Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Tolerance Induction (tolerance + induction)
Kinds of Tolerance Induction Terms modified by Tolerance Induction Selected AbstractsRegulatory T Cells Are Critical to Tolerance Induction in Presensitized Mouse Transplant Recipients Through Targeting Memory T CellsAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 8 2010W. Ge Memory T cells are a significant barrier to induction of transplant tolerance. However, reliable means to target alloreactive memory T cells have remained elusive. In this study, presensitization of BALB/c mice with C57BL/6 skin grafts generated a large number of OX40+CD44hieffector/memory T cells and resulted in rapid rejection of donor heart allografts. Recognizing that anti-OX40L monoclonal antibody (mAb) (,-OX40L) monotherapy prolonged graft survival through inhibition and apoptosis of memory T cells in presensitized recipients, ,-OX40L was added to the combined treatment protocol of LF15,0195 (LF) and anti-CD45RB (,-CD45RB) mAb,a protocol that induced heart allograft tolerance in non-presensitized recipients but failed to induce tolerance in presensitized recipients. Interestingly, this triple therapy restored donor-specific heart allograft tolerance in our presensitized model that was associated with induction of tolerogenic dendritic cells and CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T regulatory cells (Tregs). Of note, CD25+ T cell depletion in triple therapy recipients prevented establishment of allograft tolerance. In addition, adoptive transfer of donor-primed effector/memory T cells into tolerant recipients markedly reduced levels of Tregs and broke tolerance. Our findings indicated that targeting memory T cells, by blocking OX40 costimulation in presensitized recipients was very important to expansion of Tregs, which proved critical to development of tolerance. [source] Alternative T-Cell Costimulatory Pathways in Transplant Rejection and Tolerance Induction: Hierarchy or Redundancy?AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 5 2003Alan D. Salama No abstract is available for this article. [source] Anti-CD28 Antibody-Induced Kidney Allograft Tolerance Related to Tryptophan Degradation and TCR, Class II, B7+ Regulatory CellsAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 10 2005Fabienne Haspot B7/CTLA-4 interactions negatively regulate T-cell responses and are necessary for transplant tolerance induction. Tolerance induction may therefore be facilitated by selectively inhibiting the B7/CD28 pathway without blocking that of B7/CTLA-4. In this study, we selectively inhibited CD28/B7 interactions using a monoclonal antibody modulating CD28 in a rat model of acute kidney graft rejection. A short-term treatment abrogated both acute and chronic rejection. Tolerant recipients presented few alloantibodies against donor MHC class II molecules, whereas untreated rejecting controls developed anti-MHC class I and II alloantibodies. PBMC from tolerant animals were unable to proliferate against donor cells but could proliferate against third-party cells. The depletion of B7+, non-T cells fully restored this reactivity whereas purified T cells were fully reactive. Also, NK cells depletion restored PBMC reactivity in 60% of tolerant recipients. Conversely, NK cells from tolerant recipients dose-dependently inhibited alloreactivity. PBMC anti-donor reactivity could be partially restored in vitro by blocking indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) and iNOS. In vivo, pharmacologic inhibition of these enzymes led to the rejection of the otherwise tolerated transplants. This study demonstrates that an initial selective blockade of CD28 generates B7+ non-T regulatory cells and a kidney transplant tolerance sustained by the activity of IDO and iNOS. [source] Cytomegalovirus hyperimmunoglobulin: mechanisms in allo-immune response in vitroEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, Issue 12 2007K. Hoetzenecker Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus hyperimmunoglobulin (CMVIg) containing drugs are routinely administered in cardiac transplantation for prophylaxis against CMV disease. Yet little is known about their influence on transplant relevant immune functions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of CMVIg on cellular immunity in in vitro experiments and to define their role in tolerance inducing mechanisms. Materials and methods/results CMVIg reduces proliferation in mixed lymphocyte reactions and anti-CD3 blastogenesis assays and is related to decreased production of immune modulating cytokines interleukin (IL)-2, interferonr (IFN,), IL-10. This antiproliferative effect is associated with a cell-cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase and induction of apoptosis in CD8+ and natural killer cells. Co-incubation with CMVIg causes down-regulation of cell bound immunoglobulin and Fc,RIII surface expression on natural killer cells and leads to attenuation of antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity effector functions. Conclusions We conclude that CMVIg induces immunological features on leukocytes in vitro that are known to be related to tolerance induction. Our observations extend the current concept of CMVIg as passive CMV prophylaxis to a therapeutic drug compound capable of reducing allogeneic immune response. [source] Typing of the immunological system in human embryos by coelocentesisEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, Issue 5 2007Maria Concetta Renda Abstract Coelocentesis offers a new opportunity for gaining access to the human embryos from 28 d postfertilization. However, while some studies about its biochemical composition have been reported, our knowledge about immunological pattern of this compartment is still limited. For this reason, we studied the human coelomic fluids sampled from 6.6 to 10 wk of gestation. The majority of cellular