			Home About us Contact

Shock Delivery (shock + delivery)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

A Rare type of Ventricular Oversensing in ICD Therapy,Inappropriate ICD Shock Delivery Due to Triple Counting

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 2 2010
MICHAEL GUENTHER M.D.
Irregular sensing by triple counting of wide QRS complexes resulted in inappropriate shocks in a patient with a biventricular implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD): A 66-year-old male patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy, left bundle branch block, and impaired left ventricular function received a biventricular ICD for optimal therapy of heart failure (CHF). Two years after implantation, the patient experienced recurrent unexpected ICD shocks without clinical symptoms of malignant tachyarrhythmia, or worsened CHF. The patient's condition rapidly worsened, with progressive cardiogenic shock and electrical,mechanical dissociation. After unsuccessful resuscitation of the patient the interrogation of the ICD showed an initial triple counting of extremely wide and fragmented QRS complexes with inappropriate shocks. (PACE 2010; 33:e17,e19) [source]

Subthreshold Test Pulses Versus Low Energy Shock Delivery to Estimate High Energy Lead Impedance in Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 1p2 2003
DIRK VOLLMANN
VOLLMANN, D., et al.: Subthreshold Test Pulses Versus Low Energy Shock Delivery to Estimate High Energy Lead Impedance in Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients. The high energy lead impedance is valuable for detecting lead failure in ICDs, but until recently shock delivery was necessary for high energy impedance measurement. This study compared the use of subthreshold test pulses and low energy test shocks to estimate the high energy impedance. Immediately after implantation of Ventak Prizm ICDs in 29 patients, the lead impedance was measured with five subthreshold (0.4 ,J) test pulses, 5 low energy (1.1 J) shocks, and two to three high energy(16 ± 4.5 J)shocks. The mean impedances measured using high energy shocks, low energy shocks, and subthreshold pulses were42.0 ± 7.3 ,, 46.5 ± 8.1 ,, and42.4 ± 7.1 ,, respectively. The impedances measured using high and low energy shocks differed significantly(P <0.0001), while those obtained by high energy shocks and low energy pulses did not(P = 0.63). According to the Pearson correlation coefficient, the impedance measurements with subthreshold pulses and low energy shocks were both closely correlated(P < 0.0001)with impedance values determined with high energy shocks. However, while the impedance values tended to be higher when measured with low energy shocks, the concordance correlation coefficient (c) was higher for subthreshold test pulse versus high energy shock(c = 0.92)than for low versus high energy shock(c = 0.73). Furthermore, the intraindividual variability of impedance measurements was lower with subthreshold pulse measurements than with low energy shocks. Compared with low energy shocks, impedance measurement with subthreshold pulses has higher reproducibility and a higher correlation with the impedance obtained by high energy shock delivery. Safe and painless high energy impedance estimation with subthreshold pulses might, therefore, help to detect ICD lead failure during routine follow-up. (PACE 2003; 26:[Pt. II]:457,460) [source]

Improvement of Defibrillation Efficacy with Preshock Synchronized Pacing

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5 2004
HUI-NAM PAK M.D., Ph.D.
Introduction: We previously demonstrated that wavefront synchronization by spatiotemporal excitable gap pacing (Sync P) is effective at facilitating spontaneous termination of ventricular fibrillation (VF). Therefore, we hypothesized that a spatiotemporally controlled defibrillation (STCD) strategy using defibrillation shocks preceded by Sync P can improve defibrillation efficacy. Method and Results: We explored the STCD effects in 13 isolated rabbit hearts. During VF, a low-voltage gradient (LVG) area was synchronized by Sync P for 0.92 second. For Sync P, optical action potentials (OAPs) adjacent to four pacing electrodes (10 mm apart) were monitored. When one of the electrodes was in the excitable gap, a 5-mA current was administered from all electrodes. A shock was delivered 23 ms after the excitable gap when the LVG area was unexcitable. The effects of STCD was compared to random shocks (C) by evaluating the defibrillation threshold 50% (DFT50; n = 35 for each) and preshock coupling intervals (n = 208 for STCD, n = 172 for C). Results were as follows. (1) Sync P caused wavefront synchronization as indicated by a decreased number of phase singularity points (P < 0.0001) and reduced spatial dispersion of VF cycle length (P < 0.01). (2) STCD decreased DFT50 by 10.3% (P < 0.05). (3) The successful shocks showed shorter preshock coupling intervals (CI; P < 0.05) and a higher proportion of unexcitable shock at the LVG area (P < 0.001) than failed shocks. STCD showed shorter CIs (P < 0.05) and a higher unexcitable shock rate at LVG area (P < 0.05) than C. Conclusion: STCD improves defibrillation efficacy by synchronizing VF activations and increasing probability of shock delivery to the unexcitable LVG area. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 15, pp. 581-587, May 2004) [source]

Subthreshold Test Pulses Versus Low Energy Shock Delivery to Estimate High Energy Lead Impedance in Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients

Shock Coordinated with High Power of Morphology Electrogram Improves Defibrillation Success in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2002
ALEXANDER BERKOWITSCH
BERKOWITSCH, A., et al.: Shock Coordinated with High Power of Morphology Electrogram Improves Defibrillation Success in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators. Animal studies have suggested that the success of defibrillation may depend on the properties of VF waveform obtained from the morphology electrogram (ME) at the time of the shock. The reliable identification of depolarization events in the fibrillatory signal can be achieved using adaptive estimation of the instantaneous signal power (P). The aim of this study was to investigate if a high P of the ME (PME) was related to ventricular DFT and if the upslope in ME can be associated with the depolarization event. A total of 575 VF (mean duration 10 s) episodes recorded and stored during ICD implantation in 77 patients with ventricular arrhythmias were used for analysis. The DFT was defined using a double step-down test. The values of PME immediately before pulse delivery (Pshock) and shock outcomes were registered. The differences between Pshock of successful and failed defibrillation were tested with the Mann-Whitney U test. The relationship between individual medians of Pshock (Pmed) and DFT was analyzed using the Kruskall-Wallis H-test. The coincidence between identified depolarization and upslope in ME was tested using the chi-square test. A P value of 0.05 was set for an error probability. The Pshock in case of failed defibrillation was significantly lower than Pshock in successful cases by the pulses of any strength (P < 0.001). The test revealed a significant inverse correlation between Pmed and DFT with P < 0.001. The depolarization corresponded to the upslope of ME in 85% of cases. This study demonstrated that a high value of instantaneous power of ME indicates the optimal time for shock delivery. The implementation of this algorithm in ICDs may improve the defibrillation efficacy. [source]

Effect of Ventricular Fibrillation Duration on the Defibrillation Threshold in Humans

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 1 2002
RAINER GRADAUS
GRADAUS, R., et al.: Effect of Ventricular Fibrillation Duration on the Defibrillation Threshold in Humans. Early during ventricular fibrillation, the defibrillation threshold may be low, as ventricular fibrillation most probably arises from a localized area with only a few wavefronts and the effects of global ischemia, ventricular dilatation, and sympathetic discharge have not yet fully developed. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of the timing of shock delivery in humans. During implantation of an ICD in 26 patients (24 men, 60 ± 11 years, 19 coronary artery disease, NYHA 2.2 ± 0.4, left ventricular ejection fraction 0.42 ± 0.16), the defibrillation threshold was determined after approximately 10 and 2 seconds of ventricular fibrillation. Ventricular fibrillation was induced by T wave shocks. Mean defibrillation threshold was 9.9 ± 3.6 J after 10.3 ± 1.0 seconds. Within 2 seconds, 20 of 26 patients could be successfully defibrillated with , 8 J. In these patients, the mean defibrillation threshold was 4.0 ± 2.1 J after 1.4 ± 0.3 seconds compared to 9.5 ± 3.1 J after 10.2 ± 1.1 seconds (P < 0.001). There were no clinical differences between patients who could be successfully defibrillated within 2 seconds and those patients without successful defibrillation within 2 seconds. In the majority of patients, the defibrillation threshold was significantly lower within the first few cycles of ventricular fibrillation than after 10 seconds of ventricular fibrillation. These results should lead to exploration of earlier shock delivery in implantable devices. This could possibly reduce the incidence of syncope in patients with rapid ventricular tachyarrhythmias and ICDs. [source]

Quadruple Pads Approach for External Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2001
NASSIR F. MARROUCHE
MARROUCHE, N.F., et al.: Quadruple Pads Approach for External Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation. This study examined the alternative of transthoracic quadruple pads shock delivery of two simultaneous 360-J shocks to convert refractory AF in patients failing standard external cardioversion. Forty-six patients (mean age 58 ± 11 years, 23 men) with chronic AF (duration 14 ± 17 months, range 1,60 months) were included. The left atrial diameter was 47 ± 7 mm. The left ventricular ejection fraction was 59 ± 11%. Antiarrhythmic drugs had failed to convert 44 (96%) of these patients. All patients underwent conventional external transthoracic cardioversion with pads applied in the antero-apical position using energy settings of 200 and 360 J, consecutively. In all patients who failed conventional cardioversion, quadruple pads were applied. Quadruple pads consisted of four pads, two in the antero-posterior position and two in a second apex-posterior position. Standard cardioversion to sinus rhythm was successful in 19 (41%) patients after use of a single 200-J shock and an additional 8 (17%) after a single 360-J shock. The total success rate was 58% after conventional cardioversion. The quadruple pads were successful in 14 (74%) of the remaining 19 patients. Four of the five patients who failed the quadruple pads approach subsequently also failed internal cardioversion. Thus, the cardioversion success rate was increased from 48% using the conventional approach to 89% using the quadruple pads approach. Quadruple pads external cardioversion is highly effective in converting chronic AF refractory to standard shock protocols to sinus rhythm. Moreover, the failure of the quadruple pads approach seems to predict poor response to internal cardioversion. [source]