Tachycardia Syndrome (tachycardia + syndrome)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Treatment of Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia with Ivabradine in a Patient with Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome and a Dual Chamber Pacemaker

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 1 2009
SITARA KHAN M.R.C.P.
We present the case of a 44-year-old woman with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and a dual chamber pacemaker. The patient suffered from inappropriate sinus tachycardia that had been resistant to treatment with traditional rate-slowing medications. Ivabradine,the specific sinus node If current inhibitor,was used to successfully lower the heart rate. The patient had no evidence of POTS on repeat autonomic function testing, and there was a corresponding symptomatic benefit. We propose that this class of drugs, the use of which is established as antianginals, should be considered in patients with resistant inappropriate sinus tachycardia. [source]


AAIR Versus DDDR Pacing in the Bradycardia Tachycardia Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Crossover Trial

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 11 2001
BERNHARD SCHWAAB
SCHWABB, B., et al.: AAIR Versus DDDR Pacing in the Bradycardia Tachycardia Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Crossover Trial. In 19 patients paced and medicated for bradycardia tachycardia syndrome (BTS), AAIR and DDDR pacing were compared with regard to quality of life (QoL), atrial tachyarrhythmia (AFib), exercise tolerance, and left ventricular (LV) function. Patients had a PQ interval , 240 ms during sinus rhythm, no second or third degree AV block, no bundle branch block, or bifascicular block. In DDDR mode, AV delay was optimized using the aortic time velocity integral. After 3 months, QoL was assessed by questionnaires, patients were investigated by 24-hour Holter, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) was performed, and LV function was determined by echocardiography. QoL was similar in all dimensions, except dizziness, showing a significantly lower prevalence in AAIR mode. The incidence of AFib was 12 episodes in 2 patients with AAIR versus 22 episodes in 7 patients with DDDR pacing (P = 0.072). In AAIR mode, 164 events of second and third degree AV block were detected in 7 patients (37%) with pauses between 1 and 4 seconds. During CPX, exercise duration and work load were higher in AAIR than in DDDR mode (423 ± 127 vs 402 ± 102 s and 103 ± 31 vs 96 ± 27 Watt, P < 0.05). Oxygen consumption (VO2), was similar in both modes. During echocardiography, only deceleration of early diastolic flow velocity and early diastolic closure rate of the anterior mitral valve leaflet were higher in DDD than in AAI pacing (5.16 ± 1.35 vs 3.56 ± 0.95 m/s2 and 69.2 ± 23 vs 54.1 ± 26 mm/s, P < 0.05). As preferred pacing mode, 11 patients chose DDDR, 8 patients chose AAIR. Hence, AAIR and DDDR pacing seem to be equally effective in BTS patients. In view of a considerable rate of high degree AV block during AAIR pacing, DDDR mode should be preferred for safety reasons. [source]


Treatment of Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia with Ivabradine in a Patient with Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome and a Dual Chamber Pacemaker

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 1 2009
SITARA KHAN M.R.C.P.
We present the case of a 44-year-old woman with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and a dual chamber pacemaker. The patient suffered from inappropriate sinus tachycardia that had been resistant to treatment with traditional rate-slowing medications. Ivabradine,the specific sinus node If current inhibitor,was used to successfully lower the heart rate. The patient had no evidence of POTS on repeat autonomic function testing, and there was a corresponding symptomatic benefit. We propose that this class of drugs, the use of which is established as antianginals, should be considered in patients with resistant inappropriate sinus tachycardia. [source]


AAIR Versus DDDR Pacing in the Bradycardia Tachycardia Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Crossover Trial

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 11 2001
BERNHARD SCHWAAB
SCHWABB, B., et al.: AAIR Versus DDDR Pacing in the Bradycardia Tachycardia Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Crossover Trial. In 19 patients paced and medicated for bradycardia tachycardia syndrome (BTS), AAIR and DDDR pacing were compared with regard to quality of life (QoL), atrial tachyarrhythmia (AFib), exercise tolerance, and left ventricular (LV) function. Patients had a PQ interval , 240 ms during sinus rhythm, no second or third degree AV block, no bundle branch block, or bifascicular block. In DDDR mode, AV delay was optimized using the aortic time velocity integral. After 3 months, QoL was assessed by questionnaires, patients were investigated by 24-hour Holter, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) was performed, and LV function was determined by echocardiography. QoL was similar in all dimensions, except dizziness, showing a significantly lower prevalence in AAIR mode. The incidence of AFib was 12 episodes in 2 patients with AAIR versus 22 episodes in 7 patients with DDDR pacing (P = 0.072). In AAIR mode, 164 events of second and third degree AV block were detected in 7 patients (37%) with pauses between 1 and 4 seconds. During CPX, exercise duration and work load were higher in AAIR than in DDDR mode (423 ± 127 vs 402 ± 102 s and 103 ± 31 vs 96 ± 27 Watt, P < 0.05). Oxygen consumption (VO2), was similar in both modes. During echocardiography, only deceleration of early diastolic flow velocity and early diastolic closure rate of the anterior mitral valve leaflet were higher in DDD than in AAI pacing (5.16 ± 1.35 vs 3.56 ± 0.95 m/s2 and 69.2 ± 23 vs 54.1 ± 26 mm/s, P < 0.05). As preferred pacing mode, 11 patients chose DDDR, 8 patients chose AAIR. Hence, AAIR and DDDR pacing seem to be equally effective in BTS patients. In view of a considerable rate of high degree AV block during AAIR pacing, DDDR mode should be preferred for safety reasons. [source]


Quantitative study on cerebral blood volume determined by a near-infrared spectroscopy during postural change in children

ACTA PAEDIATRICA, Issue 3 2009
Yasuko Taeja Kim
Abstract Aim: To investigate changes in cerebral blood volume during standing in healthy children with or without abnormal cardiovascular responses. Methods: We studied 53 children (age, 10,15 years). Cerebral oxygenated haemoglobin (oxy-Hb) and deoxygenated Hb (deoxy-Hb) were non-invasively and continuously measured using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) (NIRO 300, Hamamatsu Photomedics, Shizuoka, Japan) during active standing. Beat-to-beat arterial pressure was monitored by Portapres. Results: Of 49 children with complete data acquisition, 33 had a normal cardiovascular response to the test (Group I) and 16 showed an abnormal response (Group II); nine with instantaneous orthostatic hypotension, three with postural tachycardia syndrome, three with neutrally mediated syncope and one with delayed orthostatic hypotension. At the onset of standing, Group II showed a significantly larger fall of oxy-Hb than Group I did (,2.9 ± 2.8 ,mol/L vs. ,6.4 ± 7.2 ,mol/L, respectively, p < 0.05). During min 1 to 7 of standing, with one exception, changes in oxy-Hb were normally distributed over the level of ,4 ,mol/L in Group I. Group II also showed a significantly marked decrease in oxy-Hb compared to Group I. Decreases in oxy-Hb were not correlated with blood pressure changes. Conclusion: This study shows that precise change in cerebral blood volume caused by orthostatic stress can be determined by NIRS in children in a quantitative manner of NIRS. Children with abnormal circulatory responses to standing showed a significant reduction of oxy-Hb compared with normal counterparts, suggesting impairment of cerebral autoregulation in these children. [source]