Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Baseline Viral Load (baseline + viral_load)
Selected AbstractsIndividualized treatment strategy according to early viral kinetics in hepatitis C virus type 1,infected patients,,HEPATOLOGY, Issue 2 2009Thomas Berg Individualized treatment on the basis of early viral kinetics has been discussed to optimize antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Individually tailored reduction in treatment duration in HCV type 1,infected patients represents one possible strategy. Four hundred thirty-three patients were randomly assigned to receive either 1.5 ,g/kg peginterferon alfa-2b weekly plus 800-1,400 mg ribavirin daily for 48 weeks (n = 225, group A) or an individually tailored treatment duration (18-48 weeks; n = 208, group B). In the latter group, treatment duration was calculated using the time required to induce HCV RNA negativity (branched DNA [bDNA] assay; sensitivity limit, 615 IU/mL) multiplied by the factor 6. All bDNA negative samples were retested with the more sensitive transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay (sensitivity limit, 5.3 IU/mL). Sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were significantly lower in group B (34.6% versus 48.0% [P = 0.005]) due to higher relapse rates (32.7% versus 14.2% [P< 0.0005]). Important predictors of response were the levels of baseline viremia as well as the time to TMA negativity on treatment. Taking the simultaneous presence of low baseline viral load (<800,000 IU/mL) and a negative TMA test within the first 4 weeks as predictors for treatment response, SVR rates were comparable between both treatment schedules with an SVR probability of >80% obtained in patients treated for only 18 or 24 weeks. Conclusion: The individualized treatment strategy according to time to bDNA negativity failed to provide comparable efficacy compared with the standard of care. The inferiority of the individualized protocol may be explained by the use of a less sensitive HCV RNA assay, and also by underestimation of the importance of baseline viremia. (HEPATOLOGY 2009.) [source] IP-10 predicts viral response and therapeutic outcome in difficult-to-treat patients with HCV genotype 1 infection,HEPATOLOGY, Issue 6 2006Martin Lagging Plasma from 173 patients with HCV genotype 1 infection was analyzed for IP-10 levels prior to treatment with pegylated interferon-,-2a and ribavirin. Significantly lower IP-10 levels were observed in patients achieving a rapid viral response (RVR) (P < .0001), even in those with body mass index (BMI) , 25 kg/m2 (P = .004) and with baseline viral load , 2 million IU/mL (P = .001). Similarly, significantly lower IP-10 levels were observed in patients obtaining a sustained viral response (SVR) (P = .0002), including those having higher BMI (P < .05), higher viral load (P = .0005), and both higher BMI and viral load (P < .03). In multivariate logistic regression analyses, a low IP-10 value was independently predictive of both RVR and SVR. A baseline cutoff IP-10 value of 600 pg/mL yielded a negative predictive value (NPV) of 79% (19/24) for all genotype 1,infected patients, which was comparable with that observed using a reduction in HCV-RNA by at least 2 logs after 12 weeks of therapy (NPV 86%; 19/22); by combining the two, 30 of 38 patients (NPV 79%) potentially could have been spared unnecessary therapy. In patients having both higher BMI and viral load, cut-off levels of 150 and 600 pg/mL yielded a positive predictive value (PPV) of 71% and NPV of 100%, respectively. In conclusion, pretreatment IP-10 levels predict RVR and SVR in patients infected with HCV genotype 1, even in those with higher BMI and viral load. A substantial proportion of the latter patients may achieve SVR in spite of unfavorable baseline characteristics if their pretreatment IP-10 level is low. Thus, pretreatment IP-10 analysis may prove helpful in decision-making regarding pharmaceutical intervention. (HEPATOLOGY 2006;44:1617,1625.) [source] Effects of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone on the efficacy of first-line boosted highly active antiretroviral therapy based on protease inhibitors: meta-regression analysis of 12 clinical trials in 5168 patientsHIV MEDICINE, Issue 9 2009A Hill Objectives Tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) and abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) are widely used with ritonavir (RTV)-boosted protease inhibitors (PIs) as first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), but there is conflicting evidence on their relative efficacy. The ACTG 5202 and BICOMBO trials suggested higher efficacy for TDF/FTC, whereas the HEAT trial showed no efficacy difference between the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) backbones. Methods A systematic MEDLINE search identified 21 treatment arms in 12 clinical trials of 5168 antiretroviral-naïve patients, where TDF/FTC (n=3399) or ABC/3TC (n=1769) was used with RTV-boosted PI. For each NRTI backbone and RTV-boosted PI, the percentage of patients with viral load <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL at week 48 by standardized Intent to Treat, Time to Loss of Virological Failure (ITT TLOVR) analysis were combined using inverse-variance weighting. The effect of baseline HIV RNA, CD4 cell count and choice of NRTI backbone were examined using a weighted analysis of covariance. Results Across all the trials, HIV RNA suppression rates were significantly higher for those with baseline viral load below 100 000 copies/mL (77.2%) vs. above 100 000 copies/mL (70.9%) (P=0.0005). For the trials of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r), atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) and fosamprenavir/ritonavir (FAPV/r) using either TDF/FTC or ABC/3TC, the HIV RNA responses were significantly lower when ABC/3TC was used, relative to TDF/FTC, for all patients (P=0.0015) and for patients with baseline viral load <100 000 copies/mL (70.1%vs. 80.6%, P=0.0161), and was borderline for those with viral load >100 000 copies/mL (67.5%vs. 71.5%, P=0.0523). Conclusions This systematic meta-regression analysis suggests higher efficacy for first-line use of a TDF/FTC NRTI backbone with boosted PIs, relative to use of ABC/3TC. However, this effect may be confounded by differences between the trials in terms of baseline characteristics, patient management or adherence. [source] Performance of a World Health Organization first-line regimen (stavudine/lamivudine/nevirapine) in antiretroviral-naïve individuals in a Western settingHIV MEDICINE, Issue 5 2007LWY Tam Objectives In 2003, the World Health Organization (WHO) and Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) introduced the ,3 by 5 Initiative' to treat 3 million individuals by the end of 2005. This study evaluates the time to treatment termination, viral load suppression, and detection of drug resistance among antiretroviral-naïve individuals initiating stavudine/lamivudine/nevirapine (d4T/3TC/NVP) in British Columbia, Canada, to provide a context for future programme planning. Methods Primary outcome was time to treatment termination. Secondary outcome was time to viral suppression. Accumulation of drug resistance mutations was followed systematically in the first 145 individuals over 30 months. Cox proportional hazard regression identified factors associated with termination and suppression. Results 312 antiretroviral-naïve individuals initiated d4T/3TC/NVP between August 1996 and September 2003. Median follow-up time was 26.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] 6.8,46.5). At a median of 12.4 months (IQR 4.3,33.3), 132 (42.3%) patients switched treatment, 53 (17.0%) stopped therapy and 26 (8.3%) died. Of 308 subjects with baseline viral load >500 copies/mL, 223 (72.4%) suppressed to ,500 copies/mL at a median of 2.0 months. Among 145 (46.5%) individuals followed longitudinally, resistance mutations to NNRTI, 3TC, or other NRTI were detected in 11 (7.6%), six (4.1%) and four (2.8%) individuals after 12 months of therapy; and in 23 (15.9%), 17 (12.0%), and six (4.1%) individuals after 30 months. Conclusions The population requiring second-line treatment was 30% at 12 months and 40% at 24 months; 20% had detectable drug resistance mutations by 30 months. While these results are from a Western setting, they illustrate the need to consider second- and third-line approaches as antiretroviral treatment scale-up continues in the developing world. [source] Improved virological response to highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patients carrying the CCR5 ,32 deletionHIV MEDICINE, Issue 4 2007JJ Laurichesse Background Patients heterozygous for the C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) ,32 deletion spontaneously progress less rapidly to AIDS and death than do wild-type patients. We investigated whether the CCR5 ,32 deletion has an impact on immunological, virological and clinical responses to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in HIV-1-infected patients. Patients and methods We included in the study 565 HIV-1-infected patients from the French HIV-1 infected cohort with documented date of serconversion (SEROCO)/haemophiliacs HIV-1 infected (HEMOCO) cohorts, who started HAART after 1996. We investigated virological responses to HAART at 6 months (defined as a plasma HIV-1 RNA measurement below the threshold of detection or a 2 log HIV-1 RNA decrease) and at 12 months (defined as a plasma HIV-1 RNA measurement below the threshold of detection) and clinical response to HAART by Kaplan,Meier survival curves, with AIDS and death as outcomes. Results The ,32 heterozygous patients (n=83; 15%) had a better virological response to HAART than wild-type patients (73 vs 53% at 6 months, P=0.01; and 60 vs 44% at 12 months, P=0.01). This better virological response was still observed after adjustment for antiretroviral status (whether or not patients were naïve to antiretroviral therapy), year of HAART initiation, number of new antiretroviral drugs and baseline viral load. There was no statistical difference between heterozygous patients and wild-type patients in terms of survival and AIDS-free survival. Conclusions CCR5 ,32 heterozygous patients were more likely to have a virological response to HAART than wild-type patients at 6 and 12 months. However, this virological response did not produce better immunological and clinical responses. The long-term impact of the ,32 deletion on survival in HIV-1-infected treated patients should be investigated in a meta-analysis. [source] Genotype and viral load as prognostic indicators in the treatment of hepatitis CJOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS, Issue 4 2000Trepo Interferon-, (IFN-,), either alone or in combination with ribavirin, is the standard treatment for patients with hepatitis C. However, most patients do not achieve a sustained remission with this treatment regimen. A number of studies have demonstrated that genotype, baseline viral load and/or a decrease in viral load early after treatment induction are the major predictive factors for response to treatment with IFN. Patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 are more resistant to treatment with IFN, whereas low viral load at baseline and a marked decline in the HCV RNA level during the first 2,12 weeks of IFN therapy are associated with enhanced treatment efficacy. These variables could potentially be used to develop treatment algorithms that tailor therapies for specific clinical situations. Continued development and refinement of such algorithms would facilitate both the selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from therapy and the development of optimal treatment regimens for different patient groups. Predictive factors will also enable clinicians to identify subsets of patients who are not expected to respond well to current treatment. The development of new delivery methods for IFN that produce sustained antiviral pressure may provide a means of treating these previously difficult-to-treat patient groups. [source] | ||||||||||