Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Senior Medical Students (senior + medical_student)
Selected AbstractsThe Impact of the Demand for Clinical Productivity on Student Teaching in Academic Emergency DepartmentsACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 12 2004Todd J. Berger MD Objective: Because many emergency medicine (EM) attending physicians believe the time demands of clinical productivity limit their ability to effectively teach medical students in the emergency department (ED), the purpose of this study was to determine if there is an inverse relationship between clinical productivity and teaching evaluations. Methods: The authors conducted a prospective, observational, double-blind study. They asked senior medical students enrolled in their EM clerkship to evaluate each EM attending physician who precepted them at three academic EDs. After each shift, students anonymously evaluated 10 characteristics of clinical teaching by their supervising attending physician. Each attending physician's clinical productivity was measured by calculating their total relative value units per hour (RVUs/hr) during the nine-month study interval. The authors compared the total RVUs/hr for each attending physician to the medians of their teaching evaluation scores at each ED using a Spearman rank correlation test. Results: Seventy of 92 students returned surveys, evaluating 580 shifts taught by 53 EM attending physicians. Each attending physician received an average of 11 evaluations (median score, 5 of 6) and generated a mean of 5.68 RVUs/hr during the study period. The correlation between evaluation median scores and RVUs/hr was ,0.08 (p = 0.44). Conclusions: The authors found no statistically significant relationship between clinical productivity and teaching evaluations. While many EM attending physicians perceive patient care responsibilities to be too time consuming to allow them to be good teachers, the authors found that a subset of our more productive attending physicians are also highly rated teachers. Determining what characteristics distinguish faculty who are both clinically productive and highly rated teachers should help drive objectives for faculty development programs. [source] Advanced Opportunities for Student Education in Emergency MedicineACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 10 2004Charissa B. Pacella MD Abstract Many medical students are excited about emergency medicine (EM) following a standard clerkship and seek out additional learning opportunities. An advanced EM elective may accomplish several educational goals, including development of clinical skills in evaluating the undifferentiated patient, broader exploration of the field of EM, and more focused study of one particular aspect of EM. Previously cited examples include pediatric EM, medical toxicology, occupational medicine, sports medicine, and EM research. Numerous other EM specialty courses for senior medical students are emerging, as reflected in the "Undergraduate Rotations" listings on the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. A few examples drawn from the list include emergency ultrasound, international EM, wilderness medicine, disaster medicine, geriatric EM, and hyperbaric medicine. Educators aspiring to develop, or in the process of developing, an advanced EM elective may benefit from a brief overview of necessary course considerations, including didactic format, the clinical role of the medical student in the emergency department, and involvement with patient procedures. Suggestions are made regarding additional educational opportunities, including follow-up of patients seen in the emergency department and development of an emergency department radiology case file. This article also addresses several related concerns, including suggested prerequisites, administration and cost considerations, appropriate didactic topics, and methods for evaluating students. Several EM subspecialty areas, namely pediatric EM, medical toxicology, and out-of-hospital care, are specifically discussed. Formal advanced cardiac life support training is also often included in an advanced EM elective and is briefly discussed. The overall intent of this article is to provide medical student educators with resources and ideas to assist them in developing a unique advanced EM elective. [source] Comparison of methods for teaching clinical skills in assessing and managing drug-seeking patientsMEDICAL EDUCATION, Issue 4 2000Taverner Aims New medical graduates lack clinical skills in assessing and managing patients seeking drugs of dependence. This study compares the effectiveness of three different clinical skills training methods, with similar content, which were developed to teach these skills to senior medical students. Methods A preliminary survey indicated that common problems seen by primary care practitioners included both new and previously known patients seeking either benzodiazepines or opiates. The common content of the teaching was determined from this survey. A didactic small group tutorial (DT), a video-based tutorial (VBT) using professional actors, and a computer-aided instruction package using digitized video (CAI) were developed with this common content, and trialled with undergraduate medical students over 2 years in a parallel-group design. Outcome was assessed by student feedback, performance on a case-based written examination and by a structured evaluation of interviews with simulated patients requesting drugs. Comparison was also made between methods on the basis of knowledge tests. Results No difference was seen in written examination and simulated patient outcomes between the three groups. However, the VBT was thought by the students to be preferable to other methods. The estimated development costs of CAI were higher, but total costs over a 6-year period were lower than for the DT and VBT. The results suggest that clinical skills can be taught equally effectively through several different methods. Collaboration between institutions in the development of widely applicable CAI tools should be an efficient and economical mode of teaching with a wide range of applications. [source] Emergency Medicine Subinternship: Does a Standard Clinical Experience Improve Performance Outcomes?ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 1 2008Christopher J. Lampe MD Abstract Background:, The emergency medicine (EM) subinternship provides a varied experience for senior medical students depending on gender, specialty choice, and interest. A didactic curriculum can be standardized, but the clinical component is difficult to control. Students can be directed to see patients with specific chief complaints. Objectives:, To assess whether a clinical requirement of 10 predetermined cases improves general knowledge as measured on an objective exam. Methods:, This was a prospective, nonrandomized, case-controlled study at a public teaching hospital. Students were assigned to the control group (CG) or test group (TG) by alternating block rotations over 6 months. The CG saw emergency department (ED) patients according to interest and faculty direction. The TG was also required to identify ten specific chief complaints. Patient encounters were recorded in computerized logs. A 10-question pretest assessed preexisting knowledge of each chief complaint, and a 40-question final exam tested general EM knowledge. Descriptive statistics measured demographic data. Groups were compared by Fisher's exact test. Difference in means testing was performed to see if pre- to posttest differences varied by group. Multivariate analysis controlled for gender and specialty choice. Results:, Eighteen CG students saw a mean of 57 patients, and 24 TG students saw a mean of 54 patients; 1 CG student (6%) and 7 TG students (31.8%) saw all 10 required cases (Fisher's exact test p = 0.044). Difference in means testing demonstrated a greater relative change in performance (13.4% points) by the TG relative to the CG on a general knowledge exam, compared with their performance on a brief pretest (p = 0.014). The authors performed multivariate regression controlling for pretest score, gender, and EM specialty choice, and neither gender nor intended EM specialty choice was a contributing factor to the improved performance. A greater relative change in performance (7% points) in the TG exam score was found when compared to the CG (p = 0.020). Conclusions:, Students who participated in the usual didactic curriculum and were required to see ED patients with representative chief complaints performed better on a general EM exam than those who employed common methods of choosing patients. [source] | ||||||||||