population consisted in mesenchymal/epithelial cells. In fluids sampled before 10 wk we found only a preT Cell Receptor expression and an absence or a very low frequency of B lymphocytes, T lymphocytes and NK (natural killer) antigens. These preliminary data suggest that the immunological system in human embryos could be in the ideal conditions to start a process of tolerance induction. [source] Ethanol lock therapy for the treatment of catheter-related infections in haemophilia patientsHAEMOPHILIA, Issue 6 2009M. RAJPURKAR Summary., Central venous access devices (CVAD) are increasingly being used for optimal delivery of clotting factor concentrates in patients with haemophilia with poor peripheral venous access. The utility of CVAD is particularly well recognized in young patients starting factor prophylaxis and in patients with inhibitors undergoing immune tolerance induction (ITI). A catheter-related infection (CRI) remains the most common complication of CVAD in haemophilia patients and is the most frequent indication for its removal. Additionally, in some patients the infection results in significant morbidity and mortality and also contributes to failure of the ITI regimen. Ethanol-lock therapy (ELT) is a treatment modality that has been used to treat CRI in patients with indwelling catheters for home parenteral nutrition and chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to report the success in treating CRI in haemophilia patients using ELT. Three severe haemophilia A patients undergoing ITI regimen who developed CVAD infections resistant to conventional management with antibiotics were treated by ELT according to the institutional technique. All three patients responded well to ELT with clearance of the CVAD infection. There were no adverse side effects. To our knowledge, this is the first report of ELT in patients with haemophilia. The role of ELT needs to be investigated in larger studies for treatment of CRI in patients with bleeding disorders. [source] Forum on: the role of recombinant factor VIII in children with severe haemophilia AHAEMOPHILIA, Issue 2 2009M. FRANCHINI Summary., The development of recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) products, fuelled by the need for improved safety of treatment arising from the dramatic widespread blood-borne virus transmission in the 1970,1980s revolutionized the care of children with haemophilia A over the last two decades. The larger availability of perceived safer replacement therapy associated with the introduction of rFVIII products reassured the haemophilia community and there was a strong push in some Western countries to treat haemophilic children only with rFVIII. Moreover, this significantly contributed in the 1990s to the diffusion outside Northern Europe of prophylactic regimens implemented at an early age to prevent bleeding and the resultant joint damage (i.e. primary prophylaxis), together with the possibility of home treatment. These changes led to a substantial improvement of the quality of life of haemophilic children and of their families. The general agreement that primary prophylaxis represents the first-choice treatment for haemophilic children has been recently supported by two randomized controlled trials carried out with rFVIII products, providing evidence on the efficacy of early prophylaxis over on-demand treatment in preserving joint health in haemophilic children. However, the intensity and optimal modalities of implementation of prophylaxis in children, in particular with respect to the issue of the venous access, are still debated. A number of studies also supports the role of secondary prophylaxis in children, frequently used in countries in which primary prophylaxis was introduced more recently. With viral safety now less than an issue and with the more widespread use of prophylaxis able to prevent arthropathy, the most challenging complication of replacement therapy for children with haemophilia remains the risk of inhibitor development. Despite conflicting data, there is no evidence that the type of FVIII concentrate significantly influences the complex multifactorial process leading to anti-FVIII alloantibodies, whereas other treatment-related factors are likely to increase (early intensive treatments due to surgery or severe bleeds) or reduce (prophylaxis) the risk. Although the optimal regimen is still uncertain, eradication of anti-FVIII antibodies by immune tolerance induction (ITI), usually with the same product administered at inhibitor detection, should be the first-choice treatment for all patients with recent onset inhibitors. This issue applies particularly to children, as most patients undergo ITI at an early age, when inhibitors usually appear. The availability of a stable and long-lasting venous access represents a leading problem also in this setting. These and other topics concerning rFVIII treatment of haemophilic children were discussed in a meeting held in Rome on 27 February 2008 and are summarized in this report. [source] Immune tolerance induction with high von Willebrand factor/factor VIII content ratio concentrate in children with haemophilia A and high-responding inhibitorHAEMOPHILIA, Issue 2 2009H. PLATOKOUKI No abstract is available for this article. [source] The North American Immune Tolerance Registry: contributions to the thirty-year experience with immune tolerance therapyHAEMOPHILIA, Issue 1 2009D. DIMICHELE Summary., The North American Immune Tolerance Registry (NAITR) began in 1992 as a project of the ISTH Factor VIII/IX Subcommittee with the goal of further determining immune tolerance induction (ITI) practices in Canada and the United States. This retrospective registry study, published in 2002, was limited in its capacity to provide definitive answers to many unresolved ITI practice issues. Nonetheless, it played a role in developing guidelines for current ITI practice and in generating hypotheses