Home  About us  Contact
 

Sphincter Preservation (sphincter + preservation)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

Sphincter preservation in rectal cancer is associated with patients' socioeconomic status

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 10 2010
L. I. Olsson
Background: Decision making regarding the choice of surgical procedure in rectal cancer is complex. It was hypothesized that, in addition to clinical factors, several aspects of patients' socioeconomic background influence this process. Methods: Individually attained data on civil status, education and income were linked to the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry 1995,2005 (16 713 patients) and analysed by logistic regression. Results: Anterior resection (AR) was performed in 7433 patients (44·5 per cent), abdominoperineal resection (APR) in 3808 (22·8 per cent) and Hartmann's procedure in 1704 (10·2 per cent). Unmarried patients were least likely (odds ratio (OR) 0·76, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0·64 to 0·88) and university-educated men were most likely (OR 1·30, 1·04 to 1·62) to have an AR. Patients with the highest income were more likely to undergo AR (OR 0·80, 0·85 and 0·86 respectively for first, second and third income quartiles). Socioeconomic differences in the use of AR were smallest among the youngest patients. Unmarried patients were more likely (OR 1·21, 95 per cent c.i. 1·00 to 1·48) and university-educated patients less likely (OR 0·78, 95 per cent c.i. 0·63 to 0·98) to have an APR. Conclusion: The choice of surgical strategy in rectal cancer is not socioeconomically neutral. Confounding factors, such as co-morbidity or smoking, may explain some of the differences but inequality in treatment is also plausible. Copyright © 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection with coloplasty and coloanal anastomosis for mid and low rectal cancer,

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 4 2003
E. Rullier
Background: The feasibility of laparoscopic rectal resection in patients with mid or low rectal cancer was studied prospectively with regard to quality of mesorectal excision, autonomic pelvic nerve preservation and anal sphincter preservation. Methods: Laparoscopic rectal excision was performed in 32 patients (21 men) with rectal carcinoma located 5 cm from the anal verge. Most patients had T3 disease and received preoperative radiotherapy. The surgical procedure was performed 6 weeks after radiotherapy and included total mesorectal excision, intersphincteric resection, transanal coloanal anastomosis with coloplasty and loop ileostomy. Results: Three patients needed conversion to a laparotomy. Postoperative morbidity occurred in ten patients, related mainly to coloplasty. Macroscopic evaluation showed an intact mesorectal excision in 29 of 32 excised specimens; microscopically, 30 of the 32 resections were R0. Sphincter preservation was achieved in 31 patients. The hypogastric nerves and pelvic plexuses were identified and preserved in 24 of the 32 patients. Sexual function was preserved in ten of 18 evaluable men. Conclusion: A laparoscopic approach can be considered in most patients with mid or low rectal cancer. Copyright © 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

B001 Multicentre Randomized Trial of Sphincter Preserving Surgery for Ultra-Low Rectal Carcinoma

COLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 2006
E. Rullier
Objective, This randomized study compared two neoadjuvant treatments in patients with a low rectal cancer less than 2 cm from the anal verge that would have required APR before radiotherapy. Method, A total of 207 patients (71% uT3) with a rectal carcinoma at 0.5 cm from the anal verge were randomized in two groups. The group HDR received a high dose of radiotherapy (45 Gy + boost 18 Gy). The group RCT received 45 Gy with concomitant chemotherapy (5FU). Surgery was performed 6 weeks after treatment, surgeons were trained with TME, APR and intersphincteric resection. Results, The rate of sphincter preserving surgery was 83% after HDR and 86% after RCT (P = 0.69). There was no difference in morbidity, clinical tumour regression (80% vs. 87%) and complete pathological response (8% vs. 15%) between HDR and RCT. Overall, the rate of R0 resection was 78%. After a follow-up of 23 months, the rates of local and distant recurrence were 6% and 19% respectively and the disease-free survival was 77%. Survival was better after sphincter preservation than after APR. Conclusion, Sphincter preservation was achieved in 85% of ultra-low rectal carcinomas without compromising oncological prinicples. No difference was observed between HDR and RCT. Further follow-up is necessary to confirm this conservative approach. [source]

