Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Suspected Infection (suspected + infection)
Selected AbstractsCharlson Index Is Associated with One-year Mortality in Emergency Department Patients with Suspected InfectionACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 5 2006Scott B. Murray MD Abstract Objectives: A patient's baseline health status may affect the ability to survive an acute illness. Emergency medicine research requires tools to adjust for confounders such as comorbid illnesses. The Charlson Comorbidity Index has been validated in many settings but not extensively in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of the Charlson Index as a predictor of one-year mortality in a population of ED patients with suspected infection. Methods: The comorbid illness components of the Charlson Index were prospectively abstracted from the medical records of adult (age older than 18 years) ED patients at risk for infection (indicated by the clinical decision to obtain a blood culture) and weighted. Charlson scores were grouped into four previously established indices: 0 points (none), 1,2 points (low), 3,4 points (moderate), and ,5 points (high). The primary outcome was one-year mortality assessed using the National Death Index and medical records. Cox proportional-hazards ratios were calculated, adjusting for age, gender, and markers of 28-day in-hospital mortality. Results: Between February 1, 2000, and February 1, 2001, 3,102 unique patients (96% of eligible patients) were enrolled at an urban teaching hospital. Overall one-year mortality was 22% (667/3,102). Mortality rates increased with increasing Charlson scores: none, 7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.4% to 8.5%); low, 22% (95% CI = 19% to 24%); moderate, 31% (95% CI = 27% to 35%); and high, 40% (95% CI = 36% to 44%). Controlling for age, gender, and factors associated with 28-day mortality, and using the "none" group as a reference group, the Charlson Index predicted mortality as follows: low, odds ratio of 2.0; moderate, odds ratio of 2.5; and high, odds ratio of 4.7. Conclusions: This study suggests that the Charlson Index predicts one-year mortality among ED patients with suspected infection. [source] Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation of Fever and Infection in Older Adult Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities: 2008 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of AmericaJOURNAL OF AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, Issue 3 2009Kevin P. High MD Residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are at great risk for infection. Most residents are older and have multiple comorbidities that complicate recognition of infection; for example, typically defined fever is absent in more than one-half of LTCF residents with serious infection. Furthermore, LTCFs often do not have the on-site equipment or personnel to evaluate suspected infection in the fashion typically performed in acute care hospitals. In recognition of the differences between LTCFs and hospitals with regard to hosts and resources present, the Infectious Diseases Society of America first provided guidelines for evaluation of fever and infection in LTCF residents in 2000. The guideline presented here represents the second edition, updated by data generated over the intervening 8 years. It focuses on the typical elderly person institutionalized with multiple chronic comorbidities and functional disabilities (e.g., a nursing home resident). Specific topic reviews and recommendations are provided with regard to what resources are typically available to evaluate suspected infection, what symptoms and signs suggest infection in a resident of an LTCF, who should initially evaluate the resident with suspected infection, what clinical evaluation should be performed, how LTCF staff can effectively communicate about possible infection with clinicians, and what laboratory tests should be ordered. Finally, a general outline of how a suspected outbreak of a specific infectious disease should be investigated in an LTCF is provided. [source] Incidence, spectrum and antibiotic sensitivity pattern of bacterial infections among patients with acute pancreatitisJOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Issue 9 2001Pramod Kumar Garg Abstract Background and Aim: Secondary infection of pancreatic necrotic tissue and peripancreatic fluid is a serious complication of acute pancreatitis resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to find out the spectrum of bacterial infections, and their antibiotic sensitivity pattern in patients with acute pancreatitis. Methods: All consecutive patients with acute pancreatitis were studied prospectively. Detailed investigations were carried out to identify bacterial infections and their antibiotic sensitivities in patients with suspected infection. These investigations included cultures of various body fluids, throat swabs, indwelling cannula and catheter tips. Pancreatic tissue was obtained by using needle aspiration or at surgery for Gram's stain, culture and sensitivity. All cultures were repeated until the presence of infection was confirmed or excluded. Results: A total of 169 patients with acute pancreatitis were studied during the period between January 1997 and June 2000 (mean age 41.3 years; 116 males and 53 females). Of the 169 patients, 