Home  About us  Contact
 

Slow Pathway Conduction (slow + pathway_conduction)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

Influences on Fast and Slow Pathway Conduction in Children: Does the Definition of Dual Atrioventricular Node Physiology Need to Be Changed?

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2002
ANDREW D. BLAUFOX M.D.
[source]

Analysis of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia with Variable Ventriculoatrial Block: Characteristics of the Upper Common Pathway

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 4 2009
KENJI MORIHISA M.D.
Background: The precise nature of the upper turnaround part of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is not entirely understood. Methods: In nine patients with AVNRT accompanied by variable ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction block, we examined the electrophysiologic characteristics of its upper common pathway. Results: Tachycardia was induced by atrial burst and/or extrastimulus followed by atrial-His jump, and the earliest atrial electrogram was observed at the His bundle site in all patients. Twelve incidents of VA block: Wenckebach VA block (n = 7), 2:1 VA block (n = 4), and intermittent (n = 1) were observed. In two of seven Wenckebach VA block, the retrograde earliest atrial activation site shifted from the His bundle site to coronary sinus ostium just before VA block. Prolongation of His-His interval occurred during VA block in 11 of 12 incidents. After isoproterenol administration, 1:1 VA conduction resumed in all patients. Catheter ablation at the right inferoparaseptum eliminated antegrade slow pathway conduction and rendered AVNRT noninducible in all patients. Conclusion: Selective elimination of the slow pathway conduction at the inferoparaseptal right atrium may suggest that the subatrial tissue linking the retrograde fast and antegrade slow pathways forms the upper common pathway in AVNRT with VA block. [source]

Coexistent Right- and Left-Sided Slow Pathways Participating in Distinct AV Nodal Reentrant Tachycardias

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 10 2008
LÁSZLÓ SÁGHY M.D.
We report a patient with two distinct atrioventricular (AV) nodal slow pathways, participating in two different AV nodal reentrant tachycardias,one eliminated from the right, the other only after ablation on the left side of the posterior septum. The case provides support for the concept of the posterior AV nodal extensions,a biatrial structure in most hearts,representing the anatomic basis of slow pathway conduction. [source]

The Electrophysiological Characteristics in Patients with Ventricular Stimulation Inducible Fast-Slow Form Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 10 2006
PI-CHANG LEE M.D.
Background: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can usually be induced by atrial stimulation. However, it seldom may be induced with only ventricular stimulation, especially the fast-slow form of AVNRT. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the specific electrophysiological characteristics in patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation. Methods: The total population consisted of 1,497 patients associated with AVNRT, and 106 (8.4%) of them had the fast-slow form of AVNRT and 1,373 (91.7%) the slow-fast form of AVNRT. In patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT, the AVNRT could be induced with only ventricular stimulation in 16 patients, Group 1; with only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation in 90 patients, Group 2; and with only atrial stimulation in 13 patients, Group 3. We also divided these patients with slow-fast form AVNRT (n = 1,373) into two groups: those that could be induced only by ventricular stimulation (Group 4; n = 45, 3%) and those that could be induced by atrial stimulation only or by both atrial and ventricular stimulation (n = 1.328, 97%). Results: Patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a lower incidence of an antegrade dual AVN physiology (0% vs 71.1% and 92%, P < 0.001), a lower incidence of multiple form AVNRT (31% vs 69% and 85%, P = 0.009), and a more significant retrograde functional refractory period (FRP) difference (99 ± 102 vs 30 ± 57 ms, P < 0.001) than those that could be induced with only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation. The occurrence of tachycardia stimulated with only ventricular stimulation was more frequently demonstrated in patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT than in those with the slow-fast form of AVNRT (15% vs 3%, P < 0.001). Patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a higher incidence of retrograde dual AVN physiology (75% vs 4%, P < 0.001), a longer pacing cycle length of retrograde 1:1 fast and slow pathway conduction (475 ± 63 ms vs 366 ± 64 ms, P < 0.001; 449 ± 138 ms vs 370 ± 85 ms, P = 0.009), a longer retrograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway (360 ± 124 ms vs 285 ± 62 ms, P = 0.003), and a longer retrograde FRP of the fast and slow pathway (428 ± 85 ms vs 362 ± 47 ms, P < 0.001 and 522 ± 106 vs 456 ± 97 ms, P = 0.026) than those with the slow-fast form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a different incidence of the antegrade and retrograde dual AVN physiology and the specific electrophysiological characteristics. The mechanism of the AVNRT stimulated only with ventricular stimulation was supposed to be different in patients with the slow-fast and fast-slow forms of AVNRT. [source]