Analysis of clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with surgery: intraperitoneal versus extraperitoneal rectal cancer

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, Issue 3 2006
E. BENZONI md
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a widely purposed and performed treatment for rectal cancer. Downstaging effects possibly enhance the rate of curative surgery and may enable sphincter preservation in low-lying tumours. The current study examines the clinical outcomes in patients enrolled in a neoadjuvant CRT-surgery protocol for rectal cancer, distinguishing between intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal cancer. From 1994 to 2003, 58 patients with a primary diagnosis of rectal cancer were enrolled in a single-centre, not randomized study based on 5-week sessions of radiotherapy associated with a 30-day protracted venous 5-FU infusion followed by surgical resection. The study population was divided into two groups according to the localization of the tumour: 18 intraperitoneal and 40 extraperitoneal (EPt). Fifty-eight patients were treated with neoadjuvant CRT and surgery. Overall mortality rate was 25.9%, no deaths were recorded during hospitalization; 10 patients (all EPt) died because of recurrence. Significant differences in disease-free survival and overall survival rates were found between intraperitoneal vs. extraperitoneal tumours (P = 0.006), both intraperitoneal vs. extraperitoneal tumours N0 (P = 0.04 and P < 0.05) and intraperitoneal vs. extraperitoneal tumours N+ (P < 0.05). We diagnosed all local recurrence and liver metastasis in extraperitoneal tumours (t = 0.02 and t = 0.04), and only one case of lung metastasis arose from intraperitoneal cancer. Extraperitoneal tumours could be more aggressive than intraperitoneal ones, spreading more precociously, and/or less responsive to the neoadjuvant CRT because of their localization rather than biological differences. Aside from lymph node status, the location of the tumour with respect to the peritoneum border, is also a prognostic factor of survival in rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant CRT and surgery. [source]

Anal sphincter preservation in locally advanced low rectal adenocarcinoma after preoperative chemoradiation therapy and coloanal anastomosis

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, Issue 1 2003
Pedro Luna-Pérez MD
Background and Objectives Standard treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma located 3,6 cm above anal verge is abdominoperineal resection. The objective was to evaluate feasibility, morbidity, and functional results of anal sphincter preservation after preoperative chemoradiation therapy and coloanal anastomosis in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma located between 3 and 6 cm above the anal verge. Methods This study included 17 males and 15 females with a mean age of 54.8,± 15.4 years. Tumors were located at a mean of 4.7,±,1.1 cm above the anal verge. The mean tumor size was 4.6,±,1.5 cm. All patients received the scheduled treatment. Twenty-two patients underwent coloanal anastomosis with the J pouch; 10 underwent straight anastomosis. Average surgical time was 328.7,±,43.8 min, and the average intraoperative hemorrhage was 471.5,±,363.6 ml. The mean distal surgical margin was 1.3,±,0.6 cm. Five patients (15.6%) received a blood transfusion. Results Major complications included coloanal anastomotic leakage (three); pelvic abscess (three), and coloanal stenosis (two). Tumor stages were as follows: T0,2,N0,M0,=,12; T3,N0,M0,=,9; T1,3,N+,M0,=,9, and T1,3,N0,3,M+,=,2. Diverting stomas were closed in 30 patients. Median follow-up was 25 months. Recurrences occurred in four patients and were local and distant (n,=,1) and distant (n,=,3). Anal sphincter function was perfect (n,=,20), incontinent to gas (n,=,3), occasional minor leak (n,=,2), frequent major soiling (n,=,3), and colostomy (n,=,2). Conclusions In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer located 3,6 cm from anal verge who are traditionally treated with abdominoperineal resection, preservation of anal sphincter after preoperative chemoradiation therapy plus complete rectal excision with coloanal anastomosis is feasible and is associated with acceptable morbidity and no mortality. J. Surg. Oncol. 2003;82:3,9. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection with coloplasty and coloanal anastomosis for mid and low rectal cancer,