that must now be examined through rigorous prospective data collection efforts. For haemophilia A, the logical next step has been the initiation of international prospective randomized studies of ITI outcome relative to factor VIII (FVIII) dose and purity for subjects with high titre inhibitors. Both trials will additionally provide platforms for translational study of the immunology of tolerance, a prelude to the next generation of safe and effective tolerizing strategies. For the less common problem of FIX inhibitor eradication, prospective randomized studies will not be a feasible way to confirm the NAITR observations. Coordinated international efforts will still be required to prospectively collect data on ITI outcome to document new potentially effective therapeutic strategies for inhibitor eradication. These registries will hopefully also serve to identify potential subjects for scientific studies of immunology of haemophilia B-related allergic phenomena, a devastating complication of FIX antibody development. [source] Haemophilia care then, now and in the futureHAEMOPHILIA, Issue 2009J. OLDENBURG Summary., Epidemiological data show the benefits of dramatically improved haemophilia care in all life-stages. There are improved administration techniques and dosing regimens, a shift from on-demand treatment to prophylaxis, successful treatment protocols for immune tolerance induction in patients with inhibitors and enhanced approaches to overall patient management. Improvements also include the introduction of virus inactivation methods for plasma derived clotting factor concentrates and the development of recombinant factor VIII therapy, which practically eliminated the risk of infectious disease transmission. Recombinant factor concentrates are recommended as treatment of choice by several guidelines today. All these developments have resulted in increased health-related quality of life and life expectancy in haemophilia patients, who are transitioning from childhood to adulthood with healthy joints and an overall healthy status today. Because of increased life expectancy, these patients are expected to experience age-related clinical problems that were not previously observed in this population. With respect to this, the spectrum of haemophilia care will be extended to diseases of older ages with the need of including further disciplines in comprehensive haemophilia care programmes. Despite these advances, the short half-life of factor VIII, requiring re-administration every 2 or 3 days and the development of inhibitors remains a challenge. Bayer's research and development currently focuses on the optimization of recombinant coagulation factors to address these challenges. Haemophilia care has experienced significant improvements within the past decades. Novel technologies and continued clinical research have facilitated the development of treatment regimen that resulted in dramatic increases in the life expectancy and quality of life of haemophilia patients. To set the scene for the following papers dealing with haemophilia care from paediatrics to geriatrics, developments behind these improvements and some aspects of future research will be presented in this paper. [source] Low-dose immune tolerance induction for paediatric haemophilia patients with factor VIII inhibitorsHAEMOPHILIA, Issue 2 2008A. UNUVAR Summary., The development of an inhibitor against factor VIII (FVIII) is a serious complication in children with haemophilia A. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy is generally considered to be the best approach to eradicate the inhibitor. In this paper, the low-dose (,50 IU kg,1 twice or three times weekly with plasma-derived factor concentrates) ITI regimen used in Turkey is discussed. This regimen was given to 21 haemophilia A patients with high titer inhibitors. The median age at the beginning of ITI was 9 years and exposure days were 25. The median pre-ITI historical peak inhibitor titer, and inhibitor titer when ITI started were 80 BU (range 6.0,517), 19.2 BU (range 3.6,515), respectively. Complete immune tolerance was defined as the time at which at least two negative inhibitor assays was obtained with no anamnestic response. Our two cases were not reached in follow-up period. Immune tolerance could be achieved in 5 of 19 (26.3%) patients within a median time of 6 months. Partial tolerance was obtained in 7 patients while treatment failed in spite of significant decreased inhibitor levels in the other patients. A relapse developed in one immune-tolerized patient, one year later. The level of inhibitor titer at the beginning of ITI (,10 BU), the pre-ITI historical peak inhibitor titer (<50 BU), and the time between the first diagnosis inhibitor to starting ITI (<12 months) were main factors in the success (complete or partial tolerance) of ITI. In conclusion, the outcome of low-dose ITI protocol was not satisfactory in this retrospective study. [source] Cyclosporin A can achieve immune tolerance in a patient with severe haemophilia B and refractory inhibitorsHAEMOPHILIA, Issue 1 2007D. C. A. CROSS Summary., Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is described in a patient with severe haemophilia B complicated by the presence of an inhibitor. A number of ITI regimes were attempted without success and the patient suffered from frequent relapses and bleeding episodes. Successful ITI was achieved with the additional use of cyclosporin A. The patient developed nephrotic syndrome although had a negative Bethesda titre at this time. When cyclosporin A therapy was ceased, the inhibitor titre rose and the patient suffered again from bleeding episodes. Cyclosporin A was reintroduced at a lower dose. The patient has now received cyclosporin A for 10 years, during which time he has relapsed three times for short periods (2 weeks). He is also on prophylaxis with factor IX three times a week with preinfusion levels >1% and without bleeding. [source] FEIBA® safety profile in multiple modes of clinical and home-therapy applicationHAEMOPHILIA, Issue 2004H. Luu Summary., The development of neutralizing antibodies to factor VIII or IX therapeutic concentrates remains the most serious and challenging complication in the management of patients with haemophilia A and B. FEIBA®, Anti-Inhibitor Coagulant Complex, is an activated prothrombin complex concentrate that has been used to treat patients with such complications for almost 30 years. The mechanism of action of FEIBA® has been proposed to involve simultaneous FVIII/FIX inhibitor bypassing action in the common, intrinsic and extrinsic coagulation pathways. FEIBA® is derived from human plasma that undergoes stringent viral screening followed by significant viral inactivation and removal. To date, there have been no confirmed reports of transmission of hepatitis A, B or C, or of human immunodeficiency viruses associated with the use of the current, vapour-heat-treated FEIBA® concentrate. The incidence of thrombotic adverse events recorded in the Baxter pharmacovigilance database for the 10-year postmarket period (1990,99) was approximately 4 : 100 000 infusions of FEIBA®. Almost all documented thrombotic events with FEIBA® occurred with doses that exceeded dosing recommendations, and known risk factors for cardiovascular disease were evident in more than 80% of the patients involved. Overall, clinical data have shown FEIBA® to be safe and well-tolerated for use in a wide variety of clinical settings, including treatment of bleeding episodes, management of surgical procedures, home therapy, long-term prophylaxis, and prophylaxis during immune tolerance induction, when used according to dosing guidelines. [source] The management of inhibitors in haemophilia A: introduction and systematic review of current practiceHAEMOPHILIA, Issue 4 2003S. Paisley Summary., Haemophilia is the commonest bleeding disorder in the UK, affecting approximately 5400 people, almost all of them male. In haemophiliacs, reduced levels, or absence, of factor VIII (FVIII) cause bleeding episodes, typically into joint spaces or muscles. Haemophilia is generally treated with exogenous FVIII. However, in some haemophiliacs, therapeutically administered FVIII comes to be recognized as a foreign protein, stimulating the production of antibodies (inhibitors), which react with FVIII to render it ineffective. Alternative treatment strategies then have to be used to manage bleeding episodes. In addition, strategies have been developed to attempt to abolish inhibitor production through the induction of immune tolerance. A systematic review was undertaken of current international practice for the clinical management of haemophilia A patients with inhibitors to FVIII, concentrating on literature published from 1995 onwards. Although it can be difficult to determine what constitutes current practice, current guidelines indicate that immune tolerance induction is seen as desirable, with the choice of regimen dependent on patient characteristics, familiarity with regimens and cost. Various approaches, based on similar factors, are used to control bleeding episodes. [source] Immune tolerance induction in patients with haemophilia A with inhibitors: a systematic reviewHAEMOPHILIA, Issue 4 2003J. Wight Summary., In some patients with haemophilia A, therapeutically administered factor VIII (FVIII) comes to stimulate the production of antibodies (inhibitors) which react with FVIII to render it ineffective. As a result, FVIII cannot be used prophylactically and patients become liable to recurrent bleeds. There are two elements to the management of patients with inhibitors: the treatment of bleeding episodes, and attempts to abolish inhibitor production through the induction of immune tolerance. This paper reports a systematic review of the best available evidence of clinical effectiveness in relation to immune tolerance induction (ITI) in patients with haemophilia A with inhibitors. Owing to the lack of randomized controlled trials on this topic, broad inclusion criteria with regard to study design were applied in order to assess the best available evidence for each intervention. As a result of the clinical and methodological heterogeneity of the evidence, it was not appropriate to pool data across studies; instead, data were synthesized using tabulation and qualitative narrative assessment. The International Registry provides the most reliable estimate of the proportion of successful cases of ITI [48.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 42.6,52.7%]. The duration of effect is unclear, but relapses appear to be infrequent. The International Registry shows a rate of relapse of 15% at 15 years. The comparative effectiveness of different protocols is uncertain, as no trials have been undertaken which compare them directly. However, the evidence suggests that the Bonn protocol may be more effective than the Malmö or low-dose protocols. There is no good evidence that immunosuppressive drug regimens are effective. [source] The future of plasma-derived clotting factor concentratesHAEMOPHILIA, Issue 2001W.K. Hoots In developed countries, preferred treatments for both haemophilia A and B have moved toward recombinant clotting factor concentrates, while plasma-derived replacement therapies are still required by many patients. Great improvements have been made in producing relatively pathogen-free clotting factor replacements from pooled plasma. The fluidity and complexity of the worldwide plasma product market are discussed in the context of the ,yin and yang' of plasma therapeutics, showing how multiple issues can influence the safety and availability of clotting factor concentrates. Use of plasma-derived products will likely continue for the next decade for patients with inhibitors, patients with von Willebrand disease, those requiring bypassing agents, in immune