Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Second-degree Atrioventricular Block (second-degree + atrioventricular_block)
Selected AbstractsThe Chicago School of Electrocardiography and Second-Degree Atrioventricular Block: An Historical PerspectivePACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 2 2001S. SERGE BAROLD First page of article [source] Second-degree atrioventricular block (Mobitz Type I) in an adolescent with anorexia nervosa: Intrinsic or acquired conduction abnormalityINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS, Issue 6 2009Nuray Ö. Kanbur MD Abstract Anorexia nervosa (AN) can cause both functional and structural cardiac complications, including a variety of different conduction abnormalities. This is the first case report of symptomatic diurnal second-degree atrioventricular (AV) block (Mobitz Type I) in an adolescent with AN. We present a 12-year-old girl with AN, restrictor sub-type who reported cardiac symptoms during weight gain, at the time of the initial diagnosis of AV block. Second-degree AV block (Mobitz Type I) is discussed as a possible complication of the AN, as well as being an intrinsic conduction system disease. © 2009 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Eat Disord 2009 [source] Assessment of an ECG event recorder in healthy dogs in a hospital environmentJOURNAL OF SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE, Issue 4 2003J. M. Eastwood Ambulatory electrocardiography techniques are superior to standard electrocardiography in evaluating rhythm disturbances in dogs with episodic weakness or collapse. Disadvantages include cumbersome equipment, short recording periods and an inherent delay in trace analysis. A small programmable cardiac event recorder with combined automatic and owner-triggered recording capability was evaluated in 13 healthy dogs in a hospital environment. The unit was well tolerated and produced diagnostic recordings directly to a personal computer, with useful information about continuous heart rate. It detects premature complexes, pauses and bradycardias according to programmed detection thresholds. These events were counted frequently but trace review revealed concerns regarding specificity. Recordings were often triggered by sinus arrhythmia, sinus tachycardia and unclassifiable rate changes rather than by clinically significant arrhythmias. Correct detection of ventricular ectopic complexes, a single supraventricular premature complex, sinus arrest and second-degree atrioventricular block occurred in individual dogs. Visual review of all automatically recorded events was essential and significantly increased the time required for event recording analysis. Manual recordings might be more useful and the overall results suggest that further studies are warranted to evaluate the system in clinical cases in the home environment. [source] Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Cardiac Surgery: Indications and Long-Term Follow-UpPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 1 2009OFER MERIN M.D. Background: Conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker implantation after heart surgery occur in about 1.5% of patients. Early pacemaker implantation may reduce morbidity and postoperative hospital stay. We reviewed our experience with patients undergoing surgery to try and identify predictors for pacemaker requirements and patients who will remain pacemaker dependent. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 4,999 patients undergoing surgery between the years 1993 and 2005. Patient age was 64 ± 12 years, and 71% were males. Coronary bypass was performed in 4,071 (81%), aortic valve replacement in 675 (14%), and mitral valve replacement in 968 (18%) patients. Results: Seventy-two patients (1.4%) required implantation of a permanent pacemaker after surgery. Indications for pacemaker implantation included complete atrioventricular block in 59, symptomatic bradycardia/slow atrial fibrillation in nine, second-degree atrioventricular block in two, and other conduction disturbances in two patients. Predictors for pacemaker requirement by multivariate analysis were left bundle branch block and aortic valve replacement (P < 0.001). Late follow-up was available in 58 patients, at 72 ± 32 months. Thirty-seven (63%) were pacemaker dependent. Predictors for late pacemaker dependency were third-degree atrioventricular block after surgery and preoperative left bundle branch block (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients at high risk for pacemaker implantation after heart surgery include those with preexisting conduction disturbances, and those undergoing aortic valve replacement. Of those receiving a pacemaker, about one-third will recover at late follow-up. For patients in the high-risk group who are pacemaker dependent after surgery, we recommend implanting a permanent pacemaker at 5 days after surgery, thus enabling early mobilization and early discharge. [source] | ||||||||||