Home  About us  Contact
 

Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (sudden + sensorineural_hearing_loss)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

Intratympanic Dexamethasone for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss After Failure of Systemic Therapy

THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 1 2007
David S. Haynes MD
Abstract Objective: Intratympanic steroids are increasingly used in the treatment of inner ear disorders, especially in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) who have failed systemic therapy. We reviewed our experience with intratympanic steroids in the treatment of patients with sudden SNHL to determine overall success, morbidity, and prognostic factors. Hypothesis: Intratympanic steroids have minimal morbidity and the potential to have a positive effect on hearing recovery in patients with sudden SNHL who have failed systemic therapy. Study Design: The authors conducted a retrospective review. Methods: Patients presenting with sudden SNHL defined as a rapid decline in hearing over 3 days or less affecting 3 or more frequencies by 30 dB or greater who underwent intratympanic steroids therapy (24 mg/mL dexamethasone) were reviewed. Excluded were patients with Meniere disease, retrocochlear disease, autoimmune HL, trauma, fluctuating HL, radiation-induced HL, noise-induced HL, or any other identifiable etiology for sudden HL. Patients who showed signs of fluctuation of hearing after injection were excluded. Pretreatment and posttreatment audiometric evaluations including pure-tone average (PTA) and speech reception threshold (SRT) were analyzed. Patient variables as they related to recovery were studied and included patient age, time to onset of therapy, status of the contralateral ear, presence of diabetes, severity of HL, and presence of associated symptoms (tinnitus, vertigo). A 20-dB gain in PTA or a 20% improvement in SDS was considered significant. Results: Forty patients fit the criteria for inclusion in the study. The mean age of the patients was 54.8 years with a range from 17 to 84 years of age. Overall, 40% (n = 16) showed any improvement in PTA or SDS. Fourteen (35%) men and 26 (65%) women were included. Using the criteria of 20-dB improvement in PTA or 20% improvement in SDS for success, 27.5% (n = 11) showed improvement. The mean number of days from onset of symptoms to intratympanic therapy was 40 days with a range of 7 days to 310 days. A statistically significant difference was noted in those patients who received earlier injection (P = .0008, rank sum test). No patient receiving intratympanic dexamethasone after 36 days recovered hearing using 20-dB PTA decrease or a 20% increase in discrimination as criteria for recovery. Twelve percent (n = 5) of patients in the study had diabetes with 20% recovering after intratympanic dexamethasone (not significantly different from nondiabetics at 28.6%, Fisher exact test, P = 1.0). Comparison to other studies that used differing steroid type, concentration, dosing schedule, inclusion criteria, and criteria for success revealed, in many instances, a similar overall recovery rate. Conclusions: Difficulty in proving efficacy of a single modality is present in all studies on SNHL secondary to multiple treatment protocols, variable rates of recovery, and a high rate of spontaneous recovery. Forty percent of patients showed some improvement in SDS or PTA after treatment failure. When criteria of 20-dB PTA or 20% is considered to define improvement, the recovery rate was 27.5%. Modest improvement is seen with the current protocol of a single intratympanic steroid injection of 24 mg/mL dexamethasone in patients who failed systemic therapy. Dramatic hearing recovery in treatment failures was rarely encountered. No patient showed significant benefit from intratympanic steroids after 36 days when using this protocol for idiopathic sudden SNHL. If patients injected after 6 weeks are excluded from the study, the improvement rate increases from 26.9% to 39.3%. Earlier intratympanic injection had a significant impact on hearing recovery, although with any therapeutic intervention for sudden SNHL, early success may be attributed to natural history. If we further exclude seven patients treated with intratympanic steroids within 2 weeks of the onset of symptoms (i.e., study only those patients treated with intratympanic dexamethasone between 2 and 6 weeks after onset of symptoms), still, 26% improved by 20 dB or 20% SDS. The recovery rates after initial systemic failure are higher than would be expected in this treatment failure group given our control group (9.1%) and literature review. These findings indicate a positive effect from steroid perfusion in this patient population. [source]

Intratympanic Dexamethasone Injection for Refractory Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 5 2006
Yun-Hoon Choung DDS
Abstract Objective: This case-control study aimed to analyze the effect of intratympanic dexamethasone injection (ITDI) as a treatment option for patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) who were refractory to classic oral steroid treatment. Methods: Sixty-six patients with SSNHL, who were refractory to a course of oral steroid therapy, were included in this study. We prospectively treated consecutive 33 patients (34 ears) with ITDI from August 2002 to January 2004. We then retrospectively collected data from age- and sex-matched previous patients who did not take any more treatments after the initial regimen between March 2000 and July 2002. ITDI was performed in the supine position on four separate occasions over the course of 2 weeks. Hearing was assessed immediately before every injection and at 1 week after therapy. Hearing improvement was defined as more than 10 dB in pure-tone average (PTA). Results: Hearing improvement was observed in 13 (39.4%) of 33 patients who underwent ITDI and in two (6.1%) of 33 patients in the control group. Five of 13 represented hearing improvement over than 20 dB in PTA, and 11 of 20 patients, who showed no improvement in PTA by ITDI, showed improvement over 10 dB in some frequencies. There were no definite prognostic factors between the patients who responded to ITDI and those who did not. Conclusion: ITDI may be a simple and effective therapy for patients with refractory SSNHL. [source]