tolerance induction, and for treatment of rare inherited deficiencies of procoagulant or anticoagulant proteins. Furthermore, in developing countries many of the most advanced therapies are not available for the majority of haemophilia patients, and thus plasma-derived replacement concentrates will continue to be used even for noninhibitor patients. [source] Oral immune tolerance induction to factor VIII via breast milk, a possibility?HAEMOPHILIA, Issue 5 2000[source] Mechanism of T cell tolerance induction by murine hepatic Kupffer cells,HEPATOLOGY, Issue 3 2008Qiang You The liver is known to favor the induction of immunological tolerance rather than immunity. Although Kupffer cells (KC) have been indicated to play a role in liver tolerance to allografts and soluble antigens, the mechanisms involved remain unclear. We hypothesized that KCs could promote immune tolerance by acting as incompetent antigen-presenting cells (APC), as well as actively suppressing T cell activation induced by other potent APCs. The expression of antigen presentation-related molecules by KCs was phenotyped by flow cytometry. The abilities of KCs to act as APCs and to suppress T cell activation induced by splenic dendritic cells (DC) were examined by in vitro proliferation assays using CD4+ OVA-TCR (ovalbumin T cell receptor) transgenic T cells. We found that, compared with DCs, KCs expressed significantly lower levels of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II, B7-1, B7-2, and CD40. This result is consistent with our observation that KCs were not as potent as DCs in eliciting OVA-specific T cell proliferation. However, KCs isolated from polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid,treated mice expressed significantly higher levels of MHC II and costimulatory molecules than did naïve KCs and could stimulate stronger T cell responses. More importantly, we found that KCs could inhibit DC-induced OVA-specific T cell activation. Further investigation of the underlying mechanism revealed that prostaglandins produced by KCs played an important role. The results ruled out the possible involvement of interleukin-10, nitric oxide, 2,3-dioxygenase, and transforming growth factor , in KC-mediated T cell suppression. Conclusion: Our data indicate that KCs are a tolerogenic APC population within the liver. These findings suggest that KCs may play a critical role in regulating immune reactions within the liver and contributing to liver-mediated systemic immune tolerance. (HEPATOLOGY 2008.) [source] Chemokine receptor-dependent alloresponsesIMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS, Issue 1 2003Wayne W. Hancock Summary:, Immunologists have typically viewed alloreactivity schematically as a function of antigen presentation, expansion of alloreactive T and B cells within regional lymphoid tissues, and cellular infiltration and destruction of an allograft. Actual details of the steps between immune activation and accumulation of effector cells within a graft typically have not received much attention. However, just how cells ,know' to move to and migrate within a graft or not is proving to be of increasing interest, as the chemokine-dependent mechanisms underlying leukocyte recruitment to a transplant are dissected. Experimentally, chemokine receptor targeting can prolong or induce permanent allograft survival, despite preservation of alloresponses within secondary lymphoid tissues, whereas current immunosuppressive protocols have only modest effects on chemokine production and leukocyte homing. Recent knowledge of the chemokine-dependent nature of allograft rejection, acceptance, and tolerance induction are presented as a basis for understanding the rationale for preclinical trials of chemokine receptor-targeted therapies currently underway in primate recipients of solid organ allografts. [source] Preclinical evaluation of tolerance induction protocols and islet transplantation in non-human primatesIMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS, Issue 1 2001Sean P. Montgomery Summary: Non-human primate studies of tolerance induction strategies in solid organ transplantation represent a critical bridge between studies in rodents and humans. Our work demonstrates that strategies involving the blockade of co-stimulatory molecules, especially the CD40,CD154 pathway, have great potential for clinical adaptation. While the combination of anti-CD154 antibody with blockade of the CD28 pathway reduced donor antibody production, graft survival was not significantly improved over that achieved with anti-CD154 antibody alone. Moreover, although long courses of steroids seem to interfere with this approach, it may be possible to combine blockade of the CD40,CD154 pathway with other conventional immunosuppressants without sacrificing efficacy. This is a key issue for reducing the risk associated with eventual clinical trials. Work in the non-human primate islet transplant model demonstrates that viable islets can be recovered, isolated and infused in a reliable fashion. It also confirms the efficacy of a steroid sparing approach to immunosuppression for islet transplantation. These data have been expanded to the kidney allograft model, setting the stage for kidney islet transplantation studies. Overall, tolerance induction and islet transplant studies in non-human primates permit the preclinical screening of promising immunomodulatory approaches developed in rodents and reduce the inherent uncertainties associated with adapting new regimens to the clinic. [source] THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN RETRACTED STEALTH matters: a novel paradigm of durable primate allograft toleranceIMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS, Issue 1 2001J. M. Thomas Summary: We review a novel strategy for tolerance induction developed in rhesus macaques and termed STEALTH. We summarize the evolution of the STEALTH model, the results