Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Test Implants (test + implant)
Selected AbstractsLocally delivered rhTGF-,2 enhances bone ingrowth and bone regeneration at local and remote sites of skeletal injuryJOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, Issue 1 2001Dr. Sumner The purposes of the present study were to determine if recombinant human transforming growth factor-beta-2 (rhTGF-,2) enhances bone ingrowth into porous-coated implants and bone regeneration in gaps between the implant and surrounding host bone. The implants were placed bilaterally for four weeks in the proximal humeri of skeletally mature, adult male dogs in the presence of a 3-mm gap. In three treatment groups of animals, the test implant was treated with hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate (HA/TCP) and rhTGF-,2 in buffer at a dose per implant of 1.2 ,g (n = 6), 12 ,g (n = 7), or 120 ,g (n = 7) and placed in the left humerus. In these same animals, an internal control implant treated only with HA/TCP and buffer was placed in the right humerus. In a non-TGF-, treated external control group of animals (n = 7), one implant was treated with HA/TCP while the contralateral implant was not treated with the ceramic. In vitro analyses showed that approximately 15% of the applied dose was released within 120 h with most of the release occurring in the first 24 h. The TGF-, treated implants had significantly more bone ingrowth than the controls with the greatest effect in the 12 ,g/implant group (a 2.2-fold increase over the paired internal control (P = 0.004) and a 4-fold increase over the external control (P < 0.001)). The TGF-, treated implants had significantly more bone formation in the gap than the controls with the greatest effect in the 12 and 120 ,g groups (1.8-fold increases over the paired internal controls (P = 0.003 and P = 0.012, respectively) and 2.8-fold increases over the external controls (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively)). Compared to the external controls, the internal control implants tended to have more bone ingrowth (1.9-fold increase, P = 0.066) and had significantly more bone formation in the gap (1.7-fold increase, P = 0.008). Thus, application of rhTGF-,2 to a porous-coated implant-stimulated local bone ingrowth and gap healing in a weakly dose-dependent manner and stimulated bone regeneration in the 3-mm gap surrounding the contralateral control implant, a site remote from the local treatment with the growth factor. © 2001 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. [source] One-Year Prospective Three-Center Study Comparing the Outcome of a "Soft Bone Implant" (Prototype Mk IV) and the Standard Brånemark ImplantCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 2 2003Bertil Friberg DDS ABSTRACT Background: Oral implant treatment ad modum Brånemark has been used for decades in the rehabilitation of edentate and partially dentate patients. Posterior jaw regions frequently exhibit bone of poor texture, and it is often difficult to obtain primary stability. Thus, it may prove beneficial to deviate from the original protocol and to use implants with a modified design, for example, with a slightly tapered geometry. Purpose: The purpose of the investigation was to compare the early behavior of a modified (prototype Mk IV, Branemark System, Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden; test) implant with that of the standard Brånemark implant (control) in regions of mainly type 4 bone. Materials and Methods: Three Swedish centers participated, and a total of 44 patients were treated with oral implants for 39 maxillas and 5 mandibles. The study focused on the most distal right and left implant sites (88 implants), which were randomized to receive either a test or a control implant. Various parameters were recorded, such as registered insertion torque (OsseoCare, Nobel Biocare AB), wobbling during insertion, primary and secondary stability (as measured with resonance frequency), and marginal bone loss. The implants were followed up for 1 year. Results.: The test implant more frequently required a higher insertion torque and showed a significantly higher primary stability than the control implant. This difference in stability leveled out over time, and test and control implants exhibited similar secondary stability at abutment operation and at the 1-year visit. Wobbling during insertion was rarely recorded for either of the implant designs. The 1-year cumulative success rate was 93.1% for test implants and 88.4% for control implants. Conclusions: The modified implant design resulted in an increased primary stability, which may be important when placing implants in jaw regions of type 4 bone. However, independent of the achieved primary stability, successful implants tended to approach similar secondary stability in the two designs tested. [source] Effects of Implant Design and Surface on Bone Regeneration and Implant Stability: An Experimental Study in the Dog MandibleCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 1 2001Lars Rasmusson DMD ABSTRACT Background: Previous experimental studies have shown a higher degree of bone-implant contact for surface-enlarged implants compared with machined implants. Yet, there is insufficient evidence that such implants show higher stability and an increased survival rate. Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to study the integration and stability of grit-blasted implants with retention elements on the implant neck, with and without marginal bone defects, compared with machined implants without retention elements. Materials and Methods: After tooth extraction of the mandibular premolars in six dogs, two grit-blasted, partly microthreaded Astra Tech implants and one standard Branemark implant were bilaterally placed in each dog. On one side, 3 ± 3 mm large buccal defects were created, to expose three to four implant threads. The contralateral side served as control, and no defects were made. The animals were sacrificed after 4 months of healing. Implant stability was measured using resonance frequency analysis at implant installation and after 4 months of healing. Histologic and histomorpho-metric evaluation was made after 4 months of healing. Results: Resonance frequency analysis indicated that all implants in the test and control groups were osseointegrated after 4 months, with a tendency toward higher implant stability for the Astra Tech implants. There was a statistically significant higher increase in resonance frequency for the Astra test implants compared with their corresponding controls. Histology and histomorphometry showed well-integrated implants with varying degrees of bone repair at the defect sites. The greater bone-implant contact for the Astra implants was statistically significant. No significant difference between the implants in amount of bone filling the threads was recorded. Conclusions: The Astra Tech implants tested showed a higher degree of bone,implant contact and higher level of bone regenerated at defect sites compared with the Brånemark implants. Resonance frequency analysis demonstrated a significantly higher increase in the Astra test implants compared with their control groups than did the Brånemark test implants versus their controls. [source] Transmucosal healing around peri-implant defects: crestal and subcrestal implant placement in dogsCLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 8 2010Binh L. T. Tran Abstract Objective: This study was designed to evaluate the transmucosal healing response of implants placed with the junction of the smooth surfaces, either crestal or subcrestal, into simulated extraction defects after healing periods of 1 and 3 months. Materials and methods: A total of 23 Straumann SP ,3.3 mm NN, SLA® 10 mm implants were placed in the mandibular premolar regions of three greyhound dogs 3 months after the teeth were removed. Five control implants were placed at the crestal bone level, and test implants with surgically created peri-implant defects of 1.25 mm wide × 5 mm depth were placed either at the crestal (nine implants) or at the 2 mm subcrestal (nine implants) bone level. Implants on the right side were placed 1 month before the dogs were sacrificed, and implants on the left side were placed 3 months before sacrifice. All dogs had daily plaque control following surgery and were sacrificed 3 months after implant placement for histological and histometric analyses. Results: Mesial,distal ground sections of the control and test implant specimens showed a greater %BIC in the coronal defect region after 3 months of healing. This healing response was incomplete for the test implants compared with the control implants after a 1-month healing period. The histometric measurements for test implants placed at the crestal bone level or 2 mm subcrestal with surgically created peri-implant defects were more coronal or closer to the implant margin compared with the control implants. Additionally, the degree of osseointegration between the newly formed bone and the implant surface was similar between the test implants. Conclusion: Peri-implant defects of 1.25 mm width healed with spontaneous bone regeneration around implants placed transmucosally at crestal or 2 mm subcrestal with a high degree of osseointegration after a 3-month healing period. To cite this article: Tran BLT, Chen ST, Caiafa A, Davies HMS, Darby IB. Transmucosal healing around peri-implant defects: crestal and subcrestal implant placement in dogs. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010; 794,803. