Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Statin Users (statin + user)
Selected AbstractsStatin use in Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with a delay in starting insulinDIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 9 2004A. Yee Abstract Aims It has been suggested that HMG Co-A reductase inhibitors (,statins') may reduce the risk of developing Type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study was designed to evaluate whether use of statins would also delay progression to insulin therapy. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study using Saskatchewan Health databases to identify subjects newly started on oral antidiabetic agents from 1991 to 1996. Subjects < 30 years of age or with previous lipid-lowering drug use were excluded. Medications known to influence glycaemic control, co-morbidity, and demographic data were collected. Statin exposure was defined as at least 1 year of use. Primary outcome was starting insulin treatment. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the association between statin use and starting insulin. Results The final cohort included 10 996 new users of oral antidiabetic agents, of which 484 (4.4%) used statins. Mean age was 64 years and 55% were male. Mean duration of follow-up was 5.1 years; 11.1% (n = 1221) eventually started insulin treatment. Statin users were no less likely than non-users to start insulin treatment eventually (11.6% vs. 11.1%, P = 0.74). After multivariate adjustment, however, statin use was associated with a 10-month delay before newly treated diabetic subjects needed to start insulin treatment (adjusted hazard ratio 0.74; 95% confidence interval 0.56, 0.97, P = 0.028). Conclusion The use of statins is associated with a delay in starting insulin treatment in patients with Type 2 diabetes initially treated with oral antidiabetic agents. Whether this relationship exists for patients at high risk of developing diabetes should be examined in a randomized trial. [source] Effect of Statin (HMG-Co-A-Reductase Inhibitor) Use on 1-Year Mortality and Hospitalization Rates in Older Patients with Cardiovascular Disease Living in Nursing HomesJOURNAL OF AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, Issue 8 2002Charles B. Eaton MD OBJECTIVES: To quantify the effect of statins on 1-year mortality, hospitalizations, and decline in physical function among patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) aged 65 and older living in nursing homes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: All Medicare/Medicaid certified nursing homes (N = 1,492) in Maine, New York, Mississippi, and South Dakota. PARTICIPANTS: We identified 51,559 older patients with CVD from a population database that merged sociodemographic data and functional, clinical, and drug treatments from more than 300,000 newly admitted nursing home residents from 1992 to 1997. Statin users (n = 1,313) were matched with nonusers (n = 1,313) in the same facilities. MEASUREMENTS: All-cause mortality, hospitalization, combined endpoint of mortality or hospitalization, and decline in physical function were determined at 1 year, and survival analysis was performed. RESULTS: Prevalence of statin use in this frail older cohort with CVD was 2.6%. Statin use varied by age, gender, comorbid condition, medication use, and cognitive and physical function. One-year mortality was 229/1,000 person-years in the statin group and 404/1,000 person-years in the nonusers, with an adjusted hazard rate ratio (HRR) of 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.58,0.81. The estimated number needed to treat was seven (95% CI = 5,13). This association with improved all-cause mortality was evident for women and men and for age groups 75 to 84, and 85 and older. CONCLUSION: Statin therapy is associated with improved clinical outcomes, including reduction in 1-year all-cause mortality, and the combined endpoint of death or hospitalization in a frail older population with CVD. Some caution should be taken in interpreting these results because potential bias from residual confounding could affect these results. [source] High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease in 5641 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiographyEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, Issue 6 2008H. F. Alber ABSTRACT Background, Although high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are well-established predictors for future cardiovascular events, little information is available regarding their correlation with the prevalence and severity of angiographically evaluated coronary artery disease (CAD). Material and methods,, Five thousand six hundred forty-one consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography for the evaluation of CAD were analysed. Cardiovascular risk factors were assessed by routine blood chemistry and questionnaire. CAD severity was graded by visual estimation of lumen diameter stenosis with significant stenoses defined as lumen diameter reduction of , 70%. Coronary angiograms were graded as one-, two- or three-vessel disease, as nonsignificant CAD (lumen irregularities < 70%) or non-CAD. Results,, HDL-C (60·3 ± 18·5 vs. 51·9 ± 15·3 mg dL,1; P < 0·001) was higher and CRP was lower (0·65 ± 1·68 vs. 1·02 ± 2·38 mg dL,1; P < 0·001) in non-CAD (n = 1517) compared to overall CAD patients (n = 4124). CAD patients were older (65·2 ± 10·5 years vs. 59·9 ± 11·4 years), more often diabetics (19·2% vs. 10·6%) and hypertensives (79·2% vs. 66·0%) and included more smokers (18·8% vs. 16·5%) (all P < 0·005). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (124·5 ± 38·3 vs. 126·0 ± 36·3 mg dL,1; P = NS) was similar in overall CAD and non-CAD patients with more statin users (43·4% vs. 27·9%; P < 0·001) among CAD patients. Comparing non-CAD with different CAD severities using analysis of variance, results did not change substantially. In a multivariate analysis, HDL-C and CRP remained independently associated with the prevalence of CAD. In addition, HDL-C is also a potent predictor for the severity of CAD. Conclusions,, In this large consecutive patient cohort, HDL-C and CRP are independently associated with the prevalence of CAD. In this analysis, HDL-C is an even stronger predictor for CAD than some other major classical risk factors. [source] Prostate cancer and PSA among statin users in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trialINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, Issue 7 2010Teemu J. Murtola Abstract Decreased risk of advanced prostate cancer has been reported among men using statins. However, the evidence on overall prostate cancer risk is conflicting. We compared the relative risk between current users and non-users of statins or other cholesterol-lowering medications in a population undergoing systematical prostate cancer screening. The study cohort comprised of 23,320 men participating in the screening arm of the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial during 1996,2004. Information on medication use was obtained from a comprehensive national prescription database. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for prostate cancer. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was compared between current users and non-users of cholesterol-lowering drugs. Compared with medication non-users, the overall prostate cancer incidence was decreased among statin users [HR 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63,0.89]. The inverse association was dose-dependent with cumulative amount of statin use, and strongest for low-grade and early stage tumors. The incidence was nonsignificantly lower also among users of other types of cholesterol-lowering drugs (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.28,1.38), but without dose-dependence. Age-adjusted median serum PSA tended to be lower among users of cholesterol-lowering drugs, but the relative risk decrease among statin users was not related to decreased PSA. Overall incidence of prostate cancer was lowered among statin users when bias due to differential PSA testing between medication users and non-users was eliminated by systematical prostate cancer screening. Cholesterol-lowering with statins seems beneficial for prostate cancer prevention. [source] Statins may reduce episodes of exacerbation and the requirement for intubation in patients with COPD: evidence from a retrospective cohort studyINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, Issue 9 2008A. I. Blamoun Summary Introduction:, Statins have diverse anti-inflammatory effects in addition to their lipid-lowering ability. This study assesses the rate of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation and intubations in patients taking statins. Methods:, This is a retrospective cohort study of 185 patients with COPD exacerbation, with a 1-year follow-up. Outcomes examined were repeat hospitalisation and intubations for COPD exacerbation. Baseline characteristics for which the p-value was , 0.10 were considered as covariates for inclusion in a multivariate model. Results:, The statin group had fewer episodes of exacerbation and required intubation fewer times than the subjects not receiving statins (p < 0.0001 for both outcomes). Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) for no statin use vs. statin use were 9.54 (95% CI: 4.54,20.02) for exacerbation and 10.47 (CI: 4.56,24.01) for intubation. The OR, adjusted for the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ORa), were 2.35 (CI: 1.01,5.50) for non-statin users exhibiting an exacerbation and 10.36 (CI: 2.77,38.76) for this group requiring intubation, compared with statin users. Similarly, ORa for long-acting ,2 agonists as a covariate were 3.01 (CI: 1.46,6.10) for exacerbation and 8.89 (CI: 3.67,21.32) for intubation. Time to outcome during the observation period was reduced by statins with the hazard ratio (HR) for exacerbation of 0.19 (CI: 0.06,0.14); HR for statins reducing intubation was 0.14 (95% CI: 0.10,0.30). Conclusions:, These data suggest that the use of statins may be associated with lower incidence of both exacerbations and intubations in patients with COPD. [source] The safety of rosuvastatin in comparison with other statins in over 100,000 statin users in UK primary care,,PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, Issue 10 2008Luis Alberto García-Rodríguez MD Abstract Purpose To compare mortality and the incidence of hospitalization for myopathy, rhabdomyolysis, acute renal failure and acute liver injury in patients receiving rosuvastatin and those taking other statins. Methods Patients prescribed a statin that they had not used before were selected from the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD) and followed up from 1 April 2003 to 31 December 2005. Results We studied 10,289 patients on rosuvastatin and 117,102 taking other statins. No cases of myopathy, rhabdomyolysis or acute liver injury occurred among rosuvastatin users. In those taking statins other than rosuvastatin, the incidence of myopathy was 0.4 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.1,0.9), of rhabdomyolysis was 0.4 (95%CI: 0.1,0.9) and of acute liver injury was 0.4 (95%CI: 0.2,1.0), per 10,000 person-years. Fourteen cases of acute renal failure were identified (two among rosuvastatin users and 12 among other statin users). Among current users, the relative risk (RR) of acute renal failure in rosuvastatin users compared with other statin users was 1.16 (95%CI: 0.15,9.03). We identified 3232 deaths during the study period (173 in the rosuvastatin-treated group and 3059 in the other statin group). The RR of death associated with current use of rosuvastatin compared with other statins was 0.55 (95%CI: 0.44,0.68). Conclusions We found no evidence that patients prescribed rosuvastatin were at greater risk of these outcomes than patients prescribed other statins. There was no evidence of increased mortality among patients taking rosuvastatin, even after allowing for age, sex and prior statin use. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] The safety of rosuvastatin in comparison with other statins in over 25,000 statin users in the Saskatchewan Health Databases,,PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, Issue 10 2008Luis Alberto García-Rodríguez MD Abstract Purpose To compare mortality and the incidence of hospitalization for myopathy, rhabdomyolysis, acute renal failure and acute liver injury in patients receiving rosuvastatin and those taking other statins. Methods Patients prescribed a statin that they had not used before were selected from the Saskatchewan Health Databases (SHD) and followed up from 1 July 2003 until 31 March 2005. Results We studied 10,384 patients on rosuvastatin and 14,854 taking other statins. Two cases of myopathy were identified (one on rosuvastatin, one on another statin). The relative risk (RR) of myopathy in patients currently taking rosuvastatin compared with other statins was 1.31 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13,13.41). Two cases of rhabdomyolysis were detected among current rosuvastatin users (incidence: 2.9 [95% CI: 0.8,10.7] per 10,000 person-years). No cases of acute liver injury occurred among rosuvastatin patients. Seventeen cases of acute renal failure were identified (five among rosuvastatin users, 12 taking other statins). The RR of acute renal failure in current rosuvastatin users compared with other statins was 0.49 (95% CI: 0.16,1.50). We identified 285 deaths during the study period (87 among rosuvastatin users, 198 taking other statins). The RR of death in current rosuvastatin users compared with other statins was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.32,0.57). Conclusions We found no evidence that patients prescribed rosuvastatin were at greater risk of the study outcomes than patients prescribed other statins. There was no evidence of increased mortality among patients taking rosuvastatin, even after allowing for age, sex and prior statin use. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Rosuvastatin safety: a comprehensive, international pharmacoepidemiology programme,,§PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, Issue 7 2006Saga Johansson MD Abstract Results from clinical trials and clinical practice have shown statins to be generally well tolerated with a low frequency of clinically relevant side effects. Nevertheless, there are rare occasions when adverse events (AEs), sometimes serious, may occur. Rosuvastatin is the newest statin to be approved in the USA and many other countries. As part of the continued assessment of the benefit-risk profile of rosuvastatin, AstraZeneca has developed a progressive, comprehensive pharmacoepidemiology programme to complement safety data obtained from randomised clinical trials and spontaneous reporting systems, which have demonstrated that rosuvastatin has a safety profile in line with comparator statins. This programme comprises nine studies conducted in recognised centres of excellence assessing over 50,000 patients treated with rosuvastatin. It consists of three components: patient characteristics studies (four studies), safety evaluation studies (four studies); and review of data generated from the Prescription-Event Monitoring (PEM) study, designed and run by an independent third party. Patient characteristics studies are designed to describe the characteristics and drug utilisation patterns of new users of rosuvastatin compared with new users of other statins in automated databases. Safety evaluation studies will examine the rates of specific AEs in different cohorts of statin users and determine risk factors for these events using data recorded prospectively in automated databases with case adjudication via medical record review. The independent PEM study will monitor any significant events recorded by general practitioners since starting rosuvastatin treatment. This article is an overview of the rationale and methodology of the rosuvastatin pharmacoepidemiology programme. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Switching statins in Norway after new reimbursement policy , a nationwide prescription studyBRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Issue 4 2007Solveig Sakshaug What is already known about this subject ,,Use of statins is growing worldwide and costs represent a burden to public budgets. ,,The introduction of simvastatin generics, generic substitution and price regulations have contributed to price reductions and resulted in overall cost reductions of statin use in Norway. What this study adds ,,New reimbursement regulations for statins in Norway in June 2005, making simvastatin the drug of choice, had a great impact on physicians' prescribing of statins. ,,Nearly 40% of the atorvastatin users switched to simvastatin during the 13-month period after implementation of the new regulations. ,,Among the new users of statins the proportion receiving simvastatin increased from 48% in May 2005 to 92% in June 2006. ,,The new regulations have reduced costs of statins, even though the prevalence of statin use has increased. Aims To assess the changes in prescribing of statins in Norway after implementation of the new reimbursement regulations for statins in June 2005. Methods Data were retrieved from the Norwegian Prescription Database covering the total population in Norway (4.6 million). Outcome measures were the proportion of atorvastatin