Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Screening Mammography (screening + mammography)
Selected AbstractsInfluence of Hormone Replacement Therapy on the Accuracy of Screening MammographyTHE BREAST JOURNAL, Issue 2 2006Marķa del Mar Vernet MD Abstract: The use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is currently a subject of debate because of the possibility of an increase in the incidence of breast cancer and difficulties associated with breast cancer detection. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of HRT on specificity and sensitivity in a breast cancer screening program. We found that although specificity was significantly lower in menopausal women who had ever used or were currently using HRT (93.3%) compared to HRT nonusers (94.8%) at the expense of a greater number of recalls (6.9% versus 5.6%), this difference seems to be clinically irrelevant. There were no significant differences with regard to the number of invasive procedures (2.5% in the HRT versus 2.1% in the control group). We conclude that the slight decrease in sensitivity of screening mammography in HRT users is not clinically significant in our setting, and in any case, false positives (recalled women) are diagnosed correctly with additional imaging studies without the need for invasive procedures. Most women given HRT are candidates to participate in population breast cancer screening campaigns., [source] Meta-analyses of the effect of false-positive mammograms on generic and specific psychosocial outcomesPSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, Issue 10 2010Talya Salz Abstract Objectives: While a previous meta-analysis found that false-positive mammography results affect women's likelihood of returning for screening, effects on well being have yet to be meta-analyzed. We investigated whether the effects of false-positive mammograms on women's well-being are limited to outcomes specific to breast cancer. Methods: We searched MEDLINE for studies of the psychosocial effects of false-positive results of routine screening mammography. We pooled effect sizes using random effects meta-analysis. Results: Across 17 studies (n=20,781), receiving a false-positive mammogram the result was associated with differences in all eight breast-cancer-specific outcomes that we examined. These included greater anxiety and distress about breast cancer as well as more frequent breast self-exams and higher perceived effectiveness of screening mammography. False positives were associated with only one of six generic outcomes (i.e. generalized anxiety), and this effect size was small. Conclusions: False-positive mammograms influenced women's well-being, but the effects were limited to breast-cancer-specific outcomes. Researchers should include disease-specific measures in future studies of the consequences of false-positive mammograms. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Resource Use and Cost of Diagnostic Workup of Women with Suspected Breast CancerTHE BREAST JOURNAL, Issue 1 2009David W. Lee PhD Abstract:, We estimated resource use and costs associated with a diagnostic workup for suspected breast cancer among Medicare beneficiaries. Using Medicare claims data, we found that the average cost of a diagnostic workup for suspected breast cancer,whether it eventuated in a breast cancer diagnosis or not,was $361, and did not vary by presentation (signs/symptoms or screening mammography). In the aggregate, we estimate that Medicare spends approximately $679 million annually on diagnostic workups for women with suspected breast cancer, and that false positive mammograms result in diagnostic costs of approximately $250 million. [source] The Use of Stereotaxic Core Biopsy and Stereotaxic Aspiration Biopsy as Diagnostic Tools in the Evaluation of Mammary CalcificationTHE BREAST JOURNAL, Issue 6 2000Joan F. Cangiarella MD Abstract: We compared stereotaxic fine needle aspiration biopsy (SFNA) with stereotaxic core needle biopsy (SCB) in the evaluation of radiographically clustered mammary microcalcification, a common finding at screening mammography. Over a 4-year period, 181 specimens were obtained from 175 patients who underwent both SFNA and SCB of clustered microcalcification. Aspiration and core biopsies were performed by radiologists at a community-based diagnostic radiology facility. All aspiration smears were air dried, stained on site, and assessed for adequacy by the radiologists, then sent to the cytopathologists at New York University for interpretation. Core biopsy specimens were formalin fixed, paraffin embedded, hematoxylin and eosin stained, and interpreted by surgical pathologists at a community hospital. Of 181 SFNA specimens, 133 (74%) were benign, 18 (10%) were atypical, 13 (7%) were suspicious, and 16 (9%) were malignant. One (0.5%) aspiration biopsy was nondiagnostic. Excisional biopsies were performed after 12 benign SFNAs and in 46 of the 47 cases with an atypical, suspicious, or malignant diagnosis on SFNA. Mammographic follow-up in 111 of the 133 cases (92%) diagnosed as benign showed no radiologic change (mean 29.2 months, range 6,60 months). The false-negative rate for cancer was 4% (6 cases) for SFNA alone. There were no false-positive diagnoses for SFNA. There was one false-positive diagnosis on core biopsy [focal cribriform ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)], which at excisional biopsy and correlation with the core biopsy was diagnosed as ductal hyperplasia; the false-negative rate for cancer was 8% (13 cases) for SCB alone. Aspiration biopsy identified calcification in 180 procedures, core needle biopsy revealed calcification in 170. SFNA was superior to SCB for the confirmation of clustered mammary microcalcification (99% versus 94%) and in the identification of cancer associated with microcalcification (false negative rate of 4% versus 8%). Patients with benign findings on stereotaxic aspiration and core biopsy can reasonably be followed mammographically. [source] In situ male breast carcinoma in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database of the National Cancer Institute,CANCER, Issue 8 2005M.P.H., William F. Anderson M.D. Abstract BACKGROUND In situ breast