Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Segmental Resection (segmental + resection)
Selected AbstractsAnatomic segmental resection compared to major hepatectomy in the treatment of liver neoplasmsHPB, Issue 3 2005THOMAS S HELLING MD Abstract Background. Familiarity with liver anatomy and refinements in operative technique have led to interest in liver conservation when dealing with hepatic tumors. There is thought to be less morbidity, less blood loss (EBL), a shorter hospital stay (LOS), and no penalty for long-term survival with segmental hepatectomy. Methods. One hundred ninety-six patients who underwent segmental (SEG group) (N=70) or major (MAJOR group) (N=126) hepatectomy for liver neoplasms were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical parameters of mortality, morbidity, EBL, LOS, and actuarial survival in patients with colorectal metastases were examined. Results. There were no differences in age or gender between the SEG and MAJOR groups. There were no deaths among 64 non-cirrhotic patients in the SEG group and 4 deaths (3.2%) among 124 non-cirrhotic patients in the MAJOR group (p=0.19). There were 4 postoperative complications in the SEG group (5.6%) and 22 in the MAJOR group (17.3%) (p<0.05). The EBL for the SEG group was 912±842 ml compared to 3675±3110 ml in the MAJOR group (p<0.001). The hospital LOS for the SEG group was 9.4±6.4 days and for the MAJOR group 10.2±5.9 days (p=0.32). Life table analysis of survival for resection of colorectal metastases showed two-year patient survival of 40% in the SEG group (N=17) and 45% for the MAJOR group (N=46). Conclusion. Segmental resections were associated with less EBL and fewer postoperative complications. There was a trend towards fewer deaths in non-cirrhotic patients, and no apparent penalty for a smaller hepatic resection in long-term survival. While sometimes technically more challenging, segmental resections are preferable when feasible and should be utilized in efforts to conserve liver parenchyma. [source] Longitudinal health-related quality of life after mandibular resection for oral cancer: a comparison between rim and segment,HEAD & NECK: JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES & SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, Issue 1 2004Simon N. Rogers FDS Abstract Background. Mandibular resection for oral cancer is often necessary to achieve an adequate margin of tumor clearance. Segmental mandibulectomy has been associated with a poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL), particularly before composite free tissue transfer to reconstruct the defect. Little is published in the literature contrasting the subjective deficit of segmental compared with rim resection. The aim of this study was to use a validated head and neck HRQOL questionnaire to compare rim and segmental mandibular resection in patients having primary surgery for oral cancer. Method. There were 224 consecutive patients between 1995 and 1999 who were treated by primary surgery for oral squamous cell carcinoma. One hundred twenty-tree had no mandibular resection, 44 had a rim resection, and 57 had a segmental resection. The University of Washington Quality of life questionnaire (UW-QOL) was adminstered before treatment, at 6 months, 12 months and after 18 months. Results. Preoperatively, patients undergoing segmental resection reported significantly more pain, chewing problems, and a lower composite UW-QOL score. Postperatively, the segment group tended to score worse at all time points, particularly in appearance, swallowing, recreation, and chewing; however, the difference between rim and segment was only seen in smaller resections without adjuvant radiotherapy. Little difference was seen between rim or segment for tumors <4 cm with radiotherapy and between rim and segments for tumors >4cm. Conclusion: After segmental mandibulectomy and reconstruction using composite free tissue transfer, the UW-QOL scores were relatively good. The only 2 difference between rim and segments was noted in the small resections without radiotherapy, and some of this was reflected in differences at baseline. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck26: 54,62, 2004. [source] Anatomic segmental resection compared to major hepatectomy in the treatment of liver neoplasmsHPB, Issue 3 2005THOMAS S HELLING MD Abstract Background. Familiarity with liver anatomy and refinements in operative technique have led to interest in liver conservation when dealing with hepatic tumors. There is thought to be less morbidity, less blood loss (EBL), a shorter hospital stay (LOS), and no penalty for long-term survival with segmental hepatectomy. Methods. One hundred ninety-six patients who underwent segmental (SEG group) (N=70) or major (MAJOR group) (N=126) hepatectomy for liver neoplasms were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical parameters of mortality, morbidity, EBL, LOS, and actuarial survival in patients with colorectal metastases were examined. Results. There were no differences in age or gender between the SEG and MAJOR groups. There were no deaths among 64 non-cirrhotic patients in the SEG group and 4 deaths (3.2%) among 124 non-cirrhotic patients in the MAJOR group (p=0.19). There were 4 postoperative complications in the SEG group (5.6%) and 22 in the MAJOR group (17.3%) (p<0.05). The EBL for the SEG group was 912±842 ml compared to 3675±3110 ml in the MAJOR group (p<0.001). The hospital LOS for the SEG group was 9.4±6.4 days and for the MAJOR group 10.2±5.9 days (p=0.32). Life table analysis of survival for resection of colorectal metastases showed two-year patient survival of 40% in the SEG group (N=17) and 45% for the MAJOR group (N=46). Conclusion. Segmental resections were associated with less EBL and fewer postoperative complications. There was a trend towards fewer deaths in non-cirrhotic patients, and no apparent penalty for a smaller hepatic resection in long-term survival. While sometimes