Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Skeletal Features (skeletal + feature)
Selected AbstractsOrigin and phylogeny of Guyniidae (Scleractinia) in the light of microstructural dataLETHAIA, Issue 1 2000Jaros, aw Stolarski The set of skeletal characters of the Recent azooxanthellate coral Guynia annulata Duncan, 1872 is unique among extant scleractinians and encompasses: (a) undifferentiated septal calcification centers (in most extant scleractinians calcification centers are clearly separated); (b) completely smooth septal faces (septa of almost all extant scleractinians bear granular ornamentation); (c) deeply recessed septa in respect to the epithecal rim in the adult coralla (in adults of the majority of extant scleractinians the relationships between septa and wall are the reverse); and (d) an aseptal part of the initial ontogenetic stage, just above the basal plate (almost all known scleractinians have a septate initial coralla). Skeletal features of five other extant traditional guyniids are typical of other caryophylliines (and of Scleractinia). However, the wall types present in different species of traditional guyniids exceed limits traditionally attributed to one caryophylliine family: i.e., Stenocyathus and Truncatoguynia have a marginothecal wall like the Flabellidae, whereas Schizocyathus and Temnotrochus usually have an entirely epithecal wall, as in Gardineriidae (Volzeioidea). Moreover, Pourtalocyathus and Schizocyathus show intraspecific variation in distribution of septal calcification centers (separated vs. non-separated) and in wall types (epithecal vs. consisting of large spherulite-like bodies). These major differences in skeletal architecture form the basis for a new, threefold taxonomical subdivision of the traditional guyniids: (1) Guyniidae Hickson, 1910, containing only monospecific Guynia with an epithecal wall, and septa with non-separated calcification centers; (2) Schizocyathidae fam.n., groups Microsmilia Schizocyathus, Pourtalocyathus, Temnotrochus, which have an epithecal wall and septa with usually well-separated calcification centers; and (3) Stenocyathidae fam.n. with Stenocyathus and Truncatoguynia which have a marginothecal wall and septa with well-separated calcification centers. Despite differences in the basic architecture of the skeleton, all taxa attributed to these families have ,thecal pores' formed by selective dissolution of the skeleton. I propose two hypotheses for evolutionary relationships among Guyniidae, Schizocyathidae, and Stenocyathidae: (1) Hypothesis A: the three families are not phylogenetically related and ,pores' originated independently in different scleractinian lineages: e.g., Guyniidae may represent distant zardinophyllid or gigantostyliid descendants, Schizocyathidae may be a volzeioid offshoot, whereas Stenocyathidae may be a flabellid descendant; (2) Hypothesis B: the three families are phylogenetically related and ,thecal pores' are synapomorphic for the clade (superfamily Guynioidea). Additional approaches, such as anatomical observations, molecular studies on guyniid DNA sequences, and in-depth studies on scleractinian biomineralization will be necessary to test these hypotheses. [source] A Morphological Study of Skeletal Development in Turkey during the Pre-Hatching StageANATOMIA, HISTOLOGIA, EMBRYOLOGIA, Issue 1 2009S. H. Atalgin Summary Skeletal chondrofication, ossification and growth of turkey embryos were investigated and analysed to enable assessment of the developmental status and evaluation of the experimental effects on skeletal development, skeletal mutations and development of cultured embryos. Ten embryos were prepared every 24 h from 8 to 28 days of incubation. The fixed embryos were cleared and stained in toto with Alcian blue & Alizarin red for cartilage and ossified components, respectively. Observation of the skeleton was performed under a stereoscopic microscopy, with special attention to the timing of chondrofication and ossification of the bones. The first occurrence of the primary ossification centres was observed in the femur, tibiotarsus, and the dentary and supra-angular of the mandible on the 12th day, followed immediately by the other long bones. Skeletal features of the skull were determined to show the latest appearance of cartilage and ossification. Hence, all elements of the hyolingual apparatus remained cartilaginous until hatching took place except for the ceratobranchial. Even though the vertebral column chondrified earlier as compared with the ribs and sternum, they ossified later. While chondrofication was present in all the regions of the vertebral column at the same time, ossification progressed from the cervical through caudal regions. The growth rate of the femur was eminently higher than that of the humerus with increase in time, particularly after the 20th day of incubation. This seems to be obviously natural because the eggs used in the study are from the broiler turkey, which gains giant muscle mass at a very short period; precocity is probably at the expense of the bones of the leg rather than those of the wing. [source] Skeletal and Pigmentation Defects following Retinoic Acid Exposure in Larval Summer Flounder, Paralichthys dentatusJOURNAL OF THE WORLD AQUACULTURE SOCIETY, Issue 3 2007Gabriela M. Martinez Supplementation of larval diets with vitamin A (VA) is routinely and successfully used to stimulate pigmentation development in hatchery-reared flatfishes. However, excess dietary VA can lead to high levels of its metabolite retinoic acid (RA) and has been associated with the occurrence of skeletal deformities, presumably via RA toxicity. We reared summer flounder larvae, Paralichthys dentatus, in water containing 0- to 20-nM RA to assess its effects on postmetamorphic pigmentation and on skeletal development. RA exposure disrupted pigmentation development: treated tanks had a smaller percentage of normally pigmented fish than did controls, with increased numbers of both hypo- and hyperpigmented individuals. Exposure also affected the development of several skeletal features: RA treatment correlated with a significant increase in the severity of defects in jaws, fins, hypurals, and vertebrae compared with control groups. [source] Fallback foraging as a way of life: Using dietary toughness to compare the fallback signal among capuchins and implications for interpreting morphological variationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, Issue 4 2009Barth W. Wright Abstract The genus Cebus is one of the best extant models for examining the role of fallback foods in primate evolution. Cebus includes the tufted capuchins, which exhibit skeletal features for the exploitation of hard and tough foods. Paradoxically, these seemingly "specialized" taxa belong to the most ubiquitous group of closely related primates in South America, thriving in a range of different habitats. This appears to be a consequence of their ability to exploit obdurate fallback foods. Here we compare the toughness of foods exploited by two tufted capuchin species at two ecologically distinct sites; C. apella in a tropical rainforest, and C. libidinosus in a cerrado forest. We include dietary data for one untufted species (C. olivaceus) to assess the degree of difference between the tufted species. These data, along with information on skeletal morphology, are used to address whether or not a fallback foraging species exhibits a given suite of morphological and behavioral attributes, regardless of habitat. Both tufted species ingest and masticate a number of exceedingly tough plant tissues that appear to be used as fallback resources, however, C. libidinosus has the toughest diet both in terms of median and maximal values. Morphologically, C. libidinosus is intermediate in absolute symphyseal and mandibular measurements, and in measures of postcranial robusticity, but exhibits a higher intermembral index than C. apella. We propose that this incongruence between dietary toughness and skeletal morphology is the consequence of C. libidinosus' use of tools while on the ground for the exploitation of fallback foods. Am J Phys Anthropol 140:687,699, 2009. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] | |||||||||||||