63 had infections at various sites. A total of 80 cultures were positive, and 12 different bacterial isolates were cultured from samples taken from these 63 patients. Polymicrobial infection was seen in 32% of patients. Twenty-four patients had a confirmed pancreatic infection. Blood cultures had a growth of organisms in 19 patients, with evidence of ongoing or worsening pancreatitis, thus raising a strong suspicion of infected necrosis in them. The commonest organisms were Escherichia coli from 20 cultures and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from 18 cultures. The antibiotic sensitivity pattern showed that most bacteria were sensitive to third generation cephalosporins and quinolones; notably among them were cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and ciprofloxacin. Conclusion: Bacterial infections were seen in 37% of patients with acute pancreatitis. The commonest organisms were Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli. Most bacterial isolates were sensitive to third generation cephalosporins and quinolones. [source] Statin Therapy Is Associated with Decreased Mortality in Patients with InfectionACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 3 2009Michael W. Donnino MD Abstract Objectives:, The objective was to investigate the association between statin therapy and mortality in emergency department (ED) patients with suspected infection. Methods:, A secondary analysis of a prospective, observational cohort study was conducted at an urban, academic ED with approximately 50,000 annual visits. Data were collected between December 2003 and September 2004. Inclusion criteria consisted of age , 18 years, clinical suspicion of infection, and hospital admission. Patients were divided by those receiving statin therapy and those not receiving statins while hospitalized. Medication data were collected from an inpatient pharmacy database. Comparisons were conducted with Fisher's exact test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. To adjust for baseline differences, multivariable logistic regression analysis controlling for gender, severity of illness (Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis [MEDS] score), Charlson Comorbidity Index, and duration of statin therapy was performed. Results:, Of 2,132 patients with suspected infection, 2,036 (95%) had interpretable pharmacy data and were analyzed. The cohort had a median age of 61 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 46,78 years) and a mortality of 3.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.1% to 4.8%). Patients who received statins (n = 474) had a lower unadjusted crude mortality (1.9%; 95% CI = 0.6% to 3.3%) compared to those who did not (4.5%; 95% CI = 3.4% to 5.4%; p , 0.01). When adjusting for gender, MEDS score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and duration of statin therapy, the odds of death for statin patients was 0.27 (95% CI = 0.1 to 0.72; p , 0.01). Conclusions:, Patients who were admitted to the hospital with infection and received statin therapy while hospitalized had a significantly lower in-hospital mortality compared to patients who did not receive a statin. [source] Performance of Severity of Illness Scoring Systems in Emergency Department Patients with InfectionACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 8 2007Michael D. Howell MD ObjectivesTo validate the Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score, the Confusion, Urea nitrogen, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure, 65 years of age and older (CURB-65) score, and a modified Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (mREMS) in patients with suspected infection. MethodsThis was a prospective cohort study. Adult patients with clinically suspected infection admitted from December 10, 2003, to September 30, 2004, in an urban emergency department with approximately 50,000 annual visits were eligible. The MEDS and CURB-65 scores were calculated as originally described, but REMS was modified in neurologic scoring because a full Glasgow Coma Scale score was not uniformly available. Discrimination of each score was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). ResultsOf 2,132 patients, 3.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.1% to 4.7%) died. Mortality stratified by the MEDS score was as follows: 0,4 points, 0.4% (95% CI = 0.0 to 0.7%); 5,7 points, 3.3% (95% CI = 1.7% to 4.9%); 8,12 points, 6.6% (95% CI = 4.4% to 8.8%); and ,13 points, 31.6% (95% CI = 22.4% to 40.8%). Mortality stratified by CURB-65 was as follows: 0 points, 0% (0 of 457 patients); 1 point, 1.6% (95% CI = 0.6% to 2.6%); 2 points, 4.1% (95% CI = 2.3% to 6.0%); 3 points, 4.9% (95% CI = 2.8% to 6.9%); 4 points, 18.1% (95% CI = 11.9% to 24.3%); and 5 points, 28.0% (95% CI = 10.4% to 45.6%). Mortality stratified by the mREMS was as follows: 0,2 points, 0.6% (95% CI = 0 to 1.2%); 3,5 points, 2.0% (95% CI = 0.8% to 3.1%); 6,8 points, 2.3% (95% CI = 1.1% to 3.5%); 9,11 points, 7.1% (95% CI = 4.2% to 10.1%); 12,14 points, 20.0% (95% CI = 12.5% to 27.5%); and ,15 points, 40.0% (95% CI = 22.5% to 57.5%). The AUCs were 0.85, 0.80, and 0.79 for MEDS, mREMS, and CURB-65, respectively. ConclusionsIn this large cohort of patients with clinically suspected infection, MEDS, mREMS, and CURB-65 all correlated well with 28-day in-hospital mortality. [source] | ||||||||||