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01911.x [source] Subcrestal placement of two-part implantsCLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 3 2009Maria Welander Abstract Objective: The aim of the present experiment was to study the healing around two-part implants that were placed in a subcrestal position. Material and methods: Five mongrel dogs, about 2 years old, were included. The mandibular premolars and the first, second and third maxillary premolars were extracted. Three months later two test and two control implants (OsseoSpeedÔ, 3.5 mm × 8 mm) were placed in one side of the mandible. The implants were placed in such a way that the implant margin was located 2 mm apical to the bone crest. In the test implants, the surface modification extended to the implant margin and, thus, included the shoulder part of the implant. Regular abutments with a turned surface (ZebraÔ) were connected to the control implants, while experimental abutments with a modified surface (TiOblastÔ) were connected to the test implants. A plaque control program that included cleaning of implants and teeth every second day was initiated. Four months later the dogs were euthanized and biopsies were obtained and prepared for histological analysis. Results: The marginal bone level at the test implants was identified in a more coronal position than that at the control implants. In 40% of the test implants, the bone-to-implant contact extended coronal of the abutment/fixture (A/F) border, i.e. in contact with the abutment part of the implant. The connective tissue portion of the peri-implant mucosa that was facing the test abutments contained a higher density of collagen and a smaller proportion of fibroblasts than that at the control sites. Conclusion: It is suggested that osseointegration may occur coronal to the A/F interface of two-part implants. Such a result, however, appears to depend on the surface characteristics of the implant components. [source] Orthodontic load on short maxillary implants with reduced sink depth: an experimental studyCLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 10 2008H. Wehrbein Abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate experimentally the positional stability and histomorphometric findings of length-reduced temporary anchorage devices (Orthosystem®, length: 4 mm) with reduced sink depth. Material and methods: For this purpose, four maxillary pre-molars (2P2, 3P3) were extracted from each of four foxhounds. After a 16-week alveolar healing period, 16 implants (four per dog) were inserted into the edentulous areas. Four implants (one per dog) were placed simultaneously in the mid-palatal area. The implants were intentionally submerged to about three-quarters of their length. After a 10-week unloaded implant healing period, the implants in the P3 areas and the palate were loaded (test implants) by means of transpalatal bars fixed on the implants in the P3 areas and Sentalloy traction springs (,2 N continuous force) inserted mid-sagittally between palatal implants and bars (force application period: 24 weeks). The implants in the P2 areas served as controls. Results: Clinical measurements and histological evaluation revealed positional stability of the loaded fixtures. Alveolar control implants (ACI) were inserted to a mean depth of 3.2 mm, alveolar test implants (ATI) to 3.3 mm and palatal test implants (PTI) to 2.6 mm. The mean direct bone contact percentage values were 71.3% (ACI), 79.6% (ATI) and 72.2% (PTI). Conclusion: These results suggest that, probably due to the relatively high percentage of bone contact with implant surface, only 3 mm of intrabony implant length is sufficient to retain positional stability during long-term orthodontic loading. [source] Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implantsCLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 3 2006Natalia Lioubavina-Hack Abstract Aim: To investigate the significance of the initial stability of dental implants for the establishment of osseointegration in an experimental capsule model for bone augmentation. Material and methods: Sixteen male rats were used in the study. In each rat, muscle-periosteal flaps were elevated on the lateral aspect of the mandibular ramus on both sides, resulting in exposure of the bone surface. Small perforations were then produced in the ramus. A rigid, hemispherical Teflon® capsule with a diameter of 6 mm and a height of 4 mm and with a hole in its middle portion, prepared to fit the circumference of an ITI® HC titanium implant of 2.8 mm in diameter, was fixed to the ramus using 4 mini-screws. On one side of the jaw, the implant was placed through the hole in such a way that its apex did not make contact with the mandibular ramus (test). This placement of the implant did not ensure primary stability. On the other side of the jaw, a similar implant was placed through the hole of the capsule in such a way that contact was made between the implant and the surface of the ramus (control). This provided primary stability of the implant. After placement of the implants, the soft tissues were repositioned over the capsules and sutured. After 1, 3, 6 and 9 months, four animals were sacrificed and subjected to histometric analysis. Results: The mean height of direct bone-to-implant contact of implants with primary stability was 38.8%, 52.9%, 64.6% and 81.3% of the implant