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss increases the risk of stroke: a 5-year follow-up study

CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, Issue 2 2009
Herng-Ching Lin PhD
No abstract is available for this article. [source]

Improved treatment of sudden hearing loss by specific fibrinogen aphaeresis

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL APHERESIS, Issue 2 2004
Heidrun Ullrich
Abstract The etiology of sudden sensorineural hearing loss is still unclear and is thought to result from disturbances of microcirculation, infectious causes, or autoimmune disorders. So far standard therapy did not show clear improvement over spontaneous remission rate, which is assumed to be about 50% [Nakashima et al., Acta. Otolaryngol. Stockh. 514:14,16, 1994; Schuknecht and Donovan, Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 243:1,15, 1986; Harris and Sharp, Laryngoscope 100:516,524, 1990; Mayot et al., Clin. Immunol. Immunopath. 68:41,45, 1993; Gussen, Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 85:94,100, 1976]. Elevated blood viscosity due to high fibrinogen levels is supposed to cause decreased cochlear blood flow and thus initiate sudden hearing loss. The specific lowering of fibrinogen immediately decreases plasma viscosity exactly to the desired extent and should lead to improved cochlear blood flow [Suckfüll et al., Acta. Otolaryngol 119:763,766, 1999; Suckfüll, Lancet 360:1811,1817, 2002; Walch et al., Laryngol. Rhino. Otol. 75:641,645, 1996; Suckfüll et al., Otol. Neurotol. 23:309,311, 2002]. In a prospective uncontrolled pilot study on 36 patients with unilateral sudden onset sensorineural hearing loss (SHL) we tried to establish that 1,3 specific fibrinogen aphaereses alone improve recovery of hearing and that it is possible to lower fibrinogen to the target of 80,100 mg/dl without important side effects. Pure tone audiometry was carried out immediately before and after each aphaeresis as well as at 2 and 4 weeks and 6 months after treatment. Sixteen patients recovered spontaneously before undergoing fibrinogen adsorption. All 20 aphaeresis patients improved during immunoadsorption; in 60% of patients auditory thresholds returned to normal after the first immunoadsorption and treatment could be discontinued, in another 20% of patients complete recovery was reached after 4 weeks. The mean plasma fibrinogen concentration of the 20 patients before the first aphaeresis session was 308.1 ± 51.5 mg/dl. Immediately after the first treatment session, the fibrinogen concentration was lowered to 100.7 ± 25.3 mg/dl (P < 0.001). The second and third sessions also showed highly significant reductions in plasma fibrinogen. No important side effects were seen. In conclusion, specific fibrinogen adsorption is a promising new treatment modality that should be tested in a prospective, randomized controlled trial in patients with sudden hearing loss. J. Clin. Apheresis 19:71,78, 2004. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Association of the C677T polymorphism in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene with sudden sensorineural hearing loss,,§

THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 4 2010
Yasue Uchida MD
Abstract Objectives/Hypothesis: To investigate the recently reported association of the C677T polymorphism in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL), we analyzed data from a community-based Japanese population. Study Design: Nested case-control study. Methods: Among 2,174 adults (1,096 males and 1,078 females) aged 40 to 79 years old who participated in the National Institute for Longevity Sciences,Longitudinal Study of Aging, we compared 33 cases of prevalent SSNHL, defined as a self-reported otolaryngologist diagnosis, with the other cases. Multiple logistic regression was used to obtain odds ratios (ORs) for SSNHL in subjects with the MTHFR C677T polymorphism, with adjustment for other possibly influential factors under additive, dominant, and recessive genetic models. Results: The per-allele ORs for SSNHL risk were 1.687 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.023,2.780) in model 1, with adjustment for age and sex, and 1.654 (CI, 1.003,2.728) in model 2, with adjustment for smoking status, body mass index, histories of heart disease, hypertension, and diabetes, in addition to the factors in model 1. In model 3, a significant association between SSNHL and the C677T polymorphism was observed under all genetic models independent of factors including folic acid and homocysteine, although there were only 25 cases and 1,677 controls due to the addition of moderating factors. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the T allele of MTHFR C677T could be associated with susceptibility to SSNHL, and even imply that this mutation could be a risk factor that is independent of blood folic acid and homocysteine. Laryngoscope, 2010 [source]

Intratympanic Dexamethasone for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss After Failure of Systemic Therapy

THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 1 2007
David S. Haynes MD
Abstract Objective: Intratympanic steroids are increasingly used in the treatment of inner ear disorders, especially in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) who have failed systemic therapy. We reviewed our experience with intratympanic steroids in the treatment of patients with sudden SNHL to determine overall success, morbidity, and prognostic factors. Hypothesis: Intratympanic steroids have minimal morbidity and the potential to have a positive effect on hearing recovery in patients with sudden SNHL who have failed systemic therapy. Study Design: The authors conducted a retrospective review. Methods: Patients presenting with sudden SNHL defined as a rapid decline in hearing over 3 days or less affecting 3 or more frequencies by 30 dB or greater who underwent intratympanic steroids therapy (24 mg/mL dexamethasone) were reviewed. Excluded were patients with Meniere disease, retrocochlear disease, autoimmune HL, trauma, fluctuating HL, radiation-induced HL, noise-induced HL, or any other identifiable etiology for sudden HL. Patients who showed signs of fluctuation of hearing after injection were excluded. Pretreatment and posttreatment audiometric evaluations including pure-tone average (PTA) and speech reception threshold (SRT) were analyzed. Patient variables as they related to recovery were studied and included patient age, time to onset of therapy, status of the contralateral ear, presence of diabetes, severity of HL, and presence of associated symptoms (tinnitus, vertigo). A 20-dB gain in PTA or a 20% improvement in SDS was considered significant. Results: Forty patients fit the criteria for inclusion in the study. The mean age of the patients was 54.8 years with a range from 17 to 84 years of age. Overall, 40% (n = 16) showed any improvement in PTA or SDS. Fourteen (35%) men and 26 (65%) women were included. Using the criteria of 20-dB improvement in PTA or 20% improvement in SDS for success, 27.5% (n = 11) showed improvement. The mean number of days from onset of symptoms to intratympanic therapy was 40 days with a range of 7 days to 310 days. A statistically significant difference was noted in those patients who received earlier injection (P = .0008, rank sum test). No patient receiving intratympanic dexamethasone after 36 days recovered hearing using 20-dB PTA decrease or a 20% increase in discrimination as criteria for recovery. Twelve percent (n = 5) of patients in the study had diabetes with 20% recovering after intratympanic dexamethasone (not significantly different from nondiabetics at 28.6%, Fisher exact test, P = 1.0). Comparison to other studies that used differing steroid type, concentration, dosing schedule, inclusion criteria, and criteria for success revealed, in many instances, a similar overall recovery rate. Conclusions: Difficulty in proving efficacy of a single modality is present in all studies on SNHL secondary to multiple treatment protocols, variable rates of recovery, and a high rate of spontaneous recovery. Forty percent of patients showed some improvement in SDS or PTA after treatment failure. When criteria of 20-dB PTA or 20% is considered to define improvement, the recovery rate was 27.5%. Modest improvement is seen with the current protocol of a single intratympanic steroid injection of 24 mg/mL dexamethasone in patients who failed systemic therapy. Dramatic hearing recovery in treatment failures was rarely encountered. No patient showed significant benefit from intratympanic steroids after 36 days when using this protocol for idiopathic sudden SNHL. If patients injected after 6 weeks are excluded from the study, the improvement rate increases from 26.9% to 39.3%. Earlier intratympanic injection had a significant impact on hearing recovery, although with any therapeutic intervention for sudden SNHL, early success may be attributed to natural history. If we further exclude seven patients treated with intratympanic steroids within 2 weeks of the onset of symptoms (i.e., study only those patients treated with intratympanic dexamethasone between 2 and 6 weeks after onset of symptoms), still, 26% improved by 20 dB or 20% SDS. The recovery rates after initial systemic failure are higher than would be expected in this treatment failure group given our control group (9.1%) and literature review. These findings indicate a positive effect from steroid perfusion in this patient population. [source]

Intratympanic Dexamethasone Injection for Refractory Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 5 2006
Yun-Hoon Choung DDS
Abstract Objective: This case-control study aimed to analyze the effect of intratympanic dexamethasone injection (ITDI) as a treatment option for patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) who were refractory to classic oral steroid treatment. Methods: Sixty-six patients with SSNHL, who were refractory to a course of oral steroid therapy, were included in this study. We prospectively treated consecutive 33 patients (34 ears) with ITDI from August 2002 to January 2004. We then retrospectively collected data from age- and sex-matched previous patients who did not take any more treatments after the initial regimen between March 2000 and July 2002. ITDI was performed in the supine position on four separate occasions over the course of 2 weeks. Hearing was assessed immediately before every injection and at 1 week after therapy. Hearing improvement was defined as more than 10 dB in pure-tone average (PTA). Results: Hearing improvement was observed in 13 (39.4%) of 33 patients who underwent ITDI and in two (6.1%) of 33 patients in the control group. Five of 13 represented hearing improvement over than 20 dB in PTA, and 11 of 20 patients, who showed no improvement in PTA by ITDI, showed improvement over 10 dB in some frequencies. There were no definite prognostic factors between the patients who responded to ITDI and those who did not. Conclusion: ITDI may be a simple and effective therapy for patients with refractory SSNHL. [source]