Home About us Contact | |||
Stopping Criterion (stopping + criterion)
Selected AbstractsA Comparative Study of Modal Parameter Identification Based on Wavelet and Hilbert,Huang TransformsCOMPUTER-AIDED CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, Issue 1 2006Banfu Yan Special attention is given to some implementation issues, such as the modal separation and end effect in the WT, the optimal parameter selection of the wavelet function, the new stopping criterion for the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and the end effect in the HHT. The capabilities of these two techniques are compared and assessed by using three examples, namely a numerical simulation for a damped system with two very close modes, an impact test on an experimental model with three well-separated modes, and an ambient vibration test on the Z24-bridge benchmark problem. The results demonstrate that for the system with well-separated modes both methods are applicable when the time,frequency resolutions are sufficiently taken into account, whereas for the system with very close modes, the WT method seems to be more theoretical and effective than HHT from the viewpoint of parameter design. [source] A stopping criterion for the conjugate gradient algorithm in the framework of anisotropic adaptive finite elementsINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, Issue 4 2009M. Picasso Abstract We propose a simple stopping criterion for the conjugate gradient (CG) algorithm in the framework of anisotropic, adaptive finite elements for elliptic problems. The goal of the adaptive algorithm is to find a triangulation such that the estimated relative error is close to a given tolerance TOL. We propose to stop the CG algorithm whenever the residual vector has Euclidian norm less than a small fraction of the estimated error. This stopping criterion is based on a posteriori error estimates between the true solution u and the computed solution u (the superscript n stands for the CG iteration number, the subscript h for the typical mesh size) and on heuristics to relate the error between uh and u to the residual vector. Numerical experiments with anisotropic adaptive meshes show that the total number of CG iterations can be divided by 10 without significant discrepancy in the computed results. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] An iterative method for the reconstruction of a stationary flowNUMERICAL METHODS FOR PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS, Issue 5 2007Tomas Johansson Abstract In this article, an iterative algorithm based on the Landweber-Fridman method in combination with the boundary element method is developed for solving a Cauchy problem in linear hydrostatics Stokes flow of a slow viscous fluid. This is an iteration scheme where mixed well-posed problems for the stationary generalized Stokes system and its adjoint are solved in an alternating way. A convergence proof of this procedure is included and an efficient stopping criterion is employed. The numerical results confirm that the iterative method produces a convergent and stable numerical solution. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Numer Methods Partial Differential Eq 2007 [source] Incorporating Data Received after a Sequential Trial Has Stopped into the Final Analysis: Implementation and Comparison of MethodsBIOMETRICS, Issue 3 2003Marina Roshini Sooriyarachchi Summary. In a sequential clinical trial, accrual of data on patients often continues after the stopping criterion for the study has been met. This is termed "overrunning." Overrunning occurs mainly when the primary response from each patient is measured after some extended observation period. The objective of this article is to compare two methods of allowing for overrunning. In particular, simulation studies are reported that assess the two procedures in terms of how well they maintain the intended type I error rate. The effect on power resulting from the incorporation of "overrunning data" using the two procedures is evaluated. [source] Sequential Tests for Noninferiority and SuperiorityBIOMETRICS, Issue 1 2003W. Brannath Summary. The problem of simultaneous sequential tests for noninferiority and superiority of a treatment, as compared to an active control, is considered in terms of continuous hierarchical families of one-sided null hypotheses, in the framework of group sequential and adaptive two-stage designs. The crucial point is that the decision boundaries for the individual null hypotheses may vary over the parameter space. This allows one to construct designs where, e.g., a rigid stopping criterion is chosen, rejecting or accepting all individual null hypotheses simultaneously. Another possibility is to use monitoring type stopping boundaries, which leave some flexibility to the experimenter: he can decide, at the interim analysis, whether he is satisfied with the noninferiority margin achieved at this stage, or wants to go for more at the second stage. In the case where he proceeds to the second stage, he may perform midtrial design modifications (e.g., reassess the sample size). The proposed approach allows one to "spend," e.g., less of , for an early proof of noninferiority than for an early proof of superiority, and is illustrated by typical examples. [source] |