length at 1, 3, 6 and 9 months, respectively. Of the bone adjacent to the implant surface, 28.1%, 28.9%, 52.6% and 69.6%, respectively, consisted of mineralized bone. At the test implants, no bone-to-implant contact was observed at any observation time or in any of these non-stabilized specimens. Conclusion: The findings of the present study indicate that primary implant stability is a prerequisite for successful osseointegration, and that implant instability results in fibrous encapsulation, thus confirming previously made clinical observations. [source] Positive effect of early loading on implant stability in the bi-cortical guinea-pig modelCLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 4 2005Els De Smet Abstract: Loading, early after implant placement, has gained rapid interest in dentistry. Primary implant stability, as e.g. defined by resonance frequency instrumentation, has been isolated as a predicator when immediate and early implant loading is applied. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of early (after 7 days) mechanical loading on the establishment of osseointegration by means of resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Percutaneous titanium implants were installed in both tibiae of 10 guinea-pigs. One week after implant installation, one implant (test) was loaded daily for 6 weeks, while the contra-lateral served as the unloaded one (control). A sinusoidally varying bending moment was applied at a frequency of 3 Hz and a force amplitude of 5 N, for 1800 cycli. Resonance frequency was measured at implant installation and from then on weekly using the RFA-device (Osstell®). Contrary to control implants, that showed a decrease in stability 1 week after installation, reaching a minimum at 3 weeks (,200 Hz), test implants showed a progressive increase in stability over time. After 6 weeks, the mean resonance frequency of test and control implants reached the same values. As confirmed by recent literature, early loading does not have to endanger the establishment of osseointegration of titanium implants. On the contrary, controlled loading is beneficial to maintain the implant stability during the early critical healing period as determined by RFA-measurements. Résumé La mise en charge précoce après l'insertion de l'implant acquière beaucoup d'intérêt en médecine dentaire. La stabilité primaire de l'implant, qui est par exemple définie par l'instrumentation de fréquence de résonnance RFA, a été isolée comme un annonciateur lorsque la mise en charge de l'implant était précoce ou immédiate. Le but de cette étude a été d'étudier l'effet d'une mise en charge précoce (sept jours) sur l'établissement de l'ostéïntégration à l'aide de RFA (Osstell®). Des implants titane percutanés ont été insérés dans les deux tibias de dix cobayes. Une semaine après le placement des implants, un implant test a été mis en charge tous les jours pendant six semaines tandis que le contralatéral servait de contrôle et n'était pas mis en charge. Un moment sinusoïdal a été appliquéà une fréquence de trois hertz et une amplitute d'une force de 5 N pour 1 800 cycles. La fréquence de résonnance a été mesurée lors de l'insertion de l'implant et ensuite hebdomadairement en utilisant le RFA. Contrairement aux implants contrôles, qui accusaient une diminution de la stabilité une semaine après leur insertion atteignant un minimum après trois semaines (,200 Hz), les implants tests ont montré une augmentation progressive de la stabilité avec le temps. Après six semaines, la fréquence de résonnance moyenne des implants tests et contrôles atteignaient les mêmes valeurs. Comme décrit dans la littérature récente, la mise en charge précoce ne met pas en danger l'établissement de l'ostéoïntégration des implants en titane. Au contraire, une mise en charge contrôlée est bénéfique au maintien de la stabilité implantaire durant la période de guérison critique précoce comme déterminée par les mesures RFA. Zusammenfassung Die Belastung kurz nach der Implantatplatzierung hat in der Zahnmedizin schnell an Interesse gewonnen. Die Primärstabilität der Implantate, bestimmt z.B. durch Messung der Resonanzfrequenz, hat sich als Voraussagewert herauskristallisiert, wenn eine Sofort-oder Frühbelastung der Implantate durchgeführt wird. Das Ziel dieser Studie war, den Einfluss der frühen (nach 7 Tagen) mechanischen Belastung auf die Ausbildung der Osseointegration mittels Resonanzfrequenzanalyse (RFA) zu untersuchen. In die beiden Tibias von 10 Meerschweinchen wurden perkutane Titanimplantate eingesetzt. Eine Woche nach der Implantation wurde ein Implantat (Test) während 6 Wochen täglich belastet, während das kontralaterale Implantat unbelastet blieb (Kontrolle). Es wurde ein Biegemoment mit sinusoidalen Schwankungen mit einer Frequenz von 3 Hz und einer Kraftamplitude von 5 N in 1800 Zyklen appliziert. Die Resonanzfrequenz wurde nach der Implantation und dann wöchentlich mit einem RFA-Gerät (Osstell®) gemessen. Im Gegensatz zu den Kontrollimplantaten, welche