of successful trials in inducing long-term, stable transplant tolerance in rhesus kidney and diabetic islet recipients and discuss information related to the mechanism by which durable tolerance is induced. STEALTH tolerance is induced by a 3-day treatment course of CD3, immunotoxin (IT) combined with a 14-day treatment with deoxyspergualin (DSG). IT causes profound depletion of sessile lymph node T cells as well as the more accessible circulating T cells. DSG, an inhibitor of HSC 70-mediated NF-,B nuclear translocation, arrests maturation of myeloid dendritic cells, blocks production of proinflammatory cytokines induced by IT administration, and promotes systemic production of Th2 type cytokines that persist indefinitely. Such Th2 cytokine deviation has not been reported in NHP transplant recipients. These studies provide proof of principle in a preclinical model that prevention of both acute and chronic allograft rejection, for at least 2.2,4.9 years of follow-up, can be achieved in NHP in the absence of chronic immunosuppressive drugs or other interventions. This strategy for inducing NHP tolerance is discussed in relation to current tolerance paradigms. [source] Local control of the immune response in the liverIMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS, Issue 1 2000Percy A. Knolle Summary: The physiological function of the liver , such as removal of pathogens and antigens from the blood, protein synthesis and metabolism , requires an immune response that is adapted to these tasks and is locally regulated. Pathogenic microorganisms must be efficiently eliminated while the large number of antigens derived from the gastrointestinal tract must be tolerized. From experimental observations it is evident that the liver favours the induction of tolerance rather than the induction of immunity. The liver probably not only is involved in transplantation tolerance but contributes as well to tolerance to orally ingested antigens (entering the liver with portal-venous blood) and to containment of systemic immune responses (antigen from the systemic circulation entering the liver with arterial blood). This review summarizes the experimental data that shed light on the molecular mechanisms and the cell populations of the liver involved in local immune regulation in the liver. Although hepatocytes constitute the major cell population of the liver, direct interaction of hepatocytes with leukocytes in the blood is unlikely. Sinusoidal endothelial cells, which line the hepatic sinusoids and separate hepatocytes from leukocytes in the sinusoidal lumen, and Kupffer cells, the resident macrophage population of the liver, can directly interact with passenger leukocytes. In the liver, clearance of antigen from the blood occurs mainly by sinusoidal endothelial cells through very efficient receptor-mediated endocytosis. Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells constitutively express all molecules necessary for antigen presentation (CD54, CD80, CD86, MHC class I and class II and CD40) and can function as antigen-presenting cells for CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Thus, these cells probably contribute to hepatic immune surveillance by activation of effector T cells. Antigen-specific T-cell activation is influenced by the local microenvironment. This microenvironment is characterized by the physiological presence of bacterial constituents such as endotoxin and by the local release of immunosuppressive mediators such as interleukin-10, prostaglandin E2 and transforming growth factor-b. Different hepatic cell populations may contribute in different ways to tolerance induction in the liver. In vitro experiments revealed that naive T cells are activated by resident sinusoidal endothelial cells but do not differentiate into effector T cells. These T cells show a cytokine profile and a functional phenotype that is compatible with the induction of tolerance. Besides sinusoidal endothelial cells, other cell populations of the liver, such as dendritic cells, Kupffer cells and perhaps also hepatocytes, may contribute to tolerance induction by deletion of T cells through induction of apoptosis. [source] PD-1 signalling in CD4+ T cells restrains their clonal expansion to an immunogenic stimulus, but is not critically required for peptide-induced toleranceIMMUNOLOGY, Issue 1 2010Joanne E. Konkel Summary The ultimate outcome of T-cell recognition of peptide,major histocompatibility complex (MHC) complexes is determined by the molecular context in which antigen presentation is provided. The paradigm is that, after exposure to peptides presented by steady-state dendritic cells (DCs), inhibitory signals dominate, leading to the deletion and/or functional inactivation of antigen-reactive T cells. This has been utilized in a variety of models providing peptide antigen in soluble form in the absence of adjuvant. A co-inhibitory molecule of considerable current interest is PD-1. Here we show that there is the opportunity for the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction to function in inhibiting the T-cell response during tolerance induction. Using traceable CD4+ T-cell receptor (TCR) transgenic cells, together with a blocking antibody to disrupt PD-1 signalling, we explored the roles of PD-1 in the induction of tolerance versus a productive immune response. Intact PD-1 signalling played a role in limiting the extent of CD4+ T-cell accumulation in response to an immunogenic stimulus. However, PD-1 signalling was not required for either the induction, or the maintenance, of peptide-induced tolerance; a conclusion underlined by successful tolerance induction in TCR transgenic cells genetically deficient for PD-1. These observations contrast with the reported requirement for PD-1 signals in CD8+ T-cell tolerance. [source] Onset of promiscuous gene expression in murine fetal thymus organ cultureIMMUNOLOGY, Issue 3 2006Renato