Surgical Decompression (surgical + decompression)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


(217) Selective Nerve Root Injections Can Accurately Predict Level of Nerve Impairment and Outcome for Surgical Decompression: A Retrospective Analysis

PAIN MEDICINE, Issue 3 2001
Kevin Macadaeg
There remains significant controversy regarding the use of a vertebral selective nerve root injection (SNI) as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool. In addition, the frequency of use of such procedures in patients with radiculopathy has increased dramatically in the last few years. Based on a Medline review there has been no studies combining cervical and lumbar SNI results and comparing preoperative diagnosis to surgical findings and outcome. The purpose of this paper is to retrospectively examine and compare the sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of a good surgical outcome in patients who had an SNI and subsequent surgical intervention. 101 patients from a 1996 thru 1999 database, who were referred to 10 spine surgeons (2 orthopedic and 8 neurosurgeon) for either cervical or lumbar radiculopathy, and had SNI and various imagery studies and subsequent surgery. Patients receive SNIs at our institution if there is a discrepancy between physical exam and radiologic imagery or to confirm a putative pain generator in multilevel pathology. These patients were then retrospectively analyzed with regard to correlation to surgical level and surgical outcome. SNIs were performed by one of three pain specialists in our clinic. Approximation of the appropriate nerve root sleeve was performed using fluoroscopic imagery, a nerve stimulator and contrast. After nerve root stimulation and neurography, 0.5,0.75 cc of lidocaine 2% was injected. Pre- and post-procedural visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were obtained from the non-sedated patient. A SNI was considered positive or negative if the patient had immediate appendicular pain relief of greater or less then ninety percent respectively. The study was designed to include only those patients that had a SNI, regardless of result, and subsequently had surgical decompression in an attempt to treat the pain that initially prompted the SNI. A statistical analysis was then performed comparing preoperative data to surgical findings and outcome. Overall, 101 patients had SNIs who subsequently underwent surgical decompression. Average duration of symptoms prior to SNI was 1.5,12 months (4 months mean). Fifteen patients presented with cervical and 86 with lumbar radiculopathy. There were a total of 110 procedures performed on these patients. VAS scores of <2 and overall pain reduction openface> 90% with respect to their pre-procedural appendicular were used to determine if a SNI was positive, negative or indeterminate. All of these patients had an MRI or CT with or without a myelogram and all went to surgery. The results yield that SNIs are able to predict surgical findings with 94% and 90% sensitivity and specificity, respectively. A good surgical outcome was determined if the patient would do the surgery again, if they were satisfied or very satisfied and had a VAS of <3 at 6- and 12-month intervals. Our data revealed that a positive SNI was able to predict a good 6-month outcome with 95% and 64% sensitivity and specificity, respectively. At 12-months, similar results were obtained of 95% and 56%. Preoperative MRI results were also evaluated and revealed a 92% sensitivity in predicting surgical findings. We had 24 false positive MRI results and 0 true negatives. Interestingly we had 8 diabetic (IDDM or NIDDM) patients or nearly 8% of our total. The odds ratio of a diabetic having a bad outcome at 12 months was 5.4 to 1. Diabetics had a 50% likelihood of having a bad 12-month outcome versus 16% for non-diabetics with a p value of 0.066. We also looked at gender, smoking history and presence of cardiovascular disease and found no significant relationship with outcomes. Our data indicate that SNIs, when performed under rigorous method, is a highly valuable tool that can accurately determine level of nerve root impairment and outcome in patients being considered for surgical decompression. With a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 90%, SNIs offer a major advantage over other diagnostic modalities in patients with difficult-to-diagnose radiculopathies. [source]


Viral meningoencephalitis: a review of diagnostic methods and guidelines for management