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 4 2003
E. Rullier
Background: The feasibility of laparoscopic rectal resection in patients with mid or low rectal cancer was studied prospectively with regard to quality of mesorectal excision, autonomic pelvic nerve preservation and anal sphincter preservation. Methods: Laparoscopic rectal excision was performed in 32 patients (21 men) with rectal carcinoma located 5 cm from the anal verge. Most patients had T3 disease and received preoperative radiotherapy. The surgical procedure was performed 6 weeks after radiotherapy and included total mesorectal excision, intersphincteric resection, transanal coloanal anastomosis with coloplasty and loop ileostomy. Results: Three patients needed conversion to a laparotomy. Postoperative morbidity occurred in ten patients, related mainly to coloplasty. Macroscopic evaluation showed an intact mesorectal excision in 29 of 32 excised specimens; microscopically, 30 of the 32 resections were R0. Sphincter preservation was achieved in 31 patients. The hypogastric nerves and pelvic plexuses were identified and preserved in 24 of the 32 patients. Sexual function was preserved in ten of 18 evaluable men. Conclusion: A laparoscopic approach can be considered in most patients with mid or low rectal cancer. Copyright © 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

B001 Multicentre Randomized Trial of Sphincter Preserving Surgery for Ultra-Low Rectal Carcinoma

COLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 2006
E. Rullier
Objective, This randomized study compared two neoadjuvant treatments in patients with a low rectal cancer less than 2 cm from the anal verge that would have required APR before radiotherapy. Method, A total of 207 patients (71% uT3) with a rectal carcinoma at 0.5 cm from the anal verge were randomized in two groups. The group HDR received a high dose of radiotherapy (45 Gy + boost 18 Gy). The group RCT received 45 Gy with concomitant chemotherapy (5FU). Surgery was performed 6 weeks after treatment, surgeons were trained with TME, APR and intersphincteric resection. Results, The rate of sphincter preserving surgery was 83% after HDR and 86% after RCT (P = 0.69). There was no difference in morbidity, clinical tumour regression (80% vs. 87%) and complete pathological response (8% vs. 15%) between HDR and RCT. Overall, the rate of R0 resection was 78%. After a follow-up of 23 months, the rates of local and distant recurrence were 6% and 19% respectively and the disease-free survival was 77%. Survival was better after sphincter preservation than after APR. Conclusion, Sphincter preservation was achieved in 85% of ultra-low rectal carcinomas without compromising oncological prinicples. No difference was observed between HDR and RCT. Further follow-up is necessary to confirm this conservative approach. [source]

Postoperative complications in patients irradiated pre-operatively for rectal cancer: report of a randomised trial comparing short-term radiotherapy vs chemoradiation

COLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 4 2005
K. Bujko
Abstract Objective, The primary outcome was sphincter preservation. No benefit was found with chemoradiation. The aim of this report is to analyse postoperative complications, which were the secondary outcome. Material and methods, Patients with resectable T3,4 low rectal carcinoma were randomised to receive either pre-operative 5 × 5 Gy irradiation with subsequent total mesorectal excision (TME) performed within 7 days or chemoradiation (50.4 Gy, 1.8 Gy per fraction plus bolus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin) followed by TME after 4,6 weeks. Results, Three hundred and five patients (153 in 5 × 5 Gy group and 152 in chemoradiation group) were analysed. The rates of patients with postoperative complications for the 5 × 5 Gy group and for the chemoradiation group were 27 vs 21%, respectively (P = 0.27). If the values were expressed in terms of number of complications, the rates were 31 vs 22%, respectively (P = 0.06). The corresponding values for severe complications were 10 vs 11% (P = 0.85) of patients with complications and 12 vs 11% (P = 0.85) of events. Conclusion, The study did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the rate of postoperative complications after short-course pre-operative radiotherapy compared with full course chemoradiation. [source]