eine Woche nach dem Setzen eine Stabilitätsabnahme zeigten und das Minimum nach drei Wochen (,200 Hz) erreichten, konnte bei den Testimplantaten eine progressive Zunahme der Stabilität über die Zeit beobachtet werden. Nach sechs Wochen erreichten die mittleren Resonanzfrequenzen der Test-und Kontrollimplantate dieselben Werte. Die frühe Belastung gefährdet die Ausbildung einer Osseointegration bei Titanimplantaten nicht, was auch durch die neuere Literatur bestätig wird. Im Gegenteil, eine kontrollierte Belastung ist von Vorteil für den Erhalt der Implantatstabilität während der kritischen frühen Einheilphase. Dies konnte mittels RFA Messungen ermittelt werden. Resumen La carga temprana tras la colocación del implante ha ganado rápidamente interesen odontología. Se ha aislado como predictor, la estabilidad primaria del implante, definida por instrumentación de frecuencia de resonancia, cuando se aplica la carga temprana al implante. La intención del estudio fue investigar el efecto de carga mecánica temprana (tras 7 días) en el establecimiento de la osteointegración por medio del análisis de la frecuencia de resonancia (RFA). Se instalaron implantes de titanio percutaneos en ambas tibias de 10 conejos de indias. Una semana tras la instalación, un implante (prueba) se cargó diariamente durante 6 semanas, mientras que el contralateral sirvió como el implante sin carga (control). Se aplicó un momento de flexión variante sinusoidalmente a una frecuencia de 3 Hz y una amplitud de la fuerza de 5 N, durante 1899 ciclos. Se midió la frecuencia de resonancia al instalar el implante y a partir de ahí semanalmente usando el dispositivo RFA (Ostell®). Contrariamente a los implantes de control, que mostraron una disminución de la estabilidad una semana después de la instalación, alcanzando un mínimo a las tres semanas (,200 Hz), los implantes de prueba mostraron un incremento progresivo de la estabilidad a lo largo del tiempo. Tras seis semanas, la frecuencia de resonancia de los implantes de prueba y de control alcanzaron los mismos valores. Tal como se confirma por la literatura reciente, la carga temprana no debe hacer peligrar el establecimiento de la osteointegración de los implantes de titanio. Por lo contrario, la carga controlada es beneficiosa para mantener la estabilidad de los implantes durante el periodo crítico de la cicatrización determinado por las mediciones de RFA. [source] Influence of implant taper on the primary and secondary stability of osseointegrated titanium implantsCLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 4 2004Dominic O'Sullivan Abstract Objectives: The study presented was designed to analyse the mechanical performance and the primary and secondary stability characteristics of endosseous titanium implants with 1° (EXP1) and 2° (EXP2) of taper when compared with the standard Brånemark design (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden). Materials and methods: One pair of 10 mm EXP1 and control implants were placed in the femoral condyles of six rabbits. Paired 6 mm EXP1 and control implants and 6 mm EXP2 and control implants were placed in the tibial metaphysis. The control implants used were 4 mm diameter standard Brånemark implants, the same length as the test implants. At placement, insertion torque (IT) and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements were performed. Six weeks postoperatively when the animals were killed, RFA and removal torque (RT) measurements were made. Results: At placement, significantly higher IT was needed to insert the EXP implants compared with the controls. RFA values were significantly higher for EXP1 implants placed in the tibia but not in the femur. In pooling data from the femur and tibia there was a significant difference. The EXP2 implants failed to insert fully and demonstrated a lower RFA value than may have been expected due to the exposed threads, although this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: The results from the present study showed that 1° of taper results in a better primary stability compared with the standard Brånemark design. There was no evidence that the tapered design caused negative bone tissue reactions. All the implants gained in stability during the healing period. Résumé L'étude présente a été effectuée pour analyser la performance mécanique et les caractéristiques de stabilité primaire et secondaire d'implants endoosseux en titane avec un taper (fuselé) 1° (EXP1) et 2 (EXP 2) comparés au modèle ad modum Branemark® standard. Une paire d'implants contrôles et un EXP1 de 10 mm ont été placés dans les condyles fémoraux de six lapins. Des paires d'implants contrôles et EXP1 de 6 mm et des implants contrôles et EXP2 de 6 mm ont été placés dans les métaphyses tibiales. Les implants contrôles utilisés avaient un diamètre standard de 4 mm, la même longueur que les implants tests. Lors du placement, des mesures de force d'insertion (IT) et d'analyse de fréquence de résonnance (RFA) ont été effectuées. Six