			Home About us Contact

Temporary Pacing (temporary + pacing)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Temporary Epicardial Ventricular Stimulation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Acute Effects of Ventricular Pacing Site on Bypass Graft Flows

JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, Issue 4 2009
Navid Madershahian M.D.
This study aimed to evaluate the optimal epicardial ventricular pacing site in patients with AF following coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). Methods: In 23 consecutive patients (mean age = 69.2 ± 1.9 years, gender = 62% male, ejection fraction [EF]= 50.4 ± 2.1%) monoventricular stimulations (VVI) were tested with a constant pacing rate of 100 bpm. The impact of ventricular pacing on bypass graft flow (transit-time flow probe) and pulsatility index (PI) were measured after lead placement on the mid paraseptal region of the right (RVPS) and the left (LVPS) ventricle, on the right inferior wall (RVIW), and on the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). In addition, hemodynamic parameters were measured. Patients served as their own control. Results: Comparison of all tested pacing locations revealed that RVOT stimulation provided the highest bypass grafts flows (59.9 ± 6.1 mL/min) and PI (2.2 ± 0.1) when compared with RVPS (51.3 ± 4.7 mL/min, PI = 2.6 ± 0.2), RVIW (54.0 ± 5.1 mL/m; PI = 2.4 ± 0.2), and LVPS (53.1 ± 4.5 mL/min; PI = 2.3 ± 0.1), respectively (p < 0.05). When analyzing patients according to their preoperative LV function (group I = EF > 50%; group II = EF < 50%), higher bypass graft flows were observed with RVOT pacing in patients with lower EF (p = n.s.). Conclusions: Temporary RVOT pacing facilitates optimal bypass graft flows when compared with other ventricular pacing sites and should be the preferred method of temporary pacing in cardiac surgery patients with AF. Especially in patients with low EF following CABG, RVOT pacing may improve myocardial oxygen conditions for the ischemic myocardium and enhance graft patency in the early postoperative period. [source]

Percutaneous Lead Implantation Connected to an External Device in Stimulation-Dependent Patients with Systemic Infection,A Prospective and Controlled Study

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 8 2006
MARTIN U. BRAUN
Background: Permanent pacemaker implantation usually is contraindicated in patients with systemic infection. The aim of the present study was to compare two different techniques of transvenous temporary pacing to bridge the infectious situation until permanent pacemaker implantation under infection-free conditions is possible. Methods and Results: Forty-nine patients with systemic infection and hemodynamic-relevant bradyarrhythmia/asystole were temporarily paced using either a conventional pacing wire/catheter (n = 26, reference group) or a permanent bipolar active pacing lead, which was placed transcutaneously in the right ventricle and connected to an external pacing generator (n = 23, external lead group). In both groups, there were no significant differences in patient characteristics. Whereas the sensing values were almost identical, the median pacing threshold was significantly higher in the reference group (1.0 V vs 0.6 V, P < 0.05). Within comparable duration of pacing (median: 8.2 vs 7.7 days), there were 24 pacing-related adverse events (including dislocation, resuscitation due to severe bradycardia, or local infection) in the reference group as compared to one event in the external lead group (P < 0.01). None of these complications resulted in cardiac death. Conclusion: Thus, transvenous pacing with active fixation is safe and associated with a significantly lower rate of pacing-related adverse events as compared to the standard technique of transvenous pacing using a passive external pacing catheter. [source]

Reversion and Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm in Patients with Permanent Atrial Fibrillation by Internal Cardioversion Followed by Biatrial Pacing

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2002
NIKOLAOS FRAGAKIS
FRAGAKIS, N., et al.: Reversion and Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm in Patients with Permanent Atrial Fibrillation by Internal Cardioversion Followed by Biatrial Pacing. Patients in atrial fibrillation (AF) who fail external cardioversion are usually regarded as in permanent AF. Internal cardioversion may revert many such patients into sinus rhythm (SR) but the majority relapse rapidly into AF. We investigated whether internal cardioversion followed by biatrial pacing is an effective to restore and subsequently maintain SR in patients with permanent AF. Patients in permanent AF underwent internal cardioversion that was followed by biatrial temporary pacing for 48 hours. Those who remained in SR received a permanent biatrial pacemaker programmed to a rate responsive mode with a lower rate 90 beats/min. Primary end point of the study included maintenance in SR 3 months after internal cardioversion. Sixteen patients (14 men, 57 ± 11 years) were cardioverted. The median duration of AF was 24 months (quartiles, Q1= 8.5 and Q3= 102) and mean left atrium diameter was 48 ± 04 mm. A permanent biatrial pacemaker was implanted in 11 patients. At a mean follow-up of 15 months (range 4 to 24), 8 patients remained in SR for more than 3 months. AF was eliminated in 5 patients, while in two a second internal cardioversion on amiodarone was required. Antiarrhythmic therapy was used in half of our population and did not predict the long-term maintenance of SR. Following internal cardioversion with continuous biatrial pacing, 50% of patients with permanent AF were maintained for prolonged periods in SR. This is a new modality of treatment of permanent AF directed to the maintenance of SR that provides a further therapeutic option in end-stage AF. [source]

Randomized Study of Early Intravenous Esmolol Versus Oral Beta-Blockers in Preventing Post-CABG Atrial Fibrillation in High Risk Patients Identified by Signal-Averaged ECG: Results of a Pilot Study

ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, Issue 2 2002
Nomeda Balcetyte-Harris M.D.
Background: Patients with prolonged signal-averaged ECG have four times higher risk for development of atrial fibrillation (AF) after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). Incidence of AF is reduced, but not eliminated by prophylaxis with beta-blockers. The limitations of prophylaxis with oral beta-blockers may be related to the delayed effect of oral therapy. We performed a pilot study of the efficacy of early intravenous esmolol and an oral beta-blocker regimen for prevention of postoperative AF. Methods: Fifty patients referred for CABG and considered to be at high risk for postoperative AF on the basis of prolonged signal-averaged ECG P wave duration > 140 ms were randomized to receive either a 24-hour infusion of esmolol 6,18 hours after CABG, at an average dose 67 ± 7 ,/kg/min, followed by oral beta-blockers versus oral beta-blockers only beginning on postoperative day 1. Results: Seven of 27 patients (26%) in the esmolol group and 6 of 23 patients (26%) in the oral beta-blocker group developed postoperative AF, P = NS. The mean time of onset of AF (2.7 ± 0.5 vs 2.7 ± 0.3 postoperative day, P = NS) and the median duration of AF (10 [2192] vs 7 [1.16] hours, P = NS) were similar between the two groups. Eleven (41%) patients treated with esmolol developed adverse events (hypotension: 8, bradycardia requiring temporary pacing: 2, left ventricular failure:1 patient) as compared to only one patient (4%) in the beta-blocker group who developed hypotension, P = 0.006. Conclusions: This randomized controlled pilot study suggests that intravenous esmolol is less well tolerated and offers no advantages to standard beta-blocker in preventing AF after CABG. A.N.E. 2002;7(2):86,91 [source]

Short communication: Is intrapartum temporary pacing required for women with complete atrioventricular block?

BJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 5 2006
An analysis of seven cases
Women with complete atrioventricular heart block without a permanent pacemaker normally receive temporary pacing for labour and birth. Here, we report seven women who were managed without pacing. All women had a temporary pacing lead inserted prior to induction of labour, but none of the women required pacing during labour or birth. Our experience suggests that women with complete atrioventricular block and without permanent pacing do not routinely require temporary pacing for labour and birth. [source]