carcinoma is not so well characterized for men as for women. METHODS Therefore, the authors of the current study compared male and female in situ and invasive breast carcinomas in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database of the National Cancer Institute to document these patterns. RESULTS In situ breast carcinomas composed 9.4% of all male (n = 280 of 2984) and 11.9% of all female breast carcinomas (n = 53,928 of 454,405) during the years 1973,2001. In situ rates rose 123% for men and 555% for women over this time period; whereas distant disease rates fell for both genders. Median ages at diagnosis were 62 years for in situ and 68 years for invasive breast carcinoma among men, compared with 58 years for in situ and 62 years for invasive breast carcinoma among women. Papillary in situ and invasive architectural types were more common among men than women. In contrast, lobular tumors were more common among women than men. Breast cancer-specific survival was similar among men and women, whereas overall survival was worse for men than women. CONCLUSION In situ male breast carcinoma is a rare disease, occurring at older ages and with different architectural types than its more common female counterpart. Gender-specific histopathologic differences probably reflect anatomic differences among the normal female and vestigial male breast. Rising in situ male breast carcinoma incidence rates over the past three decades suggest earlier detection over time, irrespective of mammography, because men do not participate in routine screening mammography. Worse overall survival for men than women possibly results from age-dependent comorbid illnesses. Cancer 2005. Published 2005 American Cancer Society. [source] Mammography screening in African American womenCANCER, Issue S1 2003Evaluating the research Abstract BACKGROUND Notwithstanding some controversy regarding the benefits of screening mammography, it is generally assumed that the effects are the same for women of all race/ethnic groups. Yet evidence for its efficacy from clinical trial studies comes primarily from the study of white women. It is likely that mammography is equally efficacious in white and African American women when applied under relatively optimal clinical trial conditions, but in actual practice African Americans may not be receiving equal benefit, as reflected in their later stage at diagnosis and greater mortality. METHODS Initial searches of Medline using search terms related to screening mammography, race, and other selected topics were supplemented with national data that are routinely published for cancer surveillance. Factors that potentially compromise the benefits of mammography as it is delivered in the current health care system to African American women were examined. RESULTS While there have been significant improvements in mammography screening utilization, observational data suggest that African American women may still not be receiving the full benefit. Potential explanatory factors include low use of repeat screening, inadequate followup for abnormal exams, higher prevalence of obesity and, possibly, breast density, and other biologic factors that contribute to younger age at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Further study of biologic factors that may contribute to limited mammography efficacy and poorer breast cancer outcomes in African American women is needed. In addition, strategies to increase repeat mammography screening and to ensure that women obtain needed followup of abnormal mammograms may increase early detection and improve survival among African Americans. Notwithstanding earlier age at diagnosis for African American women, mammography screening before age 40 years is not recommended, but screening of women aged 40,49 years is particularly critical. Cancer 2003;97(1 Suppl):258,72. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11022 An erratum to this article is published in Cancer (2003) 97(8) 2047. [source] Increased mammography use and its impact on earlier breast cancer detection in Vermont, 1975,1999CANCER, Issue 8 2002Pamela M. Vacek Ph.D. Abstract BACKGROUND A trend toward earlier breast carcinoma detection in the United States has been attributed to screening mammography, although direct evidence linking this trend to the increased use of mammography in a general population is lacking. This study examined the effects of mammography on tumor size and axillary lymph node metastasis in Vermont over 25 years. METHODS Pathology and mammography data from 3499 Vermont women who were diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma during 1975,1984, 1989,1990, and 1995,1999 were compared. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the effects of age, mammography use, and period on the odds of a tumor , 2 cm and the odds of negative lymph nodes. RESULTS The proportion of breast tumors that were detected by screening mammography increased from 2% during 1974,1984 to 36% during 1995,1999 (P < 0.001), and these tumors were more likely to measure , 2 cm than tumors that were detected by other methods. Among women age > 50 years, the odds ratio (OR) was 4.5, with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 3.5,6.4. The effect was smaller in younger women (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1,3.0). Mammographic detection increased the odds of negative lymph nodes by a similar amount in both age groups, although women age > 50 years were more likely to have negative lymph nodes than younger women (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1,1.6). Tumor size and lymph node metastasis also were related to the number of mammograms and to the mammographic interval. CONCLUSIONS Most of the trend toward earlier detection in Vermont was due to mammography. Mammography had a lesser effect on tumor size among younger women, which may be related to less frequent screening, although its effect on lymph node metastasis was not age dependent. Women age < 50 years were more likely to have positive lymph nodes, independent of the method of detection or the frequency of mammography. Cancer 2002;94:2160,8. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10459 [source] | ||||||||||