technically more challenging, segmental resections are preferable when feasible and should be utilized in efforts to conserve liver parenchyma. [source] The survival outcome and prognostic factors for middle and distal bile duct cancer following surgical resectionJOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, Issue 6 2009Sae Byeol Choi MD Abstract Background and Objectives The objective of this study was to analyze the survival outcome and the clinicopathological factors that influence survival and recurrence of middle and distal bile duct cancer after surgical resection. Methods From January 2000 to June 2007, 125 patients underwent surgical resection for middle and distal bile duct cancer. The clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes were reviewed retrospectively. Results Of the 125 patients, 31 patients underwent segmental resection of the bile duct, and 94 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Overall survival rates were 85.8% at 1 year and 38.3% at 5 years. Lymph node metastasis, noncurative resection, poorly differentiated tumor, and preoperative bilirubin level greater than 5.0 mg/dl were significant independent predictors of poor prognosis by multivariate analysis. The number of metastatic lymph nodes did not significantly affect survival. Recurrence occurred in 72 patients (61.0%). Disease-free survival rates were 74.1% at 1 year and 42.0% at 3 years. Lymph node and distant metastases and poorly differentiated tumors were found to be significant independent predictors of recurrence by multivariate analysis. Conclusions R0 resection confers a survival benefit, thus the surgeon should make an effort to achieve R0 resection. The presence of lymph node metastasis was a significant prognostic factor. J. Surg. Oncol. 2009;99:335,342. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Review article: the management of lower gastrointestinal bleedingALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 11 2005J. J. Farrell Summary Several recent advances have been made in the evaluation and management of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. This review focuses on the management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding, especially acute severe bleeding. The aim of the study was to critically review the published literature on important management issues in lower gastrointestinal bleeding, including haemodynamic resuscitation, diagnostic evaluation, and endoscopic, radiologic, and surgical therapy, and to develop an algorithm for the management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding, based on this literature review. Publications pertaining to lower gastrointestinal bleeding were identified by searches of the MEDLINE database for the years 1966 to December 2004. Clinical trials and review articles were specifically identified, and their reference citation lists were searched for additional publications not identified in the database searches. Clinical trials and current clinical recommendations were assessed by using commonly applied criteria. Specific recommendations are made based on the evidence reviewed. Approximately, 200 original and review articles were reviewed and graded. There is a paucity of high-quality evidence to guide the management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding, and current endoscopic, radiologic, and surgical practices appear to reflect local expertise and availability of services. Endoscopic literature supports the role of urgent colonoscopy and therapy where possible. Radiology literature supports the role of angiography, especially after a positive bleeding scan has been obtained. Limited surgical data support the role of segmental resection in the management of persistent lower gastrointestinal bleeding after localization by either colonoscopy or angiography. There is limited high-quality research in the area of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Recent advances have improved the endoscopic, radiologic and surgical management of this problem. However, treatment decisions are still often based on local expertise and preference. With increased access to urgent therapeutic endoscopy for the management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy can be expected to play an increasing role in the management of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. [source] Size reduction of donor organs in pediatric lung transplantationPEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2010Carsten Mueller Mueller C, Hansen G, Ballmann M, Schwerk N, Simon AR, Goerler H, Strueber M. Size reduction of donor organs in pediatric lung transplantation. Pediatr Transplantation 2010:14: 364,368. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract:, Lobar transplantation and peripheral segmental resection allow downsizing of larger lungs for use in smaller recipients, particularly with regard to pediatric patients on the high urgency waiting list. We studied the safety and outcome of these techniques in children. All pediatric patients who underwent reduced size LTx between January 2000 and March 2009 were retrospectively reviewed and compared with pediatric patients who underwent full size LTx during the same period. Patient characteristics, intra-operative variables, and post-operative morbidity and mortality were compared. Among 28 primary LTxs, 16 (57%) were performed in reduced size technique. Preoperatively, there was a trend toward a higher rate of mechanical ventilation and a higher capillary pCO2 in the reduced size group. Surgical procedures tended to be longer in that group. Post-operative complications, survival and functional parameters were comparable between both groups. Our study demonstrates that reduced size LTx in children is a reliable therapeutic option that provides results comparable to full size LTx. This technique might help to reduce waiting list mortality by expanding the donor pool in pediatric LTx. [source] Laryngotracheal