Sousa Cardoso Summary T-cell differentiation and induction of tolerance to self-antigens occurs mainly in the thymus. Thymic stromal cells, specifically medullary thymic epithelial cells, express a diverse set of genes encoding parenchymal organ-specific proteins. This phenomenon has been termed promiscuous gene expression (PGE) and has been implicated in preventing organ-specific autoimmunity by inducing T-cell tolerance to self antigens. Early thymopoiesis and the critical factors involved in T-cell differentiation can be reproduced in vitro by murine fetal thymus organ culture (FTOC), which mimics the natural thymic microenvironment. To evaluate the occurrence of PGE in FTOC, gene expression profiling during in vitro thymic development in BALB/c mice was performed using a set of nylon cDNA microarrays containing 9216 sequences. The statistical analysis of the microarray data (sam program) revealed the temporal repression and induction of 57 parenchymal and seven lymphoid organ-specific genes. Most of the genes analysed are repressed during early thymic development (15,17 days post-coitum). The expression of the autoimmune regulator (AIRE) gene at 16 days post-coitum marks the onset of PGE. This precedes the induction of parenchymal organ genes during the late developmental phase at 20 days post-coitum. The mechanism of T-cell tolerance induction begins during fetal development and continues into adulthood. Our findings are significant because they show a fine demarcation of PGE onset, which plays a central role in induction of T-cell tolerance. [source] A novel model of sensitization and oral tolerance to peanut proteinIMMUNOLOGY, Issue 3 2004Jessica Strid Summary The prevalence of food allergic diseases is rising and poses an increasing clinical problem. Peanut allergy affects around 1% of the population and is a common food allergy associated with severe clinical manifestations. The exact route of primary sensitization is unknown although the gastrointestinal immune system is likely to play an important role. Exposure of the gastrointestinal tract to soluble antigens normally leads to a state of antigen-specific systemic hyporesponsiveness (oral tolerance). A deviation from this process is thought to be responsible for food-allergic diseases. In this study, we have developed a murine model to investigate immunoregulatory processes after ingestion of peanut protein and compared this to a model of oral tolerance to chicken egg ovalbumin (OVA). We demonstrate that oral tolerance induction is highly dose dependent and differs for the allergenic proteins peanut and OVA. Tolerance to peanut requires a significantly higher oral dose than tolerance to OVA. Low doses of peanut are more likely to induce oral sensitization and increased production of interleukin-4 and specific immunoglobulin E upon challenge. When tolerance is induced both T helper 1 and 2 responses are suppressed. These results show that oral tolerance to peanut can be induced experimentally but that peanut proteins have a potent sensitizing effect. This model can now be used to define regulatory mechanisms following oral exposure to allergenic proteins on local, mucosal and systemic immunity and to investigate the immunomodulating effects of non-oral routes of allergen exposure on the development of allergic sensitization to peanut and other food allergens. [source] Role of NK1.1+ and AsGm-1+ cells in oral immunoregulation of experimental colitisINFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, Issue 2 2003Shivti Trop Abstract NK1.1 and AsGm-1 expressing cells play a role in immunomodulation. Our purpose was to determine the role of NK1.1+ and AsGm-1+ expressing cells in the inflammatory/tolerance paradigm in experimental colitis. Oral tolerance towards colitis-extracted proteins had previously been shown to alleviate experimental colitis. Colitis was induced in C57/B6 mice by intracolonic instillation of trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS). Oral tolerance was induced via five oral doses of proteins extracted from TNBS-colitis colonic wall. Clinical, macroscopic, and microscopic scores were used for colitis assessment. To evaluate the putative role of AsGm-1 in tolerance induction, depletion of AsGm-1 expressing cells was performed. To evaluate the mechanism of tolerance induction, liver-associated NKT lymphocytes were harvested 14 days following tolerance induction, and cultured with concanavalin A (con A) and colitis-extracted proteins. T cell subsets were measured by flow cytometry. Cytokine expression was measured by intracellular staining and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Orally tolerized mice exhibited significant alleviation of the clinical, macroscopic, and microscopic parameters of colitis, with increased CD4+IL4+/CD4+IFN,+ lymphocyte ratio, increased IL-4, and decreased IFN, and IL-12 serum levels. In contrast, orally fed mice that were AsGm-1 depleted showed evidence of severe colitis. These mice exhibited significant decreased CD4+IL4+/CD4+IFN,+ ratios, and an increase in IFN, and IL-12, with decreased IL-4 levels. NKT cells harvested from tolerized mice secreted high levels of antiinflammatory cytokines. In contrast, in nontolerized mice, NKT cells mainly secreted proinflammatory cytokines. In a tolerized environment, both NK1.1 and AsGm-1 expressing cells are essential for disease alleviation. In contrast, in a nontolerized environment, AsGm-1 expressing cells support an antiinflammatory immune paradigm, while NKT lymphocytes support a proinflammatory shift. [source] Cross-talk involving extracellular sensors and extracellular alarmones gives early warning to unstressed Escherichia coli of impending lethal chemical stress and leads to induction of tolerance responsesJOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, Issue 5 2001R.J. Rowbury 1. Summary, 678 2. Introduction 2.1. Chemical and biological stress agents