, the number of transplanted children remains low in comparison with adults. The experience of the individual pediatric transplant center is very important in the outcome of pediatric transplant recipients. In this study, our pediatric renal transplantation experience is presented. We retrospectively analyzed the results of 72 pediatric renal transplants performed at Ege University Pediatric Nephrology Transplantation Center between June 1989 and May 2003. They were 40 girls, 32 boys and their mean RTx age was 13.27±3.73 yr (range 3,20 yr). Thirty-eight (52.8%) of the transplanted kidneys came from a living related donor, and 34 (47.2%) from a cadaveric donor. Preemptive RTx was performed in one patient and a second RTx was performed in one patient after two-period hemodialysis. Hypertension (31.9%), acute rejection (27.8%) and chronic rejection (13.9%) were the most common complications. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection occurred in 15 children (20.8%), none of whom died or lost their graft as a result of the infection. Pretransplant acquired hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection was detected in 12 patients (16.7%). Urinary tract infections (UTIs) were seen in 31 (43.1%) recipients. The 1, 5 and 10 yr graft survival rates were 91, 84 and 77%, respectively, and corresponding patient survival rates were 97, 84 and 77%, respectively by Kaplan,Meier method. The graft and overall survival was not correlated with sex, donor type, treatment modality, acute rejection episodes, hypertension, UTIs, CMV and HCV infection. [source]

Solid Organ Transplantation After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study of the EBMT

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 8 2010
C. Koenecke
To analyze the outcome of solid organ transplantation (SOT) in patients who had undergone allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), a questionnaire survey was carried out within 107 European Group of Blood and Marrow Transplantation centers. This study covered HSCT between 1984 and 2007 in Europe. Forty-five SOT in 40 patients were reported. Fifteen liver, 15 renal, 13 lung, 1 heart and 1 skin transplantations were performed in 28 centers. Overall survival (OS) of patients after SOT was 78% at 5 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 64% to 92%). OS at 5 years was 100% for renal, 71% (95% CI, 46% to 96%) for liver and 63% (95% CI, 23% to 100%) for lung transplant recipients. The 2-year-incidence of SOT failure was 20% (95% CI, 4% to 36%) in patients with graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and 7% (95% CI, 0% to 21%) in patients without GvHD before SOT. The relapse incidence for underlying malignant diseases was 4% at 5 years (95% CI, 0% to 12%). In summary, this study shows that selected patients receiving SOT after HSCT have a remarkably good overall and organ survival. These data indicate that SOT should be considered in selected patients with single organ failure after HSCT. [source]

Utilization of Defibrillators and Resynchronization Therapy at the Time of Evaluation at a Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Center

Renal Transplantation in HIV-Infected Patients: The Paris Experience

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 10 2010
M. Touzot
Kidney transplantation is now considered as a reasonable option for HIV-infected patients with end-stage renal disease. We describe here a retrospective study conducted in five transplantation centers in Paris. Twenty-seven patients were included. Immunosuppressive protocol associated an induction therapy and a long-term treatment combining mycophenolate mofetil, steroids and either tacrolimus or cyclosporine. All the patients had protocol biopsies at 3 months and 1 year. Patient's survival was 100% at 1 year and 98% at 2 years. Graft survival at 1 and 2 years is 98% and 96% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The mean glomerular filteration rate values at 12 and 24 months were 60.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 (range 23,98) and 65.4 mL/min/1.73m2 (range 24,110), respectively. Acute cellular rejection was diagnosed in four cases (15%). Because of high trough levels of calcineurin inhibitor, protease-inhibitor therapies were withdrawn in 11 cases. HIV disease progression was not observed. One patient developed B-cell lymphoma. In conclusion, our study confirms the safety of renal transplantation in HIV-infected patients with few adverse events and a low incidence of acute rejection. [source]

Early Hepatic Artery Thrombosis after Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Incidence, Outcome and Risk Factors

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 4 2009
J. Bekker
To clarify inconsistencies in the literature we performed a systematic review to identify the incidence, risk factors and outcome of early hepatic artery thrombosis (eHAT) after liver transplantation. We searched studies identified from databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index) and references of identified studies. Seventy-one studies out of 999 screened abstracts were eligible for this systematic review. The incidence of eHAT was 4.4% (843/21, 822); in children 8.3% and 2.9% in adults (p < 0.001). Doppler ultrasound screening (DUS) protocols varied from ,no routine' to ,three times a day.' The median time to detection was at day seven. The overall retransplantation rate was 53.1% and was higher in children (61.9%) than in adults (50%, p < 0.03). The overall mortality rate of patients with eHAT was 33.3% (range: 0,80%). Mortality in adults (34.3%) was higher than in children (25%, p < 0.03). The reported risk factors for eHAT were, cytomegalovirus mismatch (seropositive donor liver in seronegative recipient), retransplantation, arterial conduits, prolonged operation time, low recipient weight, variant arterial anatomy, and low volume transplantation centers. eHAT is associated with significant graft loss and mortality. Uniform definitions of eHAT and uniform treatment modalities are obligatory to confirm these results and to obtain a better understanding of this disastrous complication. [source]

The Roles of a Bioethicist on an Organ Transplantation Service

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 4 2005
Linda Wright
Organ transplantation centers have expanded and increased in the last 20 years as transplant recipient outcomes have improved steadily and transplantation has moved from experimentation to treatment of choice for several indications. Transplantation presents difficult ethical and legal challenges for the transplant community and society. These include declarations of death, consent to donation and allocation of a scarce societal resource, i.e. transplantable organs. Policy and practice reflect the law, societal beliefs and prevailing values. A bioethicist contributes to a transplant team by clarifying values held by various stakeholders or embodied in decisions and policies, conducting clinical consultations, developing and interpreting policy and researching the ethics of innovations for rationing and increasing available supply of organs for transplantation. The bioethicist's interdisciplinary education, preparation, experience and familiarity with ethics, law, sociology and philosophy and skills of mediation, communication and ethical analysis contribute to addressing and resolving many issues in transplantation. This paper outlines the various roles of a bioethicist on a transplantation service, using case examples to illustrate some of the ethical issues. [source]