users switching to simvastatin and changes in the proportion of new statin users receiving simvastatin. Based on retail costs for all statin prescriptions dispensed in Norway, expenditure was measured in Norwegian currency. Results One-year prevalences of statin use increased from 6.3 to 6.8% for women and from 7.5 to 8.1% for men from the year before to the year after the new statin regulations. Of atorvastatin users (N = 131 222), 39% switched to simvastatin during the 13-month period after the implementation. The proportion of switching was higher in women (41%) than in men (36%). In May 2005, 48% of the new statin users received simvastatin. The proportion of new users receiving simvastatin increased rapidly after implementation of the new regulations to 68% in June 2005 and reached 92% in June 2006. Expenditure was reduced from ,120 million to ,95 million when comparing the year before with the year after the new statin regulations. Conclusions The new reimbursement policy for statins has had a great impact on physicians' prescribing of statins in Norway. Physicians in Norway acknowledge the importance of contributing to cost containment. [source] Effects of etanercept on C-reactive protein levels in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritisBRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, Issue 2 2008B. Strober Summary Background, C-reactive protein (CRP), an inflammation biomarker, indicates cardiovascular risk and is elevated in psoriasis. The effect of etanercept on CRP in psoriasis has not been previously examined. Objectives, The primary objective was to examine the effect of etanercept on CRP levels from baseline to week 12 compared with placebo. Secondary objectives included assessment of baseline CRP and relationships between CRP and body mass index (BMI), statin drug use, and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores. Methods, A retrospective analysis was conducted of CRP levels from patients with psoriasis who participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, U.S. registrational study. Data were analysed separately if patients self-reported psoriatic arthritis. Results, Baseline CRP levels were elevated in patients with psoriasis with and without psoriatic arthritis. CRP was significantly reduced in both groups after 12 weeks of etanercept treatment. Patients with psoriasis with psoriatic arthritis and patients with higher BMIs had higher median baseline CRP values and greater reduction of CRP values compared with those without psoriatic arthritis and those with lower BMIs. Etanercept lowered CRP levels in statin users and nonusers. Regression analyses revealed an association between baseline PASI score and baseline CRP independent of BMI in patients with psoriasis. Conclusions, Patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, with or without psoriatic arthritis, have increased systemic inflammation demonstrated by elevated CRP levels. In psoriasis without psoriatic arthritis, skin disease activity is associated significantly with CRP elevation, independent of BMI, age and sex. Etanercept reduced CRP levels in all but the normal weight psoriasis group without psoriatic arthritis. [source] Statin treatment after a recent TIA or stroke: is effectiveness shown in randomized clinical trials also observed in everyday clinical practice?ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 1 2010H. F. Lingsma Lingsma HF, Steyerberg EW, Scholte op Reimer WJM, van Domburg R, Dippel DWJ, the Netherlands Stroke Survey Investigators. Statin treatment after a recent TIA or stroke: is effectiveness shown in randomized clinical trials also observed in everyday clinical practice? Acta Neurol Scand: 2010: 122: 15,20. © 2009 The Authors Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Munksgaard. Aim and background,,, The benefit of statin treatment in patients with a previous ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) has been demonstrated in randomized clinical trials (RCT). However, the effectiveness in everyday clinical practice may be decreased because of a different patient population and less controlled setting. We aim to describe statin use in an unselected cohort of patients, identify factors related to statin use and test whether the effect of statins on recurrent vascular events and mortality observed in RCTs is also observed in everyday clinical practice. Methods,,, In 10 centers in the Netherlands, patients admitted to the hospital or visiting the outpatient clinic with a recent TIA or ischemic stroke were prospectively and consecutively enrolled between October 2002 and May 2003. Statin use was determined at discharge and during follow-up. We used logistic regression models to estimate the effect of statins on the occurrence of vascular events (stroke or myocardial infarction) and mortality within 3 years. We adjusted for confounders with a propensity score that relates patient characteristics to the probability of using statins. Results,,, Of the 751 patients in the study, 252 (34%) experienced a vascular event within 3 years. Age, elevated cholesterol levels and other cardiovascular risk factors were associated with statin use at discharge. After 3 years, 109 of 280 (39%) of the users at discharge had stopped using statins. Propensity score adjusted analyses showed a beneficial effect of statins on the occurrence of the primary outcome (odds ratio 0.8, 95% CI: 0.6,1.2). Conclusion,,, In our study, we found poor treatment adherence to statins. Nevertheless, after adjustment for the differences between statin users and non-statin users, the observed beneficial effect of statins on the occurrence of vascular events within 3 years, although not statistically significant, is compatible with the effect observed in clinical trials. [source] | ||||||||||||||||||||||