affecting enterobacteria, 678 2.2. Sensing of chemical and biological stress stimuli, 678 2.3. Intracellular sensors detect intracellularly-produced chemical stressing agents, 679 2.4. Intracellular sensors and intracellular induction components could delay response induction by extracellular chemical or biological stress agents, 680 2.5. Extracellular sensors and EICs give early warning of stress, 681 2.6. Disadvantages of extracellular components being needed for stress response induction, 682 2.7. Extracellular sensors and EICs allow stressed cells to warn unstressed ones, 682 2.8. A second role for some extracellular stress sensors, 683 3. Responses switched on by extracellular sensors and EICs 3.1. Involvement of EICs and ESCs in acid tolerance induction at pH 5·0 and at other mildly acidic pH values, 683 3.2. Further evidence for the obligate involvement of extracellular sensors and EICs in acid tolerance induction at pH 5·0, 684 3.3. On the nature of the acid pH tolerance-inducing ESC and EIC, 686 3.4. The acid tolerance ECs and their relation to other extracellular response-inducing components, 686 3.5. Extracellular components are needed for other inducible acid tolerance responses, 687 3.6. Involvement of EICs and extracellular sensors in acid tolerance in E. coli O157, 687 3.7. EICs involved in acid tolerance induction are diffusible, 687 4. Acid sensitization at alkaline pH and the role of extracellular sensor and EIC(s), 688 5. Responses affecting tolerance to alkali 5.1. Alkali sensitization at acidic pH, 688 5.2. Induced alkali tolerance at pH 9·0 and role of extracellular components, 688 6. Inducible tolerance to alkylhydroperoxides, 689 7. Are extracellular sensors and extracellular induction components needed for all stress responses?, 689 8. Altered responsiveness of extracellular sensors depending on growth conditions, 691 9. Protection of living cells from chemical stress by dead cultures, 691 10. How can intracellular levels of stress be detected?, 692 11. Are Nikolaev's extracellular ,protectants' and similar components related to EICs?, 693 12. Conclusions, 693 13. References, 694 [source] Factor VIII gene (F8) mutations as predictors of outcome in immune tolerance induction of hemophilia A patients with high-responding inhibitorsJOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, Issue 11 2009A. COPPOLA Summary.,Background:, Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the only therapeutic approach that can eradicate factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors in patients with hemophilia A. Predictors of ITI outcome are still debated, and the role of F8 gene mutations in this is not well established. Objectives: To investigate the relationship between F8 genotype and ITI outcome in patients with severe hemophilia A and high-responding inhibitors. Patients and Methods:F8 mutations were identified in 86 patients recruited as part of the Italian ITI registry (the PROFIT study). ITI outcome was centrally reviewed according to the following definitions: success (undetectable inhibitor and normal FVIII pharmacokinetics), partial success (inhibitor titer < 5 BU mL,1 and/or abnormal FVIII pharmacokinetics), and failure. Results:F8 mutations known to be associated with a high risk of inhibitor development (large deletions, inversions, nonsense mutations and splice site mutations) were found in 70 patients (81%); among these, the intron 22 inversion was present in 49 patients (57%). In 16 patients (19%) lower-risk F8 defects (small insertions/deletions and missense mutations) were identified. The latter group of patients showed a significantly higher ITI success rate than those carrying high-risk mutations [13/16 (81%) vs. 33/70 (47%); risk ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1,2.1, P = 0.01]. On multivariate analysis, the mutation risk class remained a significant predictor of success [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 6.2, 95% CI 1.1,36.0, P = 0.04], as were inhibitor titer at ITI start (< 5 BU mL,1, OR 11.8, 95% CI 3.5,40.2, P < 0.001), and peak titer during ITI (< 100 BU mL,1, OR 11.4, 95% CI 3.2,40.8, P < 0.001). Conclusions: ITI success is influenced by F8 genotype. This knowledge should contribute to the stratification of prognosis, and to the clinical choices made for ITI in patients with high-responding inhibitors. [source] The immunological monitoring of alloreactive responses in liver transplant recipients: A reviewLIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2006Raymond Reding The aim of this work is to review the current knowledge in the field of immunological monitoring of allogenic responsiveness in clinical liver transplantation. When compared to other solid-organ transplants, liver allografts are considered as immunologically privileged, and, accordingly, constitute a favorable setting to develop experimental as well as clinical strategies for minimization of immunosuppression and even induction of operational tolerance. The validation of simple, reliable, noninvasive assays exploring antidonor alloreactivity will constitute a crucial step toward implementing such approaches in the clinic. In contrast to research in rodents claiming the development of donor-specific tolerance in case of graft survivals of over 100 days without immunosuppression, it is impractical to confirm tolerance induction in this way in humans. Promising candidate assays include the detection of post-transplant immune deviation, of circulating precursors of dendritic cells subtypes, and of regulatory T cells. A conceptual framework for the development of tolerance assays in clinical liver transplantation is also proposed. Liver Transpl 12:373,383, 2006. © 2006 AASLD. [source] Kupffer cells: Another player in liver tolerance inductionLIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 5 2003Mary Lou Everett [source] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||