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, Issue 8 2010
I. Steiner
Background:, Viral encephalitis is a medical emergency. The prognosis depends mainly on the pathogen and host immunologic state. Correct immediate diagnosis and introduction of symptomatic and specific therapy has a dramatic influence upon survival and reduces the extent of permanent brain injury. Methods:, We searched the literature from 1966 to 2009. Recommendations were reached by consensus. Where there was lack of evidence but consensus was clear, we have stated our opinion as good practice points. Recommendations:, Diagnosis should be based on medical history and examination followed by CSF analysis for protein and glucose levels, cellular analysis, and identification of the pathogen by polymerase chain reaction amplification (recommendation level A) and serology (level B). Neuroimaging, preferably by MRI, is essential (level B). Lumbar puncture can follow neuroimaging when immediately available, but if this cannot be performed immediately, LP should be delayed only under unusual circumstances. Brain biopsy should be reserved only for unusual and diagnostically difficult cases. Patients must be hospitalized with easy access to intensive care units. Specific, evidence-based, antiviral therapy, acyclovir, is available for herpes encephalitis (level A) and may also be effective for varicella-zoster virus encephalitis. Ganciclovir and foscarnet can be given to treat cytomegalovirus encephalitis, and pleconaril for enterovirus encephalitis (IV class evidence). Corticosteroids as an adjunct treatment for acute viral encephalitis are not generally considered to be effective, and their use is controversial, but this important issue is currently being evaluated in a large clinical trial. Surgical decompression is indicated for impending uncal herniation or increased intracranial pressure refractory to medical management. [source]


Viral encephalitis: a review of diagnostic methods and guidelines for management

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, Issue 5 2005
I. Steiner
Viral encephalitis is a medical emergency. The spectrum of brain involvement and the prognosis are dependent mainly on the specific pathogen and the immunological state of the host. Although specific therapy is limited to only several viral agents, correct immediate diagnosis and introduction of symptomatic and specific therapy has a dramatic influence upon survival and reduces the extent of permanent brain injury in survivors. We searched MEDLINE (National Library of Medicine) for relevant literature from 1966 to May 2004. Review articles and book chapters were also included. Recommendations are based on this literature based on our judgment of the relevance of the references to the subject. Recommendations were reached by consensus. Where there was lack of evidence but consensus was clear we have stated our opinion as good practice points. Diagnosis should be based on medical history, examination followed by analysis of cerebrospinal fluid for protein and glucose contents, cellular analysis and identification of the pathogen by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification (recommendation level A) and serology (recommendation level B). Neuroimaging, preferably by magnetic resonance imaging, is an essential aspect of evaluation (recommendation level B). Lumbar puncture can follow neuroimaging when immediately available, but if this cannot be obtained at the shortest span of time it should be delayed only in the presence of strict contraindications. Brain biopsy should be reserved only for unusual and diagnostically difficult cases. All encephalitis cases must be hospitalized with an access to intensive care units. Supportive therapy is an important basis of management. Specific, evidence-based, anti-viral therapy, acyclovir, is available for herpes encephalitis (recommendation level A). Acyclovir might also be effective for varicella-zoster virus encephalitis, gancyclovir and foscarnet for cytomegalovirus encephalitis and pleconaril for enterovirus encephalitis (IV class of evidence). Corticosteroids as an adjunct treatment for acute viral encephalitis are not generally considered to be effective and their use is controversial. Surgical decompression is indicated for impending uncal herniation or increased intracranial pressure refractory to medical management. [source]


Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

NEUROMODULATION, Issue 4 2010
Amedeo Costantini MD
Objective:, Chronic back and leg pain associated with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is common in the elderly. Surgical decompression is usually performed when conservative treatments fail. We present an evaluation of the long-term outcome of patients suffering from symptomatic LSS treated with spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Materials and Methods:, Data were collected prospectively in three independent registries in three European centers. Pooled data were analyzed retrospectively. Changes in pain intensity, functional status, and analgesic medication were compared at baseline and at the last available follow-up. Demographic data as well as details regarding the implantation procedure and any adverse events were systematically recorded. Results:, Data were recorded in 69 patients with a mean follow-up period of 27 months. All patients showed clinically and statistically significant improvement in pain relief, the visual analog scale decreasing from 7.4 ± 2.3 to 2.8 ± 2.4 (p < 0.05). The use of analgesic medication decreased and the functional status improved. Conclusion:, Spinal cord stimulation seems to be effective in the treatment of patients suffering from chronic pain associated with LSS. Being less invasive and reversible, SCS should be considered before surgical decompression, particularly in patients with increased risks associated with back surgery. [source]


Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia presenting with spinal cord compression: A case report

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, Issue 12 2006
Hani Al-Halabi
Abstract Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma characterized by a wide range of clinical presentations related to direct tumor infiltration and the production of IgM. Most commonly it presents with cytopenia, hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, constitutional symptoms, and hyperviscosity syndrome. We report a case of WM in an 81-year-old man who initially presented with severe back pain. The patient had no peripheral lymphadenopathy or hepatosplenomegaly and his peripheral blood smear was normal. MRI of the spine revealed an epidural mass causing spinal cord compression at T9. Surgical decompression was performed and pathological analysis of the mass revealed a lymphoproliferative B-cell process. The diagnosis of WM was established after cytomorphologic and immunohistochemical analysis of the patient's bone marrow revealed the presence of a lymphoid/lymphoplasmacytoid-like bone marrow infiltrate along with an elevated serum IgM level. The patient responded both clinically and serologically to local radiotherapy. This case is unusual because the patient lacked all common clinical features of WM. This is the first reported case of epidural spinal cord compression as the initial manifestation of WM, adding to the spectrum of clinical presentations seen in this disease. Am. J. Hematol., 2006. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


Extradural haematoma secondary to brown snake (Pseudonaja species) envenomation

AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, Issue 4 2009
RKC Ong
A 4-year-old Siberian Husky dog was treated with brown snake antivenom by his regular veterinarian after a witnessed episode of brown snake envenomation. The dog was discharged 5 hours post presentation despite an ongoing coagulopathy. The dog was presented to the emergency centre 2 hours later because the owner believed the dog to be in pain. Initial examination revealed an ambulatory but neurologically normal patient with thoracolumbar pain and laboratory evidence of a coagulopathy. Despite correction of the coagulopathy, the signs progressed to bilateral hind limb paresis after approximately 3 hours of hospitalisation, and continued to deteriorate over the next 56 hours to loss of deep pain perception in the right hind limb. Computed tomography imaging identified the presence of an extradural haematoma which was subsequently removed via a hemilaminectomy. Surgical decompression was successful in treating the spinal compression and the dog recovered with minimal complications. To our knowledge this is the first report of extradural haematoma secondary to coagulopathy induced by brown snake envenomation. [source]


Circumferential mural bands in the small intestine causing simple obstructive colic: a case series

EQUINE VETERINARY JOURNAL, Issue 4 2006
J. F. PEREZ OLMOS
Summary Reasons for performing study: Circumferential mural band (CMB) in the small intestine is an emerging condition in Ireland. The clinical presentation is a simple obstruction of the small intestine of unknown aetiology. Hypothesis: Horses affected with CMB in the small intestine have a good prognosis following surgical decompression into the caecum. Methods: A retrospective study was carried out and 28 cases identified from 559 colic surgeries performed over a 5.5 year period. An exploratory celiotomy was performed in every case. A simple obstruction at the mid or distal jejunum was identified caused by a CMB, which was multiple in some cases. All of the horses except 2 had undergone a regular anthelmintic programme. Results: Manual decompression of the small intestine into the caecum resulted in resolution of the simple jejunal obstruction. A constricted segment of small intestine was resected in one case, as the degree of constriction was severe. A full thickness biopsy was taken from another case. Histopathology was performed on both samples. All horses recovered from surgery and were discharged from the hospital 7,32 days post operatively. Short-term complications were observed. Survival rate was 100% at long-term follow-up. Histopathology showed inflammatory infiltration in the submucosa, muscularis and serosa with eosinophils predominating. Parasites were not detected. Conclusion and potential relevance: Small intestine circumferential mural bands have a good prognosis after surgical decompression of the small intestine into the caecum. [source]


