Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
AV Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia (av + nodal_reentrant_tachycardia)
Selected AbstractsNeed for Fast Pathway Ablation in Typical Irregular AV Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in a Patient with Multiple AV Nodal PathwaysJOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 2 2000PETER WEISMÜLLER M.D. A case of a 60-year-old male with irregular AV nodal reentrant tachycardia of the common type is reported. Electrophysiological study revealed multiple antegrade slowly conducting AV nodal pathways and one exclusively retrogradely conducting fast AV nodal pathway. Despite the recommendation for slow pathway ablation as the treatment of choice in patients with AVNRT, first pathway ablation was successfully performed in this case due to the risk of total A V block of ablating the slow pathways. The present report shows that there is the rare patient in whom fast pathway ablation is required for curative treatment of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. [source] Coexistent Right- and Left-Sided Slow Pathways Participating in Distinct AV Nodal Reentrant TachycardiasPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 10 2008LÁSZLÓ SÁGHY M.D. We report a patient with two distinct atrioventricular (AV) nodal slow pathways, participating in two different AV nodal reentrant tachycardias,one eliminated from the right, the other only after ablation on the left side of the posterior septum. The case provides support for the concept of the posterior AV nodal extensions,a biatrial structure in most hearts,representing the anatomic basis of slow pathway conduction. [source] Mechanism of Repolarization Change During Initiation of Supraventricular TachycardiaJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 11 2004YENN-JIANG LIN M.D. Introduction: Previous literature has documented the association between narrow QRS supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and pronounced ST-T segment change. The aim of this study was to evaluate repolarization changes during SVT initiation and demonstrate the possible mechanism. Methods and Results: Fifty-one consecutive patients (20 men and 31 women; mean age 46.1 ± 16.4 years) with narrow QRS SVT (32 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia and 19 patients with AV reentrant tachycardia) were included. We retrospectively analyzed the intracardiac recordings and ST-T segment changes on 12-lead surface ECGs during SVT initiation. Twenty-six (51%) patients developed ST segment repolarization changes during SVT initiation. Patients with shorter baseline sinus cycle length, shorter tachycardia cycle length, elevated systolic blood pressure before tachycardia induction, and greater reduction of systolic blood pressure had a higher incidence of repolarization changes. However, multivariate analysis showed that reduction of systolic blood pressure after SVT induction was the only independent predictor of repolarization changes. Furthermore, the maximal degree of ST segment depression during SVT correlated with the reduction of systolic blood pressure (r = 0.75, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Repolarization changes during SVT initiation were caused mainly by concurrent hemodynamic change after SVT initiation with abrupt cycle length shortening. [source] Spontaneous Transition of 2:1 Atrioventricular Block to 1:1 Atrioventricular Conduction During Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia:JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 12 2003Evidence Supporting the Intra-Hisian or Infra-Hisian Area as the Site of Block Introduction: The incidence of spontaneous transition of 2:1 AV block to 1:1 AV conduction during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia has not been well reported. Among previous studies, controversy also existed about the site of the 2:1 AV block during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Methods and Results: In patients with 2:1 AV block during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the incidence of spontaneous transition of 2:1 AV block to 1:1 AV conduction and change of electrophysiologic properties during spontaneous transition were analyzed. Among the 20 patients with 2:1 AV block during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, a His-bundle potential was absent in blocked beats during 2:1 AV block in 8 patients, and the maximal amplitude of the His-bundle potential in the blocked beats was the same as that in the conducted beats in 4 patients and was significantly smaller than that in the conducted beats in 8 patients (0.49 ± 0.25 mV vs 0.16 ± 0.07 mV, P = 0.007). Spontaneous transition of 2:1 AV block to 1:1 AV conduction occurred in 15 (75%) of 20 patients with 2:1 AV block during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Spontaneous transition of 2:1 AV block to 1:1 AV conduction was associated with transient right and/or left bundle branch block. The 1:1 AV conduction with transient bundle branch block was associated with significant His-ventricular (HV) interval prolongation (66 ± 19 ms) compared with 2:1 AV block (44 ± 6 ms, P < 0.01) and 1:1 AV conduction without bundle branch block (43 ± 6 ms, P < 0.01). Conclusion: The 2:1 AV block during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia is functional; the level of block is demonstrated to be within or below the His bundle in a majority of patients with 2:1 AV block during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, and a minority are possibly high in the junction between the AV node and His bundle. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 14, pp. 1337-1341, December 2003) [source] Irregular Atrial Activation During Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia:JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2003Evidence of an Upper Common Pathway Controversy continues regarding the precise nature of the reentrant circuit of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, especially the existence of an upper common pathway. In this case report, we show that marked variation and irregularity in atrial activation (maximum AA interval variation of 80 msec) can exist with fixed and constant activation of the His bundle and ventricles during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia in a 45-year-old female patient. We propose that irregular atrial activation is due to variable and inconsistent conduction from the AV node to the atria through the perinodal transitional cell envelope extrinsic to the reentrant circuit. Our observations support the concept of an upper common pathway, at least in some patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.