Home  About us  Contact
 

Thrombus Burden (thrombus + burden)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

Thrombectomy during PCI for acute myocardial infarction

CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 7 2008
Are the randomized controlled trial data relevant to the patients who really need this technique?
Abstract Macro and microembolization during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEAMI) is frequent and may result in obstruction of the microvascular network with subsequent reduction in efficacy of reperfusion. Numerous mechanistic studies have shown that the presence and size of the culprit thrombus is the most powerful predictor of incidence of embolization and slow flow/no reflow. Techniques that have been used to reduce the incidence of these events include thrombectomy devices and embolic protection devices. Although numerous prospective randomized clinical trials have been performed to evaluate the role of thrombectomy devices in patients with STEAMI, the results of these trials are conflicting and they speak to both sides of the controversy. The Achilles heal of the majority of these trials is the premise that thrombectomy devices should be routinely used in all patients presenting with STEAMI even irrespective of the presence and size of the thrombus. Such a hypothesis is naively optimistic and it ignores the basic knowledge available to us regarding the relationship between thrombus burden and embolization. Nonetheless, clinicians are faced every day with the reality of making difficult decisions on how to best treat patients presenting with STEAMI and large thrombus burden. The current available "evidence-based medicine" cannot and should not be generalized to these patients because only a minority of these patients was included in these randomized clinical trials. In these patients, thrombectomy devices should be strongly considered as an integral part of the armamentarium available to reduce thrombus burden prior to definitive treatment. Whether a future clinical trial will provide a definitive answer in terms of clinical outcome difference is doubtful because such a trial will need to include large number of selected patients with STEAMI who both have large amount of myocardium at jeopardy and large thrombus burden, a difficult and possibly undoable study. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Laser-facilitated thrombectomy: A new therapeutic option for treatment of thrombus-laden coronary lesions

CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 3 2002
Johannes B. Dahm MD
Abstract To overcome the adverse complications of balloon angioplasty in thrombus burden lesions (i.e., distal embolization, platelet activation, no-reflow phenomenon with persistent myocardial hypoxemia), mechanical removal of the thrombus or distal embolization protection devices is required. Pulsed ultraviolet excimer laser light at 308 nm can vaporize thrombus and suppress platelet aggregation. Clinical experience has already shown its efficacy in acute ischemic-thrombotic acute coronary syndromes. Unlike other thrombectomy devices, a 308 nm excimer laser can ablate thrombi as well as the underlying plaque, speed up thrombus clearing, and enhance thrombolytic and GP IIb/IIIa activity. It can also be employed in patients with contraindications for systemic thrombolytic agents or GP IIb/IIIa antagonists. Our report covers clinical data and technical aspects concerning three patients with acute myocardial infarction who presented with a large thrombus burden. After successful laser-transmitted vaporization of the thrombus mass in these patients, the remaining thrombus burden was evacuated, and normal antegrade coronary flow was successfully restored. This approach can be useful for selective patients with acute coronary syndromes. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2002;56:365,372. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Evolution of Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Therapy: Benefits and Risks of Contemporary Pharmacologic Agents and Their Implications for Myonecrosis and Bleeding in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue S2 2007
Hector M. Medina M.D., M.P.H.
Abstract Periprocedural myonecrosis, as evidenced by elevated creatine kinase,myocardial bound (CK-MB) levels, occurs in up to 25% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and has been linked with an increased risk of adverse short- and long-term clinical outcomes. Such myonecrosis arises from three main pathophysiological mechanisms: procedure-related complications, lesion-specific characteristics (e.g., large thrombus burden, plaque volume), and patient-specific characteristics (e.g., genetic predisposition, arterial inflammation). Periprocedural myonecrosis has not been definitively identified as the cause of postprocedural ischemic events, although agents that reduce or prevent thrombosis,including aspirin, thienopyridines, heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and direct thrombin inhibitors,have been shown to reduce the incidence of ischemic outcomes in this population, as have agents that reduce inflammation (aspirin, statins). At the same time, antithrombotic agents are known to increase the risk of bleeding and the use of transfusions, which have likewise been associated with worse outcomes in these patients. Thus, optimal management of patients undergoing PCI represents a balance between minimizing the risk of ischemic outcomes and simultaneously minimizing the risk of major bleeding. It may be that patients who have only minor, untreated postprocedural elevations in CK-MB level (with no clinical or angiographic signs of ischemia) might have a better prognosis than patients who have normal CK-MB levels but who suffer major bleeding complications. Copyright © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [source]