Treating nerves: a call to arms

JOURNAL OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, Issue 2 2008
Richard A. C. Hughes
Abstract The process of proving that new treatments for peripheral nerve diseases work has often been slow and inefficient. The lack of adequate evidence for some existing treatments has been highlighted by Cochrane systematic reviews. This article uses four different conditions to illustrate the need for more research. Both corticosteroid injections and surgical decompression of the median nerve are efficacious in carpal tunnel syndrome, but whether corticosteroid injections avoid the need for operation needs to be discovered. Corticosteroids are efficacious for Bell's palsy, but the role of antiviral agents needs clarification, which should come from ongoing trials. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasma exchange are both efficacious in Guillain-Barré syndrome, but corticosteroids are not. More trials are needed to discover the best dose of IVIg in severe cases and whether mild cases need treatment. In chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, corticosteroids, IVIg and plasma exchange are all efficacious, at least in the short term, but trials are needed to discover whether and which other immunosuppressive agents help. The Peripheral Nerve Society has formed a standing committee, the Inflammatory Neuropathy Consortium (http://pns.ucsd.edu/INC.htm), to facilitate the trials needed to answer the remaining questions in the inflammatory neuropathies. [source]


Interventions for treating the posterior interosseus nerve syndrome: a systematic review of observational studies

JOURNAL OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, Issue 2 2006
Bionka M. A. Huisstede
Abstract For the posterior interosseus nerve syndrome (PINS), no randomised controlled trials or controlled clinical trials about the effectiveness of interventions are available; only case series can be found. Although the validity of case series is inferior to controlled trials, they may provide valuable data about the efficacy of treatment options. Therefore, we systematically reviewed all available observational studies on treatment of PINS. A literature search and additional reference checking was done. On the basis of previous checklists, we constructed a quality assessment and rating system to analyse the included case series. Studies with less than 50% of the maximum points on the methodological quality assessment were excluded from the analysis. The results are summarised according to a rating system for the strength of the scientific evidence. Six eligible case series for this review were found. After the data extraction and methodological quality assessment, two higher quality studies that evaluated the effectiveness of surgical decompression of the PIN were included in the final analysis. There is a tendency for the effectiveness of surgical decompression of the PIN in patients with PINS. The effectiveness of a conservative treatment for PINS is unknown because no higher quality studies are available. Additional high-quality controlled studies are needed to assess the level of ,conclusive evidence' for surgical treatment. There is also a need for high-quality controlled trials into the effectiveness of conservative treatments for PINS. [source]


Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

NEUROMODULATION, Issue 4 2010
Amedeo Costantini MD
Objective:, Chronic back and leg pain associated with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is common in the elderly. Surgical decompression is usually performed when conservative treatments fail. We present an evaluation of the long-term outcome of patients suffering from symptomatic LSS treated with spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Materials and Methods:, Data were collected prospectively in three independent registries in three European centers. Pooled data were analyzed retrospectively. Changes in pain intensity, functional status, and analgesic medication were compared at baseline and at the last available follow-up. Demographic data as well as details regarding the implantation procedure and any adverse events were systematically recorded. Results:, Data were recorded in 69 patients with a mean follow-up period of 27 months. All patients showed clinically and statistically significant improvement in pain relief, the visual analog scale decreasing from 7.4 ± 2.3 to 2.8 ± 2.4 (p < 0.05). The use of analgesic medication decreased and the functional status improved. Conclusion:, Spinal cord stimulation seems to be effective in the treatment of patients suffering from chronic pain associated with LSS. Being less invasive and reversible, SCS should be considered before surgical decompression, particularly in patients with increased risks associated with back surgery. [source]


(217) Selective Nerve Root Injections Can Accurately Predict Level of Nerve Impairment and Outcome for Surgical Decompression: A Retrospective Analysis