(J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 14, pp. 309-313, March 2003) [source] Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia with Persistent Ventriculoatrial BlockJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 1 2003BERNHARD STROHMER M.D. Supraventricular Tachycardia with VA Conduction Block. We report the case of a 64-year-old patient with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and persistent VA block. Induction and maintenance of tachycardia occurred without apparent activation of the atria. Diagnostic characteristics were most compatible with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Automatic junctional tachycardia and orthodromic nodoventricular or nodofascicular reentry tachycardia were considered in the differential diagnosis. Upper common pathway block during AVNRT may be explained by either intra-atrial conduction block or purely intranodal confined AVNRT. The arrhythmia was cured by a typical posteroseptal ablation approach guided by slow pathway potentials. [source] Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in Children: Effect of Slow Pathway Ablation on Fast Pathway FunctionJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2002GEORGE F. VAN HARE M.D. AV Nodal Reentry in Children.Introduction: Prior studies in adults have shown significant shortening of the fast pathway effective refractory period after successful slow pathway ablation. As differences between adults and children exist in other characteristics of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), we sought to characterize the effect of slow pathway ablation or modification in a multicenter study of pediatric patients. Methods and Results: Data from procedures in pediatric patients were gathered retrospectively from five institutions. Entry criteria were age < 21 years, typical AVNRT inducible with/without isoproterenol infusion, and attempted slow pathway ablation or modification. Dual AV nodal pathways were defined as those with > 50 msec jump in A2-H2 with a 10-msec decrease in A1-A2. Successful ablation was defined as elimination of AVNRT inducibility. A total of 159 patients (age 4.4 to 21 years, mean 13.1) were studied and had attempted slow pathway ablation. AVNRT was inducible in the baseline state in 74 (47%) of 159 patients and with isoproterenol in the remainder. Dual AV nodal pathways were noted in 98 (62%) of 159 patients in the baseline state. Ablation was successful in 154 (97%) of 159 patients. In patients with dual AV nodal pathways and successful slow pathway ablation, the mean fast pathway effective refractory period was 343 ± 68 msec before ablation and 263 ± 64 msec after ablation. Mean decrease in the fast pathway effective refractory period was 81 ± 82 msec (P < 0.0001) and was not explained by changes in autonomic tone, as measured by changes in sinus cycle length during the ablation procedure. Electrophysiologic measurements were correlated with age. Fast pathway effective refractory period was related to age both before (P = 0.0044) and after ablation (P < 0.0001). AV block cycle length was related to age both before (P = 0.0005) and after ablation (P < 0.0001). However, in dual AV nodal pathway patients, the magnitude of change in the fast pathway effective refractory period after ablation was not related to age. Conclusion: Lack of clear dual AV node physiology is common in pediatric patients with inducible AVNRT (38%). Fast pathway effective refractory period shortens substantially in response to slow pathway ablation. The magnitude of change is large compared with adult reports and is not completely explained by changes in autonomic tone. Prospective studies in children using autonomic blockade are needed. [source] Mechanisms of Transition Between Double Paroxysmal Supraventricular TachycardiasJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 12 2001JEN-YUAN KUO M.D. Double Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardias. Introduction: Coexistence of double tachycardias in one patient has been infrequently reported. Furthermore, the mechanisms of transition between double paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias have not been well studied. Methods and Results: Thirty-five patients with two paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias were studied. Group IA consisted of 3 patients with spontaneous transition between AV reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) and AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Group IB consisted of 13 patients without spontaneous transition between AVRT and AVNRT. Group IIA consisted of 5 patients with spontaneous transition between AVNRT and atrial tachycardia (AT). Group IIB consisted of 14 patients without spontaneous transition between AVNRT and AT. The absolute values of differences between the two tachycardia cycle lengths were significantly smaller in patients with than in those without transition between the two tachycardias (25 ± 8 msec vs 90 ± 46 msec, P < 0.05, IA vs IB; 21 ± 25 msec vs 99 ± 57 msec, P < 0.01, IIA vs IIB). The cutoff point of 25 msec had 80% positive predictive value for transition between the two tachycardias. Transition between two tachycardias occurred due to a spontaneous premature atrial complex (30%), conduction block at one limb of tachycardia (20%), or tachycardiainduced tachycardia (50%). Absence of transition between two tachycardias might be explained by the absence of a spontaneous premature atrial complex, longer cycle length of the first tachycardia, larger difference between two tachycardia cycle lengths, or induction of each tachycardia under different situations. Conclusion: Double supraventricular tachycardias with similar