Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (transcatheter aortic + valve_implantation)
Selected AbstractsSurgical Techniques: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with "No Touch" of the Aortic Arch for the Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis Associated with Complex Aortic AtherosclerosisJOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, Issue 5 2010Rodrigo Bagur M.D. [source] Transcatheter aortic valve implantation through the left subclavian artery with a patent LIMA graft,CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 1 2010Maurizio Taramasso MD Abstract We report the case of an 80-year-old male with severe aortic valve stenosis previously submitted to surgical myocardial revascularization with patent mammary graft treated by TAVI through left-transaxillary approach because of unsuitable transfemoral and transapical approaches.© 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Optimal projection estimation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation based on contrast-aortography,CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 4 2010Validation of a Prototype Software Abstract We investigate the accuracy of a new software system (C-THV, Paieon) designed to calculate the optimal projection (OP) view for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) based on two aortograms, and its agreement with the operator's choice. An optimal fluoroscopic working view projection with all three aortic cusps depicted in one line, is crucial during TAVI. In our institution selection of the OP is based on multislice computed tomography (MSCT). Seventy-three consecutive patients referred for TAVI were divided into two groups. For the first group (53 patients, retrospective cohort) we compared the OP views estimated by C-THV with the ones estimated by MSCT. For the second group (20 patients, prospective cohort), we compared the OP views estimated by C-THV with the operator's choice during TAVI. For the retrospective cohort, the mean absolute difference (mean ± SD) between C-THV and MSCT was 6.6 ± 4.9 degrees. In 77% of the cases the mean difference between C-THV and MSCT was <10 degrees. For the prospective cohort, the mean absolute difference (mean ± SD) between C-THV and the operator's choice was 5.5 ± 3.4 degrees. A mean difference of <10 degrees was found in 90% of the cases. In this study we found that the C-THV software estimated the OP view for TAVI with good accuracy. The level of agreement between C-THV and either the MSCT or the operator's choice was deemed satisfactory, with the vast majority of observed differences being <10 degrees. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Impact of coronary artery disease on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation,CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 2 2010Jean-Bernard Masson MD Abstract Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) negatively impacts prognosis of patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement and revascularization is generally recommended at the time of surgery. Implications of CAD and preprocedural revascularization in the setting of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are not known. Method: Patients who underwent successful TAVI from January 2005 to December 2007 were retrospectively divided into five groups according to the extent of CAD assessed with the Duke Myocardial Jeopardy Score: no CAD, CAD with DMJS 0, 2, 4, and ,6. Study endpoints included 30-day and 1-year survival, evolution of symptoms, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and mitral regurgitation (MR) and need of revascularization during follow-up. Results: One hundred and thirty-six patients were included, among which 104 (76.5%) had coexisting CAD. Thirty-day mortality in the five study groups was respectively 6.3, 14.6, 7.1, 5.6, and 17.7% with no statistically significant difference between groups (P = 0.56). Overall survival rate at one year was 77.9% (95% CL: 70.9, 84.9) with no difference between groups (P = 0.63). Symptoms, LVEF, and MR all significantly improved in the first month after TAVI, but the extent of improvement did not differ between groups (P > 0.08). Revascularization after TAVI was uncommon. Conclusion: The presence of CAD or nonrevascularized myocardium was not associated with an increased risk of adverse events in this initial cohort. On the basis of these early results, complete revascularization may not constitute a prerequisite of TAVI. This conclusion will require re-assessment as experience accrues in patients with extensive CAD. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] The incidence of nephropathy in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation,CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 4 2009Ronak Rajani MD No abstract is available for this article. [source] | ||||||||||