			Home About us Contact

Stroke Syndromes (stroke + syndrome)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Recurrent artery of Heubner infarction in infancy

DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE & CHILD NEUROLOGY, Issue 5 2000
Steven P Miller MDCM
Classically, acquired occlusion of the recurrent artery of Heubner (RAH) results in hemiparesis with faciobrachial predominance. Infarction in the territory of the RAH represents a specific stroke syndrome not yet described in infancy with a range of motor and functional manifestations. An infant is described with apparent congenital infarction of the recurrent artery of Heubner. The child had prominent involvement of the contralateral upper extremity with athetosis. Neuroimaging changes were evident in the vascular territory classically attributed to the RAH. The clinician should suspect congenital RAH infarction in those infants with congenital upper-extremity athetosis. [source]

The Poor Outcome of Ischemic Stroke in Very Old People: A Cohort Study of Its Determinants

JOURNAL OF AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, Issue 1 2010
Licia Denti MD
OBJECTIVES: To assess how much of the excess risk of poor outcome from stroke in people aged 80 and older aging per se explains, independent of other prognostic determinants. DESIGN: Cohort, observational. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand five hundred fifty-five patients with first-ever ischemic stroke consecutively referred to an in-hospital Clinical Pathway program were studied. MEASUREMENTS: The relationship between age and 1-month outcome (death, disability (modified Rankin Scale 3,5), and poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale 3,6)) was assessed, with adjustment for several prognostic factors. RESULTS: Six hundred twelve patients aged 80 and older showed worse outcome after 1 month than those who were younger, in terms of mortality (19% vs 5%, hazard ratio (HR)=3.85, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.8,5.4) and disability (51% vs 33%, odds ratio (OR)=3.16, 95% CI=2.5,4.0), although in multivariate models, the adjusted HR for mortality decreased to 1.47 (95% CI=1.0,2.16) and the ORs for disability and poor outcome decreased to 1.76 (95% CI=1.32,2.3.) and 1.83 (95% CI=137,2.43), respectively. Stroke severity, the occurrence of at least one medical complication, and premorbid disability explained most of the risk excess in the oldest-old. CONCLUSION: Stroke outcome is definitely worse in very old people, and most of the excess risk of death and disability is attributable to the higher occurrences of the most-severe clinical stroke syndromes and of medical complications in the acute phase. These represent potential targets for preventive and therapeutical strategies specifically for elderly people. [source]

Presumed perinatal ischemic stroke: Vascular classification predicts outcomes

ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, Issue 4 2008
Adam Kirton MD, FRCPC
Objective Perinatal stroke commonly causes childhood neurological morbidity. Presumed perinatal ischemic stroke (PPIS) defines children presenting outside a normal perinatal period with chronic, focal infarction on neuroimaging. Infarcts are assumed to represent arterial strokes, but recent evidence suggests the periventricular venous infarction (PVI) of infants born preterm may also occur in utero and present as PPIS. Using the largest published cohort, we aimed to define arterial and PVI PPIS syndromes and their outcomes. Methods A PPIS consecutive cohort was identified (SickKids Children's Stroke Program, 1992,2006). Systematic neuroradiological scoring executed by blinded investigators included previously defined arterial stroke syndromes. PVI criteria included unilateral injury with at least four of the following conditions: (1) focal periventricular encephalomalacia, (2) internal capsule T2 prolongation, (3) cortical and (4) relative basal ganglia sparing, and (5) remote hemorrhage. Arterial and PVI classifications were validated and correlated with neurological outcomes (Pediatric Stroke Outcome Measure). Results In 59 PPISs (64% male), 94% of lesions fell within potential middle cerebral artery territories. Although arterial proximal M1 infarction was most common (n = 19; 35%), venous PVI was second (n = 12; 22%) and accounted for 75% of subcortical injuries. Motor outcomes (mean follow-up, 5.3 years) were predicted by basal ganglia involvement including leg hemiparesis, spasticity, and need for assistive devices (p < 0.01). Nonmotor outcomes were associated with cortical involvement, including cognitive/behavioral outcomes, visual deficits, and epilepsy (p < 0.01). Classification interrater reliability was excellent (correlation coefficients > 0.975). Interpretation Recognizable PPIS patterns predict long-term morbidity and may guide surveillance, therapy, and counseling. PVI is an underrecognized cause of PPIS and congenital hemiplegia. Ann Neurol 2008 [source]

Guidelines for patient selection and performance of carotid artery stenting

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 6 2010
The Carotid Stenting Guidelines Committee
Abstract Background:, The endovascular treatment of carotid atherosclerosis with carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains controversial. Carotid endarterectomy remains the benchmark in terms of procedural mortality and morbidity. At present, there are no consensus Australasian guidelines for the safe performance of CAS. Methods:, We applied a modified Delphi consensus method of iterative consultation between the College representatives on the Carotid Stenting Guidelines Committee (CSGC). Results:, Selection of patients suitable for CAS needs careful consideration of clinical and patho-anatomical criteria and cannot be directly extrapolated from clinical indicators for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Randomized controlled trials (including pooled analyses of results) comparing CAS with CEA for treatment of symptomatic stenosis have demonstrated that CAS is more hazardous than CEA. On current evidence, the CGSC therefore recommends that CAS should not be performed in the majority of patients requiring carotid revascularisation. The evidence for CAS in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis who are considered medically high risk is weak, and there is currently no evidence to support CAS as a treatment for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The use of distal protection devices during CAS remains controversial with increased risk of clinically silent stroke. The knowledge requirements for the safe performance of CAS include an understanding of the evidence base from randomized controlled trials, carotid and aortic arch anatomy and pathology, clinical stroke syndromes, the differing treatment options for stroke and carotid atherosclerosis, and recognition and management of periprocedural complications. It is critical that all patients being considered for a carotid intervention have adequate pre-procedural neuro-imaging and an independent, standardized neurological assessment before and after the procedure. Maintenance of proficiency in CAS requires active involvement in surgical/endovascular audit and continuing medical education programs. These standards should apply in the public and private health care settings. Conclusion:, These guidelines represent the consensus of an inter-collegiate committee in order to direct appropriate patient selection and the range of cognitive and technical requirements to perform CAS. Advances in endovascular technologies and the results of randomized controlled trials will guide future revisions of these guidelines. [source]