Home About us Contact | |||
Specific Clinical Situations (specific + clinical_situation)
Selected AbstractsSmall-Diameter Implants: Indications and ContraindicationsJOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, Issue 4 2000MITHRIDADE DAVARPANAH MD ABSTRACT The choice of implant diameter depends on the type of edentulousness, the volume of the residual bone, the amount of space available for the prosthetic reconstruction, the emergence profile, and the type of occlusion. Small-diameter implants are indicated in specific clinical situations, for example, where there is reduced interradicular bone or a thin alveolar crest, and for the replacement of teeth with small cervical diameter. Before using a small-diameter implant, the biomechanical risk factors must be carefully analyzed. Preliminary reports of this type of implant show good short- and medium-term results. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Specific clinical situations indicate the use of small-diameter implants: a reduced amount of bone (thin alveolar crest) and where the replacement tooth requires a small cervical diameter. In some cases, the use of small-diameter implants avoids bone reconstruction. [source] Narrative Methods and Children: Theoretical Explanations and Practice IssuesJOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRIC NURSING, Issue 1 2008Lorna Bennett RN TOPIC:,The Narrative approach is an innovative way of working with children and adolescents experiencing mental health problems. This approach can be effectively integrated with the expressive arts and other nonverbal ways of accessing the life world of children. In addition, the approach promotes respect for and collaboration with the child in working towards healing and growth. PURPOSE:,In this paper core features of the narrative approach are described; the theoretical and philosophical and evidence base for this approach as well as its congruence with the special nature and needs of children will be explored. Finally, the benefits and challenges of this approach in relation to a specific clinical situation will be highlighted. SOURCES USED:,Published literature and the author's clinical experiences. CONCLUSION:,Narrative methods are ideally suited for addressing needs of children experiencing mental health problems and can enhance therapeutic effectiveness. Some of the challenges associated with its use include: finding creative ways to apply specific narrative concepts and methods with diverse clinical issues/problems; learning to collaborate with children and respect them as experts in their own lives; and shifting the nursing focus from a problem-focused orientation to a strength-oriented and child-centered approach. [source] Idiopathic myelofibrosis: pathogenesis to treatmentHEMATOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, Issue 2 2006John T Reilly Abstract Idiopathic myelofibrosis (IMF) is the least common of the chronic myeloproliferative disorders and carries the worst prognosis with a median survival of 4 years. It is a clonal haematopoietic stem-cell disorder and, although the pathogenesis remains unclear, approximately 50% of cases are known to possess an activating JAK2 V617F mutation. In contrast, the characteristic stromal proliferation is a reactive, or secondary, event that results from the aberrant release of a variety of growth factors from megakaryocytes and monocytes. Treatment for most cases is supportive, although androgens, recombinant erythropoietin, steroids and thalidomide are effective modalities for the amelioration of anaemia. Myelosuppression, splenectomy and irradiation are valuable therapeutic modalities for specific clinical situations. Prognostic scores are available to aid the identification of cases for whom bone marrow transplantation should be considered. Recently, the use of reduced intensity conditioning has resulted in prolonged survival and lower transplant-related mortality. This review summarises the recent advances in the disease's pathogenesis and discusses the role of the various therapeutic options. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] IMMEDIATE LOADING OF IMPLANTS IN THE ESTHETIC ZONEJOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, Issue 5 2005Saj Jivraj DDS The predictability of dental implants using the traditional Branemark protocol has been well documented. Since its inception, this protocol has been progressively challenged to decrease treatment time, minimize the number of surgical procedures, and maximize esthetic outcomes. Today, in specific clinical situations, implants may be placed and immediately loaded with provisional restorations. Immediate loading in the edentulous mandible has been well documented. There are also good data to show that immediate loading of the edentulous maxilla is also feasible if bone quality is suitable. The focus now has shifted toward immediate loading of implants placed in the esthetic zone. Clinicians have recognized that the challenge of providing anterior tooth replacements is in preserving the hard and soft tissue components that exist around natural teeth. The advantages of immediate restoration are obvious; however, the application of immediate or early load may pose an increased risk of implant failure in single-tooth situations. The prerequisites for achieving and maintaining acceptable results are not fully known. This review examines some of the literature concerning the reliability of early or immediate loading of implants placed in the esthetic zone. [source] Small-Diameter Implants: Indications and ContraindicationsJOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, Issue 4 2000MITHRIDADE DAVARPANAH MD ABSTRACT The choice of implant diameter depends on the type of edentulousness, the volume of the residual bone, the amount of space available for the prosthetic reconstruction, the emergence profile, and the type of occlusion. Small-diameter implants are indicated in specific clinical situations, for example, where there is reduced interradicular bone or a thin alveolar crest, and for the replacement of teeth with small cervical diameter. Before using a small-diameter implant, the biomechanical risk factors must be carefully analyzed. Preliminary reports of this type of implant show good short- and medium-term results. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Specific clinical situations indicate the use of small-diameter implants: a reduced amount of bone (thin alveolar crest) and where the replacement tooth requires a small cervical diameter. In some cases, the use of small-diameter implants avoids bone reconstruction. [source] Investigating intellectual disability: A genetic perspectiveJOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, Issue 7 2003NK Poplawski Abstract: Intellectual disability (ID) is a common paediatric problem. Investigation focused on determining the aetiology of ID is warranted because a specific diagnosis may assist in prognostication, recurrence risk counselling, and identification of therapeutic and educational interventions. Three groups of screening investigations can be justified on the basis of expert opinion, common sense and the small body of published evidence-based medicine. First, investigations where current evidence justifies routine use in the investigation of ID; second, investigations which should be considered in all children with ID, although there is insufficient current evidence to support routine use; and finally, investigations which currently have an unclear role in children with ID and should be restricted to specific clinical situations unless further evidence suggesting otherwise emerges. There is a great need for systematic evaluation of the diagnostic yield of investigation templates based on this proposed stratification of investigations. [source] Genotype and viral load as prognostic indicators in the treatment of hepatitis CJOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS, Issue 4 2000Trepo Interferon-, (IFN-,), either alone or in combination with ribavirin, is the standard treatment for patients with hepatitis C. However, most patients do not achieve a sustained remission with this treatment regimen. A number of studies have demonstrated that genotype, baseline viral load and/or a decrease in viral load early after treatment induction are the major predictive factors for response to treatment with IFN. Patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 are more resistant to treatment with IFN, whereas low viral load at baseline and a marked decline in the HCV RNA level during the first 2,12 weeks of IFN therapy are associated with enhanced treatment efficacy. These variables could potentially be used to develop treatment algorithms that tailor therapies for specific clinical situations. Continued development and refinement of such algorithms would facilitate both the selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from therapy and the development of optimal treatment regimens for different patient groups. Predictive factors will also enable clinicians to identify subsets of patients who are not expected to respond well to current treatment. The development of new delivery methods for IFN that produce sustained antiviral pressure may provide a means of treating these previously difficult-to-treat patient groups. [source] Magnification devices for endodontic therapyAUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, Issue 4 2009M Del Fabbro Background:, After the introduction of microsurgical principles in endodontics, involving new techniques for root canal treatment, there has been a continuous search for enhancing the visualization of the surgical field. It would be interesting to know if the technical advantages for the operator brought in by magnification devices like surgical microscope, endoscope and magnifying loupes, are also associated with advantages for the patient, in terms of improvement of clinical and radiographic outcomes. Objectives:, The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate and compare the effects of endodontic treatment performed with the aid of magnification devices versus endodontic treatment without magnification devices. We also aimed at comparing among them the different magnification devices used in endodontics (microscope, endoscope, magnifying loupes). Search strategy:, The Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched with appropriate search strategies. Handsearching included nine dental journals. The bibliographies of relevant clinical trials and relevant articles were checked for identifying studies outside the handsearched journals. Seven manufacturers of instruments in the field of endodontics and/or endodontic surgery, as well as the authors of the identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were contacted in order to identify unpublished or ongoing RCTs. There were no language restrictions. The last electronic search was conducted on 2nd April 2009, and the last handsearching was undertaken on 31st January 2009. Selection criteria:, All randomized and quasi-randomized trials comparing endodontic therapy performed with or without using one or more types of magnification device, as well as randomized and quasi-randomized trials comparing two or more magnification devices used as an adjunct to endodontic therapy were considered. Data collection and analysis:, Screening of studies and data extraction were conducted independently and in duplicate. The Cochrane Collaboration statistical guidelines were to be followed for data synthesis. Main results:, No trial could be included in the present review. All of the prospective trials that were identified, all dealing with endodontic surgery, had to be excluded for various reasons. Only one RCT was identified comparing three magnificators (magnifying loupes, surgical microscope, endoscope) in endodontic surgery. No RCT was found that compared the outcome of endodontic therapy using or without using a given magnification device. Authors' conclusions:, No objective conclusion can be drawn from the results of this review as no article was identified in the current literature that satisfied the criteria for inclusion. It is unknown if and how the type of magnification device affects the treatment outcome, considering the high number of factors that may have a significant impact on the success of endodontic surgical procedure. This should be investigated by further long-term RCTs with large sample size. Technical advantages of magnificators have been widely reported in low evidence level studies, but they should be systematically addressed to know if there can be the clinical indication for using a given magnification device for specific clinical situations, such as for molar teeth, or if they can all be used interchangeably. Well-designed RCTs should also be performed to determine the true difference in terms of treatment success rates between using or not using a magnification device in both conventional and surgical endodontic treatment, if any exist. Plain language summary:, Magnification devices for endodontic therapy. There are no data to draw a sound conclusion on the effect of adopting either a microscope, an endoscope, or magnifying loupes for better visualization in endodontic therapy, in terms of clinical outcomes. Though the use of magnification devices has often been associated with technical advantages for the operator and with an improved management of the root canal due to a better visualization of the operative field, it still has to be demonstrated that their use may lead to an improved treatment success rate. More long-term well-designed randomized trials with a large sample size are urgently needed to address the issues of the present review. [source] |