Tobacco Cessation Intervention (tobacco + cessation_intervention)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Tobacco Cessation Intervention in a Nurse Practitioner Managed Clinic

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, Issue 5 2000
Kathleen Reeve MSN
ABSTRACT Tobacco cessation counseling by health care professionals has been associated with increased tobacco cessation rates. In this study we compare the effectiveness of two smoking cessation approaches administered by nurse practitioners , a stepped care approach (n = 34) and a routine care approach (n = 41), using a pre- and post-test control group study design. Additionally, this study was guided by the "stages of change" construct of the transtheoretical model. Study results indicated that nurse practitioners delivered consistent office-based advice about tobacco use. In addition, nurse practitioner smoking cessation interventions contributed to positive shifts in stage of change for smoking cessation. [source]


Frequency of nurses' smoking cessation interventions: report from a national survey

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, Issue 14 2009
Linda Sarna
Aims and objectives., To describe the frequency of nurses' delivery of tobacco cessation interventions (,Five A's': Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, Arrange) and to determine the relationship of interventions to nurses' awareness of the Tobacco Free Nurses initiative. Background., Tobacco cessation interventions can be effectively provided by nurses. The delivery of smoking cessation interventions by healthcare providers is mandated by several organisations in the USA and around the world. Lack of education and resources about tobacco cessation may contribute to the minimal level of interventions. The Tobacco Free Nurses initiative was developed to provide nurses with easy access to web-based resources about tobacco control. Design., Cross-sectional survey of nurses (n = 3482) working in 35 Magnet-designated hospitals in the USA (21% response rate). Method., A valid and reliable questionnaire used in previous studies to assess the frequency of the nurse's delivery of smoking cessation interventions (,Five A's') was adapted for use on the web. Results., The majority of nurses asked (73%) and assisted (73%) with cessation. However, only 24% recommended pharmacotherapy. Only 22% referred to community resources and only 10% recommended use of the quitline. Nurses familiar with TFN (15%) were significantly more likely to report delivery of all aspects of interventions, including assisting with cessation (OR = 1·55, 95% CI 1·27, 1·90) and recommending medications (OR = 1·81, 95% CI 1·45, 2·24). Conclusions., Nurses' delivery of comprehensive smoking cessation interventions was suboptimal. Awareness of Tobacco Free Nurses was associated with increased interventions. Relevance to clinical practice., Further efforts are needed to ensure that nurses incorporate evidence-based interventions into clinical practice to help smokers quit. These findings support the value of Tobacco Free Nurses in providing nurses with information to support patients' quit attempts. [source]


Modeling missing binary outcome data in a successful web-based smokeless tobacco cessation program

ADDICTION, Issue 6 2010
Keith Smolkowski
ABSTRACT Aim To examine various methods to impute missing binary outcome from a web-based tobacco cessation intervention. Design The ChewFree randomized controlled trial used a two-arm design to compare tobacco abstinence at both the 3- and 6-month follow-up for participants randomized to either an enhanced web-based intervention condition or a basic information-only control condition. Setting Internet in the United States and Canada. Participants Secondary analyses focused upon 2523 participants in the ChewFree trial. Measurements Point-prevalence tobacco abstinence measured at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Findings The results of this study confirmed the findings for the original ChewFree trial and highlighted the use of different missing-data approaches to achieve intent-to-treat analyses when confronted with substantial attrition. The use of different imputation methods yielded results that differed in both the size of the estimated treatment effect and the standard errors. Conclusions The choice of imputation model used to analyze missing binary outcome data can affect substantially the size and statistical significance of the treatment effect. Without additional information about the missing cases, they can overestimate the effect of treatment. Multiple imputation methods are recommended, especially those that permit a sensitivity analysis of their impact. [source]


Frequency of nurses' smoking cessation interventions: report from a national survey

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, Issue 14 2009
Linda Sarna
Aims and objectives., To describe the frequency of nurses' delivery of tobacco cessation interventions (,Five A's': Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, Arrange) and to determine the relationship of interventions to nurses' awareness of the Tobacco Free Nurses initiative. Background., Tobacco cessation interventions can be effectively provided by nurses. The delivery of smoking cessation interventions by healthcare providers is mandated by several organisations in the USA and around the world. Lack of education and resources about tobacco cessation may contribute to the minimal level of interventions. The Tobacco Free Nurses initiative was developed to provide nurses with easy access to web-based resources about tobacco control. Design., Cross-sectional survey of nurses (n = 3482) working in 35 Magnet-designated hospitals in the USA (21% response rate). Method., A valid and reliable questionnaire used in previous studies to assess the frequency of the nurse's delivery of smoking cessation interventions (,Five A's') was adapted for use on the web. Results., The majority of nurses asked (73%) and assisted (73%) with cessation. However, only 24% recommended pharmacotherapy. Only 22% referred to community resources and only 10% recommended use of the quitline. Nurses familiar with TFN (15%) were significantly more likely to report delivery of all aspects of interventions, including assisting with cessation (OR = 1·55, 95% CI 1·27, 1·90) and recommending medications (OR = 1·81, 95% CI 1·45, 2·24). Conclusions., Nurses' delivery of comprehensive smoking cessation interventions was suboptimal. Awareness of Tobacco Free Nurses was associated with increased interventions. Relevance to clinical practice., Further efforts are needed to ensure that nurses incorporate evidence-based interventions into clinical practice to help smokers quit. These findings support the value of Tobacco Free Nurses in providing nurses with information to support patients' quit attempts. [source]