semaines après l'opération lorsque les animaux ont été euthanasiés, les mesures RFA et les forces d'enlèvement (RT) ont été relevées. Lors du placement un IT significativement plus important a été nécessaire pour insérer les implants EXP1 comparé au contrôle. Les valeurs RFA étaient significativement plus importantes pour les implants EXP1 placés dans le tibia mais pas dans le fémur. En rassemblant les données du fémur et du tibia il y avait une différence significative. Les implants EXP2 ne parvenaient pas àêtre insérés à fond et ont montré une valeur RFA inférieure qui n'était pas inattendue vu les filetages exposés bien que ces différences n'étaient pas statistiquement significatives. Les résultats de l'étude présente ont montré que le taper 1 résultait en une stabilité primaire supérieure comparé au modèle ad modum Branemark® standard. Il n'y avait aucun signe que ce nouveau modèle causait des réactions tissulaires osseuses négatives. Tous les implants ont gagné en stabilité durant leur période de guérison. Zusammenfassung Ziele: Die hier vorgestellte Studie hatte zum Ziel, das mechanische Verhalten und die Charakteristika von Primär- und Sekundärstabilität bei enossalen Implantaten mit einer Gewindeneigung von 1° (EXP1) und von 2° (EXP2) zu untersuchen. Man verglich die Daten mit dem Standarddesign von Brånemark (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Schweden). Material und Methode: Man implantierte ein Päärchen von 10mm-Implantaten (EXP1 und Kontrollimplantat) in die Femurkondylen von 6 Kaninchen. Zwei weitere Päärchen von 6mm-Implantaten (EXP1 und Kontrollimplantat, sowie EXP2 und Kontrollimplantat) implantierte man in die Metaphyse der Tibia. Bei den Kontrollimplantaten handelte es sich um Standardtypen von Brånemark mit einem Durchmesser von 4 Millimetern und derselben Länge wie die Testimplantate. Bei der Implantation mass man die Kraft, die es zu Eindrehen der Implantate brauchte (IT) und führte Messungen mit der Resonanzfrequenzanalyse (RFA) durch. Sechs Wochen nach der Operation wurden die Tiere geopfert, die RFA erneut durchgeführt und anschliessend der Ausdrehwiderstand (RT) bestimmt. Resultate: Bei der Implantation brauchte es signifikant grössere IT um die EXP-Implantate einzusetzen, als bei den Kontrollimplantaten. Die RFA-Werte waren bei den EXP1-Implantaten, die in die Tibia geschraubt worden waren, signifikant höher. Dies gilt aber nicht für die in den Femur geschraubten Implantate. Wurden die Daten vom Femur mit denen der Tibia verglichen, so erkannte man signifikante Unterschiede. Die EXP2-Implantate konnten nicht vollständig inseriert werden und zeigten auch tiefere RFA-Werte, als man den freiliegenden Schraubenwindungen entsprechend erwarten könnte. Diese Unterschiede waren aber nicht statistisch signifikant. Zusammenfassung: Die Resultate dieser Studie zeigten, das Schraubenwindungen mit 1° Steigung verglichen mit dem Standarddesign von Brånemark eine bessere Primärstabilität erzielten. Man fand andererseits keine Beweise, dass sich dieses neue Design der Schraubenwindungen negativ auf die Reaktion des Knochengewebes auswirkt. Alle Implantate gewannen während in der Heilphase an Stabilität dazu. Resumen Objetivos: El estudio presentado se diseñó para analizar el rendimiento mecánico y las características de estabilidad primaria y secundaria de implantes endoóseos de titanio con 1o (EXP1) y 2o (EXP 2) de autoroscado al compararlos con el diseño estándar de Brånemark (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Suecia). Material y Métodos: Se colocó una pareja de implantes de 10 mm EXP1 y de control en los cóndilos femorales de 6 conejos. Se colocaron pareja de implantes de 6 mm EXP1 y de control y de 6 mm EXP2 y de control en la metáfisis tibial. Los implantes de control utilizados fueron Brånemark estándar de 4 mm de diámetro. A la colocación, se llevaron a cabo mediciones del torque de inserción (IT) y del análisis de la frecuencia de resonancia (RFA). Los animales se sacrificaron a las seis semanas de la operación, y se tomaron medidas del torque de remoción (RT). Resultados: Al colocarse, se necesitó un IT significativamente mas alto para insertar los implantes EXP en comparación con los de control. Los valores RFA fueron significativamente mas altos para implantes EXP1 colocados en la tibia pero no en el fémur. Confrontando los datos del fémur y de la tibia apareció una diferencia significativa. Los implantes EXP2 fracasaron en insertarse completamente y demostraron un menor valor de RFA del que se podía esperar debido a la exposición de las roscas, aunque esta diferencia no fue estadísticamente significativa. Conclusiones: Los resultados del presente estudio mostraron que 1o de autoroscado resultan en una mejor estabilidad primaria comparada con el diseño estándar de Brånemark. No hubo evidencia de que el diseño de autoroscado causara reacciones negativas en el tejido óseo. Todos los implantes ganaron estabilidad durante el periodo de cicatrización. [source] | ||||||||||