Silicone Injection (silicone + injection)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Penis swelling due to foreign body reaction after injection of silicone

JOURNAL DER DEUTSCHEN DERMATOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT, Issue 9 2010
Tobias Plaza
Summary A 19-year-old man presented with phimosis and painful swelling of the penis four weeks after augmentation with silicone in Thailand. Histology revealed a foreign body reaction to silicone. Infectious causes were ruled out. Granulomatous foreign body reactions to silicone are common, but there are few case reports on reactions following silicone injection for penis enlargement. Foreign body reactions should be included in the differential diagnosis of penis swelling. [source]


Sonographic and mammographic findings of breast liquid silicone injection

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, Issue 6 2006
Anabel Medeiros Scaranelo MD
Abstract Purpose. To describe the sonographic and mammographic features of patients whose breasts have been injected with silicone. Methods. Between July 1997 and August 1999, 14 patients with a history of breast injection of liquid silicone underwent physical, mammographic, and sonographic examination. Mammographic findings were classified as macronodular, micronodular, or mixed striated patterns. Sonographic appearances were classified as macronodular, micronodular, mixed, or snowstorm patterns. Results. Eighty-six percent of the patients had abnormal physical examination. Well-defined nodules were palpable in 4 patients, 6 patients had diffusely heterogeneous breasts on palpation, and 2 patients had a combination of heterogeneous texture with dominant nodules. Sonographic examination revealed the presence of marked echogenicity (i.e., snowstorm pattern) in all 14 patients; in 11 patients it was associated with macronodules and/or micronodules, whereas in 3 patients only snowstorm appearance was noted. Mammographic patterns were macronodular in 7 patients and mixed macronodular and micronodular in 6 patients. Conclusions. Both mammography and sonography can help identify free silicone injected directly into the breast. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 34:273,277, 2006 [source]


The Pathology of Adulterated Injected Cosmetic Filler Materials

JOURNAL OF CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY, Issue 1 2005
M. Pulitzer MD
We report five cases of illicit injections of filler-substances for cosmetic purposes in non-medical clinics. The first two patients, a mother and 30-year-old daughter, presented with skin lesions in both legs after calf-augmentation by paraffin injection 4 years prior. One week later calf hyperpigmentation and induration developed, with progression up the legs, and eventual purulent draining ulceration (daughter). The third patient, a 34-year-old female, presented with pink-brown macules on both buttocks after receiving silicone injections 9 months earlier. The fourth patient, a 31-year-old female, developed skin lesions on the buttocks after silicone injections. The fifth patient, a 43-year-old female, developed sclerodermoid plaques on the buttocks after silicone injection. The first two biopsies showed large spaces in tissue, calcinosis cutis, dermal sclerosis, granulation tissue, and lymphedema. The third biopsy revealed foreign body reaction to non-polarizing material, the fourth lipogranulomatous reaction, and the fifth microvacuolar change with scar. Biopsies post-injection of cosmetic filler materials typically show macrovacuolar "swiss cheese" changes, and later microvacuolar changes with considerable granulomatous reaction. The reactions here were clinically severe, and may reflect adulteration of injected materials. We believe these cases augur a public health epidemic given a proliferation of non-medical cosmetic "mills" which offer illicit cosmetic procedures. [source]


Tissue reaction to liquid silicone simulating low-grade liposarcoma following lip augmentation

JOURNAL OF ORAL PATHOLOGY & MEDICINE, Issue 5 2004
Alexander Maly
We report the case of a 32-year-old woman who underwent silicone injection into the upper lip 2 years prior to presenting with masses clinically suspicious for tumor and interpreted on biopsy as low-grade liposarcoma. Lack of pre-operative history of silicone injection almost led to unnecessary surgery. This complicated situation may arise when reaction to liquid or gel silicone histologically closely simulates a low-grade liposarcoma. Clinical and pathological correlations are of critical assistance in making the correct pre-operative diagnosis and avoiding unnecessary traumatic surgical intervention. [source]


The Pathology of Adulterated Injected Cosmetic Filler Materials

JOURNAL OF CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY, Issue 1 2005
M. Pulitzer MD
We report five cases of illicit injections of filler-substances for cosmetic purposes in non-medical clinics. The first two patients, a mother and 30-year-old daughter, presented with skin lesions in both legs after calf-augmentation by paraffin injection 4 years prior. One week later calf hyperpigmentation and induration developed, with progression up the legs, and eventual purulent draining ulceration (daughter). The third patient, a 34-year-old female, presented with pink-brown macules on both buttocks after receiving silicone injections 9 months earlier. The fourth patient, a 31-year-old female, developed skin lesions on the buttocks after silicone injections. The fifth patient, a 43-year-old female, developed sclerodermoid plaques on the buttocks after silicone injection. The first two biopsies showed large spaces in tissue, calcinosis cutis, dermal sclerosis, granulation tissue, and lymphedema. The third biopsy revealed foreign body reaction to non-polarizing material, the fourth lipogranulomatous reaction, and the fifth microvacuolar change with scar. Biopsies post-injection of cosmetic filler materials typically show macrovacuolar "swiss cheese" changes, and later microvacuolar changes with considerable granulomatous reaction. The reactions here were clinically severe, and may reflect adulteration of injected materials. We believe these cases augur a public health epidemic given a proliferation of non-medical cosmetic "mills" which offer illicit cosmetic procedures. [source]