			Home About us Contact

Sensing Threshold (sensing + threshold)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Improved Arrhythmia Detection in Implantable Loop Recorders

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2008
MICHELE BRIGNOLE M.D.
Introduction: Implantable loop recorders (ILR) have an automatic arrhythmia detection feature that can be compromised by inappropriately detected episodes. This study evaluated a new ILR sensing and detection scheme for automatically detecting asystole, bradyarrhythmia, and tachyarrhythmia events, which is implemented in the next generation device (Reveal DX/XT). Methods and Results: The new scheme employs an automatically adjusting R-wave sensing threshold, enhanced noise rejection, and algorithms to detect asystole, bradyarrhythmia, and tachyarrhythmia. Performance of the new algorithms was evaluated using 2,613 previously recorded, automatically detected Reveal Plus episodes from 533 patients. A total of 71.9% of episodes were inappropriately detected by the original ILR, and at least 88.6% of patients had one or more inappropriate episodes, with most inappropriate detections due to R-wave amplitude reductions, amplifier saturation, and T-wave oversensing. With the new scheme, inappropriate detections were reduced by 85.2% (P < 0.001), with a small reduction in the detection of appropriate episodes (1.7%, P < 0.001). The new scheme avoided inappropriate detections in 67.4% of patients that had them with the original scheme. Conclusions: The new sensing and detection scheme is expected to substantially reduce the occurrence of inappropriately detected episodes, relative to that of the original ILR. [source]

Induction Ovens and Electromagnetic Interference:

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 7p1 2003
What is the Risk for Patients with Implanted Pacemakers?
Electromagnetic fields may interfere with normal pacemaker function. Despite the introduction of modern pacemakers and bipolar lead systems, electromagnetic interference (EMI) still remains to be a concern during daily lives when patients are exposed to cellular phones, electronic security systems, and several household appliances. The aim of this study was to evaluate potential EMI risk of induction ovens, which are increasingly used in private households. The study included 40 consecutive patients (22 men, 18 women; age73 ± 11 years) with implanted DDD, VVI, VDD, and AAI pacemaker systems. The pacemakers were programmed to unipolar sensing and pacing. Sensitivity remained unchanged, if the measured sensing threshold was more than twice the programmed value; otherwise, it was set at half of the measured sensing threshold. Patients were placed in a sitting position at the closest possible distance of about 20 cm between two cooking pots and pacemaker bending the upper part of the body slightly over the induction oven. The energy was increased stepwise to the maximum. One pot was removed and placed again at the highest oven level. Potential interference was monitored continuously. The study showed no incidence of pacemaker malfunction during the entire test while the patients with intrinsic cardiac rhythms were exposed to the induction oven at varying energy strengths. Likewise, there was no external interference when the patients were paced at heart rates of 10,15 beats/min above their heart rates. The programmed parameters remained unchanged after the study. In conclusion, this study shows no EMI risk of an induction oven in patients with bipolar or right-sided unipolar pacemakers. (PACE 2003; 26[Pt. I]:1494,1497) [source]

Atrial Lead Placement During Atrial Fibrillation.

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 7 2000
Is Restitution of Sinus Rhythm Required for Proper Lead Function?
Unexpected atrial fibrillation (AF) during implantation of an atrial pacemaker lead is sometimes encountered. Infra-operative cardioversion may lengthen and complicate the implantation process. This study prospectively investigates the performance of atrial leads implanted during AF (group A) and compares atrial sensing and pacing properties to an age- and sex-matched control group in which sinus rhythm had been restored before atrial lead placement (group B). Patient groups consisted of 32 patients each. All patients received DDDE pacemakers and bipolar, steroid-elating, active fixation atrial leads. In patients with AF at the time of implantation (group A), a minimal intracardiac fibrillatory amplitude of at least 1.0 mV was required for acceptable atrial lead placement. In patients with restored sinus rhythm (group B). a voltage threshold < 1.5 V at 0.5 ms and a minimal atrial potential amplitude > 1.5 mV was required. Patients of group A in whom spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm did not occur within 4 weeks after implantation underwent electrical cardioversion to sinus rhythm. Pacemaker interrogations were performed 3, 6, and 12 months after implantation. In group A, implantation time was significantly shorter as compared to group B (58.7 ± 8.6 minutes vs 73.0 ± 17.3 minutes, P < 0.001). Mean atrial potential amplitude during AF was correlated with the telemetered atrial potential during sinus rhythm (r = 0.49, P < 0.001), but not with the atrial stimulation threshold. Twelve months after implantation, sensing thresholds (1.74 ± 0.52 mV vs 1.78 ± 0.69 mV, P = 0.98) and stimulation thresholds (1.09 ± 0.42 V vs 1.01 ± 0.31 V.P = 0.66) did not differ between groups A and B. However, in three, patients of group A, chronic atrial sensing threshold was , 1 mV requiring atria) sensitivities of at least 0.35 mV to achieve reliable atrial sensing. Atrial lead placement during AF is feasible and reduces implantation time. However, bipolar atrial leads and the option to program high atrial sensitivities are required. [source]

Feasibility Of Temporary Biventricular Pacing In Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Function After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 2007
FRANK EBERHARDT M.D.
Background and Methods: Biventricular pacing improves hemodynamics after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with severely reduced left ventricular (LV) function undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We examined the feasibility of temporary biventricular pacing for 96 hours postoperatively. Unipolar epicardial wires were placed on the roof of the right atrium (RA), the right ventricular (RV) outflow tract, and the LV free lateral wall and connected to an external pacing device in 51 patients (mean LV ejection fraction 35 ± 4%). Pacing and sensing thresholds, lead survival and incidence of pacemaker dysfunction were determined. Results: Atrial and RV pacing thresholds increased significantly by the 4th postoperative day, from 1.6 ± 0.2 to 2.5 ± 0.3 V at 0.5 ms (P = 0.03) at the RA, 1.4 ± 0.3 V to 2.7 ± 0.4 mV (P = 0.01) at the RV, and 1.9 ± 0.6 V to 2.9 ± 0.7 mV (P = 0.3) at the LV, while sensing thresholds decreased from 2.0 ± 0.2 to 1.7 ± 0.2 mV (P = 0.18) at the RA, 7.2 ± 0.8 to 5.1 ± 0.7 mV (P = 0.05) at the RV, and 9.4 ± 1.3 to 5.5 ± 1.1 mV (P = 0.02) at the LV. The cumulative overall incidence of lead failure was 24% by the 4th postoperative day, and was similar at the RV and LV. We observed no ventricular proarrhythmia due to pacing or temporary pacemaker malfunction. Conclusions: Biventricular pacing after CABG using a standard external pacing system was feasible and safe. [source]