PAIN MEDICINE, Issue 3 2001
Kevin Macadaeg
There remains significant controversy regarding the use of a vertebral selective nerve root injection (SNI) as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool. In addition, the frequency of use of such procedures in patients with radiculopathy has increased dramatically in the last few years. Based on a Medline review there has been no studies combining cervical and lumbar SNI results and comparing preoperative diagnosis to surgical findings and outcome. The purpose of this paper is to retrospectively examine and compare the sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of a good surgical outcome in patients who had an SNI and subsequent surgical intervention. 101 patients from a 1996 thru 1999 database, who were referred to 10 spine surgeons (2 orthopedic and 8 neurosurgeon) for either cervical or lumbar radiculopathy, and had SNI and various imagery studies and subsequent surgery. Patients receive SNIs at our institution if there is a discrepancy between physical exam and radiologic imagery or to confirm a putative pain generator in multilevel pathology. These patients were then retrospectively analyzed with regard to correlation to surgical level and surgical outcome. SNIs were performed by one of three pain specialists in our clinic. Approximation of the appropriate nerve root sleeve was performed using fluoroscopic imagery, a nerve stimulator and contrast. After nerve root stimulation and neurography, 0.5,0.75 cc of lidocaine 2% was injected. Pre- and post-procedural visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were obtained from the non-sedated patient. A SNI was considered positive or negative if the patient had immediate appendicular pain relief of greater or less then ninety percent respectively. The study was designed to include only those patients that had a SNI, regardless of result, and subsequently had surgical decompression in an attempt to treat the pain that initially prompted the SNI. A statistical analysis was then performed comparing preoperative data to surgical findings and outcome. Overall, 101 patients had SNIs who subsequently underwent surgical decompression. Average duration of symptoms prior to SNI was 1.5,12 months (4 months mean). Fifteen patients presented with cervical and 86 with lumbar radiculopathy. There were a total of 110 procedures performed on these patients. VAS scores of <2 and overall pain reduction openface> 90% with respect to their pre-procedural appendicular were used to determine if a SNI was positive, negative or indeterminate. All of these patients had an MRI or CT with or without a myelogram and all went to surgery. The results yield that SNIs are able to predict surgical findings with 94% and 90% sensitivity and specificity, respectively. A good surgical outcome was determined if the patient would do the surgery again, if they were satisfied or very satisfied and had a VAS of <3 at 6- and 12-month intervals. Our data revealed that a positive SNI was able to predict a good 6-month outcome with 95% and 64% sensitivity and specificity, respectively. At 12-months, similar results were obtained of 95% and 56%. Preoperative MRI results were also evaluated and revealed a 92% sensitivity in predicting surgical findings. We had 24 false positive MRI results and 0 true negatives. Interestingly we had 8 diabetic (IDDM or NIDDM) patients or nearly 8% of our total. The odds ratio of a diabetic having a bad outcome at 12 months was 5.4 to 1. Diabetics had a 50% likelihood of having a bad 12-month outcome versus 16% for non-diabetics with a p value of 0.066. We also looked at gender, smoking history and presence of cardiovascular disease and found no significant relationship with outcomes. Our data indicate that SNIs, when performed under rigorous method, is a highly valuable tool that can accurately determine level of nerve root impairment and outcome in patients being considered for surgical decompression. With a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 90%, SNIs offer a major advantage over other diagnostic modalities in patients with difficult-to-diagnose radiculopathies. [source]


A prospective study of the time to evacuate acute subdural and extradural haematomas,

ANAESTHESIA, Issue 3 2009
D. Bulters
Summary We performed a prospective, single-centre study of times to treatment of patients with life-threatening, traumatic, extra- and subdural haematomas requiring surgical evacuation between May 2006 and May 2007. The mean time to surgical decompression was 5.0 h and 32% were performed within 4 h. Patients who initially presented to a district hospital and required transfer for neurosurgery were decompressed in 5.4 h vs 3.7 h for those admitted directly. The current standard of surgical evacuation of all haematomas within 4 h is not being met. Delays were identified in every stage in the management of these patients and no single step was identified as the major cause. Initial treatment in district hospitals led to delays greater than the added driving time. There may be time savings from carrying out treatment steps in parallel instead of in series. [source]