Anastomosis: Primary and Revised ProceduresTHE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 4 2001Michael Wolf MD Abstract Objectives Acquired upper airway stenosis is usually associated with a complex of pathological conditions at the high tracheal and the subglottic levels. Reported reconstructive techniques include widening by incorporation of grafts, segmental resection, and anastomosis or combined procedures. The management of recurrent stenosis after reconstructive surgery is a major challenge and has rarely been discussed in the literature. The purposes of the present study are to compare the clinical course of primary versus revised reconstructive procedures and to analyze the effect of age, diabetes, chronic lung disease, grading of stenosis, extent of resection, and revised procedures on the operative rate of success. Study Design A cohort study in a tertiary referral medical center. Methods The clinical course of 23 consecutive patients undergoing laryngotracheal anastomosis was studied comparing a group of 13 primary with 10 revision procedures. Seventeen patients underwent cricotracheal and six patients thyrotracheal anastomoses. All patients but one were tracheotomized before the definitive reconstructive procedure. Suprahyoid release was routinely performed except for two cases, and only one patient required sternotomy. The Wilcoxon test was used to examine the relationship between preoperative clinical parameters and the postoperative success (i.e., airway patency). Results Twenty-two of 23 patients (95.6%) had successful decannulation. Four patients required a revision procedure because of repeat stenosis at the site of the anastomosis (2) or distal tracheal malacia (2). Residual airway stenosis of less than 50% was noted in six patients, although only three complained of dyspnea during daily-activity exertion. There was no associated mortality. Complications included subcutaneous emphysema (4), granulation tissue formation (3), pneumonia (2), cardiac arrhythmia (2), and one each of pneumomediastinum, neck hematoma, and urosepsis. Protracted aspirations were noted in one patient who had revision surgery. Age was the only parameter that correlated with postoperative airway patency (P <.07), whereas the presence of chronic obstructive lung disease and diabetes, grade of stenosis, type of surgery, and revision surgery were found to be insignificant. Conclusions The clinical course of laryngotracheal anastomosis in primary and revised procedures was similar in our group of patients. The operation can be performed safely, with an expected high rate of success and acceptable morbidity. [source] Anatomic segmental resection compared to major hepatectomy in the treatment of liver neoplasmsHPB, Issue 3 2005THOMAS S HELLING MD Abstract Background. Familiarity with liver anatomy and refinements in operative technique have led to interest in liver conservation when dealing with hepatic tumors. There is thought to be less morbidity, less blood loss (EBL), a shorter hospital stay (LOS), and no penalty for long-term survival with segmental hepatectomy. Methods. One hundred ninety-six patients who underwent segmental (SEG group) (N=70) or major (MAJOR group) (N=126) hepatectomy for liver neoplasms were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical parameters of mortality, morbidity, EBL, LOS, and actuarial survival in patients with colorectal metastases were examined. Results. There were no differences in age or gender between the SEG and MAJOR groups. There were no deaths among 64 non-cirrhotic patients in the SEG group and 4 deaths (3.2%) among 124 non-cirrhotic patients in the MAJOR group (p=0.19). There were 4 postoperative complications in the SEG group (5.6%) and 22 in the MAJOR group (17.3%) (p<0.05). The EBL for the SEG group was 912±842 ml compared to 3675±3110 ml in the MAJOR group (p<0.001). The hospital LOS for the SEG group was 9.4±6.4 days and for the MAJOR group 10.2±5.9 days (p=0.32). Life table analysis of survival for resection of colorectal metastases showed two-year patient survival of 40% in the SEG group (N=17) and 45% for the MAJOR group (N=46). Conclusion. Segmental resections were associated with less EBL and fewer postoperative complications. There was a trend towards fewer deaths in non-cirrhotic patients, and no apparent penalty for a smaller hepatic resection in long-term survival. While sometimes technically more challenging, segmental resections are preferable when feasible and should be utilized in efforts to conserve liver parenchyma. [source] Bowel resection for severe endometriosis: An Australian series of 177 casesAUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 4 2009Hannah J. WILLS Background: Colorectal resection for severe endometriosis has been increasingly described in the literature over the last 20 years. Aims: To describe the experiences of three gynaecological surgeons who perform radical surgery for colorectal endometriosis. Methods: The records of three surgeons were reviewed. Relevant information was extracted and complied into a database. Results: One hundred and seventy-seven women were identified as having undergone surgery between February 1997 and October 2007. The primary reason for presentation was pain in the majority of women (79%). Eighty-one segmental resections were performed, 71 disc excisions, ten appendicectomies and multiple procedures in ten women. The majority of procedures (81.4%) were performed laparoscopically. Histology confirmed the presence of disease in 98.3% of cases. A further 124 procedures to remove other sites of endometriosis were conducted, along with an additional 44 procedures not primarily for endometriosis. A total of 16 unintended events occurred. Conclusions: Our study adds to the growing body of literature describing colorectal resection for severe endometriosis. Overall, the surgery appeared to be well tolerated, demonstrating the role for this surgery. [source] | ||||||||||