Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Self-report Assessment (self-report + assessment)
Selected AbstractsWithdrawal symptoms in abstinent methamphetamine-dependent subjectsADDICTION, Issue 10 2010Todd Zorick ABSTRACT Aims Withdrawal symptoms have been linked to a propensity for relapse to drug abuse. Inasmuch as this association applies to methamphetamine (MA) abuse, an understanding of the course of MA withdrawal symptoms may help to direct treatment for MA dependence. Previous studies of symptoms manifested during abstinence from MA have been limited in size and scope. We asked (i) whether debilitating psychological and/or physical symptoms appear during the first several weeks of MA abstinence, (ii) how craving for MA evolves and (iii) whether psychiatric symptoms (e.g. depression, psychosis) persist beyond a month of abstinence. Design A study of MA-dependent participants, who initiated and maintained abstinence from the drug for up to 5 weeks, compared to a matched healthy comparison group. Setting In-patient research hospital ward (MA-dependent subjects) and out-patient (comparison subjects). Participants Fifty-six MA-dependent and eighty-nine comparison subjects. Measurements Rater-assessed MA withdrawal questionnaire and self-report assessment of craving (MA-dependent subjects) and self-report assessment of psychiatric symptoms (both groups). Findings At study entry, MA-dependent subjects exhibited a wide range in severity of depressive symptoms, with the average score at a mild,moderate level of severity. Symptoms of psychosis were also prevalent. While depressive and psychotic symptoms largely resolved within a week of abstinence, craving did not decrease significantly from the time of initiating abstinence until the second week, and then continued at a reduced level to the fifth week. Conclusions Depressive and psychotic symptoms accompany acute withdrawal from methamphetamine but resolve within 1 week. Craving is also present and lasts at least 5 weeks. [source] Development and validation of the Subtypes of Antisocial Behavior QuestionnaireAGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR, Issue 5 2009S. Alexandra Burt Abstract There is converging evidence that physical aggression, rule-breaking, and social aggression constitute meaningfully distinct, if somewhat overlapping, components of the broader construct of antisocial behavior. Indeed, these subtypes appear to have different developmental trajectories, demographic correlates, and personological underpinnings. They also demonstrate important etiological distinctions. One potential limitation to accumulating additional scientific insights into the correlates and origins of these three types of antisocial behavior is the lack of an efficient self-report assessment in the public domain. We developed the 32-item Subtypes of Antisocial Behavior Questionnaire (STAB) to fill this gap. Our goal was to develop a brief measure that could reliably and validly assess each of the three major subtypes of antisocial behavior and that would be freely available for other researchers. The present series of studies provides initial evidence of the factorial validity, internal consistency, and criterion-related validity of the STAB scales. In short, it appears that the STAB is a brief and useful measure that can be used to differentiate and assess physically aggressive, rule-breaking, and socially aggressive forms of antisocial behavior. Aggr. Behav. 35:376,398, 2009. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Validation of a six-graded faces scale for evaluation of postoperative pain in childrenPEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 8 2003A. Bosenberg MBChB Summary Background: The faces pain scales are often used for self-report assessment of paediatric pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of a six-graded faces pain scale after surgery by comparing the level of agreement between the children's report of faces pain scores and experienced nurses' assessment of pain by observation of behaviour. The faces pain scores before, at and after administration of analgesics were analysed. The study was performed in two South African hospitals, one with a mainly rural population and the other with an urban population. Methods: A total of 110 children aged 4,12 years, scheduled for inguinal surgery in the two South African hospitals, were included in the study. The anaesthetic technique was standardized. All patients received a caudal block preoperatively. Postoperative pain assessments were made every hour for 8 h after the caudal block was performed. A designated nurse assessed pain by using a four-graded descriptive scale (no, mild, moderate or severe pain) and thereafter the child reported pain by using the six-graded faces pain scale. Results: A high correlation was found between the two methods of assessment (, = 0.76, P < 0.0001). The correlation between methods was high in both hospital populations and in all age groups. The weakest correlation was found in children aged 8,12 years (, = 0.56, P < 0.01). Significantly lower faces pain scores were found after administration of analgesics compared with pain rating before analgesics (P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients with pain scores above 2 decreased from 86% to 31% (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The findings support this six-graded faces pain scale as a useful and valid instrument for measuring pain in the postoperative period in children aged 4,12 years. [source] Respect in close relationships: Prototype definition, self-report assessment, and initial correlatesPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, Issue 2 2002Jennifer R. Frei Researchers who study romantic relationships have mentioned respect as a factor contributing to relationship success, but little effort has been made to define respect, measure it, or discover how it relates to other relationship constructs. In Study 1 a prototype methodology was used to identify consensual features of respect. Participants in Study 2 rated the centrality of the features of respect and completed a new prototype-based respect-for-partner scale that was highly reliable and correlated in predictable ways with avoidant attachment and evaluative aspects of partner descriptions. In Study 3, the new respect scale predicted relationship satisfaction better than scales measuring liking, loving, attachment-related anxiety and avoidance, and positive and negative partner qualities. Suggestions are offered for future research on respect. [source] Coherent Accounts of Coping with a Chronic Illness: Convergences and Divergences in Family Measurement Using a Narrative AnalysisFAMILY PROCESS, Issue 4 2003BARBARA H. FIESE Ph.D. Researchers and clinicians have shown increasing interest in family narratives as an avenue for accessing the family meaning-making process. In this study, we examine the convergences and divergences between narrative assessment, family self-report, and verbal accounts of family climate. Sixty-two families with a child with pediatric asthma were interviewed about the impact that asthma had on family life. These interviews were coded for narrative coherence, relationship expectations, and engagement with the interviewer. Primary caregivers were also interviewed using the Five Minute Speech sample (FMSS) and completed self-report assessments of family functioning (Family Assessment Device [FAD] Impact on the Family Scale [IOF]). Contrary to prediction. Narrative coherence was higher in those cases where Emotional Over-involvement (EOI) was present on the FMSS. Narrative coherence and engagement with the interviewer were positively related to self-report of family problem solving, communication, and affective responsiveness as measured on the FAD. Divergences and convergences between different types of family measurement are discussed in light of meaning-making processes associated with coping with a chronic illness. [source] Screening for personality disorder: a comparison of personality disorder assessment by patients and informantsINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, Issue 1 2004Dr Paul Walters Abstract The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (SCID-II Version 2.0) is becoming the most favoured instrument to measure personality disorder but takes up to an hour to complete. The Standardized Assessment of Personality (SAP), an informant-based measure, takes 10 to 15 minutes to complete. Both instruments have been validated independently. This study aimed to determine whether the SAP is a suitable screening instrument for personality disorder as measured by the SCID-II. Fifty-seven psychiatric patients were assessed for personality disorder using both the SAP and the SCID-II. The SAP assessments were conducted blind to the results of the SCID-II assessments. Agreement between the two instruments in this population was low (kappa = 0.3). The level of agreement differed between personality disorder categories, ranging from kappa = 0.4 (antisocial) to ,0.1 (narcissistic). In this population of patients, the SAP proved to be a poor screen for the SCID-II. The study highlights the discrepancy between informant and self-report assessments for personality disorder. Copyright © 2004 Whurr Publishers Ltd. [source] | |||||||||||||