Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Skeletal Events (skeletal + event)
Selected AbstractsEfficacy of ibandronate for the treatment of skeletal events in patients with metastatic breast cancerEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, Issue 6 2009P. HERAS md HERAS P., KRITIKOS K., HATZOPOULOS A. & GEORGOPOULOU A.-P. (2009) European Journal of Cancer Care Efficacy of ibandronate for the treatment of skeletal events in patients with metastatic breast cancer Patients with breast carcinoma often develop bone metastases that carry a high risk of complications. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ibandronate in patients with metastatic bone disease following breast cancer. The primary efficacy end point of the study was the proportion of patients who developed skeletal-related events (SREs, defined as pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation therapy to bone, change in anti-neoplastic therapy and surgery to bone). Secondary end points included time to first skeletal event, skeletal morbidity rate (events/year) and time to progression of bone lesions. In 150 patients (148,/2,) with breast carcinoma and bone metastases, treatment with intravenous ibandronate 6 mg over 15 min every 4 weeks for 24 months significantly reduced the proportion of patients who experienced an SRE compared with placebo (36% vs. 48%; P = 0.027). Time to first SRE was also delayed significantly (median 457 vs. 304 days; P = 0.007). Multiple event analysis showed that ibandronate reduced the risk of developing an SRE by 32% (hazard ratio = 0.69; 95% confidence interval 0.42,0.79; P = 0.003). In general, ibandronate was well tolerated with very rare grade 3 or 4 toxicity. In this study, ibandronate was shown to be significantly more effective than placebo as a treatment for metastatic bone disease from breast cancer using multiple end points. [source] Remodeling and Vascular Spaces in BoneJOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, Issue 1 2007Erik Fink Eriksen Abstract In recent years, we have come to appreciate that the close association between bone and vasculature plays a pivotal role in the regulation of bone remodeling and fracture repair. In 2001, Hauge et al. characterized a specialized vascular structure, the bone remodeling compartment (BRC), and showed that the outer lining of this compartment was made up of flattened cells, displaying all the characteristics of lining cells in bone. A decrease in bone turnover leads to a decrease in surfaces covered with remodeling compartments, whereas increased turnover causes an increase. Immunoreactivity for all major osteotropic growth factors and cytokines including osteoprotegerin (OPG) and RANKL has been shown in the cells lining the BRC, which makes the BRC the structure of choice for coupling between resorption and formation. The secretion of these factors inside a confined space separated from the bone marrow would facilitate local regulation of the remodeling process without interference from growth factors secreted by blood cells in the marrow space. The BRC creates an environment where cells inside the structure are exposed to denuded bone, which may enable direct cellular interactions with integrins and other matrix factors known to regulate osteoclast/osteoblast activity. However, the denuded bone surface inside the BRC also constitutes an ideal environment for the seeding of bone metastases, known to have high affinity for bone matrix. Reduction in BRC space brought about by antiresorptive therapies such as bisphosphonates reduce the number of skeletal events in advanced cancer, whereas an increase in BRC space induced by remodeling activators like PTH may increase the bone metastatic burden. The BRC has only been characterized in detail in trabecular bone; there is, however, evidence that a similar structure may exist in cortical bone, but further characterization is needed. [source] Predictors of androgen independence in metastatic prostate cancerBJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 9 2004H.G. Sim OBJECTIVE To assess the factors that influence the onset of androgen independence (AI, which heralds a dismal outcome) in patients with metastatic prostate carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS The records of 361 consecutive patients with prostate carcinoma diagnosed and treated in the authors' institution from 1 January 1996 to 31 December 1999 were reviewed retrospectively; 92 with metastatic prostate carcinoma were assessed (median age 71.0 years, range 42,93). Patients were included if they developed metastatic disease from prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis. The nadir for prostate specific antigen (PSA) level was defined as the date of the lowest PSA level after hormonal therapy, and AI was defined as the date of the third consecutive PSA increase above the nadir value by any threshold. RESULTS The median Gleason sum was 8 and the modal Gleason score 4 + 5. The median (range) pretreatment PSA level was 274.0 (1.3,2179) ng/mL. Of the 92 men, 57 (62%) attained a nadir PSA, including 23 with a nadir of <,2 ng/mL; 32 (35%) progressed to AI within 2 years and 27% reached a nadir PSA but did not develop AI. The mean (sd) time from diagnosis to the nadir PSA was 13.7 (11.8) months, while the mean time from diagnosis to progression to AI was 30.3 (15.6) months. Univariate analysis showed that a nadir PSA level after treatment of ,,1 ng/mL (P = 0.0128) was an early predictor of progression to AI; a nadir PSA level of ,,2 ng/mL (P = 0.0216) was a predictor of poor overall survival. CONCLUSION Failure to attain a nadir PSA of <,1 ng/mL after treatment predicts progression to AI and a nadir PSA of >,2 ng/mL predicts poorer overall survival. The development of skeletal events predicts the onset of AI but occurs late in the disease and is unsuitable as an early prognostic marker. [source] | ||||||||||