Home About us Contact | |||
Severe Asthma Exacerbation (severe + asthma_exacerbation)
Selected AbstractsA comparison of budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy vs. conventional best practice in asthma managementINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, Issue 10 2009R. Louis Summary Objective:, To study the effectiveness and safety of budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort®) Maintenance And Reliever Therapy (Symbicort SMART®, AstraZeneca, Södertalje, Sweden), a simplified management approach with one inhaler compared with conventional best practice (CBP) with multiple inhalers in patients with persistent asthma. Design:, Open-label randomised controlled parallel group trial, 6-month treatment. Participants:, A total of 908 patients , 12 years of age, with persistent asthma receiving treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), either alone or in conjunction with long-acting ,2 -agonist. Main outcome measures:, Time to first severe asthma exacerbation and number of severe asthma exacerbations. Results:, No difference between groups was seen in time to first severe exacerbation (p = 0.75). Exacerbation rates were low in both groups. A total of 12 patients in the Symbicort SMART® group experienced a total of 14 severe asthma exacerbations, and 19 patients in the CBP group experienced a total of 25 severe asthma exacerbations (annual rate 0.07 vs. 0.13 p = 0.09). The mean daily dose of ICS expressed in BDP equivalent was significantly lower in the Symbicort SMART® group (including as-needed use) vs. in the CBP group (749 ,g vs. 1059 ,g; p < 0.0001). Mean scores in Asthma Control Questionnaire, 5 question version improved significantly in the SMART group compared with the CBP group (p = 0.0026). Symbicort SMART and CBP were equally well tolerated. The mean drug cost/patient/month was significantly lower for the patients in the Symbicort SMART group compared with patients receiving CBP (51.3 , vs. 66.5 ,; p < 0.0001). Conclusions:, In Belgian patients, a simplified regimen using budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy was at least as effective at improving clinical control compared with CBP with a significantly lower ICS dose and significantly lower drug costs. [source] Heart involvement detected by magnetic resonance in a patient with Churg,Strauss syndrome, mimicking severe asthma exacerbationALLERGY, Issue 8 2010W. Szczeklik No abstract is available for this article. [source] Mechanical ventilation in children with severe asthmaPEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, Issue 6 2001DMSc, Kristiina Malmström MD Abstract Hospital admissions for childhood asthma have increased during the past few decades. The aim of this study was to describe the need for mechanical ventilation for severe asthma exacerbation in children in Finland from 1976 to 1995. We reviewed medical records and collected data retrospectively from all 5 university hospitals in Finland, thus covering the entire population of about 5 million. The endpoints selected were the number of admissions and readmissions leading to mechanical ventilation, duration of stay in the hospital, and mortality. Moreover, asthma medications prescribed prior to admission and administered in the intensive care unit (ICU), as well as the etiology of the exacerbation associated with mechanical ventilation were examined. Mechanical ventilation was required in 66 ICU admissions (59 patients). This constituted approximately 10% of all 632 admissions for acute asthma to an ICU. The number of admissions decreased from 1976 to 1995: 41 admissions between 1976 and 1985 vs. 25 admissions during the next 10-year period. The mean age at admission to the ICU was 3.6 years, and 46% of the patients were boys. Prior to the index admission, 70% of the patients had used asthma medication such as oral bronchodilator (50%), inhaled bronchodilator (20%), theophylline (38%), inhaled glucocorticoid (18%), oral glucocorticoid (5%), and cromoglycate (7%). Respiratory infection was by far the most common cause of all the exacerbations (61%), followed by food allergy (8%) and gastroesophageal reflux (3%). In 28% of cases the cause of the severe asthma exacerbation could not be identified. In the mechanically ventilated patients readmissions occurred 38 times between 1976 and 1985 vs. 5 times between 1986 and 1995. Five of the patients who received mechanical ventilation died, and in 3 of these patients asthma was the event causing death. In conclusion, there has been decrease in the number of first and repeat ICU admission for asthma requiring mechanical ventilation between 1970 and 1995. This trend occurred despite a simultaneous 5% yearly increase in hospital admissions for childhood asthma during these 2 decades. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2001; 31:405,411. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] A comparison of budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy vs. conventional best practice in asthma managementINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, Issue 10 2009R. Louis Summary Objective:, To study the effectiveness and safety of budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort®) Maintenance And Reliever Therapy (Symbicort SMART®, AstraZeneca, Södertalje, Sweden), a simplified management approach with one inhaler compared with conventional best practice (CBP) with multiple inhalers in patients with persistent asthma. Design:, Open-label randomised controlled parallel group trial, 6-month treatment. Participants:, A total of 908 patients , 12 years of age, with persistent asthma receiving treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), either alone or in conjunction with long-acting ,2 -agonist. Main outcome measures:, Time to first severe asthma exacerbation and number of severe asthma exacerbations. Results:, No difference between groups was seen in time to first severe exacerbation (p = 0.75). Exacerbation rates were low in both groups. A total of 12 patients in the Symbicort SMART® group experienced a total of 14 severe asthma exacerbations, and 19 patients in the CBP group experienced a total of 25 severe asthma exacerbations (annual rate 0.07 vs. 0.13 p = 0.09). The mean daily dose of ICS expressed in BDP equivalent was significantly lower in the Symbicort SMART® group (including as-needed use) vs. in the CBP group (749 ,g vs. 1059 ,g; p < 0.0001). Mean scores in Asthma Control Questionnaire, 5 question version improved significantly in the SMART group compared with the CBP group (p = 0.0026). Symbicort SMART and CBP were equally well tolerated. The mean drug cost/patient/month was significantly lower for the patients in the Symbicort SMART group compared with patients receiving CBP (51.3 , vs. 66.5 ,; p < 0.0001). Conclusions:, In Belgian patients, a simplified regimen using budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy was at least as effective at improving clinical control compared with CBP with a significantly lower ICS dose and significantly lower drug costs. [source] Budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and reliever therapy in the management of moderate to severe asthmaALLERGY, Issue 12 2008M. Humbert The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines aim at improving asthma control and preventing future risk. For patients with moderate to severe asthma an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) or an ICS/long-acting ,2 -agonist (LABA) combination with a short-acting ,2 -agonist (SABA) as reliever is recommended. Despite the availability of effective maintenance therapies, a large proportion of patients still fail to achieve guideline-defined asthma control, and overuse of SABA reliever medication at the expense of ICS is commonly observed. New simplified treatment approaches may offer a solution and assist physicians to achieve overall asthma control. One such treatment approach, which is recommended in the GINA guidelines, is budesonide/formoterol for both maintenance and reliever therapy. This treatment strategy significantly reduces the rate of severe asthma exacerbations compared with ICS/LABA plus SABA and achieves equivalent daily symptom control compared with higher doses of ICS/LABA plus separate SABA for relief. These benefits are achieved at a lower overall steroid load, and budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy is well tolerated in patients with moderate to severe asthma. This review discusses current asthma management in patients with moderate to severe disease and examines the evidence for alternative asthma management approaches. [source] Chronic inhaled corticosteroids do not affect the course of acute severe asthma exacerbations in children,PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, Issue 12 2006Christopher L. Carroll MD Abstract Chronic therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) suppresses airway inflammation and increases airway responsiveness to ,2 -adrenergic receptor agonists. We hypothesized that the chronic use of ICS would be associated with shorter duration of hospitalization in severely ill children with status asthmaticus. An 8-year retrospective chart review was conducted of all children admitted to the ICU with status asthmaticus. During the study period, 241 children were admitted, and 44% reported the use of chronic ICS. ICS use was associated with increased baseline asthma severity, previous hospitalization for asthma, and public insurance status. However, ICS use had no effect on hospital or ICU length of stay, type, and duration of treatments received, or the rate of recovery determined by a standard severity of illness scoring system. In the subsets of patients including children with persistent asthma and those who received intravenous terbutaline, there was also no improvement in outcomes with the use of chronic ICS showing that the chronic use of ICS did not improve response to ,2 -adrenergic receptor agonists in severely ill children with status asthmaticus. Although useful as a preventive therapy, the chronic use of ICS does not appear to affect the course of severe acute asthma exacerbations in pediatric patients once hospitalized. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006; 41: 1213,1217. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] |