tachycardia cycle lengths are vulnerable to transition between different tachycardias. [source] Incidence and Clinical Significance of Inducible Atrial Tachycardia in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant TachycardiaJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5 2001CHRISTIAN STICHERLING M.D. Significance of Atrial Tachycardia.Introduction: The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the prevalence and clinical significance of inducible atrial tachycardia in patients undergoing slow pathway ablation for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia who did not have clinically documented episodes of atrial tachycardia. Methods and Results: Twenty-seven (15%) of 176 consecutive patients who underwent slow pathway ablation for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia were found to have inducible atrial tachycardia with a mean cycle length of 351 ± 95 msec. The atrial tachycardia was sustained in 7 (26%) of 27 patients and was isoproterenol dependent in 20 patients (74%). The atrial tachycardia was not ablated or treated with medications, and the patients were followed for 9.7 ± 5.8 months. Six (22%) of the 27 patients experienced recurrent palpitations during follow-up. In one patient each, the palpitations were found to be due to sustained atrial tachycardia, nonsustained atrial tachycardia, recurrence of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, sinus tachycardia, and frequent atrial premature depolarizations. Thus, only 2 (7%) of 27 patients with inducible atrial tachycardia later developed symptoms attributable to atrial tachycardia. Conclusion: Atrial tachycardia may be induced by atrial pacing in 15% of patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Because the vast majority of patients do not experience symptomatic atrial tachycardia during follow-up, treatment for atrial tachycardia should be deferred and limited to the occasional patient who later develops symptomatic atrial tachycardia. [source] Atrioventricular Nodal Tachycardia Occurring During Atrial FibrillationJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 7 2000JANE CHEN M.D. AVNRT During Atrial Fibrillation. We describe the case of a 32-year-old woman with palpitations and atrial fibrillation (AF) as the only documented arrhythmia. The patient underwent electrophysiologic study and was found to have inducible AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). During a prolonged episode of AVNRT, AF developed in both atria, hut AVNRT persisted. Dissociation of the atria during AVNRT is evidence that the atrium is not necessary in AVNRT. This case also illustrates the utility of an electrophysiologic study in locating a potentially curable arrhythmia as the primary cause of AF in young patients. [source] Nonfluoroscopic Three-Dimensional Mapping for Arrhythmia Ablation: Tool or Toy?JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2000APICHAI KHONGPHATTHANAYOTHIN M.D. Arrhythmia Ahlation with Nonfluoroscopic 3D Mapping. Introduction: Conventional mapping and ablation rely on fluoroscopy, which can result in imprecise positioning of the ablation catheter and long fluoroscopic exposure times. We evaluated a nonfluoroscopic three-dimensional mapping system, termed CARTO, and compared the results of ablation using this technique with those of conventional mapping. Methods and Results: We compared the results of 88 arrhythmia ablations (79 patients) using CARTO with 100 ablations (94 patients) using the conventional technique. The ablations were separated into four groups: (1) AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT); (2) atrial tachycardia/flutter; (3) ventricular tacbycardia (VT); and (4) bypass tract tachycardia. We compared the success rate, complications, and fluoroscopy and procedure times. Tbe ablation outcomes were excellent and comparable in all four types of the arrhythmias between the two techniques. Major complications included one cardiac tamponade in each group and one second-degree AV block in the conventional group. Fluoroscopy time was shorter using the CARTO technique: 10 ± 7 versus 27 ± 15 minutes for AVNRT (P < 0.01), 18 ± 17 versus 44 ± 23 minutes for atrial tachycardia and flutter (P < 0.01), 15 ± 12 versus 34 ± 31 minutes for VT (P < 0.05), and 21 ± 14 versus 53 ± 32 minutes for bypass tract tachycardia (P < 0.01). Procedure times were similar except for the bypass tract patients, wbich was shorter in the CARTO group, 4 ± 1.3 versus 5.5 ± 2.5 hours (P < 0.01). Conclusion: The electroanatomic three-dimensional mapping technique reduced fluoroscopy time and resulted in excellent outcome without increasing the procedure time. [source] Need for Fast Pathway Ablation in Typical Irregular AV Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in a Patient with Multiple AV Nodal PathwaysJOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 2 2000PETER WEISMÜLLER M.D. A case of a 60-year-old male with irregular AV nodal reentrant tachycardia of the common type is reported. Electrophysiological study revealed multiple antegrade slowly conducting AV nodal pathways and one exclusively retrogradely conducting fast AV nodal pathway. Despite the recommendation for slow pathway ablation as the treatment of choice in patients with AVNRT, first pathway ablation was successfully performed in this case due to the risk of total A V block of ablating the slow pathways. The present report shows that there is the rare patient in whom fast pathway ablation is required for curative treatment of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. [source] Coexistent Right- and Left-Sided Slow Pathways Participating in Distinct AV Nodal Reentrant TachycardiasPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 10 2008LÁSZLÓ SÁGHY M.D. We report a patient with two distinct atrioventricular (AV) nodal slow pathways, participating in two different AV nodal reentrant tachycardias,one eliminated from the right, the other only after ablation on the left side of the posterior septum. The case provides support for the concept of the posterior AV nodal extensions,a biatrial structure in most hearts,representing the anatomic basis of slow pathway conduction. [source] | ||||||||||