Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Secondary Efficacy Variables (secondary + efficacy_variable)
Selected AbstractsMilnacipran and pindolol: a randomized trial of reduction of antidepressant latencyHUMAN PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY: CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, Issue 8 2003Michael T. Isaac Abstract Background New, better tolerated and faster treatments for depression are needed. Patients are understandably unhappy with having to wait 3 to 4 weeks for a response to an antidepressant, while experiencing side effects almost immediately. This frequently has an adverse effect on compliance and engagement with treatment. Aims The primary objective was to assess the activity of pindolol on the onset of antidepressive response of milnacipran. The secondary objective was to assess the number of responders among the patients who received milnacipran and pindolol versus patients who received milnacipran and placebo. The tertiary objective was to evaluate the safety of milnacipran and pindolol versus milnacipran and placebo. Method Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study over 42 days. Setting Inner city London community mental health teams. Participants 80 patients were selected and gave written consent to treatment, 78 were randomized (39 in each group) and evaluated for safety (intention-to-treat, ITT, safety data set), 77 (ITT efficacy data set), and 64 (per protocol, PP, data set) were evaluated for efficacy. The mean age was 31.9 for the pindolol group and 32.3 for the placebo. Intervention All patients received milnacipran 50,mg twice a day plus either pindolol 2.5,mg (the ,pindolol group') or matching placebo (the ,placebo group') three times a day. Outcome measures The main efficacy variable was the Montgomery,Åsberg depression rating scale (MADRS) score at days 0, 4, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, 42 on PP data set in an observation carried (OC) approach. Secondary efficacy variables were clinical global impression (global improvement) and Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS). Results Improvement in MADRS total score was greater in the pindolol group than in the placebo group from day 7 (p=0.03). Responder rates in the clinical global impression were 97.2% for the pindolol group and 60.6% for the placebo group. The treatment was well tolerated with the most common side effects being nausea (28.2%; 35.9%), vomiting (7.7%; 23.1%), hot flushes (15.4%; 5.1%) and sweating (12.8%; 12.8%). Conclusion The milnacipran and pindolol combination is safe, well tolerated and efficacious in major depression, and represents a rational strategy for the possible acceleration or potentiation of antidepressant action. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Alverine citrate fails to relieve the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trialALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 6 2002S. A. Mitchell Summary Background : Alverine citrate has been used in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome for many years. Aims : To compare the efficacy and safety of a new formulation of alverine citrate, a 120-mg capsule, with placebo given three times daily for 12 weeks. Methods : One hundred and seven patients with irritable bowel syndrome were entered into this three-centre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial. The primary end-point was relief of abdominal pain indicated by improvement in the scores for severity and frequency. Secondary efficacy variables included scores for other clinical symptoms and for overall well-being. Results : The severity and frequency of abdominal pain improved in 66% and 68% of patients treated with alverine citrate vs. 58% and 69% of the placebo group, but these differences were not significant. The mean percentage reduction in the scores for abdominal pain from baseline to the final assessment, although greater in the alverine citrate group (43.7%) compared with the placebo group (33.3%), was not statistically significant. Conclusions : Alverine citrate is no better than placebo at relieving the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome. Future trials should be designed to take into account the high and persistent placebo response seen in this condition. [source] Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of terguride in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: Results of a twelve-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study,ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 1 2010Oliver Distler Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of terguride, a partial dopamine agonist, in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). Methods In a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, 99 patients were randomized at a ratio of 2 to 1 to receive terguride or placebo. Over 21 days, the dosage was titrated to a maximum daily dose of 3 mg of terguride or placebo, and this fixed dosage was continued over 9 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the intensity of pain (100-mm visual analog scale). Secondary efficacy variables included the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) score, the tender point score (TPS), and the Hamilton Depression Scale (HDS) score. During the study, patients were evaluated for the presence of cervical spine stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results No significant differences in the change in pain intensity, FIQ score, TPS, or HDS score between baseline and 12 weeks were observed in the terguride group as compared with the placebo group. Cervical spine stenosis was detected in 22% of the patients. Only patients with cervical spine stenosis responded to terguride treatment. FIQ scores improved significantly (per-protocol analysis), and pain intensity, the TPS score, and the HDS score showed a trend toward improvement in the terguride group as compared with the placebo group. Terguride treatment was safe. Only those adverse events already known to be side effects of terguride were observed. Premature termination of the study in patients receiving terguride (26%) occurred predominantly during up-titration and in the absence of comedication for treatment of nausea. Conclusion Terguride treatment did not improve pain, the FIQ score, the TPS, or the HDS score in the total study population. However, a subgroup of patients with cervical spine stenosis seemed to benefit from terguride treatment. [source] An investigation of dose titration with darifenacin, an M3 -selective receptor antagonistBJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 4 2005William Steers OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and safety of a flexible-dosing strategy with darifenacin, an M3 -selective receptor antagonist, in patients with symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB). PATIENTS AND METHODS In this multicentre double-blind 12-week study, 395 patients (aged 22,89 years; 84% female) with OAB symptoms for >6 months were randomized (2 : 1) and received once-daily treatment with darifenacin controlled-release tablets 7.5 mg (268 patients) or matching placebo (127). After 2 weeks of treatment, the efficacy, safety and tolerability were assessed and the dose increased to 15 mg once daily (pseudo-increase for placebo recipients) if additional efficacy was required by both the patient and physician. In the week before clinic visits (at 2 and 12 weeks), patients recorded incontinence episodes (primary efficacy endpoint) and several secondary efficacy variables in an electronic daily diary. Safety and tolerability were evaluated from withdrawal rates and adverse-event reports. RESULTS The treatment groups had comparable baseline characteristics. Similar proportions of darifenacin (59%) and placebo (68%) recipients increased the dose at 2 weeks; at 12 weeks patients on darifenacin (overall group) had a significantly greater reduction in the median number of incontinence episodes per week than had those on placebo, at ,,8.2 (,62.9%) and ,,6.0 (,48.1%), respectively (P = 0.035). There were also significant improvements in voiding frequency (P = 0.001), bladder capacity (volume voided; P=,0.036), frequency of urgency (P < 0.001), severity of urgency (P = 0.013) and number of significant leaks/week (i.e. incontinence episodes needing a change of clothing or pads, per week; P = 0.010) for darifenacin over placebo. Subset analysis suggested that some patients (those remaining on darifenacin 7.5 mg) were more sensitive to darifenacin than those who increased the dose, based on both efficacy and adverse events. Continued treatment with 7.5 mg for ,sensitive' patients, and an increased dose (to 15 mg) for remaining patients, resulted in comparable outcomes by 12 weeks. The most common treatment-related adverse events were mild-to-moderate dry mouth and constipation, which led to discontinuation in <,3.0% of darifenacin-treated patients and <1.0% of the placebo group. Central nervous system and cardiovascular adverse events were comparable to those with placebo. CONCLUSIONS Darifenacin appears to be an effective, well-tolerated and flexible treatment for patients with OAB, allowing individualized dosing according to patient needs. [source] | ||||||||||