Home About us Contact | |||
Shorter Hospitalization (shorter + hospitalization)
Selected AbstractsTreatment with intravenous hyperalimentation for severely anorectic patients and its outcomePSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, Issue 3 2004TAKASHI TONOIKE md Abstract In treating patients with severe anorexia nervosa, it is important to improve their physical condition first. Patients who had lost close to 60% standard bodyweight (SBW) were candidates for inpatient treatment due to the mortality risk. With 80% SBW as the target for therapy, they were given both intravenous hyperalimentation and food by oral intake in order to improve their physical condition. In total, 51 patients were admitted. One died and four patients dropped out in the course of treatment. Forty-six patients who completed the inpatient treatment were reviewed. Although ,admitted ,with ,an ,average ,weight ,of ,approximately ,60%,SBW, ,they ,were ,discharged with a weight of approximately 80% SBW after approximately 60 days. An average follow up of 25.0 months was conducted, and two patients were found to have died. The mean weight, percentage resuming menstruation, and rehospitalization rate of the 44 survivors were 79% SBW, 23%, and 32%, respectively. The patients with the restricting type of anorexia had an earlier onset of the disorder and a better social outcome. Patients in whom onset occurred at a younger age had a better social outcome. After being discharged, the majority of the patients continued treatment as outpatients. Although the results were similar to those of conventional studies in terms of outcome, the shorter hospitalization was significant. Overall, in the treatment of patients with severe anorexia nervosa, it is important to begin psychotherapy while trying to improve their physical condition. [source] Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for T1 renal cancer: the gold standard?BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 1 2004A comparison of laparoscopic vs open nephrectomy OBJECTIVE To evaluate the complication rate and clinical follow-up of patients treated for T1 renal cancer by open or laparoscopic nephrectomy at the same institution, as this approach appears to be attractive for treating small renal cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 1995 and 2002, 39 patients underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic and 26 transperitoneal open radical nephrectomy for T1 renal cancer (TNM 1997). Variables before during and after surgery, e.g. cancer recurrence, were compared between the groups. RESULTS There were no differences between the laparoscopic and open groups in age, sex ratio, weight, height, fitness score, operative duration (134 vs 133 min), minor or major complications, tumour diameter, Fuhrman grade or length of follow-up. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery had less blood loss (133 vs 357 mL, P < 0.001), less need for transfusion (none vs 150 mL, P = 0.04), a lower consumption of analgesia drugs, and shorter hospitalization (5.5 vs 8.8 days, P < 0.001). With a mean follow-up of 20.4 months there was no recurrence or tumour progression. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for patients with T1 renal cancer is a safe, reliable procedure that decreases hospitalization time and bleeding, and ensures the same cancer control as open nephrectomy. [source] Can we make hospitals and the community baby friendly?ACTA PAEDIATRICA, Issue 6 2003CW Binns There is an increasing trend in midwifery towards shorter hospitalization, and in a world where 24,48 h will be the norm, the challenge for the baby-friendly hospital in the new century will be to establish community support services for all mothers and to make all of our hospitals and communities "Baby and breastfeeding friendly". [source] An economic evaluation of atenolol vs. captopril in patients with Type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 54)DIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 6 2001A. Gray Abstract Aims To compare the net cost of a tight blood pressure control policy with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (captopril) or , blocker (atenolol) in patients with Type 2 diabetes. Design A cost-effectiveness analysis based on outcomes and resources used in a randomized controlled trial and assumptions regarding the use of these therapies in a general practice setting. Setting Twenty United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Hospital-based clinics in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Subjects Hypertensive patients (n= 758) with Type 2 diabetes (mean age 56 years, mean blood pressure 159/94 mmHg), 400 of whom were allocated to the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor captopril and 358 to the , blocker atenolol. Main outcome measures Life expectancy and mean cost per patient. Results There was no statistically significant difference in life expectancy between groups. The cost per patient over the trial period was £6485 in the captopril group, compared with £5550 in the atenolol group, an average cost difference of £935 (95% confidence interval £188, £1682). This 14% reduction arose partly because of lower drug prices, and also because of significantly fewer and shorter hospitalizations in the atenolol group, and despite higher antidiabetic drug costs in the atenolol group. Conclusions Treatment of hypertensive patients with Type 2 diabetes using atenolol or captopril was equally effective. However, total costs were significantly lower in the atenolol group. Diabet. Med. 18, 438,444 (2001) [source] |