Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Skeletal Metastases (skeletal + metastase)
Selected AbstractsEvaluation of the feasibility of and results of measuring health-status changes in patients undergoing surgical treatment for skeletal metastasesJOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, Issue 1 2000Denis R. Clohisy The goal of treating patients with skeletal metastases is to decrease pain and improve or maintain physical function. Assessment of the effectiveness of treatment should therefore include evaluation of patient-rated measures of quality of life. The primary objective of the study was to determine the feasibility of studying the effect of surgical treatment of skeletal metastases on quality of life. The secondary objective was to provide data that begin to characterize this effect. The characteristics of patients with skeletal metastases are heterogeneous, patient enrollment in the study may be low, high attrition occurs secondary to death, and well accepted health-status measures (such as the Short Form-36) may be ineffective at detecting changes in health status: therefore, it is difficult to study these patients. High attrition and adjuvant treatment with radiation or chemotherapy made it impractical to draw firm conclusions about the effect of surgical treatment, but a trend toward improvement in selected health-status measures for both physical and mental health was noted. Analysis of patient-rated health-status scores as predictors of survival indicates that improvement in these scores 6 weeks after surgery is associated with an increase in the length of survival following surgery. [source] HURTHLE CELL NEOPLASM OF THE THYROID GLANDANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 3 2008Mohammed Ahmed Background: A clinicopathological analysis and long-term follow up of 32 patients with Hurthle cell neoplasm (HCN) was undertaken to contrast the clinical and histological features between benign versus malignant HCN of thyroid and to examine the effect of treatment on the outcome. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 32 patients with HCN who were identified out of an archival clinical/pathological/imaging database of 3752 thyroid cancer patients seen between 1976 and June 2006. All patients underwent thyroid surgery. Data for the non-surgical treatment along with follow up were also analysed. Results: Seventeen patients were classified as malignant HCN (MHCN) and 15 as benign HCN (BHCN). Among the MHCN, there were 11 women and 6 men, whereas among BHCN there were 14 women and 1 man. Three patients designated MHCN presented with metastases, one with pulmonary metastases and two others with skeletal metastases who developed lung metastases 9,19 months later. The mean tumour size was 4.43 ± 0.66 cm for MHCN, and 2.57 ± 0.32 cm for BHCN (P = 0.03). Multicentric tumour foci were evident in five cases (29%) of MHCN but none among the BHCN (P = 0.03). At neck exploration cervical lymph node dissection was carried out in nine MHCN patients with findings of tumour metastases in 33%. Postoperatively, three MHCN patients had no thyroid remnant on ultrasound and computed tomography of neck and undetectable serum thyroglobulin; these were considered to be in remission. Fourteen other MHCN patients with postoperative thyroid remnant and/or distant metastases received 131I treatment. Eight of these patients had negative whole-body scans after 131I treatment and undetectable thyroglobulin. Accordingly, 11 MHCN patients (64.7%) showed evidence of remission and 6 patients did not respond to 131I treatment. After a mean follow up of 35 months, all BHCN patients are alive with no evidence of disease. Of the MHCN, 11 (64.7%) were in remission and 35% had evidence of persistence/recurrence. One patient who had recurrence is dead. A lack of effectiveness of 131I therapy in two patients with distant metastases is an important finding. Conclusion: Features of MHCN consisted of a large tumour size, unequivocal capsular and vascular invasion, multicentric tumour foci, metastatic lymph node deposits in one-third of patients and presence of distant metastasis in a few. Findings of dominant Hurthle cell cytology in a fine-needle aspiration biopsy from a thyroid nodule should prompt surgical resection of the lesion to assess malignancy. [source] High-dose 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy for 12 patients with malignant pheochromocytomaCANCER, Issue 2 2003Brian Rose M.D. Abstract BACKGROUND 131I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine (131I-MIBG) can be used systemically to treat malignant pheochromocytoma. To improve outcome, the authors used higher levels of activity of 131I-MIBG than previously reported. The authors reported the response rates and toxicity levels in patients with malignant pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma who were treated with high-dose 131I-MIBG. METHODS Following debulking surgery and stem cell harvest, 12 patients with malignant pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma were treated with 131I-MIBG. Five had received previous external beam radiation and/or chemotherapy. The median single treatment dose was 800 mCi (37 gigabecquerels; range, 386,866 mCi) or 11.5 mCi/kg (range, 5.6,18.3 mCi/kg). The median cumulative dose was 1015 mCi (range, 386,1690 mCi). RESULTS Three patients had a complete response, two of whom had soft tissue and skeletal metastases. Their median follow-up was 45 months (range, 23,101 months). Seven patients had a partial response (PR), with a median follow-up 43 months (range, 6,47 months). Two patients without a response died with progressive disease (PD) and 2 patients with an initial PR died of PD at 13 and 11 months, respectively. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred after 79% (15 of 19) of treatments had been administered. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia followed 53% (10 of 19) and 19% (4 of 19) of treatments, respectively. One patient required stem cell infusion, and one developed primary ovarian failure. CONCLUSIONS The single and cumulative doses of 131I-MIBG were approximately 2,3.5 times higher than those used at other centers. Unlike previous reports, two patients with both skeletal and soft tissue metastases had a complete response. Hematologic toxicity was significant but tolerable. High-dose 131I-MIBG may lead to long-term survival in patients with malignant pheochromocytoma. Cancer 2003;98:239,48. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11518 [source] Bisphosphonate therapy for patients with breast carcinomaCANCER, Issue S3 2003Who to treat, when to stop Abstract Bisphosphonates have become well established in the treatment of patients with metastatic bone disease, although the optimal use of these agents has not been defined clearly. Randomized, controlled trials have demonstrated that treatment with intravenous pamidronate can significantly reduce the rate of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases from myeloma or advanced breast carcinoma. To date, there are few data from controlled, randomized studies to support the use of bisphosphonates in patients with bone metastases from malignancies other than breast carcinoma and myeloma. The optimal duration of treatment is unknown. Recent data have demonstrated that prolonged treatment is tolerated well, with no obvious toxicity. Generally, treatment is continued irrespective of the development of skeletal-related events and until there is a substantial decline in performance status. The widespread use of bisphosphonates will have major financial implications. Retrospective studies have suggested that the cost-effectiveness ratio is high for patients with advanced breast carcinoma. These ratios may be improved by targeting therapy to patients at high risk of developing complications from skeletal metastatic disease. Among patients with skeletal metastases from breast carcinoma, a recent retrospective analysis demonstrated that patients with disease confined to the skeleton were at greater risk of pathologic fractures compared with patients who had additional extraosseous disease. It is interesting to note that approximately two-thirds of patients with advanced breast carcinoma in the randomized trials of intravenous pamidronate had disease confined to the skeleton. The use of markers of bone turnover to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from bisphosphonate therapy or to identify patients who will respond to such therapy is the subject of further investigation. There are conflicting data on the use of bisphosphonates as an adjuvant therapy. Currently, such treatment should occur only as part of a clinical trial. Bisphosphonates can be used to prevent bone loss as a result of therapy for malignant disease, e.g., premature menopause in patients with early breast carcinoma. Cancer 2003;97(3 Suppl):854,8. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11146 [source] | ||||||||||