			Home About us Contact

SES Implantation (se + implantation)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes and Stent Thrombosis of Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Bare Metal Stents in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: Results of Korean Multicenter Angioplasty Team (KOMATE) Registry

JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 5 2009
BYEONG-KEUK KIM M.D., Ph.D.
Background:There are still controversies about long-term clinical outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) versus bare metal stents (BMS) implantation in patients with end-stage renal diseases (ESRD). Objective:To compare long-term outcomes in patients with (ESRD) following SES versus BMS implantation. Methods:Between March 2003 and July 2005, a total of 54 patients (80 lesions) with ESRD undergoing SES implantation [SES-ESRD] were enrolled and compared with 51 patients (54 lesions) with ESRD receiving BMS during the same periods [BMS-ESRD] in the Korean Multicenter Angioplasty Team Registry. The primary outcome was the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or any stent thrombosis (ST) according to the Academic Research Consortium definition during a 3-year follow-up. Results:The cumulative 3-year rate of composite of death, MI, or ST of the SES-ESRD group (24%) was nearly similar with that of the BMS-ESRD group (24%, P = 1.000). The 3-year rates of death (26% vs. 24%, P = 0.824) or MACE (37% vs. 43%, P = 0.331) in the SES-ESRD did not differ significantly from those in the BMS-ESRD. However, the SES-ESRD showed a sustained lower 3-year TVR rate (9%), compared with BMS-ESRD (24%, P = 0.042). The rate of any ST in SES-ESRD was not significantly higher than that in the BMS-ESRD (17% vs. 14%, P = 0.788). There was no significant difference in the rate of late or very late ST between SES-ESRD (15%) versus BMS-ESRD group (10%, P = 0.557). Conclusions:SES did not increase the risks for death, MI, or any ST in patients with ESRD during the long-term follow-up, compared with BMS. [source]

Impact of sirolimus-eluting stents on outcomes of patients treated for acute myocardial infarction by primary angioplasty

CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 4 2005
Edouard Cheneau MD
Abstract Sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) are currently being used in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). SESs have not been evaluated in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction by primary angioplasty. We report our initial experience with SESs implanted during primary angioplasty. One hundred and three patients were treated within 12 hr after onset of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with primary angioplasty and SES implantation. Those patients were compared to 504 patients treated with bare metal stents (BMSs). Angiographic success (TIMI flow grade 3 and residual stenosis < 50%) was completed in 98% of patients with SESs and no subacute stent thrombosis was reported. In-hospital outcomes were similar in the SES and BMS groups. At 6 months, major cardiac events were less frequent in the SES group than in the BMS group (9% vs. 24%, respectively; P < 0.001), driven by a lesser need for repeat revascularization with SESs (1% vs. 10.3% with BMSs; P = 0.014). Mortality at 6 months was 7% with SESs and 11% with BMSs (P = 0.14). SESs are safe and effective for the treatment of AMI by primary angioplasty. As compared to BMSs, SESs improve long-term outcome after AMI, mainly by reducing the need for repeat revascularization. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Elective sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for multivessel disease involving significant LAD stenosis: One-year clinical outcomes of 99 consecutive patients,the Rotterdam experience

CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 1 2004
Chourmouzios A. Arampatzis MD
Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation for patients with multivessel disease, which included left anterior descending artery (LAD) treatment. Since April 2002, SES has been utilized as the device of choice for all interventions in our institution as part of the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Hospital (RESEARCH) registry. In the first 6 months of enrolment, 99 consecutive patients (17.6% of the total population) were treated for multivessel disease involving the LAD. The impact of SES implantation on major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was evaluated. All the patients received SES in the LAD. Additional stent implantation in the right coronary artery, the left circumflex, or in all three major vessels was attempted successfully in 32 (32%), 51 (52%), and 16 (16%) of the treated patients respectively. During a mean follow-up of 360 ± 59 days (range, 297,472 days), we had one death, one non-Q-wave myocardial infarction, and eight patients required subsequent intervention. The event-free survival of MACE at 1 year was 85.6%. SES implantation for multivessel disease in a consecutive series of patients is associated with low incidence of adverse events. The reported results are related predominantly to the reduction in repeat revascularization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;63:57,60. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Clinical outcomes for sirolimus-eluting stent implantation and vascular brachytherapy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis

CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 3 2004
Francesco Saia MD
Abstract The purpose of this study was to compare the mid-term clinical outcome of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation and vascular brachytherapy (VBT) for in-stent restenosis (ISR). We assessed the 9-month occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in 44 consecutive patients with ISR treated with SES implantation and 43 consecutive patients treated with VBT in the period immediately prior. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics of the two groups were similar. During follow-up, three patients (7%) died in the VBT group and none in the SES group. The incidence of myocardial infarction was 2.3% in both groups. Target lesion revascularization was performed in 11.6% of the VBT patients and 16.3% of the SES patients (P = NS). The 9-month MACE-free survival was similar in both groups (79.1% VBT vs. 81.5% SES; P = 0.8 by log rank). The result of this nonrandomized study suggests that sirolimus-eluting stent implantation is at least as effective as vascular brachytherapy in the treatment of in-stent restenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;62:283,288. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]